Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 464–471 | Cite as

Assessing anthropogenic pressure and its impact on Hippophae salicifolia pockets in Central Himalaya, Uttarakhand

  • Deepak DhyaniEmail author
  • Shalini Dhyani
  • R. K. Maikhuri


Natural habitat of Hippophae salicifolia in Central Himalaya is continuously being degraded due to habitat destruction and harvesting. Although logging is prohibited, habitat destruction has increased because of regular road construction, repairing and broadening activities. In addition, Hippophae resources are continuously being harvested by lopping (both partial and complete) for fuelwood, fodder and fruits in higher Himalayan region. This paper presents a detailed analysis of relationship between density, demographic structure, and harvesting of H. salicifolia growing pockets in the five major valleys (Gangotri, Yamunotri, Niti, Mana and Bhyundhar) of Uttarakhand in Central Himalaya, India. A total of 120 quadrats were laid randomly to study population structure, regeneration, sex ratio and lopping using quadrats of 100 m2 (24 in each valley) in Hippophae growing patches. Our study shows that the density, size distribution, and regeneration of Hippophae vary considerably among the major valleys. Trees in the Yamunotri valley have the highest density of large trees but the lowest density of seedlings. In contrast, there are few large trees but many seedlings in the Mana valley. The number and size of lopped trees also varied among the valleys. Lopping was greatest in Bhyundhar (11.4%) and Yamunotri (19.7%) and least in Niti (3.9%). The size of lopped trees differed substantially as well. In Bhyundhar, the largest trees were taken while saplings were taken in Yamunotri. Our study revealed that unsustainable harvesting from plants for fuel, fencing and fruits along with road broadening activities in Central Himalaya are the main cause of habitat destruction. Our research highlights the urgent need for in-situ and ex-situ conservation of Hippophae salicifolia so that it’s potential can be harnessed sustainably by rural hill societies for their socio-economic development.

Key words

Central Himalaya Seabuckthorn Dioecious Disturbance Habitat Conservation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agresti A (1996) An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York. p290Google Scholar
  2. Anand ML (2006) Understanding the socio-cultural experiences of pahari folk: the jagar gathas of kumaon and Garhwal. Indian Folklore Research Journal 3(6): 93–103.Google Scholar
  3. Bartish I, Jeppsson N, Nybom H (1999) Population genetic structure in the dioecious pioneer plant species Hippophae rhamnoides investigated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Molecular Ecology 8: 791–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton AH, Werner JWE (1976) Field Biology and Ecology. McGraw Hill, New York, p 564.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen R (1997) Log-Linear Models and Logistic Regression, Springer-Verlag, New York. p 483.Google Scholar
  6. Clements FE (1936) Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology 24:252–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis JT, Mc Intosh RP (1950) The inter relation of certain analytic and synthetic physiological character. Ecology 31: 438–455.Google Scholar
  8. Curtis JT (1959). Vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Dhyani D (2007) Exploration, multiplication, identification of elite population of Hippophae rhamnoides (Seabuckthorn) for sustainable rural development of higher Himalayan region of Uttaranchal. PhD Thesis., H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India. p173.Google Scholar
  10. Dhyani D, Maikhuri RK, Misra S, et al. (2010) Endorsing the declining indigenous ethnobotanical knowledge system of Seabuckthorn in Central Himalaya, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 127: 329–334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2009. 10.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhyani D, Maikhuri RK, Rao KS, et al. (2007). Basic nutritional attributes of Hippophae rhamnoides (Seabuckthorn) populations from central Himalaya. Current Science 92(8): 1148–1152.Google Scholar
  12. Dhyani D, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani S (2011) Seabuckthorn: An underutilized resource for the nutritional security and livelihood improvement of rural communities in Uttarakhand Himalaya. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 50(2): 168–180. DOI: 10.1080/03670244.2011.552375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gadgil M, Guha R (1992) This Fissured Land. An Ecological History of India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  14. Gaur RD (1999) Flora of the District Garhwal: NW Himalaya (With Ethnobotanical Notes). TransMedia, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.Google Scholar
  15. Greig-Smith P (1997). Pattern in vegetation. Journal of Ecology 67: 755–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grubb PJ (1977). The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews 52: 107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ives JD, Messerly B (1989) The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kent M, Coker P (1994) In: Vegetation Despcriprion and Analysis. A Practical Approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England. pp 72–112.Google Scholar
  19. Kothari A, Suri S, Singh N (1995) People and protected areas: rethinking conservation in India. Ecologist 25: 188–194.Google Scholar
  20. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1997). Secondary sex characters in seed plants. Botanical Review 43: 177–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luoga EJ, Witkowski ETF, Balkwill K (2004) Regeneration by coppicing (resprouting) of miombo (African savannah) trees in relation to land use. Forest Ecology and Management 189: 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Murali KS, Shankar U, Shaankar RU, et al. (1996) Extraction of Non-Timber Forest Produce in the Forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP Extraction on Regeneration, Population Structure and Species Composition. Economic Botany 50: 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers GP, Newton AC, Melgarejo O (2000) The influence of canopy gap size on natural regeneration of Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa) in Bolivia. Forest Ecology and Management 127: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naithani BD (1984–1985) Flora of Chamoli, Vol. I & II. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah.Google Scholar
  26. Nanami S, Kawaguchi H, Yamakura T (1999) Dioecy-induced spatial patterns of two co-dominant tree species, Podocarpus nagi and Neolitsea aciculate. Journal of Ecology 87: 678–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Negi SS (1995) Uttarakhand: Land and People. MD Pub. New, Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  28. Pathak SD, Shukla RP (2004) Population structure and sexratio of mallotus philippensis muel. arg. within forest vegetation of north-eastern UP, India. Tropical Ecology 45(2): 271–280.Google Scholar
  29. Peterson CJ, Squiers ER (1995a) Competition and succession in an aspen white-pine forest. Journal of Ecology 83: 449–457. DOI: 10.2307/2261598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson CJ, Squiers ER (1995b) An unexpected change in spatial pattern across 10 years in an aspen white-pine forest. Journal of Ecology 83: 847–855. DOI: 10.2307/2261421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Popp JW, Reinartz JA (1988) Sexual dimorphism in biomass allocation and clonal growth of Xanthoxylum americanum. American Journal of Botany 75: 1732–1741. DOI: 10.2307/2444688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raghubanshi AS, Tripathi A (2009) Effect of disturbance, habitat fragmentation and alien invasive plants on floral diversity in dry tropical forests of Vindhyan highland: a review. Tropical Ecology 50: 57–69.Google Scholar
  33. Rongsen L (1992) Seabuckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. Occasional Paper Number 20. Kathmandou, Nepal: ICIMOD. p 62.Google Scholar
  34. Singh SP (1998). Chronic disturbance, a principal cause of environmental degradation in developing countries (Editorial). Environmental Conservation 25: 1–2. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892998000010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sundriyal RC, Sharma E (1996). Anthropogenic pressure on tree structure and biomass in temperate forest of Mamlay watershed in Sikkim. Forest Ecology and Management 81: 113–134. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03657-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sundriyal RC, Sharma E, Rai LK, et al. (1994) Tree structure, regeneration and woody biomass removal in a subtropical forest of Mamlay watershed in the Sikkim Himalaya. Vegetatio 113: 53–63. DOI: 10.1007/BF00045463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uuttera J, Tokola T, Maltamo M (2000) Differences in the structure of primary and managed forests in East Kalimantan, Indonesia, Forest Ecology and Management 129: 63–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00157-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepak Dhyani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shalini Dhyani
    • 1
  • R. K. Maikhuri
    • 1
  1. 1.G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Garhwal UnitSrinagar GarhwalUttarakhandIndia

Personalised recommendations