Skip to main content
Log in

Precipitation type estimation and validation in China

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results from three methods aimed at improving precipitation type (e.g., rain, sleet, and snow) estimation are presented and compared in this paper. The methods include the threshold air temperature (AT), threshold wet bulb temperature (WBT) and Koistinen and Saltikoff (KSS) methods. Dot graphs are plotted to acquire the threshold air temperature or the threshold wet bulb temperature using daily averaged air temperature, wet bulb temperature and precipitation data at 643 stations from 1961 to 1979 (precipitation types are not labeled in the database from 1980 to present) in China. The results indicate that the threshold AT or WBT methods are not able to differentiate rain, sleet and snow in the most regions in China; sleet is difficult to differentiate from other precipitation types based on the two threshold methods. Therefore, one threshold AT and WBT method was used in this study to differentiate rain and snow. Based on Gaussian-Kriging interpolation of threshold air temperature (T 0) and wet bulb temperature (T w), the T 0 and T w contour lines and contour surfaces are calculated for China. Finally, a comparison between the KSS, AT and WBT methods are provided in which the KSS method is calculated based on air temperature and relative humidity. The results suggest that the KSS method is more appropriate for water phase estimation than are the other methods; the maximum precision for rain and snow is 99% and 94%, respectively. The AT method performs better than the WBT method when the critical air temperature is 2°C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, et al. (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73–89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström S (1995) The HBV Model. In: Singh VP (ed.), Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch. pp. 443–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocchieri JR (1980) The objective use of upper air sounding to specify precipitation type. Monthly Weather Review, 108: 596–603. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108〈0596:TOUOUA〉2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgouin PA (2000) Method to Determine Precipitation Types. Weather and Forecasting 15: 583–592. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015〈0583:AMTDPT〉2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks CF (1920) The nature of sleet and how it is formed. Monthly Weather Review, 48: 69–73.DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1920)48〈69b:TNOSAH〉2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen RS, Lu SH, Kang ES, et al. (2008) A distributed waterheat coupled model for mountainous watershed of an inland river basin in Northwest China (I) model structure and equations. Environmental Geology 53: 1299–1309. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-007-0738-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czys RR, Scott RW, Tang KC, et al. (1996) A physically based, nondimensional parameter for discriminating between locations of freezing rain and ice pellets. Weather and forecasting 11: 591–598. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011〈0591:APBNPF〉2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David-Labor E, Heilig M (2004) Hydrologische Prognosen in Niederösterreich. Wiener Mitteilungen 164: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • DHSVM version 3.0. http://www.hydro.washington.edu/Lettenmaier/Models/DHSVM/index.shtml.

  • Gjertsen U, Ødegaard V (2005) The water phase of precipitation — a comparison between observed, estimated and predicted values. Atmospheric Research 77(1–4): 218–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.10.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang E, Cheng G, Lan Y, et al. (1999). A model for simulating the response of runoff from the mountainous watersheds of inland river basins in the arid area of northwest China to climatic changes. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 42(1): 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koistinen J, Saltikoff E (1998) Experience of customer products of accumulated snow, sleet and rain. In: Advanced weather radar systems, COST 75 Int. Seminar, Locarno, Switzerland. pp 397–406. [Available from European Commission, B-1049 Brussels, EUR 18567 EN]

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolwine T (1975) Freezing rain. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Physics, University of Toronto. p 92. [Available from University of Toronto Libraries, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada]

    Google Scholar 

  • Levizzani V, Bauer P, Turk FJ (2007) Measuring precipitation from space: EURAINSAT and the future. Dordrecht, Advances in Global Change Research 28: 655–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP (1996) Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: valuation and modification. Global and Planetary Change 13(1–4): 195–206. DOI: 10.1016/0921-8181(95)00046-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn S (1957) The prediction of snow vs. rain. Forecasting Guide 2, U.S. Weather Bureau. p 29. [Available from NOAA Central Library, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910]

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard A, Seth SM, Bathurst JC, et al. (1992) Application of the SHE to catchments in India-Part 1: General Results. Journal of Hydrology 140:1–23. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90232-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuur TJ, Park HS, Ryzhkov AV, Reeves HD (2012). Classification of precipitation types during Transitional Winter Weather Using the RCU Model and Polarimetric Radar retrievals. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 51: 763–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R (1985) Precipitation Types in winter storms. PAGEOPH 123: 597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JA (1957) Mean temperature from 1000 mb to 500 mb as a predictor of precipitation type. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 38:584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigmosta MS, Vail L, Lettenmaier DP (1994) A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain. Water Resource Research 30: 1665–1679. DOI: 10.1029/94WR00436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren-sheng Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Rs., Liu, Jf. & Song, Yx. Precipitation type estimation and validation in China. J. Mt. Sci. 11, 917–925 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2625-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2625-x

Keywords

Navigation