Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 742–751 | Cite as

Relationships between landslide types and topographic attributes in a loess catchment, China

  • Fanyu ZhangEmail author
  • Wenwu Chen
  • Gao Liu
  • Shouyun Liang
  • Chao Kang
  • Faguo He
Article

Abstract

Topographic attributes have been identified as the most important factor in controlling the initiation and distribution of shallow landslides triggered by rainfall. As a result, these landslides influence the evolution of local surface topography. In this research, an area of 2.6 km2 loess catchment in the Huachi County was selected as the study area locating in the Chinese Loess Plateau. The landslides inventory and landslide types were mapped using global position system (GPS) and field mapping. The landslide inventory shows that these shallow landslides involve different movement types including slide, creep and fall. Meanwhile, main topographic attributes were generated based on a high resolution digital terrain model (5 m × 5 m), including aspect, slope shape, elevation, slope angle and contributing area. These maps were overlaid with the spatial distributions of total landslides and each type of landslides in a geographic information system (GIS), respectively, to assess their spatial frequency distributions and relative failure potentials related to these selected topographic attributes. The spatial analysis results revealed that there is a close relation between the topographic attributes of the post-landsliding local surface and the types of landslide movement. Meanwhile, the types of landslide movement have some obvious differences in local topographic attributes, which can influence the relative failure potential of different types of landslides. These results have practical significance to mitigate natural hazard and understand geomorphologic process in thick loess area.

Keywords

Shallow landslides Movement types Topographic attributes Loess catchment GIS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Baeza C, Corominas J (2001) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 1251–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borga M, Fontana DG, Cazorzi F (2002) Analysis of topographic and climatic control on rainfall-triggered shallow landsliding using a quasi-dynamic wetness index. Journal of Hydrology 268: 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RLE (Eds.), Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA. pp 36–75.Google Scholar
  4. Derbyshire E (2001) Geological hazards in loess terrain, with particular reference to the loess regions of China. Earth-Science Reviews 54: 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derbyshire E, Dijkstra TA, Smalley IJ, et al. (1994) Failure mechanisms in loess and the effects of moisture content changes on remoulded strength. Quaternary International 24: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derbyshire E, Mellors TW (1988) Geological and geotechnical characteristics of some loess and loessic soils from China and Britain: A comparison. Engineering Geology 25: 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dietrich WE, Reiss R, Hsu ML, et al. (1995) A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes 9: 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dijkstra TA, Rogers CDF, Smalley IJ, et al. (1994) The loess of north-central China: Geotechnical properties and their relation to slope stability. Engineering Geology 36: 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandes NF, Guimarães RF, Gomes RAT, et al. (2004) Topographic controls of landslides in Rio de Janeiro: field evidence and modeling. Catena 55: 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao J, Maro J (2010) Topographic controls on evolution of shallow landslides in pastoral Wairarapa, New Zealand, 1979–2003. Geomorphology 114: 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Handy RL (1973) Collapsible loess in Iowa. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 37: 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hennrich K, Crozier MJ (2004) A hillslope hydrology approach for catchment-scale slope stability analysis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29: 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iida T (1999) A stochastic hydro-geomorphological model for shallow landsliding due to rainstorm. Catena 34: 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meisina C, Scarabelli S (2007) A comparative analysis of terrain stability models for predicting shallow landslides in colluvial soils. Geomorphology 87: 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resources Research 30: 1153–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery DR, Schmidt KM, Greenberg HM, et al. (2000) Forest clearing and regional landsliding. Geology 28: 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Callaghan JF, Mark DM (1984) The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision Graphics Image Processes 28: 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roering JJ (2004) Soil creep and convex-upward velocity profiles: theoretical and experimental investigation of disturbance-driven sediment transport on hillslopes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29: 1597–1612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Šajgalik J (1990) Sagging of loesses and its problems. Quaternary International 7–8: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Talebi A, Uijlenhoet R, Troch PA (2008) A low-dimensional physically based model of hydrologic control of shallow landsliding on complex hillslopes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33: 1964–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Varnes DJ, Commission on Landslides of the IAEG (1984) Landslide Hazard Zonation: a Review of Principles and Practice. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Zevenbergen LW, Thorne CR (1987) Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 12: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fanyu Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wenwu Chen
    • 1
  • Gao Liu
    • 1
  • Shouyun Liang
    • 1
  • Chao Kang
    • 2
  • Faguo He
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China (Ministry of Education of China), and Department of Geological EngineeringLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations