Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 760–769 | Cite as

Complementary zoning frameworks for sustainable management of eco-economic capital: a case study of Lijiang, China

  • Dewei YangEmail author
  • Quanyi Qiu
  • Wenjuan Liu
Article

Abstracts

We propose two zoning frameworks for regional decision-makers to regulate eco-economic capital in Lijiang, southwest China, using an index system, layer overlay, and GIS spatial analysis. The frameworks include eco-economic zoning and major function-oriented zoning, with an emphasis on ecoeconomic capital and human activities. The two frameworks share common advantages in top-down resource regulation by a certain function and the pursuit of competitiveness, sustainability and welfare fairness. Their differences in development orientation, functional links and scale suitability provide a complementary approach for regional decisionmakers. The frameworks will help to understand complex eco-economic resource patterns and foster appropriate regional regulation strategies.

Key words

Capital Eco-economic zoning GIS Function-oriented zoning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey RG (1976) Ecoregions of the United States (map). 1:7500000. Utah: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey RG (1996) Ecosystem Geography. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot DR, et al. (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Del Carmen Sabatini M, Verdiell A, Rodríguez Lglesiasa RM, et al. (2007) A quantitative method for zoning of protected areas and its spatial ecological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 83:198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du Y, Wang CS, Zhao HY, et al. (2007) Functional regionalization with the restriction of ecological shelter zones: A case of Zhaotong in Yunnan. Journal of Geographical Sciences 17(3): 365–374. (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan J, Li PX (2009) The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. Journal of Geographical Science 19(5): 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan J, Sun W, Zhou K, et al. (2012) Major function oriented zone: New method of spatial regulation for reshaping regional development pattern in China. Chinese Geographical Science 22(2): 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu BJ, Liu GH, Chen LD, et al. (2001) Scheme of ecological regionalization in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 21(1):1–6. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Galicia L, Romero AG (2007) Land use and land cover change in highland temperate forests in the Izta-Popo National Park, Central Mexico. Mountain Research and Development 27(1):48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao JX, Fan XS (2007) Connotation, traits and research trends of eco-assets. Research of Environmental Sciences 20(5):137–143. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Hall O, Arnberg W (2002) A method for landscape regionalization based on fuzzy membership signatures. Landscape and Urban Planning 59 (4): 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jia LQ, Ouyang ZY, Zhao TQ, et al. (2005) The ecological function regionalization of Anhui Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25(2):254–260. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Li HT, Xu XG, Xiao DN (2007) Study on the value of ecological capital based on the emery theory: A case study on the forest ecosystem in the middle part of the north slope of the Tianshan Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25(6):1383–1390. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Lu DD, Liu Y, Fan J (2001) Regional development of China. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) (2002) Provisional technical procedures for ecological function zoning. Available online: http://sts.mep.gov.cn/stbh/stglq/200308/t20030815_90755.htm [accessed on 2003-08-15].
  16. Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Gao JX, et al. (2009) Regional ecological assessment and ecosystem service zoning. Beijing: China environmental sciences press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Miao H (1999) A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica 19(5): 607–613. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Pan YZ, Shi PJ, Zhu WQ, et al. (2005) Measurement of ecological capital of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on remote sensing. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 48(6): 786–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. State Council (2010) National planning of major function oriented zone. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-06/08/content_1879180.htm [accessed on 2011-06/08].
  20. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Der Valk A (2002) The Dutch planning experience. Landscape and Urban Planning 58(2–4): 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang CS, Fan ZJ, Dong SC, et al. (2005) Study on the ecoeconomical regionalization: a case of 6 provinces in Northwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25(7): 1804–1810. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Wei J, Zhao YT, Xu HQ, et al. (2007) A framework for selecting indicators to assess the sustainable development of the natural heritage site. Journal of Mountain Science 4(4): 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xie GD, Lu CX, Leng YF, et al. (2003) Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of natural resources 18(2):189–196. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Yang DW, Gao LJ, Xiao LS, et al. (2012) Cross-boundary environmental effects of urban household metabolism based on an urban spatial conceptual framework: a comparative case of Xiamen. Journal of Cleaner Production 27: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang JC, Zhang SW, Li Y, et al. (2010) Dynamics of salinealkali land and its ecological regionalization in western Songnen Plain, China. Chinese Geographical Science 20(2): 159–166. (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang PF (2005) The research on the theory and approach of urban and rural spatial eco-planning. Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Yang QY, Zheng D, Wu SH (2002) A study of eco-region system in China. Progress in Natural Sciences 12(3): 287–291. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Yang ZS, Liu YS, Tao WX, et al. (2008) Method for evaluating the degrees of land use sustainability of mountainous county and its application in Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Mountain Science 5(2): 98–112. (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yao YH, Zhang BP, Han F, et al. (2010) Diversity and geographical pattern of altitudinal belts in the Hengduan Mountains in China. Journal of Mountain Science 7(2): 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yong Y, Zhang H, Wang XR, et al. (2010) Urban land-use zoning based on ecological evaluation for large conurbations in less developed regions: a case study in Foshan, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 136(2): 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao J, Dai D, Lin T, et al. (2010) Rapid urbanization, ecological effects and sustainable city construction in Xiamen. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 17: 271–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina
  2. 2.Institute of Urban EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations