Abstract
The gradation of cultivated land is to assess the suitability of cultivated land for agricultural production in terms of natural and economic properties of land. It can be used to evaluate sustainability of land use and soil management practices. Formal and informal surveys, Delphi and comprehensive index method are adopted to identify appropriate integrated indicators, and measure the gradation of cultivated land quality. The determination of integrated indicators presents three basic features of cultivated land quality: stable plant productivity, social acceptability and maintenance of environmental quality. Pronounced concentration-dissipation law of total function score value occurs in paddy field units, with three ranges, i.e., 79∼68.5, 68.5∼59 and 59∼51. Total function score value in dryland units mainly ranges from 40 to 70, but slight concentration-dissipation law of each unit is still observed, with four ranges, i.e., 79∼68, 68∼51, 51∼37 and 37∼15. Paddy field quality is divided into three gradations, and the scales are 18 220.9 ha, 5410.6 ha and 2890.9 ha. Dryland quality is classified into four gradations, and the scales are 1548.6 ha, 8153.8 ha, 3316.3 ha and 685.2 ha. The total function score value of every gradation unit is conformed to the results of farmers’ assessment. Research results meet with the needs of accurate degree of the gradation of cultivated land quality. Integrated indicators-based gradation of cultivated land assessment accords with the characteristics of land resources and human preference in the mountains of southwestern China. This study will be useful to promote the monitoring of cultivated land quality, and to supply fine ground and knowledge for establishing appropriate cultivated land management practices in Southwestern China.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen R.B., Hewitt A.E., Partridge T.R.. 1995. Predicting land use suitability from vegetation and landform in depleted semiarid grassland, New Zealand. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(1): 31–42.
Deng Xiangzheng, Huang Jikun, Rozelle S., Uchida E.. 2006. Cultivated land conversion and potential agricultural productivity in China. Land Use Policy, 23(4): 372–384.
English N.B., Weltzin J.F., Fravolini A., Thomas L., Williams D.G.. 2005. The influence of soil texture and vegetation on soil moisture under rainout shelters in a semi-desert grassland. Journal of Arid Environments, 63(1): 324–343.
Feng Zhiming, Yang Yanzhao, Zhang Yaoqi, Zhang Pengtao, Li Yiqing. 2005. Grain-for-green policy and its impacts on grain supply in West China. Land Use Policy, 22(4): 301–312.
Geissen V., Guzman G.M.. 2006. Fertility of tropical soils under different land use systems—a case study of soils in Tabasco, Mexico. Applied Soil Ecology, 31(1–2): 169–178.
Hubacek K., Vazquez J.. 2002. The Economics of Land Use Change. Interim Report. Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Hurni H.. 1988. Principles of soil conservation for cultivated land. Soil Technology, 1(2): 101–116.
Feng Rongye, Tan Zhihao, Huang Jinsong, Ye Fang, Zhou Shenglu. 2004. Discussion on improvement of method for utilization coefficient and economic coefficient calculation in farmland classification: a case study in Wuxi city. Economic Geography, 22(2): 246–249. (In Chinese)
Karlen D.L., Ditzler C.A., Andrews S.S.. 2003. Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma, 114(3–4): 145–156.
Komatsu Y., Tsunekawa A., Ju H.. 2005. Evaluation of agricultural sustainability based on human carrying capacity in drylands — a case study in rural villages in Inner Mongolia, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 108(5): 29–43.
Lin G.C.S., Ho S.P.S.. 2003. China’s land resources and land-use change: insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy, 20(2): 87–107.
Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, Tian Hanqin, Zhuang Dafang, Zhang Zengxiang, Zhang Wen, Tang Xianming, Deng Xiangzheng. 2005a. Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4): 442–456.
Liu Jiyuan, Zhan Jinyan, Deng Xiangzheng. 2005b. Spatio-temporal Patterns and Driving Forces of Urban Land Expansion in China during the Economic Reform Era. Ambio, 34(6): 450–455.
Mottet A., Ladet S., Coqué N., Gibon A.. 2006. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2–4): 296–310.
Okoli C., Pawlowski S.D.. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1): 15–29.
Paudel G.S., Thapa G.B.. 2004. Impact of social, institutional and ecological factors on land management practices in mountain watersheds of Nepal. Applied Geography, 24(1): 35–55.
Rasul G., Thapa G.B.. 2004. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: an assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems, 79(3): 327–351.
Reeves D.W.. 1997. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping system. Soil Till. Res. 43(1–2): 131–167.
Shao Jing’an, Wei Chaofu, Xie Deti. 2005. Index system of agricultural land classification and gradation in County districts of undeveloped western region. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science), 31(6): 1133–1137. (In Chinese)
Shi T., Gill R.. 2005. Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: the case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model. Ecological Economics, 53(2): 223–246.
Tao Fulu, Yokozawa M., Hayashi Y., Lin Erda. 2003. Future climate change, the agricultural water cycle, and agricultural production in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(1): 203–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, J., Wei, C., Xie, D. et al. Integrated indicators-based gradation of cultivated land quality in mountainous region of Southwestern China. J. Mt. Sci. 3, 259–270 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-006-0259-6
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-006-0259-6