Advertisement

Changes in agricultural biodiversity: Implications for sustainable livelihood in the Himalaya

  • K. G. Saxena
  • R. K. Maikhuri
  • K. S. Rao
Article

Abstract

Himalayan mountain system is distinguished globally for a rich biodiversity and for its role in regulating the climate of the South Asia. Traditional crop-livestock mixed farming in the Himalaya is highly dependent on forests for fodder and manure prepared from forest leaf litter and livestock excreta. Apart from sustaining farm production, forests provide a variety of other tangible and intangible benefits, which are critical for sustainable livelihood of not only 115 million mountain people, but also many more people living in the adjoining plains. Extension of agricultural landuse coupled with replacement of traditional staple food crops by cash crops and of multipurpose agroforestry trees by fruit trees are widespread changes. Cultivation of Fagopyrum esculentum, Fagopyrum tataricum, Panicum miliaceum, Setaria italica and Pisum arvense has been almost abandoned. Increasing stress on cash crops is driven by a socio-cultural change from subsistence to market economy facilitated by improvement in accessibility and supply of staple food grains at subsidized price by the government. Farmers have gained substantial economic benefits from cash crops. However, loss of agrobiodiversity implies more risks to local livelihood in the events of downfall in market price/demand of cash crops, termination of supply of staple food grains at subsidized price, pest outbreaks in a cash crop dominated homogeneous landscape and abnormal climate years. Indigenous innovations enabling improvement in farm economy by conserving and/enhancing agrobiodiversity do exist, but are highly localized. The changes in agrobiodiversity are such that soil loss and run-off from the croplands have dramatically increased together with increase in local pressure on forests. As farm productivity is maintained with forest-based inputs, continued depletion of forest resources will result in poor economic returns from agriculture to local people, apart from loss of global benefits from Himalayan forests. Interventions including improvement in traditional manure and management of on-farm trees, participatory development of agroforestry in degraded forest lands and policies favoring economic benefits to local people from non-timber forest products could reduce the risks of decline in agricultural biodiversity and associated threats to livelihoods and Himalayan ecosystems.

Keywords

Land use/cover change food security cash crops traditional agricultural practices forest management 

References

  1. Chandrasekhar K. 2003. Ecological Analysis of Settled Agropastoral Farming in Cold Desert (Spiti Catchment, Himachal Pradesh). Ph.D. Thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Hrabovzsky J. and Miyan K. 1987. Population growth and land use in Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 7: 264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ives J.D. and He Y. 1996. Environmental and cultural change in the Yulong Xue Shan, Lijiang District. N W Yunnan, China. In: Rerkassem, B. (Ed.), Montane Mainland South East Asia in Transition. Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp. 1–16Google Scholar
  4. Maikhuri R.K., Nautiyal S., Rao K.S., et al. 2000a. Analysis and resolution of protected area-people confliets in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. India. Environmental Conservation 27: 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Maikhuri R.K., Semwal R.L., Rao K.S., et al. 1997. Rehabilitation of degraded community lands for sustainable development in Himalaya: a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 4: 192–203Google Scholar
  6. Maikhuri R.K., Semwal R.L., Rao K.S., et al. 2000b. Cleome viscose, Capparidaceae: a weed or a cash crop? Economic Botany 54:150–154Google Scholar
  7. Maikhuri R.K., Semwal R.L., Rao K.S., et al. 2000c. Growth and ecological impacts of traditional agroforestry tree species in central Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems 48:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mishra C. 1997. Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environmental Conservation 24:338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nautiyal S., Maikhuri R.K., Semwal R.L., et al. 1998. Agroforestry systems in the rural landscape — a case study in Garbwal Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems 41: 151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nautiyal S., Maikhuri R.K., Rao K.S., et al. 2001. Medicinal plant resources in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve in the central Himalaya. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 8: 47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Preston D. 1998. Post-peasant capitalist graziers: the 21st century in southern Bolivia. Mountain Research and Development 18: 151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rai S.C. 1995. Land use options in Sikkim Himalaya: an analysis from the Mamlay Watershed in South District. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 6: 63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rao K.S. and Pant R. 2001. Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical microwatershed in the mid elevation zone of central Himalaya, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86: 113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rao K.S., Maikhuri R.K, Nautiyal S., et al. 2002. Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 66: 317–327Google Scholar
  15. Rao K.S., Maikhuri R.K. and Saxena K.G. 1999. Participatory approach to rehabilitation of degraded forest lands: a case study in a high altitude village of Indian Himalaya. International Tree Crops Journal 10: 1–17Google Scholar
  16. Rao K.S. and Saxena K.G. 1994. Sustainable Development and Rehabilitation of Degraded Village Lands in Himalaya. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Rao K.S. Semwal R.L. Maikhuri R.K., et al. 2003. Indigenous ecological knowledge, biodiversity and sustainable development in the central Himalayas. Tropical Ecology 44:93–111Google Scholar
  18. Renaud F., Bechstedt H.D. and Udomachai, N. 1998. Farining system and soil conservation practices in a study area of northern Thailand. Mountain Research and Development 18: 345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Semwal R.L., Maikhuri R.K., Rao K.S., et al. 2002. Crop productivity under differentially lopped canopies of multipurpose trees in central Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems 56: 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Semwal R.L., Maikhuri R.K., Rao K.S., et al. 2003. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns of six multipurpose tree species of central Himalaya, India. Biomass and Bioenergy 24:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Semwal R.L., Nautiyal S., Sen K.K., et al. 2004. Patterns and ecological implications of agricultural land-use changes: a case study from central Himalaya, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 102: 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sen K.K., Rao K.S. and Saxena K.G. 1997. Soil erosion due to settled upland farming in Himalaya: a case study in Pranmati watershed. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 4: 65–74Google Scholar
  23. Sen K.K., Semwal R.L., Rana, U., et al. 2002. Patterns and implications of land-use/cover change: a case study in Pranmati watershed (Garhwal Himalaya, India). Mountain Research and Development 22: 56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma S. and Sharma E. 1993. Energy budget and efficiency of some cropping systems in Sikkim Himalaya. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3: 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma U.R. and Shaw W.W. 1993. Role of Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park in meeting the grazing and fodder needs of local people. Environmental Conservation 20: 139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh G.S., Rao K.S. and Saxena K.G. 1997. Energy and economic efficiency of the mountain farming system: a case study in the north-western Himalaya. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 9: 25–49Google Scholar
  27. Singh J. S., Pandey U. and Tiwari A. K. 1984. Man and forests: a central Himalayan case study. Ambio 13: 80–87.Google Scholar
  28. Singh K. 2002. Ecological Diversity in Relation to Agricultural Land Use Intensity in a Mid-Altitude Village in Central Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  29. Sundriyal R.C., Rai S.C., Sharma E., et al. 1994. Hill agroforestry systems in south Sikkim. Agroforestry Systems 26: 215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thapa G.B., Sinclair F.L. and Walker D.H. 1995. Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development. Part 2. Case study on the impact of explicit representation of farmers’ knowledge. Agroforestry Systems 30: 249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Toky O.P., Kumar P. and Khosla P.K. 1989. Structure and function of traditional agroforestry systems in the western Himalaya. I. Biomass and productivity. Agroforestry Systems 9: 47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS(IMHE) and Science Press 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. G. Saxena
    • 1
  • R. K. Maikhuri
    • 2
  • K. S. Rao
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.G. B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Garhwal UnitSrinagarIndia
  3. 3.Centre for Inter-disciplinary Studies of Mountain and Hill EnvironmentUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations