Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Employee-owned and capitalist firms: is performance linked to ownership?

  • Empirical Article
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper does a comparative analysis of the economic performance between employee-owned firms (EOFs) and conventional capitalist companies (non-employee-owned firms, NEOFs). EOFs show good economic performance if the different objectives that distinguish them from NEOFs are considered. These differences stem precisely from the different capital-ownership structures. Nevertheless, the results deteriorate if profitability and productiveness are analysed. The results for productivity differ from theoretical thought which considers that the main differences between these two types of structures should be explained by the double condition people have as both partners and workers in the EOF; this link between company and workers should translate into increased productiveness. The results of the analysis do not empirically demonstrate the positive effects that were expected with an EOF structure. There are, however, sufficient motives for extending the study to the compared analysis of other subjects that work under specific legal regulations and even to the compared analysis of other regulative forms that exist in other Member States of the European Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J Political Econ 105(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian A, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs and economic organization. Am Econ Rev 62(5):777–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez M, Arbesú P, Fé C (2000) Las cooperativas en el marco de la teoría de la agencia. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa 34:169–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett W, Cable J, Estrin S, Jones DC, Smith SC (2003) Las cooperativas autogestionadas por los trabajadores y las empresas privadas al norte de Italia. In: Morales AC, Monzón JL, Chaves R (eds) Análisis Económico de la Empresa Autogestionada. CIRIEC, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt R, Appelbaum E (1995) Worker participation in diverse settings: does the form affect the outcome, and if so, who benefits? Br J Ind Relat 3(33):353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BenNer A (1998) The life cycle of worker-owned firms in market economies. A theoretical analysis. J Econ Behav Organ 10(3):287–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin JP, Jones DC, Putterman L (1993) Theoretical and empirical studies of producers co-operatives: Hill the Twain Meet. J Econ Lit 31(3):1290–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill N (2000) Profit sharing, employee share ownership and gainsharing: what can they achieve? NESC (National Economic and Social Council). Research Series Paper, no. 4, Mayo 2000. http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/attached_files/Pdf%20files/NESCResearchSeries4.pdf

  • Central Directory for Enterprises. Ministry of Industry (2010) http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft37%2Fp201&file=inebase&L=0

  • Clarke T (1984) Alternative models of cooperative production. Econ Ind Democr 5(1):97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke WN (1994) Employee participation programs, group based incentives and company performance: a union-nonunion comparison, industrial and labour relations review, 47(4): 594–609

  • Domar ED (1966) The soviet collective farm as a producer cooperative. Am Econ Rev 56(4):734–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow G (2003) Governing the firm: worker’s control in theory an in practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1991) The pepper report. Promotion of employee participation in profits and enterprise results in the Member States of the European Community. Directorate-general employment, industrial relations and social affairs

  • European Commission (1998) Resolution of 15th January 1998 concerning the second PEPPER report on the promotion among member states of employee participation in the profits and business results of companies (including shareholding) (COM(1998) 697)

  • European Commission (2002) European parliament resolution relating to the commission communication to the council, the Parliament, the Social and Economic Committee and the Regional Committee regarding a framework for the financial participation of employees (COM(2002) 364–(2002/2243(INI))

  • European Commission (2006) The PEPPER III Report. Promotion of Employee Participation in Profits and Enterprise Results in the New Member and Candidate Countries of the European Union. Germany, Institute for Eastern European Studies, Free University of Berlin, 353 Pp

  • European Commission (2009) The PEPPER IV Report: Benchmarking of Employee Participation in Profits and Enterprise Results in the Member and Candidate Countries of the European Union. Editors: Lowitzsch J, Hashi I, Woodward R. Inter-University Centre at the Institute for Eastern European Studies, Free University of Berlin, pp. 264

  • European Commission (1989) Communication from Commission concerning its Action Programme relating to the implementation of the Community Charter of Basic Social Rights for Workers, COM (89) 569 final, Brussels, 29 November 1989

  • European Commission (1992) Council recommendation of 27th July 1992 regarding the promotion among member states of employee participation in the profits and business results of companies (including shareholding)

  • European Economic and Social Committee (2009) Opinion on different types of business. INT/447, CESE 1454/2009, Brusels, 1st october

  • Fernández-Guadaño J (2009) Analysis of the economic differences between capitalist and labour-owned enterprises. Int J Soc Econ 36(6):679–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Guadaño J (2012) Desempeño de las empresas propiedad de sus trabajadores: ¿un modelo de gobierno corporativo laboral? INNOVAR, J Admin Soc Sci 22(43):33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernie S, Metcalf D (1995) Participation. Contingent Pay, Representation and Workplace Performance: evidence from Great Britain. Br J Ind Relat 33(3):279–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grávalos M, Pomares I (2001) La adaptación de las Sociedades Laborales a la evolución del ciclo económico. Un estudio empírico para las diferentes comunidades autónomas. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, no 38:33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black B, Babin B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate analysis. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland NJ (1987) The economic analysis of labour management firms. Bull Econ Res 39(4):249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M, Meckling W (1979) Rights and production functions: an application to labour-managed firms and co-determination. J Bus 52(4):469–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Kato T, Pliskin J (1997) Profit sharing and gainsharing: a review of theory, incidence and effects. In: Lewin G, Michell D, Zaide M (eds) The human resource management handbook, part I. JAI Press, Greenwich CT, pp 153–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Julia JF, Chaves R (2012) Introduction: social economy, a third sector in a plural people-oriented economy. Serv Bus Int J 6(1):1–4

  • Kruse D, Blasi J (1997) Employee ownership, employee attitudes, and firm performance: a review of the evidence. In: Lewin G, Michell D, Zaide M (eds) The human resource management handbook, part I. JAI Press, Greenwich CT, pp 113–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejarriaga G (2002) Participación financiera de los trabajadores y creación de valor: una propuesta operativa de comportamiento con relación a los objetivos empresariales. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, no 40:73–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejarriaga G, Martín S (2010) Análisis de la evolución de las sociedades laborales (2000–2009). In: Monzón JL (ed) Las empresas de trabajo asociado en España. CIRIEC, Spain, pp 61–148

    Google Scholar 

  • March I, Yagüe RM (2009) Desempeño en empresas de economía social. Un modelo para su medición, CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, no 64:105–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R (2012) ‘Nick Clegg plans a ‘John Lewis economy’’ Daily Telegraph 15 January. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nick-clegg/9016800/Nick-Clegg-plans-a-John-Lewis-economy.html

  • McCain RA (1982) Empirical Implications of Worker Participation in Management. In: Jones DC, Sevejnar J (eds) Participatory and self management, Lexington Books, Lexington, pp. 17–44

  • Meade JE (1972) The theory of labour-managed firms and profit-sharing. Econ J 82(325):402–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade JE (2003) La teoría de las empresas autogestionadas por los trabajadores y del reparto del beneficio. In: Morales AC, Monzón JL, Chaves R (eds) Análisis Económico de la Empresa Autogestionada. CIRIEC, Spain, pp 291–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina U, Correa A, González A (2000) Posición financiera de las entidades de Economía Social canarias. CIRIEC-España. Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa 36:5–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo Z, Arcelus FJ, Simon K (2007a) Measuring performance: differences between capitalist and labour-owned enterprises. Int J Soc Econ 34(7):485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo Z, Arcelus FJ, Simon K (2007b) Desempeño económico: diferencias de pequeñas empresas clasificadas según la estructura de la propiedad del capital. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos 93:7–38. http://www.ucm.es/info/revesco

  • Melgarejo Z, Arcelus FJ, Simon K (2007c). Una evaluación crítica del potencial de supervivencia de las Sociedades Laborales. CIRIEC-España. Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa 59:181–202

  • Monzón JL, Chaves R (2008) The European social economy: concept and dimensions of the third sector. Ann Public Coop Econ 79(3):549–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzón JL, Chaves R (2012) Beyond the crisis: the social economy, prop of a new model of sustainable economic development. Serv Bus Int J 6(1):5–26

  • Morales AC, Monzón JL, Chaves R (2003) Análisis Económico de la Empresa Autogestionada. CIRIEC, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyer P (2004) Why do firms use incentives that have no incentive effects? J Finance 59(4):1619–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotin V, Robinson G (2003) Employee participation of profit and ownership: a review of issues and evidence. Luxembourg, European Parliament

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma E (2001) Recent trends in employee financial participation in the European Union. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma E, Kalmi P, Pendleton A (2006) The Relationship between financial participation and other forms of employee participation: new survey evidence from Europe. Econ Ind Democr 27(4):637–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prychitko DL, Vanek J (1996) Producer cooperatives and Labor-Managed Systems. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Terradillos E (2004) Iniciativas comunitarias para la promoción de la participación (financiera y otras) en la empresa. In: LANDA ZAPIRAIN, J.P. (Cood) Nuevas formas de participación de los trabajadores y gobierno de la empresa. Spain, Bomarzo, pp 55–68

  • Uvalic M (1995) La participación financiera de los trabajadores en la Unión Europea. Ekonomiaz, no 33:64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Bulcke, F. A Company perspective on Financial Participation in the European Union Objectives and Obstacles. Research Centre for Financial Participation, november 1999. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/labour_law/docs/finpartobjobs_en.pdf.

  • Ward B (1958) The firm in Illyria: market syndicalism. Am Econ Rev 48(4):566–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman M, Kruse D (1990) Profit Sharing and Productivity. In: Blinder A (ed) Paying for productivity: a look at the evidence. Brookings, Washington, pp 95–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevi A (1982) The performance of Italian Producer Cooperatives. In: Jones DC, Svejnar J (eds) Participatory and self-managed firms. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics Science, Complutense University, Campus de Somosaguas, Pabellón de Sexto, Despacho 46, 28223, Madrid, Spain

    Josefina Fernández-Guadaño

Authors
  1. Josefina Fernández-Guadaño
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josefina Fernández-Guadaño.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández-Guadaño, J. Employee-owned and capitalist firms: is performance linked to ownership?. Serv Bus 8, 541–558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0206-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0206-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation