Skip to main content
Log in

Strategies developed by leading EU agrifood cooperatives in their growth models

  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this article is to identify the factors that have brought about the greatest degree of competitiveness in some of the principal agrifood cooperative groups in the European Union (EU), using pertinent case studies from a range of sectors including the dairy, meat and fruit and vegetable sectors from three EU member states: Holland, Ireland and Denmark. With this purpose in mind, seven cases were identified for inclusion: Kerry Group, the Irish Dairy Board, Arla Foods, The Greenery BV, Danish Crown, Agrifirm and DLG. The article identifies the main barriers and problems faced by this type of cooperative and shows the strategies developed by leading cooperatives in their sector within the current comparative context and familiarizes readers with the different growth models these cooperatives use to achieve and maintain their market standing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bremmers H, Zuurbier PJP (1997) Globalisation in the dairy industry. In: Loader RJ, Neneson SJ, Traill WB (eds) Globalisation of the food industry: policy implications. Proceedings of the international of community medicine

  • CIAA (2008) Data & trends of the European food and drink industry, 2007. http://www.ciaa.be/documents/brochures/dataandtrends_2007.pdf

  • CIAA (2009) The competitiveness of the EU food and drink industry, facts and figures 2009. http://www.ciaa.be/asp/documents/brochures.asp

  • COGECA (2010) Agricultural cooperatives in Europe. Main issues and trends. In: Europeanagri-cooperatives (ed), http://www.copa-cogeca.eu/Cogeca

  • COGECA (2011) Paolo Bruni presentation, President of Cogeca. Asamblea General de las Cooperativas Agroalimentarias, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook ML (1995) The future of U.S agricultural cooperatives. Am J Agric Econ 77:1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Águila AR, Padilla A (2010) Factores determinantes de la innovación en empresas de la economía social La importancia de la formación y de la actitud estratégica. CIRIEC-Esp Rev Econ Públ Soc Coop 67:129–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson W (1992) Competitive strategies of US fluid milk processors: a case study. Agribusiness 8(5):427–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson W (2007) Competitive strategies of dairy processing firms in Ireland. Babcock Institute Discussion Paper, no. 2007-3

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad Manag Rev 16(3):620–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández de Bobadilla S, Velasco E (2008) Gestionan mejor la innovación las empresas de economía social que las sociedades anónimas: estudio comparativo de empresas innovadoras vascas. CIRIEC-Esp Rev Econ Públ Soc Coop 63:5–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton ME, Huethy E (2009) Cooperative conversions failures and restructurings: an overview. J Coop 23:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton JR, Popp MP, Gray C (1996) Strategic alliance and joint venture agreements in grain marketing co-operatives. J Co-op 11:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor Z (2008) Demutualization of cooperatives: reasons and perspectives. http://www.coopgalor.com/i_publications.html

  • Giannakas K, Fulton M (2003) Agricultural cooperatives and cost-reducing R&D in the agri-food system. In: Paper prepared for presentation at the american agricultural economics association. Annual meeting, Montreal, July 2003

  • Guillouzo R, Ruffio P (2005a) Internationalisation of European dairy co-operatives. Int J Co-op Manag 2:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillouzo R, Ruffio P (2005b) Strategic alliances: challenges and limits for agri-food co-operatives. Internationalisation of European Dairy Co-operatives. Int J Co-op Manag 2:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman DL, Cook ML (1998) Producers as agrichain leaders: the importance of the institutional environment. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on «Chain management in agribusiness and the food industry » held in Ede, 28–29 May 1998, pp 183–198

  • Hamel J (1992) The case method in sociology introduction: new theoretial and methodological issues. Curr Sociol 40(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juliá-Igual JF, Server RJ (2003) Social economy companies in the Spanish agricultural sector: delimitation and situation in the context of the European Union. Ann Publ Coop Econ 74(3):465–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennelly JJ (2001) The Kerry way. The history of Kerry group, 1972–2000. Oak Tree Press, Dublin

  • Maxwell JA (1996) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA (1998) Designing a qualitative study. In: Bickman L, Rog DJ (eds) Handbook of applied social research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 66–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Meliá E, Juliá-Igual JF, Martínez A (2010) Mergers of agrifood cooperatives and their effects: from expectations to results: an empirical study in four Spanish autonomous regions. Span J Agric Res 8(2):232–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Montolío JM (2000) Legislación cooperativa en la Unión Europea. INFES, Madrid 1.646 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J (1998) The emergence of new operational models for agricultural co-operatives. Swed J Agric Res 28:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J, Kihlén A, Norrell L (2009) Are traditional cooperatives an endangered species? About shrinking satisfaction, involvement and trust. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 12(4):101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards T, Manfredo MR (2003) Cooperative mergers and acquisitions: the role of capital constraints. J Agr Resour Econ 28(1):152–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero A (2010) La fiscalidad aplicada a las cooperativas en Europa y la reforma del régimen fiscal en España. CIRIEC-Esp Rev Econ Públ Soc Coop 69:91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra S (2004) Una metodología para el Derecho Comparado europeo. Civitas, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake RE (1994) Case Studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 236–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeker R (1991) Evaluating and rethinking: the case study. Sociol Rev 39(1):88–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bekkum O (2007) NICE European Agrifood Cooperative Top 100. www.vz-gmbh.de/dokument/NICE_Top100.pdf

  • Van der Krogt D, Nilsson J, Høst V (2007) The impact of cooperatives’ risk aversion and equity capital constraints on their inter-firm consolidation and collaboration strategies–with an empirical study of the European dairy industry. Agribusiness 23(4):452–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk G, Mackel C (1991) Dutch agriculture seeking for market leader strategies. Eur Rev Agric Econ 18:345–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal O (2007) La Estrategia de Internacionalización de la Empresa. Un Estudio de Casos de Multinacionales Vascas, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Bilbao. Premio Extraordinario de Doctorado de la UPV/EHU. www.ieae.net

  • Villarreal O (2008) El caso de CIE automotive: el crecimiento de un grupo empresarial mediante la internacionalización. Ekonomiaz Cuatrimest 68:231–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal O, Landeta J (2010) El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización. Investig Eur Dir Econ Empres 16(3):31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal O, Gómez O, Lertxundi A, Urionabarrenetxea S, Matey J (2004) Implantación de las empresas vascas en los mercados exteriores: una visión desde la práctica en su operativa diaria, Cluster Conocimiento, Bilbao

  • Yin RK (1989) Case study research. Design and methods, applied social research methods series, vol 5. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1993) Applications of case study research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1994) Case study research. Design and methods, applied social research methods series, vol 5, vol 2. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1998) The abridged version of case study research. In: Bickman, Rog DJ (eds) Handbook of applied social research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 229–259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Meliá-Martí.

Appendix

Appendix

Guide/questionnaire used for in-depth interviews with cooperative organizations/firms.

  1. 1.

    LEGISLATION. Comments/evolution of cooperative legislation in recent years. Does your current framework represent a hindrance to some of your activities?

  2. 2.

    FINANCING. Do you consider current access to financing for agrifood cooperatives to be sufficient? Indicate the main sources of financing for your cooperative. Does your cooperative have access to capital markets to look for financing?

  3. 3.

    STRATEGY (I). Is the size of your organization a factor in the competitiveness of the cooperative?

  4. 4.

    STRATEGY (II). Do you consider diversification strategies to be important for your cooperative? Are they…

    1. a.

      Horizontal or vertical? To what extent?

    2. b.

      Within the agrifood sector or in others? To what extent?

  5. 5.

    INTEGRATION (I). What are the main integration models used by your cooperative in the past? (Mergers/Joint ventures/Alliances/Through the use of the status of European Cooperative/Others). Have they been developed with national cooperatives or internationally?

  6. 6.

    INTEGRATION (II). In the integration models currently used by your cooperative, what are the main changes you would highlight in comparison with those you have used in the past? Describe the advantages and drawbacks of the current models.

  7. 7.

    INTEGRATION (III). What are the main problems faced by your cooperative in merger processes? Did you have problems with or meet opposition from members, employees or managers? Comments on the law on defense of competition. Is it an obstacle to your activities?

  8. 8.

    INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT. Does your cooperative have institutional support? What type of support does it receive (subsidies, shares on the capital of as company within the group, tax incentives, etc.)?

  9. 9.

    MARKETS (I). What are the relations like between your cooperative and retailers (describe)? (Capital investment, Supply contracts, Others). Have these relations been stable over time? Do you have exclusive supply agreements? Do you consider this to be a positive thing?

  10. 10.

    MARKETS (II). Can your products be distinguished in the market as coming from a cooperative? If so, explain how and if you have any programs designed to achieve this.

  11. 11.

    R+D+i. What percentage over turnover is represented by investment in R+D+i? Si it carried out via contracts with a university, your own R+D teams, research institutes, others? To what extent?

CONCLUSIONS. Indicate the current strengths and weaknesses of agrifood cooperatives.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juliá-Igual, J.F., Meliá-Martí, E. & García-Martinez, G. Strategies developed by leading EU agrifood cooperatives in their growth models. Serv Bus 6, 27–46 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0129-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0129-3

Keywords

Navigation