Abstract
The objective of this article is to identify the factors that have brought about the greatest degree of competitiveness in some of the principal agrifood cooperative groups in the European Union (EU), using pertinent case studies from a range of sectors including the dairy, meat and fruit and vegetable sectors from three EU member states: Holland, Ireland and Denmark. With this purpose in mind, seven cases were identified for inclusion: Kerry Group, the Irish Dairy Board, Arla Foods, The Greenery BV, Danish Crown, Agrifirm and DLG. The article identifies the main barriers and problems faced by this type of cooperative and shows the strategies developed by leading cooperatives in their sector within the current comparative context and familiarizes readers with the different growth models these cooperatives use to achieve and maintain their market standing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bremmers H, Zuurbier PJP (1997) Globalisation in the dairy industry. In: Loader RJ, Neneson SJ, Traill WB (eds) Globalisation of the food industry: policy implications. Proceedings of the international of community medicine
CIAA (2008) Data & trends of the European food and drink industry, 2007. http://www.ciaa.be/documents/brochures/dataandtrends_2007.pdf
CIAA (2009) The competitiveness of the EU food and drink industry, facts and figures 2009. http://www.ciaa.be/asp/documents/brochures.asp
COGECA (2010) Agricultural cooperatives in Europe. Main issues and trends. In: Europeanagri-cooperatives (ed), http://www.copa-cogeca.eu/Cogeca
COGECA (2011) Paolo Bruni presentation, President of Cogeca. Asamblea General de las Cooperativas Agroalimentarias, Madrid
Cook ML (1995) The future of U.S agricultural cooperatives. Am J Agric Econ 77:1153–1159
Del Águila AR, Padilla A (2010) Factores determinantes de la innovación en empresas de la economía social La importancia de la formación y de la actitud estratégica. CIRIEC-Esp Rev Econ Públ Soc Coop 67:129–156
Dobson W (1992) Competitive strategies of US fluid milk processors: a case study. Agribusiness 8(5):427–443
Dobson W (2007) Competitive strategies of dairy processing firms in Ireland. Babcock Institute Discussion Paper, no. 2007-3
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad Manag Rev 16(3):620–627
Fernández de Bobadilla S, Velasco E (2008) Gestionan mejor la innovación las empresas de economía social que las sociedades anónimas: estudio comparativo de empresas innovadoras vascas. CIRIEC-Esp Rev Econ Públ Soc Coop 63:5–37
Fulton ME, Huethy E (2009) Cooperative conversions failures and restructurings: an overview. J Coop 23:1–11
Fulton JR, Popp MP, Gray C (1996) Strategic alliance and joint venture agreements in grain marketing co-operatives. J Co-op 11:1–14
Galor Z (2008) Demutualization of cooperatives: reasons and perspectives. http://www.coopgalor.com/i_publications.html
Giannakas K, Fulton M (2003) Agricultural cooperatives and cost-reducing R&D in the agri-food system. In: Paper prepared for presentation at the american agricultural economics association. Annual meeting, Montreal, July 2003
Guillouzo R, Ruffio P (2005a) Internationalisation of European dairy co-operatives. Int J Co-op Manag 2:25–32
Guillouzo R, Ruffio P (2005b) Strategic alliances: challenges and limits for agri-food co-operatives. Internationalisation of European Dairy Co-operatives. Int J Co-op Manag 2:33–39
Hackman DL, Cook ML (1998) Producers as agrichain leaders: the importance of the institutional environment. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on «Chain management in agribusiness and the food industry » held in Ede, 28–29 May 1998, pp 183–198
Hamel J (1992) The case method in sociology introduction: new theoretial and methodological issues. Curr Sociol 40(1):1–7
Juliá-Igual JF, Server RJ (2003) Social economy companies in the Spanish agricultural sector: delimitation and situation in the context of the European Union. Ann Publ Coop Econ 74(3):465–488
Kennelly JJ (2001) The Kerry way. The history of Kerry group, 1972–2000. Oak Tree Press, Dublin
Maxwell JA (1996) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Maxwell JA (1998) Designing a qualitative study. In: Bickman L, Rog DJ (eds) Handbook of applied social research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 66–100
Meliá E, Juliá-Igual JF, Martínez A (2010) Mergers of agrifood cooperatives and their effects: from expectations to results: an empirical study in four Spanish autonomous regions. Span J Agric Res 8(2):232–250
Montolío JM (2000) Legislación cooperativa en la Unión Europea. INFES, Madrid 1.646 p
Nilsson J (1998) The emergence of new operational models for agricultural co-operatives. Swed J Agric Res 28:39–47
Nilsson J, Kihlén A, Norrell L (2009) Are traditional cooperatives an endangered species? About shrinking satisfaction, involvement and trust. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 12(4):101–120
Richards T, Manfredo MR (2003) Cooperative mergers and acquisitions: the role of capital constraints. J Agr Resour Econ 28(1):152–168
Romero A (2010) La fiscalidad aplicada a las cooperativas en Europa y la reforma del régimen fiscal en España. CIRIEC-Esp Rev Econ Públ Soc Coop 69:91–118
Sierra S (2004) Una metodología para el Derecho Comparado europeo. Civitas, Madrid
Stake RE (1994) Case Studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 236–247
Stoeker R (1991) Evaluating and rethinking: the case study. Sociol Rev 39(1):88–112
Van Bekkum O (2007) NICE European Agrifood Cooperative Top 100. www.vz-gmbh.de/dokument/NICE_Top100.pdf
Van der Krogt D, Nilsson J, Høst V (2007) The impact of cooperatives’ risk aversion and equity capital constraints on their inter-firm consolidation and collaboration strategies–with an empirical study of the European dairy industry. Agribusiness 23(4):452–472
Van Dijk G, Mackel C (1991) Dutch agriculture seeking for market leader strategies. Eur Rev Agric Econ 18:345–364
Villarreal O (2007) La Estrategia de Internacionalización de la Empresa. Un Estudio de Casos de Multinacionales Vascas, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Bilbao. Premio Extraordinario de Doctorado de la UPV/EHU. www.ieae.net
Villarreal O (2008) El caso de CIE automotive: el crecimiento de un grupo empresarial mediante la internacionalización. Ekonomiaz Cuatrimest 68:231–263
Villarreal O, Landeta J (2010) El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización. Investig Eur Dir Econ Empres 16(3):31–52
Villarreal O, Gómez O, Lertxundi A, Urionabarrenetxea S, Matey J (2004) Implantación de las empresas vascas en los mercados exteriores: una visión desde la práctica en su operativa diaria, Cluster Conocimiento, Bilbao
Yin RK (1989) Case study research. Design and methods, applied social research methods series, vol 5. Sage, London
Yin RK (1993) Applications of case study research. Sage, London
Yin RK (1994) Case study research. Design and methods, applied social research methods series, vol 5, vol 2. Sage, London
Yin RK (1998) The abridged version of case study research. In: Bickman, Rog DJ (eds) Handbook of applied social research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 229–259
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Guide/questionnaire used for in-depth interviews with cooperative organizations/firms.
-
1.
LEGISLATION. Comments/evolution of cooperative legislation in recent years. Does your current framework represent a hindrance to some of your activities?
-
2.
FINANCING. Do you consider current access to financing for agrifood cooperatives to be sufficient? Indicate the main sources of financing for your cooperative. Does your cooperative have access to capital markets to look for financing?
-
3.
STRATEGY (I). Is the size of your organization a factor in the competitiveness of the cooperative?
-
4.
STRATEGY (II). Do you consider diversification strategies to be important for your cooperative? Are they…
-
a.
Horizontal or vertical? To what extent?
-
b.
Within the agrifood sector or in others? To what extent?
-
a.
-
5.
INTEGRATION (I). What are the main integration models used by your cooperative in the past? (Mergers/Joint ventures/Alliances/Through the use of the status of European Cooperative/Others). Have they been developed with national cooperatives or internationally?
-
6.
INTEGRATION (II). In the integration models currently used by your cooperative, what are the main changes you would highlight in comparison with those you have used in the past? Describe the advantages and drawbacks of the current models.
-
7.
INTEGRATION (III). What are the main problems faced by your cooperative in merger processes? Did you have problems with or meet opposition from members, employees or managers? Comments on the law on defense of competition. Is it an obstacle to your activities?
-
8.
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT. Does your cooperative have institutional support? What type of support does it receive (subsidies, shares on the capital of as company within the group, tax incentives, etc.)?
-
9.
MARKETS (I). What are the relations like between your cooperative and retailers (describe)? (Capital investment, Supply contracts, Others). Have these relations been stable over time? Do you have exclusive supply agreements? Do you consider this to be a positive thing?
-
10.
MARKETS (II). Can your products be distinguished in the market as coming from a cooperative? If so, explain how and if you have any programs designed to achieve this.
-
11.
R+D+i. What percentage over turnover is represented by investment in R+D+i? Si it carried out via contracts with a university, your own R+D teams, research institutes, others? To what extent?
CONCLUSIONS. Indicate the current strengths and weaknesses of agrifood cooperatives.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Juliá-Igual, J.F., Meliá-Martí, E. & García-Martinez, G. Strategies developed by leading EU agrifood cooperatives in their growth models. Serv Bus 6, 27–46 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0129-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0129-3