Skip to main content

A new economical storage technique for strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in vitro

Abstract

Strawberry plants grown in vitro are typically stored and maintained on agar containing Murashige and Skoog (MS) media and sucrose as a carbohydrate source. This method of storing strawberry plants in vitro is expensive and time consuming, requiring sub-culturing onto fresh media every 2 to 3 mo. This study aimed to establish the viability of using a substrate alternative as an economical replacement for MS media, for both long-term storage in vitro and ease of transfer (ex vitro). A protocol was developed for strawberry in vitro using commercially available sterilized peat pellets (Jiffy-7® pellets), to optimize culture conditions and tissue culture practices. Suitability of the peat substrate was measured by the plant’s overall response to culture in vitro and subsequent health and survival ex vitro following deflasking. Included in this study was a comparison of the use of vented vs non-vented tissue culture vessels for their effect on plant development and survival in vitro and ex vitro. The results show that strawberry plants can be grown and stored under in vitro conditions in vented vessels without sub-culturing for up to 3 yr or more. This equates to an approximately eightfold more efficient technique, significantly decreasing cost of storing and maintaining strawberry plants in vitro. Furthermore, plants grown in the peat substrate did not multiply, and had more established secondary roots than those grown in the conventional MS media.

Introduction

Maintaining germplasm in vitro is important for strawberry breeding programs in the event of losses of mother stock plants grown in pots, and for the storage of elite accessions and cultivars. For the propagation and in vitro storage of strawberry plantlets, a conventional Murashige and Skoog (MS; Murashige and Skoog 1962) basal medium is typically used (Rashid 2010; Quiroz et al. 2017; Naing et al. 2019; Phillips and Garda 2019). This media contains the following ingredients: MS basal medium, sucrose, and a gelling agent. Modifications to the medium by addition of growth regulators or hormones can be used for crops including strawberry to increase root and shoot development (Phillips and Garda 2012; Saad and Elshahed 2012); however, MS media free of hormones has proven suitable for general plant development in strawberry (Debnath and Teixeira da Silva 2007). By not requiring a plant growth hormone, in vitro strawberry is an ideal species for investigations into substrate substitutions, such as peat pellets.

Alternative substrates such as peat provide an opportunity to significantly decrease subculturing frequency. Strawberry plants grown on MS media require subculturing onto fresh media every 1 to 3 mo for best plant health and survival (Moradi et al. 2011; Harugade et al. 2014; Naing et al. 2019) which makes it an expensive and time-consuming exercise. Additionally, short intervals between subculturing increases the chance of somaclonal variation (Bairu et al. 2011), and the chance of contamination due to operator error.

Plants grown under high humidity in vessels and low light intensity typical in plant culture rooms (Ziv 1986) can have problems adjusting to the lower relative humidity ex vitro, mainly due to rapid water loss through the stomata. Comparisons of stomatal functions have been made between plantlets grown under photoautotrophic and photomixotrophic conditions. Under photoautotrophic conditions, stomatal size and density, transpiration rate, and wax content of the leaves all increase, and plantlets have normal and a controlled transpiration rate compared to plantlets grown under photomixotrophic conditions (Zobayed et al. 1999). Stomatal malfunction has been identified as one of the main reasons for desiccation when plants are transferred from an in vitro to an ex vitro environment (Ghashghaie et al. 1992; George et al. 2008). Changes to the plant’s condition from mixotrophic (can use a mix of different sources of energy and carbon) to photoautotrophic (manufactures its own food by photosynthesis) can take several days after transfer ex vitro (George et al. 2008). Transferring plants from in vitro to ex vitro is less stressful to plants grown photoautotrophic due to the plant’s photosynthetic capability and functioning stomata, thus limiting water loss.

Early research in the 1980s revealed that plants in vitro can re-develop photosynthetic ability (become photoautotrophic) when micropropagated using little or no sugar (Fujiwara 1987; Fujiwara et al. 1988; Kozai et al. 1988; Hdider and Desjardins 1994). For many species, using sugar-free media has advantages in vitro, encouraging plant growth, limiting fungal and bacterial contamination, and increasing the success of later transfers ex vitro (Fujiwara et al. 1988; Nguyen et al. 2016). Conventional micropropagation uses sucrose (sugar) in the culture medium as a carbohydrate source. A high sugar content in the culture medium can reduce the photosynthetic ability and impair stomatal function (Kozai et al. 1991; George et al. 2008). Kaul and Sabharwal (1971) found that the inclusion of sucrose in the culture medium decreased the chlorophyll content of leaves compared to those grown with lower or no sugar. Fujiwara et al. (1988) also found that strawberry growth and development was greater when cultured without sugar under photoautotrophic conditions.

In this study, several experiments were conducted to determine if a substrate without sugar could improve efficacy while maintaining plant health in vitro, by examining (1) growth and health of plants grown in a peat substrate vs MS media; (2) the effect of culture on peat in vented vs non-vented vessels on plant development and survival in vitro and ex vitro; and (3) plant health and survival after long-term storage in peat.

Materials and Methods

Peat Pellet vs MS Media

This experiment compared two substrate treatments: peat pellets vs the control MS media, to evaluate the viability of peat as a substrate substitute. For the peat substrate treatment, Jiffy-7® peat pellets (Jiffy Growing Solutions, Zwijndrecht, Netherlands) were chosen as they are assembled within a mesh case, simplifying preparation and transfer ex vitro. Jiffy pellets contain 100% natural compostable and biodegradable sphagnum peat (http://wwwjiffypot.com). The pellets were soaked in distilled water for up to 30 min, after which they were placed into 300-mL plastic vented vessels (Techno Plas, Adelaide, Australia) and the lid vents covered with a gas permeable tape (3M™ Micropore™, Sydney, Australia). Both substrates were autoclaved @121 °C for 30 min.

Nineteen healthy in vitro strawberry plants, derived from lateral buds of cultivar Red Rhapsody, were grown in 120-mL glass culture vessels in vitro on a medium containing 2.215 g L-1 MS basal medium with vitamins (PhytoTech Labs, Lenexa, KS) 20 g L-1 sucrose and 4 g L-1 Gellan Gum, CultureGel™ (PhytoTech Labs). These cultures were maintained in a growth room under Philips Master LED tubes (color temperature of 6500K) with a 12-h photoperiod, at 26 °C ± 2 °C. After 2 mo in culture under sterile conditions, plant roots and older leaves were removed, leaving the three youngest leaves intact. Plant weight was recorded, and each plant placed into either glass vessels containing MS media (eight plants) or peat pellets in plastic vessels (11 plants) (Fig. 1). All cultures were then placed into a growth room under Philips Master LED tubes (color temperature of 6500K) with a 12-h photoperiod, at 26 °C ± 2 °C.

Figure 1.
figure 1

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plants cultured in Murashige and Skoog medium (top) and peat (bottom).

Four mo after sub-culturing into their treatment substrates, half of the plants in each treatment were destructively sampled to evaluate plant growth and health, determined by plant weight, leaf color, leaf number, and root development. Survival and dry weight (after incubation at 60 °C for 24 h) were also recorded. The remaining plants were transferred ex vitro into Uncut Kwik Pot 42 Cell Trays (cell dimensions: 45mm L × 45mm W × 75mm D) containing steam-sterilized river sand and coir (1:1) seedling mix supplemented with standard fertilizer Scotts Osmocote® (Osmocote Exact Standard, Heerlem, Netherlands) at approximately 30 g per tray. The trays were placed under two layers of shade cloth in a glasshouse. After 1 wk, plants were hardened off by gradually removing one layer of shade cloth, and at 2 wk covers were completely removed. One mo after planting into trays, plants from both treatments were evaluated on leaf and shoot numbers produced, and root development.

For all experiments conducted, plant health in vitro and after transfer ex vitro were evaluated according to leaf color on a scale of 1 to 4, where 1 = pale brown or dead, 2 = pale yellow/green, 3 = light green or patchy, and 4 = dark green (healthy). Evaluation of root development was on a scale of 1–5, where 1 = less than five roots, 2 = five to 10 roots, 3 = 10 to 15 roots, 4 = 15 to 20 roots, and 5 = more than 20 roots. Data was analyzed using GenStat Release 16.1, ANOVA, general analysis of variance, significant at the P = 0.050 level.

Vented vs Non-vented Vessel

Plant growth in peat substrate in vented and non-vented vessels was compared to evaluate the effect of gas exchange and lowered humidity within the vessels on health in vitro and survival ex vitro. Twenty plants of the strawberry cultivar Meadowsong cultured on MS media were sub-cultured into peat pellets in 300-mL vessels. All vessels were capped with lids with a hole (vent) (approximately 4 mm). The lids of the vented treatment were covered with a gas permeable tape while control vessel vents were covered with two layers of duct tape to restrict gas and moisture exchange. Ten plants were included in each treatment. After 15 wk, plants were evaluated as described previously. Five-wk ex vitro survival rates and dry weight of plants from both treatments were measured.

Plant Storage Survival in Peat Substrate

Experiment 1 (22 to 36 Mo in Peat)

In this experiment, in vitro plants of the cultivar Red Rhapsody were tested for plant health and survival without sub-culturing after long-term storage at two intervals. The plants were sub-cultured onto peat in vented vessels as previously described. During the experiment, vessels were moistened intermittently with approximately 10 to 20 mL sterile water only if the peat pellet looked dry. This was dependent on the individual peat pellet; some vessels had extra water added once over the course of the experiment, while many did not require any additional water.

Ten plants were evaluated at 22 mo and three plants at 36 mo after sub-culturing. Following this time, the stem was cut at the point where it emerged from the peat substrate surface. The top section was sub-cultured onto MS media to determine if transfer back onto MS after extended storage on peat could be successful, and to determine levels of contamination from fungi and bacteria and to check for off-types.

Experiment 2 (8 Mo in Peat)

In this study, long-term survival and storage of 35 in vitro plants of four different breeding accessions in peat substrate were assessed after 8 mo without sub-culturing. Plants were sub-cultured from an MS media and placed into peat pellets in vented vessels as previously described. The genotypes were accessed from the Australian Strawberry Breeding Program, and included accessions 2014-009-121 (five plants), 2014-009-159 (five plants), 2014-049-104 (10 plants), and 2014-051-151 (15 plants). Plants were evaluated for health (leaf color), presence of off-types, and contamination. Also assessed was the plant’s response to transfer back onto MS media after being stored for 8 mo on peat substrate, as per experiment 1 (36 mo in peat) above.

Results

Peat vs MS Media

All plants from MS and peat pellet treatments appeared healthy, with a leaf color rating of 4 (dark green and healthy) after 4 mo in vitro (Table 1). One mo ex vitro, the plants cultured in peat rated slightly higher (4) for leaf color than those in MS (3.5). Significant differences in leaf and shoot numbers, and root ratings were observed between treatments 1 mo after transfer ex vitro into trays. Plants in MS showed a higher multiplication rate of shoots (mean shoot number of 4), and more leaves and roots (ratings of 25.5 and 4.25 respectively) than those in peat. In comparison, plants cultured on peat displayed no shoot multiplication, with a mean shoot number of 1.0, a mean leaf number of 12.71, and root number of 2.71. The plants grown in peat had shorter primary roots and more secondary roots compared to plants grown in MS media (data not shown).

Table 1. Mean strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plant growth parameters for peat substrate vs Murashige and Skoog medium at 4 mo in vitro and 1 mo after transfer ex vitro

Vented vs Non-vented Vessel

Although there were no significant differences in leaf color and leaf number for plants in vented vs non-vented vessels, there was a significant difference in the root rating at 15 wk in vitro (Table 2). At 15 wk in vitro, plants from the non-vented treatment displayed shorter and more tightly clumped roots, showing a root rating of 3.1. The vented treatment displayed longer roots (root rating of 4.2), with many protruding through the peat casing (Fig. 2a). Visually there were differences in plant vigor, with plants in vented vessels having better leaf and root development (Fig. 2b). After 5 wk ex vitro, there was no significant difference in plant dry weight or survival rates, and all plants survived transplant well.

Table 2. Mean strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) growth parameters for plants in vented vs non-vented vessels at 15 wk in vitro and 5 wk after transfer ex vitro
Figure 2.
figure 2

Effect of vented vs non-vented vessel on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). (a) Roots of plant in vented treatment protruding through peat casing. (b) Strawberry plants from non-vented treatment top row, and vented treatment bottom row.

Plant Storage Survival in Peat Substrate

Experiment 1 (22 to 36 Mo in Peat)

At 22 mo after being cultured on peat substrate without sub-culturing, the 10 plants were green and healthy (Fig. 3a). Even after being stored on peat substrate for 36 mo all assessed plants still had green leaves (Fig. 3b). All plants evaluated for their long-term storage ability on peat substrate in vitro at 22 and 36 mo were successfully sub-cultured back into MS media. One plant exhibited fungal contamination 1 mo after transfer onto MS media, which may be attributed to operator error. No off-types were evident.

Figure 3.
figure 3

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plant health and survival after long-term storage in peat. (a) Strawberry plant at 22 mo stored in vitro on peat. (b) Strawberry plant at 36 mo stored in vitro on peat. (c) Plant cut back at 8 mo and ready to be transferred back onto Murashige and Skoog medium.

Experiment 2 (8 Mo in Peat)

All plants in this experiment had a health rating of 4 (dark green leaves) after 8 mo of culture on peat pellets. Plants that were subsequently sub-cultured back onto MS media (Fig. 3c) exhibited no fungal or bacterial contamination, and no off-types were observed after 1 mo. In this instance, the genotypes subjected to the long-term culture treatment on peat substrate did not appear to be poorly affected by the length of culture, up to 8 mo.

Discussion

The protocol developed here for growing in vitro strawberry plants on peat substrate is ideal for long-term storage and transfer ex vitro. The necessary period between sub-culturing is significantly lower, with an approximately eight-fold decrease in the number of sub-cultures required, resulting in a substantial increase in efficiency and costs. In comparison, the current MS gel-based media requires sub-culturing once every 1 to 3 mo, as the nutrient level in the media is slowly depleted. The savings on resources and time are a prominent advantage of adopting this new protocol.

Strawberry plant growth in vitro was noticeably different when cultured in peat pellets under photoautotrophic conditions. Plants in peat remained single stemmed and did not multiply as much as those in MS. Strawberry root development improved when cultured in peat pellets and in vented vessels. Although root numbers were significantly higher for plants in MS media (mean root ratings of 4.25 in MS and 2.71 for peat treatment), due to greater shoot multiplication, plants in peat had a more mature root system (more secondary roots). Additionally, the roots of peat plants are further enhanced when stored in vented vessels. This was demonstrated by an increase in the root rating of plants in peat in vented vessels 1 mo ex vitro. Overall strawberry growth and development was greater for plants grown in peat in vented vessels. These findings confirm the findings of Fujiwara et al. (1988) who also found strawberry growth and development was greater when cultured without sugar under photoautotrophic conditions.

Plants in peat pellets transferred ex vitro easily due to being enclosed in the pellet mesh, had less root damage, and adjusted faster to ex vitro conditions. This may possibly be a result of reduced water loss and transplant shock caused by stomatal malfunction as described by George et al. (2008), and by having an intact root system enclosed in the pellet. Plant roots from the MS treatments had some damage and breakage due to the removal of gel and handling.

An established root system is beneficial not only for plant health and growth in vitro but also for successful transfer ex vitro. Strawberry plants produce both primary and secondary (feeder) roots. The primary roots are the first roots produced and are long and can live for many yrs. The secondary roots tend to be short lived and make up the bulk of the root system. Secondary roots absorb water and nutrients for the primary roots to then transport into the plant crown (Darrow 1966). Sustaining a healthy root system is essential to obtain plant growth and health while in culture, and for transplant ex vitro. The results showed that plants grown in peat substrate in vented vessels produced shorter primary roots and had more established feeder roots than those grown in MS media. Roots of plants in the vented treatment were longer compared to the non-vented treatment, which were shorter and more tightly clumped. There was a significant difference in the root ratings between plants grown in peat and MS treatments. Plants grown in peat substrate had shorter primary roots and more secondary roots compared to those grown in the MS treatment.

Experience has shown that plants grown in peat pellets for extended durations benefit from the addition of sterile water if they dry out due to the vents. Peat dryness and plant dehydration is noticeable by lack of condensation on the sides of the vessels, the peat looks dry, and the plants may wilt. Peat hydration has been seen to depend on several variables including culture room temperature and humidity, and correct soaking times. If peat is looking dry, it is recommended to add enough sterile water to hydrate the pellet but not leave water pooling on the bottom of the container.

One limiting factor of using peat as a substrate is that bacterial contamination can be difficult to observe. These studies, however, did not observe any bacteria contamination after plants were sub-cultured back onto MS media. Being sucrose-free, peat pellets limit bacterial growth compared with MS media; however, the potential for contamination should be considered if using this protocol. In the long-term storage experiment 1 (22 to 36 mo in peat), one plant showed fungal contamination after transfer back to MS media after 22 mo on peat substrate. This low percentage of contamination is not uncommon for MS media and peat substrate cultures and may be due to operator error during transfer to MS media or by an irregular-shaped vented plastic vessel or lid.

Two strawberry cultivars and four different breeding accessions were tested on peat in these experiments due to the limited availability of plants; however, this allowed insight to how different cultivars would react to culture on peat. Testing other plant species in peat substrate could result in this protocol successfully being implemented by other industries. Peat pellets typically have a low pH, which is suitable for acid tolerant plants which includes strawberry. Further research to substrate alternatives such as coir peat is recommended. Coir has a neutral pH, similar water holding properties to peat pellets and is more sustainable. These and other parameters will need to be investigated further.

Conclusion

The adoption of peat substrate into our tissue culture laboratory has significantly increased efficiency of the long-term storage of plant material. Additionally, the transfer process from in vitro to ex vitro is simplified due to improved root development and readiness for the ex vitro environment. The peat protocol allows for an increased length of the sub-culturing cycles (approximately every 2 to 3 yr) while decreasing media expenses, both financial and in time. This equates to an efficient and effective technique. Applied to crops like strawberry, this system would be beneficial for the storage of germplasm collections, limiting the number of transfers, reducing the chance of contamination, the requirement to re-initiate into culture, and most importantly the chance of somaclonal variation.

References

  • Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Van Staden J (2011) Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul 63:147–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrow GM (1966) The strawberry; history, breeding, and physiology, New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

  • Debnath SC, Teixeira da Silva JA (2007) Strawberry culture in vitro: applications in genetic transformation and biotechnology. Fruit Veget Cereal Sci Biotechnol 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara K (1987) Measurements of carbon dioxide gas concentration in closed vessels containing tissue cultured plantlets and estimates of net photosynthetic rates of the plantlets. J Agric Met Jpn 43:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara K, Kozai T, Watanabe I (1988) Development of a photoautotrophic tissue culture system for shoots and/or plantlets at rooting and acclimatization stages. Acta Hort 230:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar T, Kevers C, Penel C, Greppin H, Reid DM, Thorpe TA (1996) Plant hormones and plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In vitro Cell Dev Biol – Plant 32:272–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822700

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ (2008) Developmental biology. In: George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 283–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghashghaie J, Brenckmann F, Saugier B (1992) Water relations and growth of rose plants cultured in vitro under various relative humidity. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 30:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harugade S, Tabe RH, Chaphalkar S (2014) Micropropagation of strawberry (Fragaria x Ananassa Duch.). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3:344–347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hdider C, Desjardins Y (1994) Effects of sucrose on photosynthesis and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity of in vitro cultured strawberry plantlets. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 36:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048312

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://wwwjiffypot.com, Downloaded December 2021

  • Kaul K, Sabharwal P (1971) Effects of sucrose and kinetin on growth and chlorophyll synthesis in tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol 47:691–695

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozai T, Iwabuchi K, Watanabe K, Watanabe I (1991) Photoautotrophic and photomixotrophic growth of strawberry plantlets in vitro and changes in nutrient composition of the medium. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 25:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozai T, Koyama Y, Watanabe I (1988) Multiplication of potato plantlets in vitro with sugar free medium under high photosynthetic photon flux. Symp High Technol Protected Cultivation 230:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi K, Otroshy M, Azimi MR (2011) Micropropagation of strawberry by multiple shoots regeneration tissue cultures. J Agr Technol 7:1755–1763. http://www.ijat-aatsea.com

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naing AH, Kim SH, Chung MY, Park SK, Kim CK (2019) In vitro propagation method for production of morphologically and genetically stable plants of different strawberry cultivars. Plant Method 15:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0421-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen QT, Xiao Y, Kozai T (2016) Photoautotrophic micropropagation. In: Kozai T, Niu G, Takagaki M (eds) Plant factory. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 271–283

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips GC, Garda M (2019) Plant tissue culture media and practices: an overview. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 55:242–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-09983-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiroz KA, Berríos M, Carrasco B, Retameles JB, Caligari P, García-Gonzáles R (2017) Meristem culture and subsequent micropropagation of Chilean strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Duch.). Biol Res 50:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-017-0125-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid R (2010) Micropropagation of strawberry (Fragaria x Ananassa). Crop Improve 37:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad AI, Elshahed, AM (2012) Plant tissue culture media, in A. Leva, Rinaldi LMR, (eds.), Recent advances in plant in vitro culture, IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/50569.

  • Ziv M (1986) In vitro hardening and acclimatization of tissue culture plants. In: Withers LA, Alderson PG (eds) Plant tissue culture and its agricultural applications. Butterworths, London, pp 187–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zobayed SMA, Afreen-Zobayed F, Kubota C, Kozai T (1999) Stomatal characteristics and leaf anatomy of potato plantlets cultured in vitro under photoautotrophic and photomixotrophic conditions. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 35:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-999-0075-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the efforts of Jodi Neal, David Innes, Joanna Kristoffersen, Madeline Betts, Gary Hopewell, and Penny Measham for providing their support and constructive comments.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions This study was funded and supported by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle L. Paynter.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paynter, M.L. A new economical storage technique for strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in vitro. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-022-10269-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-022-10269-6

Keywords

  • Tissue culture
  • Photoautotrophy
  • Murashige and Skoog
  • Sub-culturing
  • Peat substrate