Skip to main content

Design of experiments (DOE)—history, concepts, and relevance to in vitro culture

Abstract

Design of experiments (DOE) is a large and well-developed field for understanding and improving the performance of complex systems. Because in vitro culture systems are complex and easily manipulated in controlled conditions, they are particularly well-suited for the application of DOE principles and techniques. Successful use of in vitro technologies in horticultural, plant breeding, or genetic applications typically involves improving some aspect of a system’s growth response—organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, metabolite biosynthesis, or responses required for crop improvement such as ploidy manipulation, embryo rescue, creation and manipulation of chimeras, somaclonal variation, and mutant isolation. How and why DOE is the appropriate research approach for developing and understanding in vitro systems research is explained. The presentation is a narrative of the historical context and the geometric basis of DOE to explain the underlying concepts. Examples illustrate the use of DOE in in vitro plant culture research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.

References

  1. Aarts AA, Anderson JE, Anderson CJ, Attridge PR, Attwood A, Axt J, Babel M, Bahník Š, Baranski E, Barnett-Cowan M, Bartmess E, Beer J, Bell R, Bentley H, Beyan L, Binion G, Borsboom D, Bosch A, Bosco FA, Bowman SD, Brandt MJ, Braswell E, Brohmer H, Brown BT, Brown K, Brüning J, Calhoun-Sauls A, Callahan SP, Chagnon E, Chandler J, Chartier CR, Cheung F, Christopherson CD, Cillessen L, Clay R, Cleary H, Cloud MD, Conn M, Cohoon J, Columbus S, Cordes A, Costantini G, Alvarez LDC, Cremata E, Crusius J, DeCoster J, DeGaetano MA, Penna ND, Den Bezemer B, Deserno MK, Devitt O, Dewitte L, Dobolyi DG, Dodson GT, Donnellan MB, Donohue R, Dore RA, Dorrough A, Dreber A, Dugas M, Dunn EW, Easey K, Eboigbe S, Eggleston C, Embley J, Epskamp S, Errington TM, Estel V, Farach FJ, Feather J, Fedor A, Fernández-Castilla B, Fiedler S, Field JG, Fitneva SA, Flagan T, Forest AL, Forsell E, Foster JD, Frank MC, Frazier RS, Fuchs H, Gable P, Galak J, Galliani EM, Gampa A, Garcia S, Gazarian D, Gilbert E, Giner-Sorolla R, Glöckner A, Goellner L, Goh JX, Goldberg R, Goodbourn PT, Gordon-McKeon S, Gorges B, Gorges J, Goss J, Graham J, Grange JA, Gray J, Hartgerink C, Hartshorne J, Hasselman F, Hayes T, Heikensten E, Henninger F, Hodsoll J, Holubar T, Hoogendoorn G, Humphries DJ, Hung COY, Immelman N, Irsik VC, Jahn G, Jäkel F, Jekel M, Johannesson M, Johnson LG, Johnson DJ, Johnson KM, Johnston WJ, Jonas K, Joy-Gaba JA, Kappes HB, Kelso K, Kidwell MC, Kim SK, Kirkhart M, Kleinberg B, Knežević G, Kolorz FM, Kossakowski JJ, Krause RW, Krijnen J, Kuhlmann T, Kunkels YK, Kyc MM, Lai CK, Laique A, Lakens D, Lane KA, Lassetter B, Lazarević LB, Le Bel EP, Lee KJ, Lee M, Lemm K, Levitan CA, Lewis M, Lin L, Lin S, Lippold M, Loureiro D, Luteijn I, MacKinnon S, Mainard HN, Marigold DC, Martin DP, Martinez T, Masicampo EJ, Matacotta J, Mathur M, May M, Mechin N, Mehta P, Meixner J, Melinger A, Miller JK, Miller M, Moore K, Möschl M, Motyl M, Müller SM, Munafo M, Neijenhuijs KI, Nervi T, Nicolas G, Nilsonne G, Nosek BA, Nuijten MB, Olsson C, Osborne C, Ostkamp L, Pavel M, Penton-Voak IS, Perna O, Pernet C, Perugini M, Pipitone RN, Pitts M, Plessow F, Prenoveau JM, Rahal RM, Ratliff KA, Reinhard D, Renkewitz F, Ricker AA, Rigney A, Rivers AM, Roebke M, Rutchick AM, Ryan RS, Sahin O, Saide A, Sandstrom GM, Santos D, Saxe R, Schlegelmilch R, Schmidt K, Scholz S, Seibel L, Selterman DF, Shaki S, Simpson WB, Sinclair HC, Skorinko JLM, Slowik A, Snyder JS, Soderberg C, Sonnleitner C, Spencer N, Spies JR, Steegen S, Stieger S, Strohminger N, Sullivan GB, Talhelm T, Tapia M, Te Dorsthorst A, Thomae M, Thomas SL, Tio P, Traets F, Tsang S, Tuerlinckx F, Turchan P, Valášek M, Van't Veer AE, Van Aert R, Van Assen M, Van Bork R, Van De Ven M, Van Den Bergh D, Van Der Hulst M, Van Dooren R, Van Doorn J, Van Renswoude DR, Van Rijn H, Vanpaemel W, Echeverría AV, Vazquez M, Velez N, Vermue M, Verschoor M, Vianello M, Voracek M, Vuu G, Wagenmakers EJ, Weerdmeester J, Welsh A, Westgate EC, Wissink J, Wood M, Woods A, Wright E, Wu S, Zeelenberg M, Zuni K (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251). doi:10.1126/science.aac4716

  2. Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallegraeff GM (2012) Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4:143–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson R, Eriksson H, Torstensson H (2006) Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and lean. The TQM Magazine 18:282–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bacon F (1650) Novum organum scientiarum. Adriani Wyngaerden, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey NTJ (1967) The mathematical approach to biology and medicine. John Wiley & Sons, London, New York, Sydney xiii, pg. 23

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barker TB (1986) Quality engineering by design: Taguchi's philosophy. Quality Progress 19:32–42

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bayart D (2001) Walter Andrew Shewhart. In: Heyde CC, Seneta E (eds) Statisticians of the centuries. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 398–401

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Begley CG, Ioannidis JP (2015) Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ Res 116:116–126

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Box JF (1978) R.A. Fisher: the life of a scientist. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Box GEP, Meyer RD (1986) An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics 28:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 13:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chernoff H (1999) Gustav Elfving's impact on experimental design. Stat Sci 14:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu CC, Wang CS, Sun CS, Hsu V, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through experiments on the nitrogen source. Scient Sin 18:659– 668

  14. Collins FS, Tabak LA (2014) NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 505:612–613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson K, Gowen RJ, Tett P, Bresnan E, Harrison PJ, McKinney A, Milligan S, Mills DK, Silke J, Crooks AM (2012) Harmful algal blooms: how strong is the evidence that nutrient ratios and forms influence their occurrence? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 115:399–413

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLoach R (2000) Improved quality in aerospace testing through the modern design of experiments. 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  17. DeLoach R (2002) The objective of aerospace ground testing: an alternative perspective. GTTC Newsletter 5:18–19

    Google Scholar 

  18. DeLoach R (2010) Analysis of variance in the modern design of experiments. 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Orlando, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deming WE (2000) The new economics for industry, government, education, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  20. Driver JA, Kuniyuki AM (1984) In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock. HortSci 19:507–509

  21. Evens TJ, Niedz RP (2008) Are Hofmeister series relevant to modern ion-specific effects research? Scholarly Research Exchange. doi:10.3814/2008/761829

    Google Scholar 

  22. Evens TJ, Niedz RP (2011) Mapping the fundamental niches of two freshwater microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris (Trebouxiophyceae) and Peridinium cinctum (Dinophyceae), in 5-dimensional ion space. Int J Ecol 2011:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M (1963) The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher RA (1921) Studies in crop variation. I. An examination of the yield of dressed grain from Broadbalk. J Agric Sci 11:107–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher RA (1926) The arrangement of field experiments. J Minist Agric (GB) 33:503–513

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher RA (1937) The design of experiments, 2nd edn. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fisher RA (1947) Development of the theory of experimental design. Proceedings of the International Statistical Conferences (Washington) 3:434–439

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fisher RA (1952) Statistical methods in genetics. Heredity 6:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS (2015) The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biol 13:e1002165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gaither CC, Cavazos-Gaither AE (2012) Gaither’s dictionary of scientific quotations, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. George EF (1993) Plant propagation by tissue culture. Part 1: The technology, 2nd edn. Exegetics Limited, Edington, UK

    Google Scholar 

  34. Glibert PM, Burkholder JM (2011) Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: "strategies" for nutrient uptake and growth outside the Redfield comfort zone. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 29:724–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hallegraeff GM (2010) Ocean climate change, phytoplankton community responses, and harmful algal blooms: a formidable predictive challenge. J Phycol 46:220–235

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heller R (1953) Researches on the mineral nutrition of plant tissues. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Vég, 11th Ser 14:1–223

  37. Johnston AE, Garner HV (1969) Broadbalk: historical introduction. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1968 Part 2:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  38. Knop W (1865) Quantitative Utersuchungen Über den Ernährungensprozeß der Pflanze. Landw Versuchssat 7:93–107

  39. Knudson L (1943) Nutrient solutions for orchid seed germination. Am Orchid Soc Bull 12:77–79

  40. Kuhfeld WF (2010) Experimental design: efficiency, coding, and choice designs. Available via https://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010c.pdf

  41. Landsberg JH (2002) The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. Rev Fish Sci 10:113–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Larsen K (2005) Stephen Hawking: a biography. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, p. 43

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lloyd G, McCown B (1980) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Proc Int Plant Propagators Soc 30:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  44. McGranahan GH, Driver JA, Tulecke W (1987) Tissue culture of Juglans. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry: case histories: gymnosperms, angiosperms and palms. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 261–271

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Montgomery DC (2013) Design and analysis of experiments, 8th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  46. Morel G, Muller J F (1964) La culture in vitro du merstem apical de la pommede terre. Compt Rend Acad Sci 258:5255–5250

  47. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Niedz RP, Evens TJ (2006) A solution to the problem of ion confounding in experimental biology. Nat Methods 3:417

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Niedz RP, Evens TJ (2007) Regulating plant tissue growth by mineral nutrition. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:370–381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Niedz RP, Evens TJ (2011) Mixture screening and mixture-amount designs to determine plant growth regulator effects on shoot regeneration from grapefruit (Citrus paradisi macf.) epicotyls. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 47:682–694

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85–87

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nordström K (1999) The life and work of Gustav Elfving. Stat Sci 14:174–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Piesk T (2014) 4-cube t0.svg. In: Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:4-cube_t0.svg. Cited 27 June 2016

  54. Quoirin M, Lepoivre P (1977) Improved media for in vitro culture of Prunus sp. Acta Hortic 78:437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ross G (2012) Fisher and the millionaire: the statistician and the calculator. Significance 9:46–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ruen T (2011a) 9-cube t0.svg. In: Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:9-cube_t0.svg. Cited 27 June 2016

  57. Ruen T (2011b) 10-cube t0.svg. In: Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:10-cube_t0.svg. Cited 27 June 2016

  58. Salsburg D (2001) The lady tasting tea. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schenk RU, Hildebrandt AC (1972) Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can J Bot 50:199–204

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schwarz A (2012) The becoming of the experimental mode. Scientiae Studia 10:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Skoog F, Miller CO (1957) Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp Soc Exp Biol 11:118–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Smith DR, King KW, Williams MR (2015) What is causing the harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie? J Soil Water Conserv 70:27A–29A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Vacin EF, Went FW (1949) Some pH changes in nutrient solutions. Bot Gaz 110:605–613

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. White PR (1943) Nutrient deficiency studies and an improved inorganic nutrient for cultivation of excised tomato roots. Growth 7:53–65

  65. Zappa F (1979) Packard Goose (song). On: Joe's Garage. Zappa Records, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall P. Niedz.

Additional information

Editor: John Finer

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niedz, R.P., Evens, T.J. Design of experiments (DOE)—history, concepts, and relevance to in vitro culture. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 52, 547–562 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-016-9786-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Experimental design
  • Scientific method
  • Plant tissue culture
  • Mineral nutrition
  • Ion-specific effects