Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of strategies for transformation with multiple genes via microprojectile-mediated bombardment

  • Biotechnology
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stable insertion and expression of multiple transgenes in crops is highly desirable, as the manipulation of complex agronomic traits and the introduction of novel biosynthetic pathways are dependent upon it. This study was performed to explore the frequency and efficiency of introducing multiple genes in soybean by using somatic embryogenesis and microprojectile bombardment transformation. The co-transformation frequency of six selectable marker or reporter genes (GusA, bleomycin resistance, glufosinate resistance, hygromycin resistance, green fluorescent protein, and kanamycin resistance) were followed throughout the T0, T1, and T2 generations. Three bombardment strategies were compared to determine the best method to generate transgenic plants that express the introduced transgenes and have a simple insertion pattern that would facilitate any downstream breeding. The plasmid bombardment treatments were (1) a six-gene-containing plasmid, (2) an equimolar treatment of five individual plasmids that collectively contained the six transgenes of interest (genes of glufosinate and hygromycin resistance were on the same plasmid), and (3) a 1:9 ratio mixture of the five plasmids, in which the plasmid containing the selectable marker used in the regeneration process, hygromycin resistance, was used in ninefold excess to all the other plasmids. Of the six bombardments performed per plasmid treatment, the results of seven independent events for the six-gene plasmid, four events for the 1:9 treatment, and a single regenerated event for the equimolar treatment indicate that containing all the transgenes on one plasmid just had an advantage in terms of frequency of a successful transformation events. Based on Southern analysis, the only events that contained all six transgenes was the one obtained by the equimolar treatment. No event was obtained that expressed all six transgenes, and certain transgenes seem to be non-randomly lost, namely gusA, bleomycin resistance, and glufosinate resistance, regardless of treatment. The addition of elements to optimize the expression of each gene cassette when multiple genes are in close proximity needs to be further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, P.K.; Kohli, A.; Twyman, R.M. and Christou, P. Transformation of plants with multiple cassettes generates simple transgene integration patterns and high expression levels. Mol Breed. 16: 247–260; 2005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breyne, P.; Gheysen, G.; Jacobs, A.; Van Montagu, M. and Depicker, A. Effect of T-DNA configuration on transgene expression. Mol Gen Genet. 235: 389–396; 1992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B.T.; Baeziger, P.S.; Mitra, A.; Sato, S. and Clemente, T. Inheritance of multiple transgenes in wheat. Crop Sci. 40: 1133–1141; 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L.; Marmey, P.; Taylor, N.J.; Brizard, J.-P.; Espinoza, C.; D’Cruz, P.; Huet, H.; Zhang, S.; de Kochko, A.; Beachy, R.N. and Fauquet, C.M. Expression and inheritance of multiple transgenes in rice plants. Nat Biotechnol. 16: 1060–1064; 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S.M.; Frankman, E.L. and Tzfira, T. A versatile vector system for multiple gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 10: 357–361; 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Church, G.M. and Gilbert, W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 81: 1991–1995; 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 12: 13–15; 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, I.E.J.A.; Broekaert, W.F. and Cammue, B.P.A. Different approaches for multi-transgene-stacking in plants. Plant Sci. 163: 281–295; 2002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goderis, I.J.W.M.; De Bolle, M.F.C.; Francois, I.E.J.A.; Wouters, P.F.J.; Broekaert, W.F. and Cammue, B.P.A. A set of modular plant transformation vectors allowing flexible insertion of up to six expression units. Plant Mol Biol. 50: 17–27; 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadi, M.Z.; McMullen, M.D. and Finer, J.J. Transformation of 12 different plasmids into soybean via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 15: 500–505; 1996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, C. Gene stacking in transgenic plants—the challenge for 21st century plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol J. 3: 141–155; 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hille, J.; Verheggen, F.; Roelvink, P.; Franssen, H.; Vankammen, A. and Zabel, P. Bleomycin resistance—a new dominant selectable marker for plant-cell transformation. Plant Mol Biol. 7: 171–176; 1986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingelbrecht, I.; Breyne, P.; Vancompernolle, K.; Van Montagu, M. and Depicker, A. Transcriptional interference in transgenic plants. Gene. 109: 239–242; 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, R.A. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 5: 387–405; 1987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komari, T.; Hiei, Y.; Saito, Y.; Murai, N. and Kumashiro, T. Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for cotransformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J. 10: 165–174; 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L.; Liu, Y.G.; Xu, X.P. and Li, B.J. Efficient linking and transfer of multiple genes by a multigene assembly and transformation vector system. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100: 5962–5967; 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lough, T.; Tourneur, C.; Masson, J. and Robaglia, C. Expression of genes in transgenic plants from bicistronic transcriptional units. Plant Sci. 129: 91–99; 1997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, G.; Hepburn, A. and Widholm, J. A simple procedure for the expression of genes in transgenic soybean callus tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 13: 632–636; 1994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S.; Schlatter, S.; Fux, C.; Rimann, M.; Bailey, J.E. and Fussenberger, B. An update of pTRIDENT multicistronic expression vectors: pTRIDENTs containing novel streptogramin-responsive promoters. Biotechnol Prog. 16: 724–735; 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashita, H.; Arai, Y.; Shikanai, T.; Doi, Y. and Yamaguchi, I. Introduction of bacterial metabolism into higher plants by polycistronic transgene expression. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 65: 1688–1691; 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Padidam, M. and Cao, Y.J. Elimination of transcriptional interference between tandem genes in plant cells. BioTechniques. 31: 328–334; 2001

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring, Harbor, NY; 1989

  • Samoylov, V.M.; Tucker, D.M. and Parrott, W.A. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] embryogenic cultures: the role of sucrose and total nitrogen content on proliferation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 34: 8–13; 1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M.A.; Tucker, D.M.; Cahoon, E.B. and Parrott, W.A. Towards normalization of soybean somatic embryo maturation. Plant Cell Rep. 24: 383–391; 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, D. and Liu, Y-G. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation with large DNA fragments. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 354–355; 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J.; Bradeen, J.M.; Naess, S.K.; Helgeson, J.P. and Jiang, J. BIBAC and TAC clones containing potato genomic DNA fragments larger than 100 kb are not stable in Agrobacterium. Theor Appl Genet. 107: 958–964; 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugita, K.; Matsunaga, E.; Kasahara, T. and Ebinuma, H. Transgene stacking in plants in the absence of sexual crossing. Mol Breed. 6: 529–536; 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.M.; LaFayette, P.R.; Schmidt, M.A. and Parrott, W.A. Artificial gene-clusters engineered into plants using a vector system based on intron- and intein-encoded endonucleases. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 38: 537–542; 2002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trick, H.N.; Dinkins, R.D.; Santarem, E.R.; Di, R.; Samoylov, V.M.; Meurer, C.; Walker, D.; Parrott, W.A.; Finer, J.J. and Collins, G.B. Recent advances in soybean transformation. Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol. 3: 9–26; 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Überlacker, B. and Werr, W. Vectors with rare-cutter restriction enzyme sites for expression of open reading frames in transgenic plants. Mol Breed. 2: 293–295; 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergauwe, A.; Van Geldre, E.; Inze, D.; Van Montagu, M. and Van den Eeckhout, E. Factors influencing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Artemisia annua L. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 105–110; 1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the United Soybean Board and by the federal and state monies allocated to the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. Parrott.

Additional information

Editor: T.J. Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, M.A., LaFayette, P.R., Artelt, B.A. et al. A comparison of strategies for transformation with multiple genes via microprojectile-mediated bombardment. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 44, 162–168 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9099-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9099-5

Keywords

Navigation