Abstract
The stable insertion and expression of multiple transgenes in crops is highly desirable, as the manipulation of complex agronomic traits and the introduction of novel biosynthetic pathways are dependent upon it. This study was performed to explore the frequency and efficiency of introducing multiple genes in soybean by using somatic embryogenesis and microprojectile bombardment transformation. The co-transformation frequency of six selectable marker or reporter genes (GusA, bleomycin resistance, glufosinate resistance, hygromycin resistance, green fluorescent protein, and kanamycin resistance) were followed throughout the T0, T1, and T2 generations. Three bombardment strategies were compared to determine the best method to generate transgenic plants that express the introduced transgenes and have a simple insertion pattern that would facilitate any downstream breeding. The plasmid bombardment treatments were (1) a six-gene-containing plasmid, (2) an equimolar treatment of five individual plasmids that collectively contained the six transgenes of interest (genes of glufosinate and hygromycin resistance were on the same plasmid), and (3) a 1:9 ratio mixture of the five plasmids, in which the plasmid containing the selectable marker used in the regeneration process, hygromycin resistance, was used in ninefold excess to all the other plasmids. Of the six bombardments performed per plasmid treatment, the results of seven independent events for the six-gene plasmid, four events for the 1:9 treatment, and a single regenerated event for the equimolar treatment indicate that containing all the transgenes on one plasmid just had an advantage in terms of frequency of a successful transformation events. Based on Southern analysis, the only events that contained all six transgenes was the one obtained by the equimolar treatment. No event was obtained that expressed all six transgenes, and certain transgenes seem to be non-randomly lost, namely gusA, bleomycin resistance, and glufosinate resistance, regardless of treatment. The addition of elements to optimize the expression of each gene cassette when multiple genes are in close proximity needs to be further investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, P.K.; Kohli, A.; Twyman, R.M. and Christou, P. Transformation of plants with multiple cassettes generates simple transgene integration patterns and high expression levels. Mol Breed. 16: 247–260; 2005
Breyne, P.; Gheysen, G.; Jacobs, A.; Van Montagu, M. and Depicker, A. Effect of T-DNA configuration on transgene expression. Mol Gen Genet. 235: 389–396; 1992
Campbell, B.T.; Baeziger, P.S.; Mitra, A.; Sato, S. and Clemente, T. Inheritance of multiple transgenes in wheat. Crop Sci. 40: 1133–1141; 2000
Chen, L.; Marmey, P.; Taylor, N.J.; Brizard, J.-P.; Espinoza, C.; D’Cruz, P.; Huet, H.; Zhang, S.; de Kochko, A.; Beachy, R.N. and Fauquet, C.M. Expression and inheritance of multiple transgenes in rice plants. Nat Biotechnol. 16: 1060–1064; 1998
Chung, S.M.; Frankman, E.L. and Tzfira, T. A versatile vector system for multiple gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 10: 357–361; 2005
Church, G.M. and Gilbert, W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 81: 1991–1995; 1984
Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 12: 13–15; 1990
Francois, I.E.J.A.; Broekaert, W.F. and Cammue, B.P.A. Different approaches for multi-transgene-stacking in plants. Plant Sci. 163: 281–295; 2002
Goderis, I.J.W.M.; De Bolle, M.F.C.; Francois, I.E.J.A.; Wouters, P.F.J.; Broekaert, W.F. and Cammue, B.P.A. A set of modular plant transformation vectors allowing flexible insertion of up to six expression units. Plant Mol Biol. 50: 17–27; 2002
Hadi, M.Z.; McMullen, M.D. and Finer, J.J. Transformation of 12 different plasmids into soybean via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 15: 500–505; 1996
Halpin, C. Gene stacking in transgenic plants—the challenge for 21st century plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol J. 3: 141–155; 2005
Hille, J.; Verheggen, F.; Roelvink, P.; Franssen, H.; Vankammen, A. and Zabel, P. Bleomycin resistance—a new dominant selectable marker for plant-cell transformation. Plant Mol Biol. 7: 171–176; 1986
Ingelbrecht, I.; Breyne, P.; Vancompernolle, K.; Van Montagu, M. and Depicker, A. Transcriptional interference in transgenic plants. Gene. 109: 239–242; 1991
Jefferson, R.A. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 5: 387–405; 1987
Komari, T.; Hiei, Y.; Saito, Y.; Murai, N. and Kumashiro, T. Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for cotransformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J. 10: 165–174; 1996
Lin, L.; Liu, Y.G.; Xu, X.P. and Li, B.J. Efficient linking and transfer of multiple genes by a multigene assembly and transformation vector system. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100: 5962–5967; 2003
Lough, T.; Tourneur, C.; Masson, J. and Robaglia, C. Expression of genes in transgenic plants from bicistronic transcriptional units. Plant Sci. 129: 91–99; 1997
Luo, G.; Hepburn, A. and Widholm, J. A simple procedure for the expression of genes in transgenic soybean callus tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 13: 632–636; 1994
Moser, S.; Schlatter, S.; Fux, C.; Rimann, M.; Bailey, J.E. and Fussenberger, B. An update of pTRIDENT multicistronic expression vectors: pTRIDENTs containing novel streptogramin-responsive promoters. Biotechnol Prog. 16: 724–735; 2000
Nakashita, H.; Arai, Y.; Shikanai, T.; Doi, Y. and Yamaguchi, I. Introduction of bacterial metabolism into higher plants by polycistronic transgene expression. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 65: 1688–1691; 2001
Padidam, M. and Cao, Y.J. Elimination of transcriptional interference between tandem genes in plant cells. BioTechniques. 31: 328–334; 2001
Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring, Harbor, NY; 1989
Samoylov, V.M.; Tucker, D.M. and Parrott, W.A. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] embryogenic cultures: the role of sucrose and total nitrogen content on proliferation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 34: 8–13; 1998
Schmidt, M.A.; Tucker, D.M.; Cahoon, E.B. and Parrott, W.A. Towards normalization of soybean somatic embryo maturation. Plant Cell Rep. 24: 383–391; 2005
Shibata, D. and Liu, Y-G. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation with large DNA fragments. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 354–355; 2000
Song, J.; Bradeen, J.M.; Naess, S.K.; Helgeson, J.P. and Jiang, J. BIBAC and TAC clones containing potato genomic DNA fragments larger than 100 kb are not stable in Agrobacterium. Theor Appl Genet. 107: 958–964; 2003
Sugita, K.; Matsunaga, E.; Kasahara, T. and Ebinuma, H. Transgene stacking in plants in the absence of sexual crossing. Mol Breed. 6: 529–536; 2000
Thomson, J.M.; LaFayette, P.R.; Schmidt, M.A. and Parrott, W.A. Artificial gene-clusters engineered into plants using a vector system based on intron- and intein-encoded endonucleases. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 38: 537–542; 2002
Trick, H.N.; Dinkins, R.D.; Santarem, E.R.; Di, R.; Samoylov, V.M.; Meurer, C.; Walker, D.; Parrott, W.A.; Finer, J.J. and Collins, G.B. Recent advances in soybean transformation. Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol. 3: 9–26; 1997
Überlacker, B. and Werr, W. Vectors with rare-cutter restriction enzyme sites for expression of open reading frames in transgenic plants. Mol Breed. 2: 293–295; 1996
Vergauwe, A.; Van Geldre, E.; Inze, D.; Van Montagu, M. and Van den Eeckhout, E. Factors influencing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Artemisia annua L. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 105–110; 1998
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the United Soybean Board and by the federal and state monies allocated to the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: T.J. Jones
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, M.A., LaFayette, P.R., Artelt, B.A. et al. A comparison of strategies for transformation with multiple genes via microprojectile-mediated bombardment. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 44, 162–168 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9099-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9099-5