Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acute cytotoxicity testing with cultured human lung and dermal cells

  • Cellular And Molecular Toxicology
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An extensive in vitro study with cultured cells was conducted to test the basal cytotoxicity theory. This theory suggests that most chemical injury, at least in vitro, is a manifestation of one or more insults to the basic cellular structures and functions common to mammalian cells. This accounts for the similarity of results in multilaboratory studies. Human fetal lung fibroblasts (HFL1), and human skin fibroblasts (WS1, Detroit551) were studied in culture to evaluate their potential to screen for cytotoxicity. Confluent monolayers were incubated in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of test chemicals for 24 h, and the MTT assay was used to assess toxicity. Inhibitory concentrations were extrapolated from concentration-effect curves after linear regression analysis. Twenty-nine chemicals were tested with each cell line and the cytotoxicity data compared to rodent and human lethal concentrations. The data suggest that the experimental IC50 values are as accurate predictors of human toxicity as equivalent toxic blood concentrations derived from rodent LD50s. In addition, lung and skin fibroblasts revealed no significant differences among the three cell lines. The results support the conclusion that finite cell lines of human origin have the potential for screening chemicals for human toxicity. In combination with previously published reports, the data suggest that a basal cytotoxic phenomenon may explain the similarity of results among different human cell lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barile, F. A. Introduction to in vitro cytotoxicology: mechanisms and methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1994:27–32, 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barile, F. A. Continuous cell lines as a model for drug toxicity assessment. In: Castell, J. V.; Gómez-Lechón, M.-J., ed. In vitro methods in pharmaceutical research. London: Academic Press; 1997:33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barile, F. A.; Alexander, D.; Sookhoo, A. Potential of human lung cells for predicting acute cytotoxicity. ATLA 23:461–468; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barile, F. A.; Arjun, S.; Hopkinson, D. In vitro cytotoxicity testing: biological and statistical significance. Toxicol. In Vitro 7:111–116; 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barile, F. A.; Dierickx, P. J.; Kristen, U. In vitro cytotoxicity testing for prediction of acute human toxicity. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 10:155–162; 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barile, F. A.; Guzowski, D. E.; Ripley, C., et al. Ammonium chloride inhibits basal degradation of newly synthesized collagen in human fetal lung fibroblasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 276:125–131; 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barile, F. A.; Siddiqi, Z.; Rouzier, C. R., et al. Effects of puromycin and hydroxynorvaline on production and intracellular degradation of collagen in human fetal lung fibroblasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 270:294–301; 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baselt, R. C.; Cravey, R. H. Disposition of toxic drugs and chemicals in man. 3rd edition. Chicago: Year Book Medical Pub., Inc.; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bondesson, I.; Ekwall, B.; Hellberg, S., et al. MEIC—a new international multicenter project to evaluate the relevance to human toxicity of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 5:331–348; 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clemedson, C.; Mcfarlane-abdulla, E.; Andersson, M., et al. MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part I. Methodology of 68 in vitro toxicity assays for the first 30 reference chemicals. ATLA 24:251–272; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clemedson, C.; Mcfarlane-abdulla, E.; Andersson, M., et al. MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part II. In vitro results from 68 toxicity assays used to test the first 30 reference chemicals and a comparative cytotoxicity analysis. ATLA 24:273–311; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel, W. W. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ekwall, B. Basal cytotoxicity data (BC-data) in human risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Toxic Chemicals. Ibaraki, Japan: National Institute for Environmental Studies; 1992:137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gad, S.; Weil, C. S. Statistics and experimental design for toxicologists. 2nd ed. Caldwell, NJ: Telford Press; 1988:55–59, 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garle, M. J.; Fentem, J. H.; Fry, J. R. In vitro cytotoxicity tests for the prediction of acute toxicity in vivo. Toxicol. In Vitro 8:1303–1312; 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hopkinson, D.; Bourne, R.; Barile, F. A. In vitro cytotoxicity testing: 24-hour and 72-hour studies with cultured lung cells. ATLA 21:167–172; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hopkinson, D.; Scheiner, P.; Barile, F. A. In vitro cytotoxicity testing of potentially active anti-HIV drugs with cultured cells. ATLA 24:413–418; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Järkelid, L.; Kjellstrand, P.; Martinson, E., et al. Toxicity of 20 chemicals from the MEIC programme determined by growth inhibition of L-929 fibroblast-like cells. ATLA 25:55–59; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jover, R.; Ponsoda, X.; Castell, J. V., et al. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of ten MEIC chemicals on human cultured hepatocytes: predictability of human toxicity and comparison with rodent cell culture systems. Toxicol. In Vitro 6:47–52; 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, R. J. Hazardous chemicals desk reference. 3rd edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merck Index. Budavari, S.; O’Neil, M. J.; Smith, A., et al., ed. 11th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co. Inc.; 1989.

  22. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65:55–63; 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ponsoda, X.; Nunez, C.; Castell, J. V., et al. Evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of MEIC chemicals 31–50 on primary culture of rat hepatocytes and hepatic and non-hepatic cell lines. ATLA 25:423–436; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Segner, H.; Schüürmann, G. Cytotoxicity of MEIC chemicals to rainbow trout R1 cell line and multivariate comparison with ecotoxicity tests. ATLA 25:331–338; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seibert, H.; Balls, M.; Fentem, J. H., et al. Acute toxicity testing in vitro and the classification and labelling of chemicals. ATLA 24:499–510; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wallace, K. A.; Harbell, J. W.; Accomando, N., et al. Evaluation of the human epidermal keratinocyte neutral red release and neutral red uptake assay using the first 10 MEIC test materials. Toxicol. In Vitro 6:367–371; 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barile, F.A., Cardona, M. Acute cytotoxicity testing with cultured human lung and dermal cells. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal 34, 631–635 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-996-0011-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-996-0011-0

Key words

Navigation