Table 4 Item statements for the deep core values, beliefs, norms, and enabling policy environment, their sources, and AST component
Item-statement | Main framework | Indicator source | Agency-Structure Theory (AST) component |
|---|---|---|---|
4a. Core value orientation | |||
1.Respect nature and have harmony with other species | VBN theory (Stern 2000), Theory of basic human values (Schwartz 1992) | (de Groot and Steg 2008; Schwartz 1992; Schwartz et al. 2012; Stern et al. 1998) | Internal trait (Core value orientation) |
2.Have a safe environment, unity with no conflicts and where people fit in with nature | |||
3.Protecting the natural environment (forest resources) from destruction | |||
4.Working and caring for the wellbeing of family and friends | |||
5.Everyone is treated justly, even people I don’t know | |||
6.Protecting society’s weak and vulnerable members | |||
7.Having authority, such as the right to lead or command | |||
8.Having social status and power and being able to tell others what to do | |||
9.Having possessions, wealth and money | |||
10.Maximize the production and utilization of forest and agricultural resources | |||
4b. Beliefs: Environmental concern | |||
1.Maintaining and restoring forest lands for ecological and economic balance is an important basis for rural development | the New Human Interdependence Paradigm (NHIP) scale (Corral-Verdugo et al. 2008); the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale (Dunlap et al. 2000) | Internal trait (Beliefs) | |
2.We must reduce our consumption levels of forest resources to ensure well-being of the present and future generations | |||
3.Plants and animals have as much right as humans to exist and should be restored and protected | |||
4.Humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their economic needs | |||
4c. Norms | |||
1.I feel personally obliged to protect, conserve, and restore forest landscapes | Norm-Activation theory of Altruistic (Schwartz 1977; ) | Internal trait (Norms) | |
2.I feel guilty when I do not act to protect, conserve and restore forest landscapes | |||
3.People I do represent and important to me think I should act towards protection, conservation and restoration of forest and agricultural landscapes | |||
4.People I do represent already act towards protection, conservation and restoration of forest and agricultural landscapes | |||
4d. Enabling policy environment | |||
1.Forest restoration pledges, regulatory mechanisms and initiatives #Ethiopia are enacted, adapted and well implemented | The Bonn challenge (Dave et al. 2019), Governance of forest Initiative (Davis et al. 2013) | (Dave et al. 2019) | Structure (policy environment) |
2.Forest laws, regulations, policies on forest restoration in #Ethiopia are clear and adequate | |||
3.Land and tree resource tenure and rights in #Ethiopia especially in your project area is secure and clear | |||
4.Benefit sharing mechanism are in place and clear (communities obtains benefits from restored sites) | |||
5.All people especially the disadvantaged (poor, less educated) are involved in planning, decision making, implementation and monitoring of forests | |||
6.All stakeholders have influence and share control over development and decision in restoration | |||
7.State rights are given to communities and households leaving close to restoration sites | |||
8.Bi-laws (customary, traditional) are more effective than state policies and should be officially recognized | |||
9.Regional laws, policies are in line with federal laws and policies | Ethiopia’s forest proclamations(laws) | Ethiopia’s forest proclamations(laws) | |
10.Rural land administration and use proclamation, investment proclamation and watershed proclamations are in line with forest development and conservation proclamation | |||
11.Rural land administration and use proclamation favors forest land restoration | |||
12.Investment proclamation favors forest land restoration | |||
13.Watershed proclamation favors forest land restoration | |||