Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental flows: issues and gaps—a critical analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of environmental flows (E-flows) is not very old and is still evolving. The central theme associated with the E-flows is allocation of water for economic benefits and maintenance of sustainability of the riparian and instream ecosystems, riverine environment, and its habitats. Assessment of E-flows involves different methodologies with numerous criteria and thresholds. However, there is little consensus and more debate on criteria and flow thresholds, and regarding priority between development and environment. While many criteria and flow thresholds are relevant, some are inadequate or even inappropriate. Besides, there are other relevant and important issues related to flows and E-flows, which are either ignored or overlooked in the existing E-flows framework. This article through critical examination has pointed out the overlooked crucial issues (such as E-flows for temporary rivers, water quality criteria, impact of water stagnancy on water balance and hydrological cycle, and possible impact of climate change on E-flows), identified gaps in E-flows’ policy framework and has recommended modifications in the E-flows policy and practice. Incorporation of the recommended criteria will surely make the E-flows policy robust and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acreman MC (2005) Linking science and decision-making: features and experience from environmental river flow setting. Environ Model Soft 20:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acreman MC (2016) Environmental flows—basics for novices. Wires Water 3:622–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acreman M (2003) Case studies of managed flood releases. Environmental flow assessment: Part III. Washington, DC: World Bank, Water Resources and Environmental Management Best Practice Brief No. 8

  • Acuña V, Jorda-Capdevila D, Vezza P, De Girolamo AM, McClain ME, Stubbington R, Pastor AV, Lamouroux N, Schiller D, Munné A, Datry T (2020) Accounting for flow intermittency in environmental flows design. J Appl Ecol 57(4):742–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers R, Budds J, Joshi D, Merme V, Zwarteveen M (2015) Framing hydropower as green energy: Assessing drivers, risks and tensions in the Eastern Himalayas. Earth Syst Dyn 6:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfredsen K, Harby A, Linnansaari T, Ugedal O (2012) Development of an inflow controlled environmental flow regime for a Norwegian river. River Res Appl 28:731–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida RM, Hamilton SK, Rosi EJ, João Arantes Jr JD, Barros N, Boemer G, Gripp A et al (2019) Limnological effects of a large Amazonian run-of-river dam on the main river and drowned tributary valleys. Sci Rep 9:16846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53060-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasinghe UA, Sharma BR, Aloysius N, Scott C, Smakhtin VU, De Fraiture C, Sinha AK, Shukla AK (2005) Spatial variation in water supply and demand across the river basins of India. Colombo, Sri Lanka, International Water Management Institute. 37 pp (IWMI Research Report 83)

  • Anantha L, Dandekar P (2012) Towards Restoring Flows into the Earth’s Arteries - a Primer on Environmental Flows. 52 pp

  • Anderson EP, Jackson S, Tharme RE, Douglas M, Flotemersch JE, Zwarteveen M, Lokgariwar C et al (2019) Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management. Wires Water. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KE, Paul AJ, McCauley E, Jackson LJ, Post JR, Nisbet RM (2006) Instream flow needs in streams and rivers: the importance of understanding ecological dynamics. Front Ecol Environ 4(6):309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW (2003) Effects of IPCC SRES emissions scenarios on river runoff: A global perspective. Hydro Earth Sys Sc 7(5):619–641. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-7-619-2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW, Gosling SN (2013) The impacts of climate change on river flow regimes at the global scale. J Hydrol 486:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Bhaduri A, Bunn SE, Jackson SE, Tharme RE, Tickner D, Young B et al (2018) The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018) Front Environ Sci 6(45):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Rall JL, Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ (2003) Environmental flow requirements of fish in Lesotho Rivers using the drift methodology. River Res Appl 19:641–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH (1998a) Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Holistic Methodologies. Occasional Paper No. 26/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia

  • Arthington AH (1998b) Brisbane River trial of a Flow Restoration Methodology (FLOWRESM). In: Water for the Environment: Recent Approaches to Assessing and Providing Environmental Flows, Arthington AH, Zalucki JM (eds) Proceedings of AWWA forum. AWWA, Brisbane, pp 35–50

  • Babel MS, Nguyen Dinh C, Mullick MRA, Nanduri UV (2012) Operation of a hydropower system considering environmental flow requirements: a case study in La Nga River basin, Vietnam. J Hydro-Environ Res 6:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2011.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakken H, Killingtveit Å, Alfredsen K (2017) The Water Footprint of Hydropower Production—State of the Art and Methodological Challenges. Global Chall 1:1600018. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker I, Kirmond A (1998) Managing surface water abstraction. In: Wheater H, Kirby C (eds) Hydrology in a changing environment, vol 1. British Hydrol Society, London, pp 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellenger H, Guilyardi E, Leloup J, Lengaigne M, Vialard J (2014) ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dyn 42(7–8):1999–2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1783-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthot L, St-Hilaire A, Caissie D, El-Jabi N, Kirby J, Ouellet-Proulx S (2020) Southern Quebec environmental flow assessments: spatial and temporal scales sensitivity. Canadian Water Res J. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2020.1834881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bora M, Goswami DC (2017) Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index (WQI): case study of the Kolong River, Assam, India. Appl Water Sci 7:3125–3135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0451-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boryczko K, Bartoszek L, Koszelnik P, Rak JR (2018) A new concept for risk analysis relating to the degradation of water reservoirs. Environ Sci Pollu Res 25:25591–25599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2634-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovee KD (1982) A Guide to Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12. FWS/OBS-82/26. USDI Fish and Wildlife Services Office of Biology Services, Washington, DC

  • Brizga SO (1998) Methods addressing flow requirements for geomorphological purposes. Chapter 2 in Arthington AH and Zalucki JM (eds) Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. LWRRDC Occasional paper No 27/98, Land and Water Resources R&D Corporation, Canberra, pp. 8–46

  • Brock MA, Casanova MT (2000) Are There Plants in Your Wetland? Revegetating Wetlands. Land and Water R&D Corporation, University of New England, Department of Land and Water Conservation, and Environment Australia. Available from Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Barton, Australian Capital Territory

  • Brock MA, Casanova MT, Berridge SM (2000) Does Your Wetland Flood and Dry? Water Regime and Wetland Plants. Land and Water R&D Corporation, University of New England, Department of Land and Water Conservation, and Environment Australia. Available from Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Barton, Australian Capital Territory

  • Brock MA (1997) Are There Seeds in Your Wetland? Assessing Wetland Vegetation. Land and Water R&D Corporation, University of New England, Department of Land and Water Conservation, and Environment Australia. Available from Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Barton, Australian Capital Territory

  • Brown C, King J (2003) Environmental flows: concepts and methods. In: Davis R, Hirji R (eds) Water resources and environment technical note C.1. The World Bank, Washington

  • Brown RPC, Ironside N, Johnson S (1991) Defining an environmentally acceptable flow regime for the river Darent, Kent. BHS 3rd National Hydrology Symposium, Southampton

  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30:492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Loneragan NR, Yeates M (1998) The influence of river flows on coastal fisheries. Chapter 5 in Arthington AH and Zalucki JM (eds) Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. LWRRDC Occasional Paper No 27/98, Land and Water Resources R&D Corporation, Canberra, pp. 106–114

  • CSE (Centre for Science and Environment) (2009) State of Pollution in Yamuna. Centre for science and environment, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • CWC (Central Water Commission) (2007) Report of Working Group to advise WQAA on the minimum flows in the rivers. CWC, Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish MG, Duncan MI (1986) Use of the instream flow incremental methodology: a tool for negotiation. Environ Impact Asses Rev 6:347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary S, Dhanya CT, Kumar A, Shaik R (2019) Water quality-based environmental flow under plausible temperature and pollution scenarios. J Hydrologic Eng 24(5):05019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Ma L, Guo W, Yang Y, Guo T, Feng C (2013) Linking water quality and quantity in environmental flow assessment in deteriorated ecosystems: a food web view. PLoS ONE 8(7):e70537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Wu M, Wu S, Sui X, Wen J, Wang P, Chang L et al (2019) Bridging gaps between environmental flows theory and practices in China. Water Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NS, Wood AW, Voisin N, Lettenmaier DP, Palmer RN (2004) The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin. Clim Change 62:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costigan KH, Kennard MJ, Leigh C, Sauquet E, Datry T, Boulton AJ (2015) Flow regimes in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. Intermittent Rivers Ephemeral Streams. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803835-2.00003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A, Wigley TML (2000) Global patterns of ENSO-induced precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 27(9):1283–1286. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Boulton AJ, Bonada N, Fritz K, Leigh C, Sauquet E, Tockner K, Hugueny B, Dahm CN (2018) Flow intermittence and ecosystem services in rivers of the Anthropocene. J Appl Ecol 55(1):353–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Larned ST, Tockner K (2014) Intermittent rivers: a challenge for freshwater ecology. Bioscience 64:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Moya N, Zubieta J, Oberdorff T (2016) Determinants of local and regional communities in intermittent and perennial headwaters of the Bolivian Amazon. Freshw Biol 61:1335–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies PM, Naiman RJ, Warfe DM, Pettit NE, Arthington AH, Bunn SE (2014) Flow-ecology rela-tionships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows. Mar Freshw Res 65:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do QT, Joshi S, Stolper S (2016) Can Environmental Policy Reduce Infant Mortality? Evidence from the Ganga Pollution Cases. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7799. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2836547

  • Docampo L, De Bikun˜a BG (1993) The Basque method for determining instream flows in northern Spain. Rivers 4(4):292–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorobek AC, Sullivan SMP, Kautza A (2015) Short-term consequences of lowhead dam removal for fish assemblages in an urban river system. River Syst 21:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MW, Stanley EH, Orr CH, Selle AR, Sethi SA, Harbor JM (2005) Stream ecosystem response to small dam removal: Lessons from the Heartland. Geomorphology 71:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duel H, Pedroli B, Laane WEM (1996) The Habitat Evaluation Procedure in the policy analysis of inland waters in the Netherlands: towards ecological rehabilitation. In: Ecohydraulics 2000. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics, Leclerc M, Capra H, Valentin S, Boudreault A, Coˆte´ Y (eds) INRS-Eau: Que´bec, Canada; A619–630

  • Dunbar MJ, Gustard A, Acreman MC, Elliott CRN (1998) Review of Overseas Approaches to Setting River Flow Objectives. Environment Agency R&D Technical Report W6B (96) 4. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK

  • Döll P, Schmied HM (2012) How is the impact of climate change on river flow regimes related to the impact on mean annual runoff? A global-scale analysis. Environ Res Lett 7:014037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2019) Incorporating environmental flows into “water stress” indicator 6.4.2 - Guidelines for a minimum standard method for global reporting. Rome. 32 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. (http://www.fao.org/3/CA3097EN/ca3097en.pdf).

  • Fantin-Cruz I, Pedrollo O, Girard P, Zeilhofer P, Hamilton SK (2016) Changes in river water quality caused by a diversion hydropower dam bordering the Pantanal floodplain. Hydrobiologia 768:223–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2550-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl G, Wüest A (2002) Disrupting biogeochemical cycles - Consequences of damming. Aquat Sci 64:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-002-8054-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich K, Grossman RL, Huntington J, Blanken PD, Lenters J, Holman KD, Gochis D et al (2018) Reservoir Evaporation in the Western United States: Current Science, Challenges, and Future Needs. Bull Am Meteor Soc 99(1):167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gippel CJ (2001) Australia’s Environmental Flow Initiative: filling some knowledge gaps and exposing others. Water Sci Technol 43(9):73–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gippel CJ, Stewardson MJ (1996) Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows. In: Ecohydraulics 2000. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics, Leclerc M, Capra H, Valentin S, Boudreault A, Coˆte´ Y (eds) INRS-Eau: Que´bec, Canada; A571–582

  • Gippel CJ, Stewardson MJ (1998) Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows. Regulated Rivers Res Manag 14:53–67

  • Gleick PH (1992) Environmental consequences of hydroelectric development: The role of facility size and type. Energy 17:735–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gnann SJ, Howden NJK, Woods RS (2020) Hydrological signatures describing the translation of climate seasonality into streamflow seasonality. Hydro Earth Syst Sci 24(2):561–658. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-561-2020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godinho F, Costa S, Pinheiro P, Reis F, Pinheiro A (2014) Integrated procedure for environmental flow assessment in rivers. Environ Process 1:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0012-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (1992) Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustard A, Cole G, Marshall D, Bayliss A (1987) A study of compensation flows in the UK. Institute of Hydrology report 99, Wallingford

  • Hamner S, Tripathi A, Mishra RK, Bouskill N, Broadaway SC, Pyle BH, Ford TE (2006) The role of water use patterns and sewage pollution in incidence of water-borne/enteric diseases along the Ganges River in Varanasi, India. Int J Environ Health Res 16(2):113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500538226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD, Finelli CM (1999) Physical-biological coupling in streams: the pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:363–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DS, Brändle JM, Seliger C, Zeiringer B, FerreiraT SS (2018) Advancing towards functional environmental flows for temperate floodplain rivers. Sci Tot Environ 633:1089–1104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2003) Climate change and Australia: trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecol 28:423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes DA (2005) Hydrological issues associated with the determination of environmental water requirements of ephemeral rivers. River Res Appl 21:899–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Rivers (2010) Dams and Extinction: Going, Going, Gone. https://archive.internationalrivers.org/blogs/229/dams-and-extinction-going-going-gone (Retrieved on 22nd November 2020)

  • Iyer RR (2005) The Notion of Environmental Flows: A Caution NIE/IWMI Workshop on Environmental Flows, New Delhi, March 23–24, 2005

  • Jain SK (2015) Assessment of environmental flow requirements for hydropower projects in India. Current Sci 108:1815–1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaksa WT, Sridhar V (2015) Effect of irrigation in simulating long-term evapotranspiration climatology in a human dominated river basin system. Agri Forest Meteorol 200:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John A, Nathan R, Horne A, Stewardson M, Webb JA (2020) How to incorporate climate change into modelling environmental water outcomes: a review. J Water Clim Change 11(2):327–340. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi KD (2017) Environmental flow assessment for Indian rivers: the need for interdisciplinary studies. Curr Sci 113(9):1652

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett IG (1997) Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches. Regul Rivers Res Manag 13(2):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanehl PD, Lyons J, Nelson JE (1997) Changes in the habitat and fish community of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin, following removal of the Woolen Mills Dam. N Am J Fish Manag 17:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1991) Biological integrity: a long neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol Appl 1:66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik CP, Sharma HR, Jain S, Dawra J, Kaushik A (2008) Pesticide residues in river Yamuna and its canals in Haryana and Delhi, India. Environ Monit Assess 144(1–3):329–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennard MJ, Arthington AH, Thompson CT (2000) Flow requirements of freshwater fish. In Environmental Flow Requirements of the Brisbane River Downstream of Wivenhoe Dam. In: Arthington AH, Brizga SO, Choy SC, Kennard MJ, Mackay SJ, McCosker RO, Ruffini JL, Zalucki JM (eds) South East Queensland Water Corporation, and Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, pp 265–329

  • King JM, Tharme RE, De Villiers M (eds) (2000) Environmental Flow Assessments for Rivers: Manual for the Building B lock Methodology. Water Research Commission Technology Transfer Report No. TT131/00. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa

  • King JM, Tharme RE, Brown CA (1999) Definition and Implementation of Instream Flows. Thematic Report for the World Commission on Dams. Southern Waters Ecological Research and Consulting: Cape Town, South Africa

  • Knighton AD, Nanson GC (1997) Distinctiveness, diversity and uniqueness in arid zone river systems. In: Thomas DSG (ed) Arid Zone Geomorphology: processes, form and change in drylands, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 185–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights P (2002) Environmental flows: lessons from an Australian experience. Proceedings of International Conference: Dialog on Water, Food and Environment. Hanoi, Vietnam. 18 pp

  • Konrad CP, Olden JD, Lytle DA, Melis TS, Schmidt JC, Bray EN, Freeman MC et al (2011) Large-scale flow experiments for managing river systems. Bioscience 61:948–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Stakhiv EZ (2010) Are climate models “ready for prime time” in water 692 resources management applications, or is more research needed? Hydrol Sci J 55(7):1085–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larned ST, Datry T, Arscott DB, Tockner K (2010) Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshw Biol 55:717–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02322.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Quesne T, Kendy E, Weston D (2010) “Flowing Forward: Freshwater Ecosystem Adaptation to Climate Change in Water Resources Management and Biodiversity Conservation.” World Bank Group Working Water Note 28, p 69

  • Leigh C, Datry T (2016) Drying as a primary hydrological determinant of biodiversity in river systems: a broad-scale analysis. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström A, Granit J (2012) Large-scale water storage in the water, energy and food nexus - Perspectives on benefits, risks and best practices. SIWI Paper 21. SIWI, Stockholm. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20014.82243

  • Liu J, Liu Q, Yang H (2016) Assessing water scarcity by simultaneously considering environmental flow requirements, water quantity, and water quality. Ecol Indic 60:434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Zhao D, Gerbens-Leenes PW, Guan D (2015) China’s rising hydropower demand challenges water sector. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan P, Furse M (2002) Preparing for the EuropeanWater Framework Directive – making the links between habitat and aquatic biota. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 12:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love F, Madamombe E, Marshall B, Kaseke E (2006) Preliminary estimate of environmental flow requirements of the Rusape River, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth Parts a/b/c 31:864–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu XX, Ashmore P, Wang JF (2003) Seasonal water discharge and sediment load changes in the Upper Yangtze, China. Mt Res Dev 23:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magand C, Alves MH, Calleja E, Datry T, Dörflinger G, England J, Gallart F, Gómez R, Jorda-Capdevila D, Marti E, Munne A, Pastor VA, Stubbington R, Tziortzis I, Von Schiller D (2020) Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: what water managers need to know. Techn Rep CA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3888474

  • Mailhot A, Talbot G, Ricard S, Turcotte R, Guinard K (2018) Assessing the potential impacts of dam operation on daily flow at ungauged river reaches. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariya A, Kumar C, Masood M, Kumar N (2019) The pristine nature of river Ganges: its qualitative deterioration and suggestive restoration strategies. Environ Monit Assess 191(9):542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7625-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCluney KE, Poff NL, Palmer MA, Thorp JH, Poole GC, Williams MR, Williams BS, Baron JS (2014) Riverine macrosystems ecology: Sensitivity, resistance, and resilience of whole river basins with human alterations. Front Ecol Environ 12(1):48–58. https://doi.org/10.1890/120367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) The water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 51. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands

  • Milhous RT, Updike MA, Schneider DM (1989) Physical Habitat Simulation System Reference Manual (Version 2). Instream Flow Information Paper 26. USDI Fish and Wildlife Services, Biology Report 89(16)

  • Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misra AK (2010) A River about to Die: Yamuna. J Water Resour and Prot 2(05):489–500. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2010.25056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, McMahon TA, Peel MC, Horne A (2019) Assessing the degree of hydrologic stress due to climate change. Clim Change 156(1–2):87–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02497-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelms SE, Duncan EM, Patel S et al (2020) Riverine plastic pollution from fisheries: Insights from the Ganges River system. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestler JM, Milhous RT, Layzer JB (1989) Instream habitat modeling techniques. In: Alternatives in Regulated River Management, Gore JA, Petts GE (eds) CRC Press, Florida, pp 295–315

  • Nilsson C, Berggren K (2000) Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. Bioscience 50(9):783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Konrad CP, Melis TS, Kennard MJ, Freeman MC, Mims MC et al (2014) Are large-scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems? Front Ecol Environ 12:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen M, Troldborg L, Henriksen HJ, Conallin J, Refsgaard JC, Boegh E (2013) Evaluation of a typical hydrological model in relation to environmental flows. J Hydrol 507:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdyke DR, Oborny EL, Vaugh SK, Mayes KB (2014) Texas environmental flow standards and the hydrology-based environmental flow regime methodology. Hydrol Sci J 59(3–4):820–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu AG, Mul M, van der Zaag P, Slinger J (2020) Re-operating dams for environmental flows: From recommendation to practice. River Res Applic. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe J, Le Quesne T (2009) Keeping Rivers Alive; A Primer on Environmental Flows. http://assets.wwfindia.org/downloads/keeping_rivers_alive.pdf.

  • Pal M, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay M, Ghosh M (2012) Methyl mercury in fish—a case study on various samples collected from Ganges River at West Bengal. Environ Monit Assess 184:3407–3414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2193-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palau A, Alcázar J (2010) The basic flow method for incorporating flow variability in environmental flows. River Res Appl 28(1):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Reidy Liermann CA, Nilsson C, Flörke M, Alcamo J, Lake PS, Bond N (2008) Climate change and the world’s river basins: Anticipating management options. Front Ecol Environ 6:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C, Rossouw N, Muller W, Scherman P (2007) The development of water quality methods within ecological Reserve assessments, and links to environmental flows. Water SA 31:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes-Arquiola J, Solera A, Martinez-Capel F, Momblanch A, Andreu J (2014) Integrating water management, habitat modelling and water quality at the basin scale and environmental flow assessment: case study of the Tormes River. Spain Hydrol Sci J 59(3–4):878–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor AV, Ludwig F, Biemans H, Hoff H, Kabat P (2014) Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:5041–5059. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piniewski M, Laizé CLR, Acreman MC, Okruszko T, Schneider C (2014) Effect of climate change on environmental flow indicators in the Narew Basin, Poland. J Environ Qual 43:155–167. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL et al (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55:147–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Stromberg J (1997) The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47(11):769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JK (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55(1):194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prat N, Gallart F, Von Schiller D, Polesello S, García-Roger EM, Latron J, Rieradevall M, Llorens P, Barberá GG, Brito D, De Girolamo AM (2014) The mirage toolbox: an integrated assessment tool for temporary streams. River Res Appl 30(10):1318–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prein AF, Langhans W, Fosser G, Ferrone A, Ban N, Goergen K, Keller M et al (2015) A review on regional convection-permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges. Rev Geophys 53:323–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey BJ (1998) Methods addressing the flow requirements of fish. In Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods, Arthington AH, Zalucki JM (eds) Occasional Paper No. 27/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia, pp 66–105

  • Renöfält BM, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2010) Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55:49–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02241.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrological alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10(4):1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP (1997) How much water does a river need? Freshw Biol 37:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Davis MM, Apse C, Konrad C (2011) A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Res Appl 28(8):1312–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Postel S, Revenga C, Scudder T, Lehner B, Churchill A, Chow M (2010) Lost in development’s shadow: The downstream human consequences of dams. Water Alternat 3(2):14–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Thomas GA (2008) Dam good operations. International Water Power and Dam Construction, July 2008, 14–17

  • Scherman PA, Muller W, Palmer C (2003) Links between ecotoxicology, biomonitoring and water chemistry in the integration of water quality into environmental flow assessments. River Res Appl 19:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz S, Moog O (2018) Chapter 6 - Dams: Ecological Impacts and Management. In: Riverine Ecosystem Management Science for Governing Towards a Sustainable Future. In: Schmutz S, Sendzimir J (eds) Aqua Ecol Series, Vol. 8, Springer Open

  • Seong C, Sridhar V, Billah MM (2018) Implications of potential evapotranspiration methods for streamflow estimations under changing climatic conditions. Int J Climatol 38(2):896–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaban A (2021) Rivers of Lebanon: Significant Water Resources under Threats. In: Theodore V. Hromadka II and Prasada Rao (eds) Hydrology, Intech Open, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94152.

  • Sharma U, Dutta V (2020) Establishing environmental flows for intermittent tropical rivers: Why hydrological methods are not adequate? Int J Env Sc Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02680-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VU, Shilpakar RL, Hughes DA (2010) Hydrology-based assessment of environmental flows: an example from Nepal. Hydrol Sci J 51(2):207–222. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.2.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VU, Anputhas M (2006) An assessment of E-Flows requirements of Indian river basins. Colombo: Int Water Management Institute, Research Report 107

  • Soni V, Shekhar S, Singh D (2014) Environmental flow for monsoon rivers in India. Current Sci 106(4):558–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava V, Prasad C, Gaur A, Goel DK, Verma A (2016) Physico-chemical and biological parameters investigation of River Ganga: from source to plain of Allahabad in India. Eur J Experim Biol 1–5

  • Stalnaker CB (1979) The use of habitat stucture preferenda for establishing flow regimes necessary for maintenance of fish habitat. In: The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Ward JV, Stanford JA (eds) Plenum Press, New York and London, pp 321–337

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker CB, Arnette SC (1976) Methodologies for the Determination of Stream Resource Flow Requirements: An Assessment. US Fish and Wildlife Services, Office of Biological Services Western Water Association

  • Stalnaker CB (1982) Instream flow assessments come of age in the decade of the 1970's. In: Research on Fish and Wildlife Habitat, Mason WT, Iker S (eds) EPA-600/8–82–022. Office of Research and Development. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp. 119–142

  • Stalnaker CB, Lamb BL, Henriksen J, Bovee KD, Bartholow J (1994) The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology: A Primer for IFIM. National Ecology Research Center, Internal Publication. National Biological Survey, Fort Collins, CO, USA

  • Stanley EH, Doyle MW (2003) Trading off: The Ecological Effects of Dam Removal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(1): 15-22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3867960

  • Stewardson MJ, Gippel CJ (2003) Incorporating flow variability into environmental flow regimes using the flow events method. River Res Appl 19:459–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewardson M, Gippel C (1997) In-stream Environmental Flow Design: A Review. Draft Report. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Stubbington R, Chadd R, Cid N, Csabai Z, Miliša M, Morais M, Munné A et al (2018) Biomonitoring of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in Europe: current practice and priorities to enhance ecological status assessments. Sci Total Environ 618:1096–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar S, Pal S (2017) Impact of dam on flow regime and flood plain modification in Punarbhaba River basin of Indo-Bangladesh barind tract. Water Conserv Sci Eng 3:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-017-0025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tare V, Gurjar SK, Mohanta H, Kapoor V, Modi A, Mathur RP, Sinha R (2017) Eco-geomorphological approach for environmental flows assessment in monsoon-driven highland rivers: A case study of Upper Ganga, India. J Hydrol 13:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tare V, Roy G, Gurjar SK (2020) Discussion of “Water Quality–Based Environmental Flow under Plausible Temperature and Pollution Scenarios” by Shushobhit Chaudhary, C. T. Dhanya, Arun Kumar, Rehana Shaik. J Hydrol Eng 2020, 25(6):07020003

  • Tare V (2014) River connectivity, flow regimes and assessment of environmental flows at some select sites in upper Ganga segment. Accessed on November 25, 2020. http://cganga.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/11/073_GBP_IIT_EFL_ANL_ 01_Ver1_Dec_2014.pdf

  • Tennant DL (1976) Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1(4):6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE, King JM (1998) Development of the building block methodology for instream flow assessments and supporting research on the effects of different magnitude flows on riverine ecosystems. Water Res Comm Report No 576/1/98

  • Tharme RE (1996) Review of International Methodologies for the Quantification of the Instream Flow Requirements of Rivers. Water law review final report for policy development for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria. Freshwater Research Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Sahagian D (2000) Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50:753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling B, Chaudhary S, Dhanya CT, Kumar A (2017) Estimation of environmental flow incorporating water quality and hypothetical climate change scenarios. Environ Monit Assess 189(5):225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Dong Z, Liao W, Li C, Feng S, Luo H, Peng Q (2013) An environmental flow assessment method based on the relationships between flow and ecological response: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir and its downstream reach. Sci China Technol Sci 56(6):1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5193-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Nathan R, Horne A (2018) Assessing the impact of climate change on environmental outcomes in the context of natural climate variability. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144(12):05018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Rhoads BL, Wang D (2016) Assessment of the flow regime alterations in the middle reach of the Yangtze River associated with dam construction: Potential ecological implications. Hydrol Process 30:3949–3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K (2001) Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshw Biol 46:807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Malard F (2001) Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regul Rivers Res Manag 17:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JA, Arthington AH, Olden JD (2017) Models of ecological responses to flow regime change to inform environmental flows assessments. In: Water for the Environment: From Policy and Science to Implementation and Management, pp. 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803907-6.00014-0

  • Wellmeyer JL, Slattery MC, Phillips JD (2005) Quantifying downstream impacts of impoundment on flow regime and channel planform, lower Trinity River, Texas. Geomorphology 69:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JG, Moyle PB, Webb A, Kondolf GM (2019) Environmental flow assessment: methods and applications. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2018) Sustaining river Ecosystems and water resources. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group (2017) Hydropower Sector Climate Resilience Guidelines. Beta Version. Washington, DC: World Bank, 90 pp

  • World Bank Group (2018) Environmental Flows for Hydropower Projects: Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets. Good Practice Handbook. Washington, DC: World Bank, 154 pp

  • World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) (2019) Guidance on Environmental Flows Integrating E-flow Science with Fluvial Geomorphology to Maintain Ecosystem Services. WMO-No. 1235

  • Wright JF, Blackburn JH, Gunn RJM, Furse MT, Armitage PD, Winder JM, Symes KL (1996) Macro invertebrate frequency data for the RIVPACS III sites in Great Britain and their use in conservation evaluation. Aquatic Conservation 6:141–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenopoulos MA, Lodge DM, Alcamo J, Marker M, Schulze K, van Vuuren DP (2005) Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Glob Change Biol 11:1557–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang P, Yin XA, Yang ZF, Tang J (2014) A revised range of variability approach considering the periodicity of hydrological indicators. Hydrol Process 28(26):6222–6235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Zhang M, Lu P (2013) The effect of dams on phosphorus in the middle and lower Yangtze river. Water Resour Res 49:3659–3669. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Majitar, Sikkim, 737136, India

    Chandrashekhar Bhuiyan

Authors
  1. Chandrashekhar Bhuiyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrashekhar Bhuiyan.

Additional information

Handled by Pankaj Kumar, IGES: Institute for Global Environment Strategies, Japan.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhuiyan, C. Environmental flows: issues and gaps—a critical analysis. Sustain Sci 17, 1109–1128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01092-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01092-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation