Ambitious subsidy reform by the WTO presents opportunities for ocean health restoration

Abstract

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is in a unique position to deliver on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6 by reforming global fisheries subsidies in 2020. Yet, a number of unanswered questions threaten to inhibit WTO delegates from crafting a smart agreement that improves global fisheries health. We combine global data on industrial fishing activity, subsidies, and stock assessments to show that: (1) subsidies prop up fishing effort all across the world’s ocean and (2) larger subsidies tend to occur in fisheries that are poorly managed. When combined, this evidence suggests that subsidy reform could have geographically-extensive consequences for many of the world’s largest fisheries. While much work remains to establish causality and make quantitative predictions, this evidence informs the rapidly-evolving policy debate and we conclude with actionable policy suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Eastern Indian Ocean is an outlier. We believe that the subsidy intensity of fishing calculated for this region to likely be an overestimate because a disproportionately high proportion of industrial vessels fishing in this region do not carry AIS.

References

  1. Bayramoglu B, Copeland BR, Jacques J-F (2018) Trade and fisheries subsidies. J Int Econ 112:13–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. FAO (2018) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—Meeting the sustainable development goals. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO, Rome

  3. Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Sumaila UR (2019) Busting myths that hinder an agreement to end harmful fisheries subsidies. Mar Policy 109:103699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Costello C, Ovando D, Hilborn R et al (2012) Status and solutions for the World’s Unassessed Fisheries. Science 338:517–520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223389

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Costello C, Ovando D, Clavelle T et al (2016) Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:5125–5129. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520420113

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heymans JJ, Mackinson S, Sumaila UR et al (2011) The impact of subsidies on the ecological sustainability and future profits from North Sea Fisheries. PLoS ONE 6:e20239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020239

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilborn R, Amoroso RO, Anderson CM et al (2020) Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909726116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroodsma DA, Mayorga J, Hochberg T et al (2018) Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science 359:904–908. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao5646

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martini R, Innes J (2018) Relative effects of fisheries support policies. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/bd9b0dc3-en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Melnychuk MC, Essington TE, Branch TA et al (2012) Can catch share fisheries better track management targets? Fish Fish 13:267–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00429.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mourougane A (2010) Phasing out energy subsidies in Indonesia. OECD Econ Dep Work Pap. https://doi.org/10.1787/5km5xvc9c46k-en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramesh N, Rising JA, Oremus KL (2019) The small world of global marine fisheries: the cross-boundary consequences of larval dispersal. Science 364:1192–1196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav3409

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakai Y (2017) Subsidies, fisheries management, and stock depletion. Land Econ 93:165–178. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.1.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sala E, Mayorga J, Costello C et al (2018) The economics of fishing the high seas. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sumaila R (2018) How to make individual transferable quotas work economically, socially, and environmentally. Oxf Res Encycl Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sumaila UR, Dyck A, Cheung WWL (2013) Fisheries subsidies and potential catch loss in SIDS Exclusive Economic Zones: food security implications. Environ Dev Econ 18:427–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X13000156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sumaila UR, Dyck A, Baske A (2014) Subsidies to tuna fisheries in the Western Central Pacific Ocean. Mar Policy 43:288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sumaila UR, Ebrahim N, Schuhbauer A et al (2019) Updated estimates and analysis of global fisheries subsidies. Mar Policy 109:103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. UN General Assembly (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts. We also thank the many WTO delegates that have provided invaluable feedback.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Costello.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handled by Carolyn Lundquist, University of Auckland Institute of Marine Science, New Zealand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costello, C., Millage, K., Eisenbarth, S. et al. Ambitious subsidy reform by the WTO presents opportunities for ocean health restoration. Sustain Sci (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00865-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fisheries subsidies
  • Overfishing
  • Sustainable development goals
  • World trade organization
  • Fisheries management