Skip to main content
Log in

Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework

Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Hundreds of sustainability programs have emerged at universities and colleges around the world over the past 2 decades. A prime question for employers, students, educators, and program administrators is what competencies these programs develop in students. This study explores convergence on competencies for sustainability programs. We conducted a Delphi study with 14 international experts in sustainability education on the framework of key competencies in sustainability by Wiek et al. (Sustain Sci 6: 203–218, 2011), the most frequently cited framework to date. While experts generally agreed with the framework, they propose two additional competencies, suggest a hierarchy of competencies, and specify learning objectives for students interested in a career as sustainability researcher. The refined framework can inform program development, implementation, and evaluation to enhance employability of graduates and facilitate comparison of sustainability programs worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

adapted from Wiek et al. (2011); icons credit: Warren et al. (2014)

Fig. 2

adapted from Wiek and Lang (2016, p.35), with permission of the authors. Each approach emphasizes a particular step (bolded) ordering the sequence of steps. The competencies per step are depicted through colors (purple: systems-, green: futures-, yellow: values-, turquoise: strategic-thinking, orange: collaborative competency). Grey boxes depict implementation, which, so far, is done by practitioners outside the collaborative research process. The TSR framework presents a synthesis of the four other frameworks combining two complementary processes (forecasting and backcasting) along the first three steps

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Christiana Figueres, https://globaloptimism.com/.

  2. Two experts participated with their teams. While they provided their contribution to the Delphi-study as one team, they are now listed individually as co-authors.

  3. Respondent 10 is marked with an (*) as this respondent withdrew their participation due to a conflict of interest.

  4. In the remainder, we use the term transdisciplinary research methods as short shrift for methodologies facilitating collaborative research between academics and practitioners with action research being one of them. Interdisciplinarity refers to collaborative research among academics from different disciplines.

  5. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy (RT) was developed by Anderson et al. (2001). It builds on Bloom’s Original Taxonomy (OT) from 1956 while addressing its shortcomings: (1) The OT combined ‘having knowledge’ with the cognitive processes of ‘acquiring knowledge’ into one dimension. The RT breaks this into four dimensions of knowledge: factual: knowing the basic elements of a discipline, conceptual: knowing the relationships among the basic elements, procedural: knowing how to do something and metacognitive: knowledge about cognition, awareness of own cognition. (2) The OT presents learning objectives hierarchically within one knowledge dimension. The RT presents them in a matrix, connecting the four dimensions of knowledge with the six levels of learning objectives (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyse, Evaluate, Create) (Amer 2006).

  6. Dweck (1999, 2006) defined mindset as a self-perception or self-theory that people hold about themselves and applied the concept of mindset to people’s self-perceptions as learners (intelligent or unintelligent learner), or in their professional or personal lives (being a good teacher, being a bad parent). Glossary of Education Reform (2013).

  7. Educating Future Change Agents Research Project: https://www.leuphana.de/en/research-centers/cgsc/research-projects/educating-future-change-agents.html.

References

  • Amer A (2006) Reflections on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Electron J Res Educ Psychol 4(1):213–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson L, Krathwohl R, Airasian P, Cruikshank K, Mayer R, Pintrich P, Raths J, Wittrock M (eds) (2001) Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council of Environmental Deans and Directors (ACEDD) (2014) Environment and sustainability learning and teaching academic standards statement project. https://environmentltas.gradschool.edu.au/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Barber J (2016) Are you career competent? Inside higher education. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2016/08/29/importance-knowing-competencies-employers-seek-essay. Accessed Jan 25, 2020

  • Barth M (2015) What are we striving for? Learning objectives and educational goals. Implementing sustainability in higher education: learning in an age of transformation, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, pp 55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth M (2019) Change Agents für das 21. Jahrhundertausbilden—NachhaltigkeitswissenschaftenalsStudiengang. In: Michelsen G, Barth M, Fischer D (eds) BildungfürnachhaltigeEntwicklung in der Hochschule: Wege und Wirkungen am Beispiel der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth M, Godemann J, Rieckmann M, Stoltenberg U (2007) Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. Int J Sustain High Educ 8(4):416–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710823582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth M, Rieckmann M (2012) Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. J Clean Prod 26(2012):28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19540–19545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J (1996) Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ 32(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K et al (2019) Supplement information on the Delphi study results of “key competencies in sustainability—towards an agreed-upon reference framework”. Report. National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE), Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A (2017) Beyond interpersonal competency: teaching and learning professional skills in sustainability. Educ Sci 7(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman CL (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):308–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011077540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns H (2016) Self-care as a way of being: fostering inner work in a graduate sustainability leadership course. Ecopsychology 8(4):250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CASEL (n.d.) Collaborative for academic, social, and emotional learning. https://casel.org/what-is-sel/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Cebrián G, Junyent M (2015) Competencies in education for sustainable development: exploring the student teachers’ views. Sustainability (Switzerland) 7(3):2768–2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebrián G, Junyent M, Mulà I (2020) Competencies in education for sustainable development: emerging teaching and research developments. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(2):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan G (2006) The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 12(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500526362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delors J (1996) Learning: the treasure within; report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century (highlights). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109590. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Demssie YN, Wesselink R, Biemans HJ, Mulder M (2019) Think outside the European box: identifying sustainability competencies for a base of the pyramid context. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTombe DJ (2001) COMPRAM, a method for handling complex societal problems. Eur J Oper Res 128:266–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dlouhá J, Heras R, Mulà I, Salgado FP, Henderson L (2019) Competences to address SDGs in higher education—a reflection on the equilibrium between systemic and personal approaches to achieve transformative action. Sustainability 11(13):3664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck CS (1999) Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Educating Future Change Agents Research Program (2019) Educating future change agents research project. https://www.leuphana.de/en/research-centers/cgsc/research-projects/educating-future-change-agents.html. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Engle EW, Barsom SH, Vandenbergh L, Sterner GE III, Alter TR (2017) Developing a framework for sustainability meta-competencies. Int J Sustain High Educ 1(4):285–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueres Ch (n.d.) Global Ooptimism. https://globaloptimism.com/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Foucrier T, Wiek A (2019) Adoption of the key competencies in sustainability in programs and courses around the world. Report. Arizona State University, Tempe

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank P, Stanszus LS (2019) Transforming consumer behavior: introducing self-inquiry-based and self-experience-based learning for building personal competencies for sustainable consumption. Sustainability 11(9):2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 31(7):735–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner S, Rieckmann M (2015) Pedagogies of preparedness: use of reflective journals in the operationalisation and development of anticipatory competence. Sustainability 7(8):10554–10575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giangrande N, White RM, East M, Jackson R, Clarke T, SaloffCoste M, Penha-Lopes G (2019) A competency framework to assess and activate education for sustainable development: addressing the UN sustainable development goals 4.7 challenge. Sustainability 11(10):2832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser H, Hirsh J (2016) Toward the development of robust learning for sustainability core competencies. Sustainability 9(3):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2016.29054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glossary of Education Reform (2013) Growth Mindset. https://www.edglossary.org/growth-mindset/. Accessed 25 Jan 2020

  • Goleman D, Boyatzis RE (2017) Emotional intelligence has 12 elements. Which do you need to work on? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/02/emotional-intelligence-has-12-elements-which-do-you-need-to-work-on. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Habron G (2012) Competency-based sustainability specialization at Michigan State University. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2012.9912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habron G (2019) Scaffolding applied learning and sustainable development goals in the Furman University Sustainability Science Program. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2018.0036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider LJ, Hentati-Sundberg J, Giusti M et al (2018) The undisciplinary journey: early-career perspectives in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 13(1):191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0445-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD, Buizer JL, Foley JA, Gilbert LE, Graumlich LJ, Kapuscinski AR, Kramer JG, Palmer MA, Peart DR, Silka L (2016) Mobilizing the power of higher education to tackle the grand challenge of sustainability: Lessons from novel initiatives. Elementa Sci Anthr 4:000090. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs H, Wiek A, Martens P, Michelsen G (2016) Introduction. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds) Sustainability science: an introduction. Springer, Dordrecht, p 1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • InTeGrate (20198) Interdisciplinary teaching about earth for a sustainable future. competencies and learning outcomes.https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/programs/workforceprep/competencies_and_LO.html. Accessed 1 Sep 2019

  • ISSP (2020) International Society of Sustainability Professionals. https://www.sustainabilityprofessionals.org/. Accessed 16 May 2020.

  • Johnson E, Edwards D, Simon J (2019) The Falk School of sustainability and environment. Chatham University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa Y, Saito O, Takeuchi K (2017) Academic landscape of 10 years of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 12(6):869–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19449–19450. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116097108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—practice, principles and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Supplement 1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23:161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka H, Wals AEJ, Kronlid D, McGarry D (2015) Transformative, transgressive social learning: rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 16:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Merrill M, Sammalisto K, Ceulemans K, Lozano F (2017) Connecting competencies and pedagogical approaches for sustainable development in higher education: a literature review and framework proposal. Sustainability 9(11):1889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Barreiro-Gen M, Lozano FJ, Sammalisto K (2019) Teaching sustainability in European higher education institutions: assessing the connections between competences and pedagogical approaches. Sustainability 11(6):1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers AWM, Borghuis VAJ, Mutsaers EJPJ, van Overveld CWAM, Perrenet JC (2005) Academic criteria for bachelor and master curricula, 2nd edn. University of Twente, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NACE (2020) National Association of Colleges and Employers. Career readiness defined. https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/career-readiness-defined/. Accessed 25 Jan 2020

  • National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In: Pellegrino JW, Hilton ML (eds) Committee on designing deeper learning and 21st century skills, board on testing and assessment and board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. The National Academies Press, Washington. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne D, Dripps W, Nicholas KA (2015) Teaching and learning sustainability: an assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustain Sci 10(1):43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0251-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberlack C, Breu T, Giger M, Harari N, Herweg K, Mathez-Stiefel S-L, Schneider F (2019) Theories of change in sustainability science: Understanding how change happens. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 28(2):106–111. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.2.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive Summary. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Ojala M (2012) Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environ Educ Res 18(5):625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okoli C, Pawlowski SD (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag 42(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuss J, Merritt E, Manuel-Navarrete D, Cloutier S, Eckard B (2019) Interacting pedagogies: a review and framework for sustainability education. J Sustain Edu 20. http://www.susted.com/wordpress/content/interacting-pedagogies-a-review-and-framework-for-sustainability-education_2019_04/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Redman A, Wiek A (2020) Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability

  • Redman A, Wiek A, Barth M (2020) Current practice of assessing students’ sustainability competencies—a review of tools. Sustain Sci

  • Rieckmann M (2012) Future-oriented higher education: which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures 44(2):127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JB (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Kemp RV, Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy SG, Souza SP, McGreavy B, Druschke CG, Hart D, Gardner K (2019) Evaluating core competencies and learning outcomes for training the next generation of sustainability researchers. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00707-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler R (2013) Making competent judgments of competency. In: Blömeke S, Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O, Kuhn C, Fege J (eds) Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education: tasks and challenges. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 13–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado FP, Abbott D, Wilson G (2018) Dimensions of professional competencies for interventions towards sustainability. Sustain Sci 13(1):163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0439-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seemiller C (2013) The student leadership competencies guidebook: designing intentional leadership learning and development. John Wiley and Sons Incorporated, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard K, Rieckmann M, Barth M (2018) Seeking sustainability competency and capability in the ESD and HESD literature: an international philosophical hermeneutic analysis. Environ Educ Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1490947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson J, Spector S, Hopkins D, McCarthy A (2018) Deep interventions for a sustainable transport future. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 61:356–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling S, Glasser H, Rieckmann M, Warwick P (2017) “More than scaling up”: a critical and practical inquiry into operationalizing sustainability competencies. In: Corcoran PB, Weakland JP, Wals AEJ (eds) Envisioning futures for environmental and sustainability education. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 153–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu T (2006) Competence versus competency: what is the difference? Perform Improv. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930451027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongco MDC (2007) Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobot Res Appl 5:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transgressive Learning (n.d.) http://transgressivelearning.org/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2012) Steering Committee on Education for Sustainable Development.. Learning for the future: competencys in education for sustainable development, Publication number: 1LVDO1202

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO (2017) Education for sustainable development goals: learning objectives. UNESCO, Paris, France. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO (2018) Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • VanWynsberghe R, Herman AC (2015) Education for social change and pragmatist theory: five features of educative environments designed for social change. Int J Lifelong Educ 34(3):268–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.988189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vare P, Arro G, de Hamer A, del Gobbo G, de Vries G, Farioli F, Kadji-Beltran C et al (2019) Devising a competence-based training program for educators of sustainable development: lessons learned. Sustainability 11(7):1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent S, Rao S, Fu Q, Gu K, Huang X, Lindaman K, Mittleman E, Nguyen K, Rosenstein R, Suh Y (2017) Scope of interdisciplinary environmental, sustainability, and energy baccalaureate and graduate education in the United States. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals AEJ (2015) Beyond unreasonable doubt: education and learning for socio-ecological sustainability in the anthropocene, Wageningen, NL. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/494121. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Waltner EM, Rieß W, Mischo C (2019) Development and validation of an instrument for measuring student sustainability competencies. Sustainability 11(6):1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler C (2018) Mind the gap: the role of mindfulness in adapting to increasing risk and climate change. Sustain Sci 13:1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0524-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler C, Brossmann J, Hendersson H, Kristjansdottir R, McDonald C, Scarampi P (2018) Mindfulness in sustainability science, practice, and teaching. Sustain Sci 13(1):143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0428-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren A, Archambault L, Foley RW (2014) Sustainability education framework for teachers: developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking. J Sustain Edu 6(4):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Lang DJ (2016) Transformational sustainability research methodology. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds) Sustainability science: an Iintroduction. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Harlow J, Melnick R, van der Leeuw S, Fukushi K, Takeuchi K, Farioli F, Yamba F, Blake A, Geiger C, Kutter R (2015) Sustainability science in action—a review of the state of the field through case studies on disaster recovery, bioenergy, and precautionary purchasing. Sustain Sci 10(1):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Bernstein M, Foley R, Cohen M, Forrest N, Kuzdas C, Kay B, Withycombe Keeler L (2016) Operationalising competencies in higher education for sustainable development. In: Barth M, Michelsen G, Rieckmann M, Thomas I (eds) 2016 Handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Routledge, London, pp 241–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm S, Förster R, Zimmermann AB (2019) Implementing competence orientation: towards constructively aligned education for sustainable development in university-level teaching-and-learning. Sustainability 11(7):1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T et al (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their detailed and thoughtful comments and suggestions. We also like to thank the experts who participated in the study and Drs. Elyzabeth Engle, Eban Goodstein, Ian Thomas, and Arnim Wiek for their valuable comments to earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Brundiers.

Additional information

Handled by Mark W Anderson,University of Maine School of Economics Winslow Hall, United States.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G. et al. Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustain Sci 16, 13–29 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2

Keywords

Navigation