Transition within a transition: how cooperative platforms want to change the sharing economy


Scholars have argued that the sharing economy represents a transitional pathway to sustainability. The growth, however, of multi-national giants, such as Airbnb or Uber, has created new environmental, social, and economic problems and led many to question the dominant form of the sharing economy. In this paper, we study a transition within a transition—that is the emergence of a new niche of cooperative platforms within the sharing economy. We examine how promoters and followers of Fairbnb, a nascent cooperative alternative to Airbnb, frame and envision their project and then discuss tensions, debates, and limits around their ideas and business model. We find that their primary motivations are to mitigate the negative effects of mass tourism, to prevent the extraction of wealth from local economies, and to sustain a prosperous social business. Tensions are found around limitations of democratic governance, decentralization, and size of the project.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. Boswijk A (2017) Transforming business value through digitalized networks: a case study on the value drivers of Airbnb. J Creat Value 3(1):104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryman A (2012) Social research methods, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chesbrough H (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Ind Corporate Change 11:529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. FairBnB (2016) FairBnB Manifesto. Accessed 20 Jan 2018

  6. Fletcher AJ (2017) Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol 20:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frenken K (2017) Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy. Phil Trans R Soc A 375:20160367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frenken K, Schor J (2017) Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ Innov Soc Transit 23:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallagher L (2017) Airbnb’s profits to top \$3 billion by 2020. Accessed 10 Dec 2018

  10. Geels FW (2014) Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult Soc 31:21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haar K, Ainger K (2018) UnFairbnb. Technical Report, Corporate Europe Observatory

  12. Kostakis V (2018) Defense of digital commoning. Organization 25:812–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindgardt Z, Reeves M, Stalk G, Deimler MS (2009) Business model innovation: when the game gets tough, change it. Report, The Boston Consulting Group

  14. Martin CJ (2016) The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol Econ 121:149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin CJ, Upham P, Budd L (2015) Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: insights from the sharing economy. Ecol Econ 118:240–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin CJ, Upham P, Klapper R (2017) Democratising platform governance in the sharing economy: an analytical framework and initial empirical insights. J Clean Prod 166:1395–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McKenzie S (2004) Social sustainability: towards some definitions. Technical Report 27. Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia, Magill

  18. Morell MF, Espelt R (2018) How much are digital platforms based on open collaboration? Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on open collaboration—OpenSym ’18 , 1–5.

  19. Oskam J, Boswijk A (2016) Airbnb: the future of networked hospitality businesses. J Tour Future 2(1):22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palgan YV, Zvolska L, Mont O (2017) Sustainability framings of accommodation sharing. Environ Innov Soc Transit 23:70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pazaitis A, Kostakis V, Bauwens M (2017) Digital economy and the rise of open cooperativism: the case of the Enspiral Network. Transfer Eur Rev Labour Res 23:177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Platform Cooperativism Consortium (2017) Platform Co-ops. Accessed 6 June 2018

  23. Reijers W, Ossewaarde M (2018) Digital commoning and its challenges. Organization 25:819–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholz T, Schneider N (eds) (2016) Ours to hack and to own: the rise of platform cooperativism, a new vision for the future of work and a fairer internet. OR Books, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schor JB, Fitzmaurice CJ (2015) Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Edward Elgar, UK, pp 410–425.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simon S (2014) The commodification of the couch: the commons vs. commodification: a dialectical analysis of hospitality exchange networks. Master’s thesis. Uppsala Universitet

  27. Slee T (2017) What’s yours is mine: against the sharing economy, 2nd edn. OR Books, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Soulo T (2017) Ahrefs’ SEO metrics explained: what they mean and why they’re so good. 28 May 2018

  29. Srnicek N (2016) Platform capitalism. Theory redux. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK; Malden MA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Steinberg MW (1998) Tilting the frame: considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory Soc 27:845–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vaughan R, Daverio R (2016) Assessing the size and presence of the collaborative economy in Europe. Technical Report, PwC UK

  32. Wachsmuth D, Chaney D, Kerrigan D, Shillolo A, Basalaev-Binder R (2018). The high cost of short-term rentals in New York City. Technical Report. Urban Politics and Governance research group, School of Urban Planning, McGill University, Montreal

  33. World Tourism Organization, 2017. UNWTO Tourism Highlights. Technical Report. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Madrid

  34. Yin R (1994) Case study: design and methods, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zaleski O (2018) Inside Airbnb’s Battle to Stay Private. Accessed 6 June 2018

Download references


We acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Business (MINECO), through the “María de Maeztu” program for Units of Excellence (MDM-2015-0552). Foramitti’s research benefited from funding through an ERC Advanced Grant from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement \(\hbox {n}^{\circ }\) 741087).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joël Foramitti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handled by Osamu Saito, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foramitti, J., Varvarousis, A. & Kallis, G. Transition within a transition: how cooperative platforms want to change the sharing economy. Sustain Sci 15, 1185–1197 (2020).

Download citation


  • Sharing economy
  • Platform cooperativism
  • Accommodation sharing
  • Airbnb
  • Framing
  • Business model innovation