The Blue Fix: What's driving blue growth?


This article explores the politics behind the promise of ‘blue growth’. Reframing it as a ‘blue fix’, we argue that the blue growth discourse facilitates new opportunities for capital accumulation, while claiming that this accumulation is compatible with social and ecological aims as well. The blue fix is made up of three underlying sub-fixes. First of all, the conservation fix quenches the social thirst for action in the face of climate change. Here we see how protecting marine areas can be an important part of mitigating climate change, but in practice, gains at the national level are overshadowed by the ongoing expansion of offshore drilling for oil and gas. Second, the protein fix satisfies the growing global demand for healthy food and nutrition through the expansion of capital-intensive large-scale aquaculture, while ignoring the negative socio-ecological impacts, which effectively squeeze small-scale capture fishing out, while industrial capture fishing remains well positioned to expand into as well as supply industrial aquaculture with fish feed from pelagic fish. And third, an energy fix offers a burst of wind energy and a splash of new deep-sea minerals without disturbing the familiar and persistent foundation of oil and gas. This dimension of the blue fix emphasizes the transition to wind and solar energy, but meanwhile the deep sea mining for minerals required by these new technologies launches us into unknown ecological territories with little understood consequences. The synergy of these three elements brought together in a reframing of ocean politics manifests as a balancing act to frame blue growth as ‘sustainable’ and in everyone’s interest, which we critically analyze and discuss in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

  2. 2.

    Data extracted from

  3. 3.

    For a critical review of the FAO Blue Growth Initiative see Barbesgaard (2018).

  4. 4.

    See for example:;;;

  5. 5.

    For a critique, see Lander, E. (2011). The Green Economy: The world in sheep’s clothing. Amsterdam: TNI. Available at:

  6. 6.

    Nautilus Minerals is a now defunct Canada-based deep-sea mining company that was at the forefront of the industry set to initiate production in Papua New Guinea’s EEZ in 2019. See Childs, this issue for further analysis of dynamics on the ground.

  7. 7.

  8. 8.

    Cook Islands, Federated State of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu.

  9. 9.

    See for example:; (pg 36).

  10. 10.

    See for example:;


  1. Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  2. Barbesgaard M (2018) Blue growth: savior or ocean grabbing? J Peasant Stud 45(1):130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbesgaard M (2019) Ocean and land control-grabbing: The political economy of landscape transformation in Northern Tanintharyi Myanmar. J Rural Stud 69:195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belton B, Thilsted S (2014) Fisheries in transition: food and nutrition security implications for the global South. Glob Food Secur 3(1):59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaulieu SE et al (2017) Should we mine the deep seafloor? Earth's Future 5(7):655–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett NJ et al (2015) Ocean grabbing. Mar Policy 57:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bond P (2019) Blue economy threats, contradictions and resistances seen from South Africa. J Polit Ecol 26:341–362

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boonstra WJ et al (2018) A sea of many colours—How relevant is Blue Growth for capture fisheries in the Global North, and vice versa? Mar Policy 87:340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brumbaugh R, Patil P (2017) Sustainable tourism can drive the blue economy: Investing in ocean health is synonymous with generating ocean wealth. Voices; Perspectives on Development. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  10. Campling L, Colás A (2018) Capitalism and the sea: sovereignty, territory and appropriation in the global ocean. Environ Plan D Soc Space 36(4):776–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campling L, Havice E (2014) The problem of property in industrial fisheries. J Peasant Stud 41(5):707–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carington D (2017) Is deep sea mining vital for a greener future—even if it destroys ecosystems? Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  13. Castree N (2008) Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environ Plan A 40:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Credit Suisse, WWF, McKinsey and Company (2014) Conservation Finance; Moving beyond donor funding toward an investor-driven approach, Switzerland. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  15. Dempsey J (2016) Enterprising nature: economics, markets, and finance in global biodiversity politics. Wiley-Blackwell, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Dempsey J, Suarez DC (2016) Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of “selling nature to save it”. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 106(3):653–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Denchak M (2018) Ocean pollution: the dirty facts: we’re drowning marine ecosystems in trash, noise, oil, and carbon emissions. Natural Resources Defense Council. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  18. Directorate-General for the Environment of the European Commission (2017) A new ocean of committments. Environ Eur (64): 4–5. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  19. Eikeset AM et al (2018) What is blue growth? The semantics of “Sustainable Development” of marine environments. Mar Policy 87:177–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekers M, Prudham S (2015) Towards the socio-ecological fix. Environ Plan A 47(12):2438–2445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ekers M, Prudham S (2017) The metabolism of socioecological fixes: capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(6):1370–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ehlers P (2016) Blue growth and ocean governance—how to balance the use and the protection of the seas. WMU J Marit Aff 15:187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ertör I, Ortega-Cerdà M (2019) The expansion of intensive marine aquaculture in Turkey: the next-to-last commodity frontier? J Agrar Change 19(2):337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. European Commission (2017) Environment for Europeans. Magazine of the Directorate-General for Environment. 64. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  25. Fabinyi M (2018) Environmental fixes and historical trajectories of marine resource use in Southeast Asia. Geoforum 91:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. FAO (2018) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

  27. Fletcher R, Mas IM, Blanco-Romero A, Blázquez-Salom M (2019) Tourism and degrowth: an emerging agenda for research and praxis. J Sustain Tour 27(12):1745–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Friend R, Arthur R, Keskinen M (2009) Songs of the doomed: the continued neglect of capture fisheries in hydropower development in the Mekong. In: Molle F, Foran T, Käkönen M (eds) Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London, pp 307–332

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gabbatiss J (2018) Cost of dismantling North Sea oil and gas likely to be double government target [online]. The independent. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  30. Giron Y (2018) The other side of large-scale, no-take, marine protected areas in the Pacific Ocean. In: Fache E, Pauwels S (eds) Fisheries in the Pacific. The challenges of governance and sustainability. Cahiers du Credo, Marseille, pp 77–117

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hadjimichael M (2018) A call for a blue degrowth: unravelling the European Union's fisheries and maritime policies. Mar Policy 94:158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harvey D (2001) Globalization and the spatial fix. Geogr Rev 2:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harvey D (2003) The new imperialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harvey D [1982] 2006 Limits to capital. Updated edition, Verso, London

  35. Howard BC (2018) Blue growth: stakeholder perspectives. Mar Policy 87:375–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. IEA (2017) Offshore Energy Outlook 2017. International Energy Agency, Paris. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  37. IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V et al (eds) Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp

  38. IPCC (2019) Special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Accessed 7 Jan 2020

  39. ISA (2018) Secretary-General Michael Lodge StatementAtWorkshop on the draft regulations for the exploitation of mineral resources in the Area: policy, legal and institutional considerations, London, 12–13 February 2018. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  40. Longo SB, Clausen R, Clark B (2015) The tragedy of the commodity: oceans, fisheries, and aquaculture. Rutgers University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Longo SB, Clark B, York R, Jorgenson AK (2019) Aquaculture and the displacement of fisheries captures. Conserv Biol 33(4):832–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mallin M-AF (2018) From sea-level rise to seabed grabbing: the political economy of climate change in Kiribati. Mar Policy 97:244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mallin M-AF et al (2019) Entrusting ocean’s capital: conservation, philanthropy and the political economy of large marine protected areas. Mar Policy. press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McAfee K (1999) Selling Nature to save It Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environ Plan D Soc Space 17(2), 133–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McAfee K (2016a) Green economy and carbon markets for conservation and development: a critical view. Int Environ Agreem 16(3):333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McAfee K (2016b) The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Dev Change 43(1):105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mills EN (2018) Implicating ‘fisheries justice’ movements in food and climate politics. Third World Q 39(7):1270–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Norsk Petroleum n.d. Exports of oil and gas. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  49. Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries & Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (2017) New growth, proud history; the Norwegian Government’s Ocean Strategy. 6. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  50. OECD (2016) The ocean economy in 2030 OECD Publishing, Paris.

  51. Pacific Small Island Developing States (2011) Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Second intersessional meeting Statement by H.E. MR. ROBERT G. AISI Permanent Representative of Papua New Guinea to the UN on behalf of the Pacific Small Island Developing State. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  52. Pascual M, Greenhill L (2018) MSP as a tool to support Blue Growth. Sector Fiche: Oil and Gas. Brussels: European MSP Platform for the European Commission Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Sustainable Projects, ECORYS, Thetis, University of Liverpool, NIMRD and Seascape Consultants

  53. Pauly D (2018) A vision for marine fisheries in a global blue economy. Mar Policy 87:371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rio Ocean Declaration (2012) Co-Chairs’ Statement of The Oceans Day at Rio+20. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  55. Ripple WJ et al (2019) World scientist’s warning of a climate emergency. Bioscience.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Robertson MM (2006) The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environ Plan D Soc Space 24(3), 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Salardi E, Group X, Allen M, International S (2018) A new economic and ecological concept for offshore decommissioning [online]. Exploration and Production. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  58. Sengupta S (2017) Both climate leader and oil giant? A Norwegian paradox. The New York Times, 22 Dec. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  59. Sibilia EA (2018) Oceanic accumulation: geographies of speculation, overproduction, and crisis in the global shipping economy. Environ Plan A Econ Space 51(2):467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Silver JJ, Campbell LM (2018) Conservation, development and the blue frontier: the Republic of Seychelles’ debt restructuring for marine conservation and climate adaptation program. Int Soc Sci J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Silver JJ et al. (2015) Blue economy and competing discourses in international oceans governance. J Environ Dev 24(2), 135–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Smith N (2003) American empire: Roosevelt’s geographer and the prelude to globalization. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  63. Standing A (2018) Meet Bond...Blue Bond; Saving your fish or bankrupting the oceans? Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements, Brussels. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  64. Steinberg PE (1999) The maritime mystique: sustainable development, capital mobility, and nostalgia in the world ocean. Environ Plan D Soc Space 17(4):403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Steinberg PE (2001) The social construction of the ocean. Cambridge University Press, pp 258. ISBN: 9780521010573

  66. Tacon AGJ, Metian M (2008) Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285:146–158.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (2015) Policy document on the North Sea 2016–2021. 19. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  68. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2015) The blue economy: growth, opportunity and a sustainable ocean economy. An Economist Intelligence Unit briefing paper for the World Ocean Summit 2015. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  69. TNI, Masifundise Development Trust, Afrika Kontakt, and World Forum of Fisher Peoples (WFFP) (2014) The Global Ocean Grab. Transnational Institute (TNI), A Primer, Amsterdam

  70. Ugarte S et al (2017) SDGs Mean Business: how credible standards can help companies deliver the 2030 agenda. WWF and ISEAL Alliance, Gland, Switzerland. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  71. United Nations (1998) The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (A historical perspective). Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  72. United Nations (2018) Status of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  73. Voyer M et al (2018) Shades of blue: what do competing interpretations of the Blue Economy mean for oceans governance? J Environ Plan Policy Manage 20(5):595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Watts M (2012) A tale of two gulfs: life, death, and dispossession along two oil frontiers. Am Q 64(3):437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. White B, Jr SMB, Hall R, Scoones I, Wolford W (2012) The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):619–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Woody T (2017) Seabed mining: the 30 people who could decide the fate of the deep ocean. news deeply. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  77. Woody T (2018) hurry up and wait: big decisions on seabed mining remain unresolved. News deeply. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  78. Young M (2015) Building the blue economy: the role of marine spatial planning in facilitating offshore renewable energy development. Int J Mar Coast Law 30(1):148–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Ytrestøyl T et al (2015) Utilisation of feed resources in production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway. Aquaculture 448:365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Zalik A (2018) Mining the seabed, enclosing the Area: ocean grabbing, proprietary knowledge and the geopolitics of the extractive frontier beyond national jurisdiction. Int Soc Sci J 68(229–230):343–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoe W. Brent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handled by Irmak Ertör, The Ataturk Institute for Modern Turkish History Istanbul, Turkey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brent, Z.W., Barbesgaard, M. & Pedersen, C. The Blue Fix: What's driving blue growth?. Sustain Sci 15, 31–43 (2020).

Download citation


  • Blue growth
  • Blue economy
  • Marine protected areas
  • Aquaculture
  • Oil and gas
  • Deep sea mining