Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating climate change adaptation pathways through capital assessment: five case studies of forest social-ecological systems in France

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest social-ecological systems (FSESs) can play a major role in both the mitigation of climate change, as well as the adaptation of local communities to it. In Europe, however, forests are highly fragmented and located close to human populations. This means that maintaining forest sustainability implies not only increasing ecosystem adaptation but also developing social adaptation. Hence, there is a need to understand the current priorities and management goals of forestry stakeholders, as well as their capacity to achieve functional and sustainable FSES in the future. The present study uses an interdisciplinary approach to evaluate stakeholders’ capacity to deal with climate change and top-down policies in different FSESs. We selected five FSESs in France that exhibit a range of climatic threats and socio-economic characteristics to estimate their adaptive capacity and transformative potential. The estimation is based on an assessment of different types of capital (i.e. natural, social, resources, governance) that involves evaluating 70 indicators through more than 70 semi-structured interviews with local stakeholders. Our results highlight that forest management in France, and more broadly in Europe, is mainly based on technical approaches, which build stakeholders’ confidence in their capacity to maintain the status quo. We observe asymmetry in capital distribution in some FSES, mainly through the maximization of the resources capital, which can constraint FSESs in a robustness trap. To develop adaptive capacity for small perturbations as well as transformability, forestry stakeholders should be encouraged to compromises. More balanced capital distribution, with decreased economic benefits, along with new technical approaches and changes to the landscape composition could be necessary to ensure the long-term adaptability of FSES to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79:387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken SN, Whitlock MC (2013) Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:367–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Folke C, Walker B, Ostrom E (2013) Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecol Soc 18(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould P, Marty P, Simon L (2002) Deux siècles d’aménagements forestiers: trois situations aux marges meridionales de la France. Eria 58:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthod C (1998) La multifonctionnalité des forêts entre discours et pratiques: illusion ou réalité à assumer? Rev For Française, numéro spécial annuel: 215–227

  • Berdoulay V, Soubeyran O (2014) Adaptation, science de la durabilité et pensée planificatrice. Nat Sci Sociétés 22:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolte A, Ammer C, Löf M et al (2009) Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scand J For Res 24:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580903418224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson J (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, Westport, pp 241–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutefeu B, Arnould P (2006) Le métier de forestier: entre rationalité et sensibilité. Environ Cult Société 58(1):61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Brang P, Spathelf P, Larsen JB et al (2014) Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change. Forestry 87:492–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU et al (2011) The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98:572–592. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedeurwaerdere T (2005) The contribution of network governance to sustainable development. Les séminaires l’Iddri 13:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2013) The adaptation policy paradox: the implementation deficit of policies. Ecol Soc 18(4):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evelya C, Fazey I, Pinard M, Lambin X (2008) The influence of philosophical perspectives in integrative research: a conservation case study in the cairngorms national park. Ecol Soc 13:52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey I, Fischer J (2009) Assisted colonization is a techno-fix. Trends Ecol Evol 24:475–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey I, Gamarra JGP, Fischer J et al (2010) Adaptation strategies for reducing vulnerability to future environmental change. Front Ecol Environ 8:414–422. https://doi.org/10.1890/080215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Manjarres J, Tschanz L (2010) Assisted colonization: protect managed forests. Science (80−) 330:1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke et al. (2002) Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Report from the Environmental Advisory Council, Ministry of Environment, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin S, Madrolles F, Richard J-B, Brusten T (2016) How to take into account climate change in forest sites handbooks? Rev Sci Tech Forêt Environ 228:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard O (2010) Dossier « Adaptation aux changements climatiques » – Cette ambiguë adaptation au changement climatique. Nat Sci Sociétés 18:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2010036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P (2000) Case study method. Sage Publi, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer K, Klostermann J et al (2010) The Adaptive Capacity Wheel a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husson JP (2006) Vers des modèles forestiers plurifonctionnels. In: Galochet M (ed) La forêt, Ressource et Patrimoine (collectif). Ellipses Edition, Paris

  • Institut National de l’Information Géographique et Forestière (2017) Le mémento: inventaire forestier

  • Isbell F, Craven D, Connolly J et al (2015) Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526:574–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzebski MP, Tumilba V, Yamamoto H (2016) Application of a tri-capital community resilience framework for assessing the social–ecological system sustainability of community-based forest management in the Philippines. Sustain Sci 11:307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0323-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnkowski W, Sahajdak A (2010) Occurence of the pinewood nematode in Portugal and Spain—threat for pine forests in Europe. Progr Plant Prot 50:1260–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre F, Boivin T, Bontemps A et al (2014) Considering evolutionary processes in adaptive forestry. Ann For Sci 71:723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H et al (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature 462:1052–1055. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maciver DC, Wheaton E (2005) Tomorrow’s forest: adapting to a changing climate. Clim Chang 70(1):273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan A (2009) Proposition d’une trame de recherche pour appréhender la capacité d’adaptation au changement climatique. Vertigo 9(3)

  • Magnan A (2014) De la vulnérabilité à l’adaptation au changement climatique: éléments de réflexion pour les sciences sociales. In: Monaco A, Prouzet P (dir.) Risques côtiers et adaptations des sociétés, ISTE Editions, pp 241–274

  • McCarthy MA, Burgman MA (1995) Coping with uncertainty in forest wildlife planning. For Ecol Manag 74:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mola-Yudego B, Arevalo J, Díaz-Yáñez O et al (2017) Wood biomass potentials for energy in northern Europe: forest or plantations? Biomass Bioenerg 106:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon K, Blackman D (2014) A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conserv Biol 28:1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Forest Inventory (2011) A new ecological and forest parting of French territories: the Sylvo-Eco Region (SER). L’Inventaire For 1–8

  • Nelson R, Brown PR, Darbas T, et al (2007) The potential to map the adaptive capacity of Australian land managers for NRM policy using ABS data. CSIRO, Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics, prepared for the National Land and Water Resources Audit

  • Nelson R, Kokic P, Crimp S et al (2010) The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: Part II—integrating impacts with adaptive capacity. Environ Sci Policy 13:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes da Silva M, Solla A, Sampedro L et al (2015) Susceptibility to the pinewood nematode of four pine species involved in potential range expansion across Europe. Tree Physiol 35:987–999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Social–ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol Soc 9(4):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ (2014) Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc 19(4):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papillon P (2014) Les forêts périurbaines: des espaces récréatifs à la fonction prophylactique. Le cas des aires urbaines d’Alençon, de Blois et du Mans. Dodier R (Dir), Paris

  • Percheval J (2014) Le développement de la filière bois-énergie en région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur. Report from the Regional Environmental Development and Housing Direction for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forest, Paris

  • Pottier A (2014) Le massif forestier des Landes de Gascogne, un patrimoine naturel? Le regard des gestionnaires. Ann Georgr 698:1016–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravera F, Tarrason D, Simelton E (2011) Envisioning adaptive strategies to change: participatory scenarios for agropastoral semiarid systems in Nicaragua. Ecol Soc 16:art20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz C (2008) Responding to scientific uncertainty in US forest policy. Environ Sci Policy 11:253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Folke C, Österblom H, Olsson P (2015) Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7369–7374. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406493112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szreter S, Woolcock M (2004) Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol 33:650–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoening JC (1973) L'ére des technocrates, les cas des Ponts et Chaussées. Les Editions d'Organisation, Collection Sociologie des Organisations, Paris

  • Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, and Climate Change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops JMH (2005) Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441:629–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004) Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol Soc 9(2):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Gunderson L, Kinzig A et al (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Campbell EM, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN (2012) Projecting future distributions of ecosystem climate niches: uncertainties and management applications. For Ecol Manage 279:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T, Hesseln H, Johnston M (2012) Adaptive capacity deficits and adaptive capacity of economic systems in climate change vulnerability assessment. For Policy Econ 24:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G (2010) Multifunctional “quality” and rural community resilience. Trans Inst Br Geogr 35:364–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR), which provided support for the doctoral position of R. Sansilvestri through the AMTools French ANR project (ANR-11-AGRO-0005). We would also like to thank Laurent Simon for his helpful advice on natural capital issues. Finally, we would sincerely like to thank all the stakeholders who participated in the interviews and gave their time to the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Ecologie Systématique Evolution, UMR 8079, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France

    Roxane Sansilvestri, Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste & Juan Fernandez-Manjarrés

  2. Geography Department, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France

    Marlène Cuccarollo

  3. INRA, UMR 1202, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France

    Marta Benito-Garzon

  4. Laboratoire ESE, Bat 360, Université Paris-Sud, Campus Orsay-Vallée, Rue du doyen André Guinier, 91405, Orsay Cedex, France

    Roxane Sansilvestri

Authors
  1. Roxane Sansilvestri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marlène Cuccarollo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marta Benito-Garzon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juan Fernandez-Manjarrés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxane Sansilvestri.

Additional information

Handled by Alexandros Gasparatos, University of Tokyo, Japan.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 451 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sansilvestri, R., Cuccarollo, M., Frascaria-Lacoste, N. et al. Evaluating climate change adaptation pathways through capital assessment: five case studies of forest social-ecological systems in France. Sustain Sci 15, 539–553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00731-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00731-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation