Advertisement

Leaving the “sustainability or collapse” narrative behind

  • Sebastian StrunzEmail author
  • Melissa Marselle
  • Matthias Schröter
Review Article

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the cogency of the “sustainability or collapse” narrative, that is, the notion that the current global civilization risks ecological overshoot-induced collapse. Combining different strands of literature, we put forward three arguments: First, for many empirical cases of past societies that purportedly “collapsed”, alternative interpretations, emphasizing resilience, transformation and reorganization are equally if not more plausible. Second, the “sustainability or collapse” narrative tends to be misleading insofar as it suggests that resource input constraints are the main sustainability challenge global civilization faces today. Instead, we argue that a stronger focus on system outputs and pollution is needed. Third, collapse-warnings are psychologically ineffective because they might induce fear and guilt, which leads to apathy not action. In consequence, we suggest that the sustainability agenda relies on positive framings that highlight the benefits from institutional and behavioral changes for human well-being. We illustrate our argument with two examples, water scarcity in Cape Town, South Africa and the German energy transition.

Keywords

Behavior Collapse Overshoot Resilience Sustainability 

Notes

References

  1. Agora Energiewende (2018) A future for lusatia: a structural change plan for the Lusatia coal mining region. [online]. https://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin2/Projekte/2017/Strukturwandel_Lausitz/Agora_Impulse_Structural_Change_Plan_Lusatia_EN_WEB.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen I (2005) Attitudes, personality and behavior, 2nd edn. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Paperback edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  5. Arcanjo M (2018) Delaying day zero: fighting back against water scarcity. Climate Institute: Washington, DC. [online]. http://climate.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Day-Zero-Water-Article.pdf. Acccessed 7 Aug 2018
  6. Arneborg J, Lynnerup N, Heinemeier J (2012) Human diet and subsistence patterns in Norse Greenland AD c.980—AD c.1450: archeological Interpretations. J North Atl 3:119–133Google Scholar
  7. Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Mäler K-G, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172Google Scholar
  8. Barnosky AD, Ehrlich PR, Hadly EA (2016) Avoiding collapse: Grand challenges for science and society to solve by 2050. Elementa Sci Anthropocene 4:000094.  https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000094 Google Scholar
  9. Beattie G (2012) Psychological effectiveness of carbon labelling. Nat Clim Chang 2:214–217Google Scholar
  10. Bennett EM, Solan M, Biggs R et al (2016) Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ 14(8):441–448.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1309 Google Scholar
  11. Berglund J (2010) Did the medieval Norse society in Greenland really fail? In: McAnany PA, Yoffee N (eds) Questioning collapse. Human resilience, ecological vulnerability and the aftermath of empire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–70Google Scholar
  12. Boersema JJ (2015) The survival of Easter Island. Dwindling resources and cultural resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Bohatch T (2017) What’s causing Cape Town’s water crisis? [online]. https://www.groundup.org.za/article/whats-causing-cape-towns-water-crisis/ Accessed 7 Aug 2018
  14. Bracha A, Brown DJ (2012) Affective decision making: a theory of optimism bias. Games Econ Behav 75:67–80Google Scholar
  15. Brandner JA, Taylor SM (1998) The simple economics of Easter Island. Am Econ Rev 88(1):119–138Google Scholar
  16. Buttlar B, Latz M, Walther E (2017) Breaking bad: existential threat decreases pro-environmental behavior. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 39(4):153–166Google Scholar
  17. Campbell B (2016) The great transition. Climate, disease and society in the late-medieval world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Chatterjee S, Vogl T (2018) Escaping the malthusian trap. Economic growth and fertility change in the developing world. Am Econ Rev 108(6):1440–14467Google Scholar
  19. Chen M-F (2016) Impact of fear appeals on pro-environmental behavior and crucial determinants. Int J Advert 35(1):74–92Google Scholar
  20. City of Cape Town (2018b) City News: Newsletter for the residents of Cape Town. February 2018 Issue 44. [online]. http://resource.capetown.gov.za/documentcentre/Documents/Forms%2c%20notices%2c%20tariffs%20and%20lists/City%20News%20Day%20Zero%20Newsletter.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  21. City of Cape Town (2018d) Your guide to 50 litres. [online]. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/text/2018/January/using_50_litres_of_water.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  22. City of Cape Town (2018e) How the City of Cape Town manages leaks and burst pipes: Guide and FAQ. [online]. http://resource.capetown.gov.za/documentcentre/Documents/Procedures,%20guidelines%20and%20regulations/CCT_Water_Leaks_and_Pipes_Management.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  23. Cordell D, White S (2011) Peak Phosphorous: clarifying the key issues of a vigorous debate about long-term phosphorous security. Sustainability 3(10):2027–2049.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3102027 Google Scholar
  24. Costanza R, Graumlich L, Steffen W (eds) (2007) Sustainability or collapse? An integrated history and future of people on earth. Dahlem Workshop Reports, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Covert T, Greenstone M, Knittel CR (2016) Will we ever stop using fossil fuels? J Econ Perspect 30(1):117–138Google Scholar
  26. Cumming GS, Peterson GD (2017) Unifying research on social-ecological resilience and collapse. Trends Ecol Evol 32(9):695–713Google Scholar
  27. Diamond J (2005) Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359:270–272Google Scholar
  29. Drupp M, Meya J, Baumgärtner S, Quaas M (2018) Economic inequality and the value of nature. Ecol Econ 150:340–345Google Scholar
  30. Ereaut G, Segnit N (2006) Warm words: how are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better?. Institute for Public Policy Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Faulseit RK (2015) Beyond collapse: archeological perspectives on resilience, revitalization, and transformation in complex societies. Southern Illinois University Press, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  32. Fielding KS, Terry DJ, Masser BM, Hogg MA (2008) Integrating social identity theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. Br J Soc Psychol 47(1):23–48Google Scholar
  33. Fredrickson B (2006) The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi IS (eds) Life worth living: contributions to positive psychology. Oxford University Press, Cary, pp 85–103Google Scholar
  34. Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction. Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66(4):290–302Google Scholar
  35. Gifford R, Scannell L, Kormos C et al (2009) Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: an 18-nation survey. J Environ Psychol 29:1–12Google Scholar
  36. Gunderson L, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris L, Zhao J, Visser M (2018) Nudging the city and residents of Cape Town to save water. [online]. http://theconversation.com/nudging-the-city-and-residents-of-cape-town-to-save-water-92192. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  38. Heckenmüller M, Narita D, Klepper G (2014) Global availability of phosphorus and its implications for global food supply: an economic overview. Kiel working paper No. 1897. [online]. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/90630/1/776834355.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  39. Heinberg R (2017) Climate change isn‘t our biggest environmental problem and why technology won’t save us. Museletter#303. [online]. http://richardheinberg.com/museletter-303-climate-change-isnt-our-biggest-environmental-problem-and-why-technology-wont-save-us. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  40. Hunt TL, Lipo C (2010) Ecological catastrophe, collapse, and the myth of “Ecocide” on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). In: McAnany PA, Yoffee N (eds) Questioning Collapse. Human resilience, ecological vulnerability and the aftermath of empire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–44Google Scholar
  41. Jacobson SK, Morales NA, Chen B, Soodeen R, Moulton MP, Jain E (2018) Love or loss: effective message framing to promote environmental conservation. Appl Environ Educ Commun 1:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015x.2018.1456380 Google Scholar
  42. Janssen M, Scheffer M (2004) Overexploitation of renewable resources by ancient societies the the role of sunk-cost effects. Ecol Soc 9(1): 6. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art6/
  43. Keller PA (1999) Converting the unconverted: the effect of inclination and opportunity to discount health related fear appeals. J Appl Psychol 84:403–415Google Scholar
  44. Klintisch E (2016) The lost norse. Science 354:696–701Google Scholar
  45. Kool R (2013) Limits to growth, environmental science and the nature of modern prophecy. Ecol Econ 85:1–5Google Scholar
  46. Lehmann P, Creutzig F, Ehlers M-H, Friedrichsen N, Heuson C, Hirth L, Pietzcker R (2012) Carbon lock-out: advancing renewable energy policy in Europe. Energies 5(2):323–354Google Scholar
  47. Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahmstorf S, Schellnhuber HJ (2008) Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(6):1786–1793Google Scholar
  48. Manning C (2009) The psychology of sustainable behavior. Tips for empowering people to take environmentally positive action. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. [online] https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/p-ee1-01.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  49. Mayewski PA, White F (2002) The ice chronicles. University Press of New England, Hanover and LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. McAnany PA, Yoffee N (eds) (2010) Questioning Collapse. Human resilience, ecological vulnerability and the aftermath of empire. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. McNeill JR (2010) Sustainable survival. In: McAnany PA, Yoffee N (eds) Questioning collapse. Human resilience, ecological vulnerability and the aftermath of empire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 355–367Google Scholar
  52. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens W III (1972) The limits to growth. a report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Michie S, Atkins L, West R (2014) The behavior change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. Silverback Publishing, SurreyGoogle Scholar
  54. Middleton GD (2017) Understanding collapse. Ancient history and modern myths. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Moser SC (2007) More bad news: the risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information. In: Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 64–80Google Scholar
  56. Motesharrei S, Rivas J, Kalnay E (2014) Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies. Ecol Econ 101:90–102Google Scholar
  57. Neilson AI (2018) No day zero for 2019 if appropriate water restrictions are maintained. Statement by executive deputy mayor alderman ian neilson. [online]. http://www.capetown.gov.za/Media-and-news/No%20Day%20Zero%20for%202019%20if%20appropriate%20water%20restrictions%20are%20maintained. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  58. Nekola JC, Allen CD, Brown JH, Burger JR, Davidson AD, Fristoe TS, Hamilton MJ, Hammond ST, Kodric-Brown A, Mercado-Silva N, Okie JG (2013) The malthusian-darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization. Trends Ecol Evol 28:127–130Google Scholar
  59. Neumayer E (2010) Weak versus strong sustainability. Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms, 3rd edn. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  60. Nisbet EKL, Gick ML (2008) Can health psychology help the planet? Applying theory and models of behavior to environmental actions. Can Psychol 49(4):296–303Google Scholar
  61. O’Brien C (2008) Sustainable Happiness: how happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Can Psychol 49(4):289–295Google Scholar
  62. Paech N (2012) Liberation from excess: the road to a post-growth economy. Oekom, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  63. Pavel CC, Lacal-Arantegui R, Marmier A, Schüler D, Tzimas E, Buchert M, Jenseit W, Blagoeva D (2017) Substitution strategies for reducing the use of rare earths in wind turbines. Resour Policy 52:349–357Google Scholar
  64. Puleston CO, Ladefoged TN, Haoa S, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Stevenson CM (2017) Rain, sun, soil, and sweat: a consideration of population limits on Rapa Nui (Easter Island) before European Contact. Front Ecol Evol 5:69.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00069 Google Scholar
  65. Research and Degrowth (2010) Degrowth declaration of the Paris 2008 conference. J Clean Prod 18(6):523–524Google Scholar
  66. Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Galetti M, Alamgir M, Crist E, Mahmoud MI, Laurence WF (2017) World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice. BioScience 67(12):1026–1028Google Scholar
  67. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:471–475Google Scholar
  68. Schmidt RC, Marschinski R (2009) A model of technological breakthrough in the renewable energy sector. Ecol Econ 69:435–444Google Scholar
  69. Scott B, Amel EL, Koger SM, Manning CM (2015) Psychology for Sustainability, 4th edn. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Seppelt R, Manceur AM, Liu J, Fenichel E, Klotz S (2014) Synchronized peak-rate years of global resource use. Ecol Soc 19(4):50.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07039-190450 Google Scholar
  71. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 Google Scholar
  72. Steffen W, Rockström J, Richardson K, Lenton TM, Folke C, Liverman D, Summerhayes CP, Barnosky AD, Cornell SE, Crucifix M, Donges JF, Fetzer I, Lade SJ, Scheffer M, Winkelmann R, Schellnhuber HJ (2018) Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115 Google Scholar
  73. Stegen KS (2015) Heavy rare earths, permanent magnets, and renewable energies: an imminent crisis. Energy Policy 70:1–8Google Scholar
  74. Stevenson CM, Puleston CO, Vitousek PM, Chadwick OA, Haoa S, Ladefoged TN (2015) Variation in Rapa Nui (Easter Island) land use indicates production and population peaks prior to European contact. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(4):1025–1030Google Scholar
  75. Strunz S (2014) The German energy transition as a regime shift. Ecol Econ 100:150–158Google Scholar
  76. Stumpf K, Baumgärtner S, Becker C, Sievers-Glotzbach S (2015) The justice dimension of sustainability: a systematic and general conceptual framework. Sustainability 7(6):7438–7472.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067438 Google Scholar
  77. Tainter JA (1988) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  78. Tainter JA (2006) Archeology of overshoot and collapse. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:59–74Google Scholar
  79. Tietenberg T, Lewis L (2016) Environmental and resource economics, 10th edn. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Turner GM (2008) A comparison of the limits to growth with 30 years of reality. Glob Environ Chang 18:397–411Google Scholar
  81. Turner GM (2012) On the cusp of global collapse? Updated comparison of The Limits to Growth with historical data. GAIA-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 21(2):116–124Google Scholar
  82. Unruh G (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830Google Scholar
  83. Valois P, Turgeon H, Godin G, Blondeau D, Cote F (2001) Influence of a persuasive strategy on nursing students’ beliefs and attitudes toward provision of care to people living with HIV/AIDS. J Nurs Educ 40(8):354–358Google Scholar
  84. van Cappellen P, Rice EL, Catalino LI, Fredrickson BL (2018) Positive affective processes underlie positive health behavior change. Psychology Health 33(1):77–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1320798 Google Scholar
  85. Van de Velde L, Verbeke W, Popp M, von Huylenbroeck G (2010) The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy. Energy Policy 38(10):5541–5549Google Scholar
  86. Vande Velde F, Hudders L, Cauberghe V, Claerebout E (2018) Changing farmers’ behavior intention with a hint of wit: the moderating influence of humor on message sidedness. J Environmental Psychol 56:97–103Google Scholar
  87. Wilson C, Marselle M (2016) Insights from psychology about the design and implementation of energy interventions using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Energy Res Soc Sci 19:177–191Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Strunz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melissa Marselle
    • 2
    • 3
  • Matthias Schröter
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of Ecosystem ServicesHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Department of Computational Landscape EcologyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations