The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: learning experiences and reflections from a transdisciplinary urban case study in Enkanini informal settlement, South Africa

Abstract

Transdisciplinarity is not a new science per se, but a new methodology for doing science with society. A particular challenge in doing science with society is the engagement with non-academic actors to enable joint problem formulation, analysis and transformation. How this is achieved differs between contexts. The premise of this paper is that transdisciplinary research (TDR) methodologies designed for developed world contexts cannot merely be replicated and transferred to developing world contexts. Thus a new approach is needed for conducting TDR in contexts characterised by high levels of complexity, conflict and social fluidity. To that end, this paper introduces a new approach to TDR titled emergent transdisciplinary design research (ETDR). A core element of this approach is that the research process is designed as it unfolds, that is, it transforms as it emerges from and within the fluid context. The ETDR outlined in this paper emerged through a case study in the informal settlement (slum) of Enkanini in Stellenbosch, South Africa. This case study demonstrates the context from and within which the ETDR approach and identifies a set of guiding logics that can be used to guide ETDR approaches in other contexts. The study demonstrates that the new logics and guiding principles were not simply derived from the TDR literature, but rather emerged from constant interacting dynamics between theory and practice. Learning how to co-design the research process through co-producing transformative knowledge and then implementing strategic interventions to bring about incremental social change is key to theory development in ways that are informed by local contextual dynamics. There are, however, risks when undertaking such TDR processes such as under-valuing disciplinary knowledge, transferring risks onto a society, and suppressing ‘truth-to-power’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

(Source: Jaglin 2014)

Fig. 2

(Source: Tosey et al. 2012)

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Jaglin (2014: 438) service provision in southern cities is “a combination made up of a networked infrastructure, deficient in varying degrees and offering a rational service, and of private sector commercial initiatives, whether individual or collective, formal or informal, which are usually illegal in respect of the exclusive contracts of operators officially responsible for the service. These services fill the gaps in the conventional service and, depending on the type of urban area, target either the well-off clientele or poor clientele excluded from the main networks because of lack of resources, geographical remoteness or illegal status. These delivery configurations have one thing in common: the conventional network does not always reach the end user.”

  2. 2.

    Such high experiments have been discussed in the well-established literature that emerged after the Chernobyl disaster. For a review see Gross & Hoffmann-Riem (2005).

  3. 3.

    By the time we approached the people of Enkanini in their informal social networks there had not been any shared experience amongst them of having worked jointly on any such project (e.g., electricity, water, waste). In other words, they were ‘un-mobilised’ following the NGO sector discourse. So, this ‘culture’ (or shared experience) of working together only emerged during our TDR process. As this was not something we intentionally planned for, it is reasonable to claim that it truly emerged during the TDR process.

References

  1. Allen A, Lampis A, Swilling M (2015) Untamed Urbanisms. Routledge

  2. Ambole LA (2016) Understanding co-production through sanitation intervention case studies in South Africa (Thesis). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argyris C (2002) Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Acad Manag. Learn Educ. 1:206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press

  5. Bateson G (2002) Mind and nature: a necessary unity. Hampton Press, Incorporated

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker E (2012) Social-ecological systems as epistemic objects. In: Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter B, Welp M (eds) Human-Nature interactions in the anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis. Routledge, London, pp 37–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergmann M, Jahn T, Knobloch T, Krohn W, Pohl C, Schramm E (2013) Methods for Transdisciplinary Research: A Primer for Practice. Campus Verlag GmbH

  8. Bohme G, Van den Daele W, Krohn W (1973) Die finalisierung der wissenschaft/the finalization of science. Z Für Soziol 2:128–144

  9. Boulton JG, Allen PM, Bowman C (2015) Embracing Complexity: Strategic Perspectives for an Age of Turbulence. Oxford University Press

  10. Burgess and Burgess (1997) Constructive confrontation: a Strategy for dealing with intractable environmental conflicts (WWW Document). Url http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/full_text_search/AllCRCDocs/97-1.htm (accessed 5.23.16)

  11. Carew AL, Wickson F (2010) The TD wheel: a heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:1146–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cavallo D (2000) Emergent design and learning environments: building on indigenous knowledge. IBM Syst J 39:768–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chilisa B (2011) Indigenous research methodologies. SAGE

  14. Chu D, Strand R, Fjelland R (2003) Theories of complexity. Complexity 8:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cilliers P (1998) Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex systems. Routledge

  16. Corcoran PB, Wals AEJ (eds) (2012) Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change. Wageningen Academic Publishers

  17. Czarniawska B (2004) Narratives in social science research. Sage

  18. Davies JL, Kaufman E (2003) Second tract/citizens’ diplomacy: concepts and techniques for conflict. Rowman & Littlefield

  19. DeLanda M (2006) A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. A&C Black

  20. Diamond L, McDonald JW (1996) Multi-track diplomacy: a systems approach to peace. Kumarian Press

  21. Edelman GM (2006) Second nature: brain science and human knowledge. Yale University Press

  22. Edensor T, Jayne M (2012) Urban theory beyond the west: a world of cities. Routledge

  23. Esterhuyse W (2012) Endgame: secret talks and the end of apartheid. NB Publishers Limited

  24. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farías I, Bender T (2012) Urban assemblages: how actor-network theory changes urban studies. Routledge

  26. Foley RW, Wiek A, Kay B, Rushforth R (2017) Ideal and reality of multi-stakeholder collaboration on sustainability problems: a case study on a large-scale industrial contamination in Phoenix, Arizona. Sustain. Science 12:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gerring J (2006) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press

  28. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE

  29. Gross M, Stauffacher M (2014) Transdisciplinary environmental science: problem-oriented projects and strategic research programs. Taylor & Francis

  30. Gross M, Hoffmann-Riem H (2005) Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment. Public Underst Sci 14:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hadorn GH, Pohl C (2008a) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hadorn GH, Pohl C (2008b) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harman G (2008) DeLanda’s ontology: assemblage and realism. Cont Philos Rev 41:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hasan H (2006) Design as research: emergent complex activity. Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Conference of Information Systems (ACIS 2006), Adelaide, 6-8 December 2006

  35. Heinen S, Sommer R (2009) Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research. Walter de Gruyter

  36. Herman D, Jahn M, Ryan M-L (2010) Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Routledge

  37. Hesse-Biber SN (2010) Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. Guilford Press

  38. Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (2010) Handbook of emergent methods. Guilford Press

  39. Hodder I (2012) Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Wiley

  40. Jacobs JA (2013) In defense of disciplines: interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. University of Chicago Press

  41. Jaglin S (2014) The routledge handbook on cities of the global south. Routledge

  42. Jahn T (2008) Transdisciplinarity in the practice of research. Matthias bergmannengelbert schramm hg transdisziplinäre forsch. Integr. Forschungsprozesse Verstehen Bewerten, German (No English translation yet) 21–37

  43. Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jonas W (2007) Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now, board of international research in design. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_11

    Google Scholar 

  45. Juarrero A (2002) Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system. MIT Press

  46. Kant I (1996) Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press

  47. Kant I (2005) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Broadview Press

  48. Kant I (2012) Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of morals. Courier Corporation

  49. Keller A (2012) Conceptualising a sustainable energy solution for in situ informal settlement upgrading (Thesis). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kincheloe JL, Berry KS (2004) Rigour and complexity in educational research: conceptualizing the bricolage. McGraw-Hill International

  51. Klein G, Snowden D, Pin CL (2011) Anticipatory thinking. In: Mosier KL, Fisch UM (eds) Information Knowledge, pp 235–246

  52. Kolb DA (2014) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press

  53. Krohn W (2008) Learning from case studies. In: Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, pp 369–383

  54. Krohn W (2010) Interdisciplinary cases and disciplinary knowledge. Oxf. Handb. Interdiscip. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 32–49

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kurtz CF (2014) Working with stories in your community or organization: participatory narrative inquiry. On Demand Publishing, LLC-Create Space

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Latour B (2007) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. OUP Oxford

  58. Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, Grauwin S, Boullier D (2012) ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’—a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. Br J Sociol 63:590–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Law J (2004) After method: mess in social science research. Routledge

  60. Machado A (2003) There is no road. White Pine Press

  61. Machado A, Trueblood AS (1982) Antonio Machado. Harvard University Press

  62. Mapendere, 2005. Track one and a half diplomacy and the complementarity of tracks. COPOJ—culture of peace online journal. 2(1). pp. 66–81—Google Scholar [WWW Document]. Url https://scholar.google.co.za/scholar?q=Mapendere%2C+J.+2005.+Track+one+and+a+half+diplomacy+and+the+complementarity+of+tracks.+COPOJ+-+Culture+of+Peace+Online+Journal%2C+2%281%29%2C+pp.+66%E2%80%9381&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 (accessed 5.23.16)

  63. McCarney PL, Stren RE (2003) Governance on the ground: innovations and discontinuities in cities of the developing world. Woodrow Wilson Center Press

  64. McFarlane C (2011) Learning the city: knowledge and translocal assemblage. Wiley

  65. Meadows D (1999) Leverage points: place to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute: Hartland, VT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  66. Medema W, Wals A, Adamowski J (2014) Multi-loop social learning for sustainable land and water governance: towards a research agenda on the potential of virtual learning platforms. NJAS-Wagening. J Life Sci 69:23–38

    Google Scholar 

  67. Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mingers J (2014) Philosophy and systems thinking: a mutual synergy. Routledge

  69. Mintzberg H, Lampel J (1999) Reflecting on the strategy process. Sloan Manage Rev 40(3):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  70. Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Théoret A (1974) The Structure of “unstructured” Decision Processes. McGill University

  71. Mintzberg H, Lampel J, Ghoshal S, Quinn JB (2013) The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases. Pearson Education

  72. Morin E, Kern AB (1999) Homeland earth: a manifesto for the new millennium. Hampton Press, Incorporated

  73. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Wiley

  74. Parnell S, Oldfield S (2014) The routledge handbook on cities of the global south. Routledge

  75. Patokorpi, 2006. Role of abductive reasoning in digital interaction (Doctoral thesis, Åbo Akademi University, Finland). [WWW Document]. https://scholar.google.co.za/scholar?q = atokorpi%2C +E.+ 2006. + Role + of + abductive + reasoning + in + digital + interaction + %28 + Doctoral + thesis%2C + %C3%85bo + Akademi + %09University%2C + Finland%29. + Available + at + http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cspeirce.com%2Fmenu%2Flibrary%2Faboutcsp%2Fpatokorpi%2Fabduction.pdf + &btnG = &hl = en&as_sdt = 0%2C5. Accessed 23 May 2016

  76. Peirce CS (1974) Collected papers of charles sanders peirce. Harvard University Press

  77. Pohl C, Hadorn GH (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Oekom, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  78. Poli R (2009) The complexity of anticipation. Balk J Philos 1:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Poli R (2010a) The many aspects of anticipation. Foresight 12:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Poli R (2010b) An introduction to the ontology of anticipation. Futures 42:769–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rip A (2011) The future of research universities. Prometheus 29:443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press

  84. Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. Int J Sustain High Educ 7:226–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370610677829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Scholz RW, Spoerri A, Lang DJ (2009) Problem structuring for transitions: the case of Swiss waste management. Futures 41:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Seidl R, Brand FS, Stauffacher M, Krütli P, Le QB, Spörri A, Meylan G, Moser C, González MB, Scholz RW (2013) Science with society in the anthropocene. Ambio 42:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0363-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Sennett R (2012) Together: the rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Penguin, UK

    Google Scholar 

  88. Simone A (2004) For the city yet to come: changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press

  89. Simone A, Pieterse E (2017) New urban worlds: inhabiting dissonant times. Polity Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  90. Snodderly (2011) USIP “Peace Terms” Glossary [WWW Document]. U. S. Inst. Peace. Url http://www.usip.org/publications/usip-peace-terms-glossary (accessed 5.23.16)

  91. Snowden D (1999) Story telling: an old skill in a new context. Bus Inf Rev 16:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  92. Snowden D (2005) Multi-ontology sense making: a new simplicity in decision making. J Innov Health Inform 13:45–53. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v13i1.578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Snowden D (2006) Perspectives around emergent connectivity, sense-making and asymmetric threat management. Public Money Manag 26:275–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Snowden D (2010) Naturalizing Sensemaking. In: Mosier KL, Fischer UM (eds) Informed by knowledge: expert performance in complex situations. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 223–234

  95. Snowden D (2011) Good fences make good neighbors. Inf Knowl Syst Manag 10:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Snowden D (2012) Sidecasting techniques [WWW Document]. Cogn. Edge. URL/blog/sidecasting-techniques/(accessed 3.17.17)

  97. Snowden D (2015) The evolutionary potential of the present [WWW Document]. Cogn. Edge. URL/blog/the-evolutionary-potential-of-the-present/(accessed 3.14.17)

  98. Snowden D (2016) The adjacent possible [WWW Document]. Cogn. Edge. URL/blog/the-adjacent-possible/(accessed 3.14.17)

  99. Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 85:68. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v13i1.578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Star SL (2010) This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35:601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19:387–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Stauffacher M, Walter AI, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2006) Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case study approach. Int J Sustain High Educ 7:252–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Tait A, Richardson KA (2010) Complexity and knowledge management: understanding the role of knowledge in the management of social networks. IAP

  104. Taylor EW, Cranton P (2012) The handbook of transformative learning: theory, research, and practice. Wiley

  105. Tosey P, Visser M, Saunders MN (2012) The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review. Manag Learn 43:291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Unger RM (1998) Democracy realized: the progressive alternative. Verso

  107. Unger RM (2007) The self awakened: pragmatism unbound. Harvard University Press

  108. Unger RM (2014) What is Wrong with the Social Sciences Today? [WWW Document]. Url http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/01/roberto-mangabeira-unger-what-is-wrong-with-the-social-sciences-today/ (accessed 7.25.16)

  109. Van Dijk TA (1976) Philosophy of action and theory of narrative. Poetics 5:287–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(76)90014-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Vester F (2007) The art of interconnected thinking: tools and concepts for a new approach to tackling complexity. MCB Verlag GmbH, Munich, Germany

  111. Vilsmaier U, Lang DJ (2015) Making a difference by marking the difference: constituting in-between spaces for sustainability learning. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 16:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. von der Heyde V (2014) Towards a sustainable incremental waste management system in Enkanini: a transdisciplinary case study (Thesis). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  113. Wals AE, Rodela R (2014) Social learning towards sustainability: problematic, perspectives and promise. NJAS-Wagening. J Life Sci 69:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  114. Wessels BS (2015) MA-Thesis. Turning points: Exploring power transitions in an incremental upgrading process in Enkanin. Stellenbosch

  115. Wickson F, Carew AL, Russell AW (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38:1046–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Wiek A, Lang DJ (2016) Transformational sustainability research methodology. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds) Sustainability science – an introduction. Springer, Berlin, New York, pp 31–41

  117. Wright D, Meadows DH (2012) Thinking in systems: a primer. Routledge

  118. Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publications

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John van Breda.

Additional information

Handled by Alexandros Gasparatos, University of Tokyo, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Breda, J., Swilling, M. The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: learning experiences and reflections from a transdisciplinary urban case study in Enkanini informal settlement, South Africa. Sustain Sci 14, 823–841 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0606-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Interdisciplinary research
  • Transdisciplinary research
  • Emergent design
  • Multi-track transdisciplinary processes
  • Boundary objects
  • Social transformation and innovation
  • Transformative knowledge co-production