Skip to main content

Hydro-social arrangements and paradigmatic change in water governance: an analysis of the sustainable development goals (SDGs)

Abstract

SDG 6 presents a global water agenda and an important opportunity to steer development trajectories towards a water-secure world. Based on semi-structured interviews and a political ecology perspective, this study takes water and SDG 6 as a focal point to analyze the shift from MDGs to SDGs in terms of underlying governance paradigms and policy change dynamics. Results indicate that the water-related SDG constitutes an important shift of UN policies in the realms of development cooperation and sustainable development policies by merging these two strands. While the MDGs were largely framed in line with conventional governance and management approaches, SDG 6 portrays a more holistic and inclusive agenda, which is also reflected in actor arrangement changing within the international water community. Nevertheless, ‘state-hydraulic paradigm’ approaches are still prevalent within Goal 6 and current implementation. To stimulate a more fundamental paradigm change towards a socio-hydrological perspective, the analysis suggests to acknowledge the wider political environment of water challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. Int-21, Private Sector, Skype Interview, 16.12.2015.

  2. Int-22, Intergovernmental Organization, Skype Interview, 16.12.2015.

  3. Int-12, Non-Governmental Organization, Skype Interview, 03.12.2015.

  4. Int-8, Non-Governmental Organization, Brussels, 30.11.2015.

  5. Int-16, Network for Governmental and Civil Society Organizations, Skype Interview, 04.12.2015.

  6. Int-19, Intergovernmental Organisation, Skype Interview, 11.12.2015.

  7. Int-11, Government Representative, Telephone, 02.12.2015.

  8. Int-5, Intergovernmental Organization, Skype Interview, 19.11.2015

References

  • Bakker K (2003) An uncooperative commodity: privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2009) Water. In: Castree N, Demeritt D, Liverman D, Rhoads B (eds) A companion to environmental geography. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 515–532

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2012) Water: political, biopolitical, material. Soc Stud Sci 42(4):616–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes J, Alatout S (2012) Water worlds: introduction to the special issue of Social Studies of Science. Soc Stud Sci 42(4):483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor C (2007) Water governance literature assessment. International Institute for Environment and Development: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02523.pdf?. Retrieved 16 March 2016

  • Biermann F, Betsill M, Gupta J, Kanie N, Lebel L, Liverman D, Schroeder H, Siebenhüner B; with contributions from Conca K, da Costa Ferreira L, Desai B, Tay S, Zondervan R (2009) Earth system governance: people, places and the planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Earth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20, Bonn

  • Budds J (2009) Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum 40(3):418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree N, Braun B (2001) Social nature: theory, practice and politics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1994) Trends and issues in land and water resources management: setting the agenda for change. Environ Manag 18(2):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) The sustainable development goals. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/policies/sustainable-development-goals_en. Retrieved 27 Aug 2017

  • Falkenmark M (1997) Society’s interaction with the water cycle: a conceptual framework for a more holistic approach. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2004) Balancing water for humans and nature: the new approach in ecohydrology. Earthscan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth T (2004) Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gläser J, Laudel G (2013) Life with and without coding: two methods for early-stage data analysis in qualitative research aiming at causal explanations. Forum Qual Soc Res 14(2)

  • Gleick PH (2000) A look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Int 25(1):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) Global water governance in the context of global and multilevel governance: its need, form, and challenges. Ecol Soc 18(4):53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik J (1992) Analyse verbaler Daten: Über den Umgang mit qualitativen Daten. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaika M (2003) The water framework directive: a new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. Eur Plan Stud 11(3):299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton J (2014) Modern water and its discontents: a history of hydrosocial renewal. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 1(1):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton J, Budds J (2014) The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum 57:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus A (2007) Working the socio-natural relations of the urban waterscape in South Africa. Int J Urban Reg Res 31(1):41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2008) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F (2007) Scales and power in river basin management: the Chao Phraya River in Thailand. Geogr J 173(4):358–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016) Better policies for sustainable development 2016: a new framework for policy coherence. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/publications/better-policies-for-sustainable-development-2016-9789264256996-en.htm. Retrieved 26 Aug 2017

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2015) Water governance in the face of global change: from understanding to transformation. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Conca K, Kramer A, Maestu J, Schmidt F (2013) Missing Links in Global Water Governance: a processes-oriented analysis. Ecol Soc 18(2):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen K (2003) Four times of politics: policy, polity, politicking, and politicization. Alternatives 28(2):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw E (1999) Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 89(3):443–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw E (2004) Social power and the urbanization of water: flows of power. University Press Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2016) Progress towards the sustainable development goals—Report of the Secretary-General. UN Economic and Social Council. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/2016/75. Retrieved 10 Nov 2016

  • United Nations (2017) Progress towards the sustainable development goals—report of the Secretary-General. UN Economic and Social Council. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/2017/66&Lang=E. Retrieved 29 Aug 2017

  • UN-Water (2015) Indicators and monitoring. UN-Water. http://www.unwater.org/sdgs/indicators-and-monitoring/en/. Retrieved 28 March 2015

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Hoekstra AY, Bunn SE, Conway D, Gupta J (2015) Fresh water goes global. Science 349(6247):478–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the reference number 01 LN 1316 A. We would like to thank all members of the Governance and Sustainability Lab at Trier University who commented on earlier versions of this article as well as two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. We would also like to thank all our interview partners who voluntarily shared their time and knowledge to make this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viviana Wiegleb.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiegleb, V., Bruns, A. Hydro-social arrangements and paradigmatic change in water governance: an analysis of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Sustain Sci 13, 1155–1166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0518-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0518-1

Keywords

  • SDGs
  • Water governance
  • Policy and paradigm change
  • Hydro-social cycle