Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 919–933 | Cite as

Against the current: rewiring rigidity trap dynamics in urban water governance through civic engagement

  • Johan EnqvistEmail author
  • Maria Tengö
  • Wiebren J. Boonstra
Special Feature: Original Article Traps! Expanding Thinking on Persistent Maladaptive States in Pursuit of Resilience
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Traps! Expanding Thinking on Persistent Maladaptive States in Pursuit of Resilience

Abstract

This paper investigates how the agency of local residents can affect persistent and unsustainable practices in urban water supply governance. Using a case study from Bangalore, India, we analyze a social–ecological trap which developed after a shift to external water provision paired with rapid urbanization. The reluctance of forsaking initial investments in infrastructure and competence, and the subsequent loss of the local network of lakes built for harvesting rainwater, reinforced dependence on external sources while undermining groundwater levels in the city. These feedbacks made water scarcity a structurally persistent feature of Bangalore. This situation started to change when local residents recently started organizing to preserve and restore Bangalore’s lakes. By entering collaborative management agreements with municipal authorities, these lake groups have restored and established effective protection of five lakes. Through a case study of this civic engagement we show that the lake restorations have the potential to counteract trap mechanisms by restoring ecological functions, and by reducing water scarcity as groundwater levels rise and authorities are relieved from maintenance and monitoring tasks. Importantly, these lake groups have also created opportunities for over a dozen similar groups to form across the city. This demonstrates that social movements can be an important source of change in social–ecological traps.

Keywords

Agency Bangalore, India Environmental governance Social–ecological systems Social movements Urbanization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all interviewees for the warm hospitality in Bangalore. We also thank Bhagyalakshmi Srinivas for the fieldwork assistance, Vanessa Masterson for comments on an early draft of this paper, and Patrick Keys for reviewing the language. This study has been carried out partly funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), and by a core grant from the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA).

References

  1. Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian Agricultural Region. Ecol Soc 9Google Scholar
  2. Andersson E, Enqvist J, Tengö M (2017) Stewardship in urban landscapes. In: Bieling C, Plieninger T (eds) The science and practice of landscape stewardship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Bangalore Mirror Bureau (2013) Linganamakki water to Bangalore is a joke. Bangalore Mirror. Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F (2010) Shifting perspectives on resource management: resilience and the reconceptualization of “natural resources” and “management”. MAST 9:13–40Google Scholar
  5. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Boonstra WJ, de Boer FW (2014) The historical dynamics of social–ecological traps. Ambio 43:260–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boonstra WJ, Joosse S (2013) The social dynamics of degrowth. Environ Values 22:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BWSSB (2014) Meeting the vital need for water—a golden journey. Bengaluru Water Supply and Sewerage Board, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  9. BWSSB. n.d. A (2014) Water supply and sources. http://bwssb.org/water-supply-sources/
  10. BWSSB. n.d. B (2014) Water supply and sources—Chamarajsagar Reservoir. http://bwssb.org/water-supply-sources-chamaraja-sagar-reservoir/
  11. BWSSB. n.d. C (2014) Mission and history. http://bwssb.org/mission-history/
  12. BWSSB. n.d. D (2014) Current projects. http://bwssb.org/current-projects/
  13. BWSSB. n.d. E (2014) Current projects 2. http://bwssb.org/current-projects-2/
  14. BWSSB. n.d. F (2014) Current projects 3. http://bwssb.org/current-projects-3
  15. BWSSB. n.d. G (2014) Current projects 4. http://bwssb.org/current-projects-4/
  16. BWSSB. n.d. H (2014) Rain water harvesting (RWH). http://bwssb.org/rain-water-harvestingrwh/
  17. BWSSB. n.d. I (2014) Rain water harvesting. http://bwssb.org/rain-water-harvesting/
  18. Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2008) Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecol Soc 13Google Scholar
  19. Central Ground Water Board (2013) Ground water information booklet—Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, FaridabadGoogle Scholar
  20. Cinner JE (2011) Social–ecological traps in reef fisheries. Glob Environ Change 21:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Citizen Matters (2014) Water found at 9 feet below ground level on Sarjapura Road. Citizen Matters—Bangalore news, views and opinions. Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  23. D’Souza R, Nagendra H (2011) Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: the Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environ Manag 47:840–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deccan Chronicle (2013) Cauvery stage V to bring in more water. Deccan Chronicle, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  25. Diani M, McAdam D (2003) Social movements and networks: relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Dikshit GS, Kuppuswamy GR, Mohan SK (1993) Tank irrigation in Karnataka—a historical survey. Gandhi Sahitya Sangha, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  27. Dorado S (2005) Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organ Stud 26:385–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Enqvist J, Tengö M, Bodin Ö (2014) Citizen networks in the Garden City: protecting urban ecosystems in rapid urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan 130:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Enqvist J, Tengö M, Luna F (2016) Emergence and spread of an urban environmental stewardship network (Manuscript) Google Scholar
  30. Ernstson H (2011) Transformative collective action: a network approach to transformative change in ecosystem-based management. In: Bodin Ö, Prell C (eds) Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 255–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friese S (2012) Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Government of India (2011) Cities having population 1 lakh and above. Pages 1–13. Census of India 2011—Provisional Population Totals. Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Gowda K, Sridhara MV (2007) Conservation of tanks/lakes in the Bangalore metropolitan area. Manag Environ Qual Int J 18:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grönwall J, Mulenga M, McGranahan G (2010) Groundwater, self-supply and poor urban dwellers—a review with case studies of Bangalore and Lusaka. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hechter M, Pfaff S, Underwood P (2016) Grievances and the genesis of rebellion: mutiny in the Royal Navy, 1740 to 1820. Am Sociol Rev 81:165–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holling CS, Gunderson LH, Peterson GD (2002) Sustainability and Panarchies. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 63–102Google Scholar
  40. Janssen MA, Scheffer M (2004) Overexploitation of renewable resources by ancient societies and the role of sunk-cost effects. Ecol Soc 9Google Scholar
  41. Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE Publications Ltd, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  42. Lele S, Srinivasan V, Jamwal P, Thomas BK, Eswar M, Zuhail TM (2013) Water management in Arkavathy Basin—a situation analysis. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, BengaluruGoogle Scholar
  43. Luna F (2014) Transformation of urban lake governance in Bangalore, India. Stockholm University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  44. Mahoney J (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory Soc 29:507–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manipal World News (2014) Bangalore: Mekedatu water for Cauvery stage V project. Manipal World News, ManipalGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagendra H (2010) Maps, lakes and citizens. Pages 19–23 Seminar 613. ATREEGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagendra H, Ostrom E (2014) Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecol Soc 19Google Scholar
  48. Nagendra H, Sudhira HS, Katti M, Tengö M, Schewenius M (2012) Urbanization, ecosystems and biodiversity: assessments of India and Bangalore. The Secretariat for the Convention of Biological Diversity, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  49. Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Social–ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecol Soc 9Google Scholar
  50. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pfaffenberger B (1992) Technology dramas. Sci Technol Hum Values 17:282–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raju KV, Manasi S, Latha N (2008) Emerging ground water crisis in urban areas—a case study of ward no. 39, Bangalore cityGoogle Scholar
  53. Saleth RM, Sastry GS (2004) Water supply and sanitation sector of Karnataka, India: status, performance and change. Water Policy 6:161–183Google Scholar
  54. Sastry GS (2008) Emerging development issues of Greater Bangalore. Working Paper 194. Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  55. Sawkar RH (2012) Evaluation of surface, ground and sewage water for sustainable supply of potable water to. J Geol Soc India 80:877–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scheffer M, Westley FR (2007) The evolutionary basis of rigidity: locks in cells, minds, and society. Ecol Soc 12Google Scholar
  57. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Srinivas S (2001) Landscapes of urban memory: the sacred and the civic in India’s high-tech city. University of Minnesota Press, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  59. Steneck RS, Hughes TP, Cinner JE, Adger WN, Arnold SN, Berkes F, Boudreau SA, Brown K, Folke C, Gunderson L, Olsson P, Scheffer M, Stephenson E, Walker B, Wilson J, Worm B (2011) Creation of a gilded trap by the high economic value of the Maine lobster fishery. Conserv Biol J Soc Conserv Biol 25:904–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Subhash Chandra KC (2012) Demand, resource availability and status of water supply to Mega City—Bangalore, Karnataka. J Geol Soc India 79:543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Subrahmanya MHB (2007) Bangalore. Cities 24:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Suresh TS (2001) An urban water scenario: a case study of the Bangalore metropolis, Karnataka, India. In: Schumann AH, Acreman MC, Davis R, Marino MA, Rosbjerg D, Jun X (eds) Regional management of water resources. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Maastricht, pp 97–104Google Scholar
  63. Tarrow S (2011) Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. The Hindu (2013) Plans afoot to take up Cauvery 5th Stage scheme. The Hindu, BelgaumGoogle Scholar
  65. The Hindu (2014) Panel suggests drawing water for Bangalore from Linganamakki. The Hindu, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  66. Times News Network (2013a) Now Sharavathi may be Bangalore’s lifeline. The Times of India, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  67. Times News Network (2013b) Cauvery V stage to quench thirst of Bangaloreans. The Times of India, Bangalore, KarnatakaGoogle Scholar
  68. Water Governance Facility (2013) Groundwater Governance in India: stumbling blocks for law and compliance. WGF Report No. 3. Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  69. Welch S (1975) Sampling by referral in a dispersed population. Public Opin Q 39:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, Bodin Ö (2013) A theory of transformative agency in linked social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Enqvist
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Tengö
    • 1
  • Wiebren J. Boonstra
    • 1
  1. 1.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations