Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 575–590

A review of vulnerability indicators for deltaic social–ecological systems

  • Zita Sebesvari
  • Fabrice G. Renaud
  • Susanne Haas
  • Zachary Tessler
  • Michael Hagenlocher
  • Julia Kloos
  • Sylvia Szabo
  • Alejandro Tejedor
  • Claudia Kuenzer
Special Feature: Review Article Sustainable Deltas: Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services, and Policy Implications

DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0366-4

Cite this article as:
Sebesvari, Z., Renaud, F.G., Haas, S. et al. Sustain Sci (2016) 11: 575. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0366-4
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Sustainable Deltas: Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services, and Policy Implications

Abstract

The sustainability of deltas worldwide is under threat due to the consequences of global environmental change (including climate change) and human interventions in deltaic landscapes. Understanding these systems is becoming increasingly important to assess threats to and opportunities for long-term sustainable development. Here, we propose a simplified, yet inclusive social–ecological system (SES)-centered risk and vulnerability framework and a list of indicators proven to be useful in past delta assessments. In total, 236 indicators were identified through a structured review of peer-reviewed literature performed for three globally relevant deltas—the Mekong, the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna and the Amazon. These are meant to serve as a preliminary “library” of potential indicators to be used for future vulnerability assessments. Based on the reviewed studies, we identified disparities in the availability of indicators to populate some of the vulnerability domains of the proposed framework, as comprehensive social–ecological assessments were seldom implemented in the past. Even in assessments explicitly aiming to capture both the social and the ecological system, there were many more indicators for social susceptibility and coping/adaptive capacities as compared to those relevant for characterizing ecosystem susceptibility or robustness. Moreover, there is a lack of multi-hazard approaches accounting for the specific vulnerability profile of sub-delta areas. We advocate for more comprehensive, truly social–ecological assessments which respond to multi-hazard settings and recognize within-delta differences in vulnerability and risk. Such assessments could make use of the proposed framework and list of indicators as a starting point and amend it with new indicators that would allow capturing the complexity as well as the multi-hazard exposure in a typical delta SES.

Keywords

Sustainable deltas Social–ecological systems Vulnerability assessment frameworks Indicators Multiple hazards 

Supplementary material

11625_2016_366_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (290 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 289 kb)
11625_2016_366_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (190 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 190 kb)
11625_2016_366_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (264 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 263 kb)
11625_2016_366_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (37 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 37 kb)
11625_2016_366_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (188 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 188 kb)

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE)
  • RE 3554/1-1

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zita Sebesvari
    • 1
  • Fabrice G. Renaud
    • 1
  • Susanne Haas
    • 1
  • Zachary Tessler
    • 2
  • Michael Hagenlocher
    • 1
  • Julia Kloos
    • 1
  • Sylvia Szabo
    • 3
  • Alejandro Tejedor
    • 4
  • Claudia Kuenzer
    • 5
  1. 1.United Nations UniversityInstitute for Environment and Human SecurityBonnGermany
  2. 2.CUNY Advanced Science Research CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Social Statistics and DemographyUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  4. 4.National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics and St. Anthony Falls LaboratoryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  5. 5.German Remote Sensing Data Center, DFD, Earth Observation Center, EOC, of the German Aerospace Center, DLROberpfaffenhofenGermany

Personalised recommendations