Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 749–762 | Cite as

Utilizing international networks for accelerating research and learning in transformational sustainability science

  • Lauren Withycombe Keeler
  • Arnim Wiek
  • Daniel J. Lang
  • Makoto Yokohari
  • John van Breda
  • Lennart Olsson
  • Barry Ness
  • Jordi Morato
  • Jordi Segalàs
  • Pim Martens
  • Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia
  • James Evans
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sustainability Science Innovation and Capacity Development

Abstract

A promising approach for addressing sustainability problems is to recognize the unique conditions of a particular place, such as problem features and solution capabilities, and adopt and adapt solutions developed at other places around the world. Therefore, research and teaching in international networks becomes critical, as it allows for accelerating learning by sharing problem understandings, successful solutions, and important contextual considerations. This article identifies eight distinct types of research and teaching collaborations in international networks that can support such accelerated learning. The four research types are, with increasing intensity of collaboration: (1) solution adoption; (2) solution consultation; (3) joint research on different problems; and (4) joint research on similar problems. The four teaching types are, with increasing intensity of collaboration: (1) adopted course; (2) course with visiting faculty; (3) joint course with traveling faculty; and (4) joint course with traveling students. The typology is illustrated by extending existing research and teaching projects on urban sustainability in the International Network of Programs in Sustainability, with partner universities from Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa. The article concludes with challenges and strategies for extending individual projects into collaborations in international networks.

Keywords

Sustainability science Sustainability education International networks University collaborations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to all those who supported and participated in the 2015 annual meeting and workshop of the International Network of Programs in Sustainability (NEPS). The research and teaching projects, ideas, and enthusiasm for collaboration shared during the workshop were critical inputs to this article. Thank you especially to the students, faculty, and administration staff at Leuphana University of Lüneburg, who made this workshop possible.

References

  1. Ayala J (2009) Blended learning as a new approach to social work education. J Soc Work Educ 45(2):277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman CL (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):308–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brundiers K, Wiek A, Kay K (2013) The role of transacademic interface managers in transformational sustainability research and education. Sustainability 5(11):4614–4636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catálogo de Iniciativas de Innovación Social para la Superación de la Pobreza Extrema (2013) Agencia Nacional para la superación de la Pobreza Extrema (ANSPE), Bogotá, Colombia. ISBN 978-958-98374-6-7Google Scholar
  5. Cayuela A, Robinson J, Campbell A, Coops N, Munro A (2013) Integration of operational and academic efforts in sustainability at the University of British Columbia. In: Caeiro S, Leal Filho W, Jabbour C, Azeiteiro UM (eds) Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  6. Corcoran PB, Wals AE (2004) Higher education and the challenge of sustainability. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crow M (2010) Organizing teaching and research to address the grand challenges of sustainable development. Bioscience 60(7):488–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies M, Swilling M (2015). Intermediaries and learning in sustainability-oriented urban transitions: a transdisciplinary case study from Stellenbosch Municipality. Masters thesis, Stellenbosch University. http://markswilling.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Davies_Swilling_C4.pdf
  9. Downes S (2007) Learning networks in practice. In: Ley D (ed) Emerging technologies for learning. BECTA, London, pp 19–27Google Scholar
  10. Forrest N, Wiek A (2014) Learning from success—towards evidence-informed sustainability transitions in communities. Environ Innov Soc Transit 12:66–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) The emergence of post-normal science. In: Science, politics and morality. Springer, Netherlands, pp 85–123Google Scholar
  12. Kates R, Clark WC, Hall JM, Jaeger C, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koester RJ, Eflin J, Vann J (2006) Greening of the campus: a whole-systems approach. J Clean Prod 14(9):769–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. König A, Evans J (2013) Experimenting for sustainable development? Living laboratories, social learning, and the role of the university. In: König A (ed) Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities—the role of living laboratories. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  15. Lang DJ, Wiek A (2013) The role of universities in fostering urban and regional sustainability. In: Mieg HA, Töpfer K (eds) Institutional and social innovation for sustainable urban development. Earthscan, London, pp 393–411Google Scholar
  16. Leuphana University of Lüneburg (2014) The global classroom. http://www.leuphana.de/studium/bachelor/komplementaerstudium/global-classroom.html
  17. Leuphana University of Lüneburg (2015) Global sustainability science. https://www.leuphana.de/no_cache/studium/master/global-sustainability-science.html
  18. Lüdeke MK, Petschel-Held G, Schellnhuber HJ (2004) Syndromes of global change: the first panoramic view. GAIA-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 13(1):42–49Google Scholar
  19. Montoya J, Cuesta O, Flecha O, Viade D, Gallegos A, Morato J (2011) Moravia como ejemplo de transformación de áreas urbanas degradadas: tecnologías apropiadas para la restauración integral de cuencas hidrográficas. NOVA 9–15, 38–49, iSSN 1794-2470Google Scholar
  20. Morató J (ed) (2013) Reciclar ciudad. Repensar la transformación de las ciudades. Cátedra UNESCO de Sostenibilidad de la UPC y Univ. Nacional Autónoma de Mexico. Kitbook, Barcelona. ISBN 978-84-941313-4-9Google Scholar
  21. Morató J, Pires Carneiro A, Ortiz A (2011) Sustainable technologies for water treatment. In: Mulder K, Ferrer D, van Lente H (eds) What is sustainable technology? Perceptions, paradoxes and possibilities, chap 12. Greenleaf Publishing, pp 188–210. ISBN 978-1-906093-50-1Google Scholar
  22. Preece J, Blunt R, Heagney M, Popov N (2000) Restructuring to broaden access: a comparative study. In: Thomas E, Cooper M (eds) Changing the culture of the campus: towards an inclusive higher education. Staffordshire University Press, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, pp 104–116Google Scholar
  23. Reeger BJ, Bunders JFG (2009) Knowledge co-creation: interaction between science and society. A transdisciplinary approach to complex societal issues. RMNO, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  24. Restrepo JIM (2011) Moravia como ejemplo de transformación de áreas urbanas degradadas: tecnologías apropiadas para la restauración integral de cuencas hidrográficas. NOVA 9(15)Google Scholar
  25. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rovai A, Jordan HM. (2004) Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. Intl Rev of Res Open Distrib Learning, 5(2)Google Scholar
  27. Savan B, Sider D (2003) Contrasting approaches to community-based research and a case study of community sustainability in Toronto, Canada. Local Environ 8(3):303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Talwar S, Wiek A, Robinson J (2011) User engagement in sustainability research. Sci Public Policy 38(59):379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trencher G, Bai X (2016) The role of university partnerships in urban sustainability experiments: evidence from Asia. In: Brauch HG, Spring U, Grin J, Scheffran J (eds) Sustainability transition and sustainable peace handbook. Springer, Berlin (in press)Google Scholar
  30. Trencher G, Bai X, Evans J, McCormick K, Yarime M (2014a) University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability. Glob Environ Change 28:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trencher G, Yarime M, McCormick K, Doll CNH, Kraines S, Kharrazi A (2014b) Beyond the third mission: exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Sci Public Policy 41:151–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Valkering P, Beumer C, De Kraker J, Ruelle C (2013) An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development. J Clean Prod 49:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiek A, Kay B (2015) Learning while transforming—solution-oriented learning for urban sustainability in Phoenix, Arizona. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 16:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiek A, Bernstein MJ, Laubichler M, Caniglia G, Minteer B, Lang DJ (2013) A global classroom for international sustainability education. Creative Educ 4(04):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiek A, Harlow J, Melnick R, van der Leeuw S, Fukushi K, Takeuchi K, Farioli F, Yamba F, Blake A, Geiger C, Kutter R (2015) Sustainability science in action—a review of the state of the field through case studies on disaster recovery, bioenergy, and precautionary purchasing. Sustain Sci 10(1):17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiek A, Kay B, Forrest N (2016) Worth the trouble?! An evaluative scheme for urban sustainability transition labs (USTL) and an application to the USTL in Phoenix, Arizona. In: Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L, Broto C, Loorbach D (eds) Urban sustainability transitions. Routledge series on sustainability transitions. Routledge, London (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L et al (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7(1):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zilahy G, Huisingh D (2009) The roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives. J Clean Prod 17:1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Withycombe Keeler
    • 1
  • Arnim Wiek
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel J. Lang
    • 1
  • Makoto Yokohari
    • 3
  • John van Breda
    • 4
  • Lennart Olsson
    • 5
  • Barry Ness
    • 5
  • Jordi Morato
    • 6
  • Jordi Segalàs
    • 6
  • Pim Martens
    • 7
  • Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia
    • 8
  • James Evans
    • 9
  1. 1.Faculty of SustainabilityLeuphana University of LüneburgLunenburgGermany
  2. 2.School of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  4. 4.School of Public LeadershipStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  5. 5.Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)Lund UniversityLundSweden
  6. 6.Research Institute for Sustainability Science and TechnologyUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  7. 7.International Center for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad (LANCIS), Instituto de EcologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)MexicoMexico
  9. 9.School of Environment, Education and DevelopmentUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations