Abstract
This article discusses the roles, challenges and opportunities of non-Indigenous academics working at the interface of Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledges. Sustainability scientists have both questioned and advocated for cross-cultural research, and in this article we reflect on what working across different ways of knowing entails for non-Indigenous researchers at the professional, personal and epistemological level. Grounded on our experiences of on-going engagement with Indigenous communities, this article explores multiple pathways of taking Indigenous knowledges seriously while working in “Western” academic settings. In doing so, it highlights issues around the role and responsibility of non-Indigenous researchers in decolonising the (re)production of knowledges and the multiple contexts in which this can take place in sustainability science. It then deals with some of the challenges and ethical dilemmas we have encountered along the way, mainly with regards to issues of representation, translation in a broader sense, participation, and authority. Finally, this article discusses some of the epistemological consequences of engaging in such work, and how despite being fraught with tensions and contradictions, it can help to foster spaces of plural co-existence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Barnes TJ, Sheppard E (2010) ‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Prog Hum Geogr 34(2):193–214
Behar R (1997) The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press, Boston
Behar R (2013) Traveling heavy: a memoir between journeys. Duke University Press, Durham
Beilin R, Bohnet I (2015) Culture-production-place and nature: the landscapes of somewhere. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0289-5
Benessia A, Funtowicz S, Bradshaw G, Ferri F, Raez-Luna EF, Medina CP (2012) Hybridizing sustainability: towards a new praxis for the present human predicament. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):75–89
Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia
Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):621–630
Bernstein RJ (1992) The new constellation: Ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bishop R (1994) Initiating empowering research? N Z J Educ Stud 29(1):175–188
Cahill C (2007) Participatory data analysis. In: Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M (eds) Participatory action research approaches and methods. Connecting people, participation and place. Routledge, London, New York, pp 181–187
Cajete G (2000) Native science: natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publishers, Santa Fe
Cepek M (2012) A future for Amazonia. University of Texas Press, Austin
Charnley S, Poe MR (2007) Community forestry in theory and practice: where are we now? Annu Rev Anthropol 36:301–336
Cupples J (2002) Disrupting discourses and (re)formulating identities: the politics of single motherhood in post-revolutionary Nicaragua. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography at the University of Canterbury
De la Cadena M, Starn O (2007) Introduction. In: De la Cadena M, Starn O (eds) Indigenous experience today. Berg Publishers, Oxford, pp 1–30
Deloria V Jr (1969) Custer died for your sins: an Indiana manifesto. MacMillian, New York
DeLyser D, Sui D (2013) Crossing the qualitative quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm. Prog Human Geograph 1–14
Denzin NK (2010) The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek
Denzin NK, Lincoln Y (2008) Introduction: Methodologies and indigenous inquiry In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Smith LT (eds) Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Sage, Los Angeles
Elmhirst R (2011) Introduction new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum 42(2):129–132
Fine-Dare K, Rubenstein S (2009) Border crossings: transnational Americanist anthropology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
Fisher W (2003) Name rituals and acts of feeling among the Kayapó (Mebengokre). J Roy Anthropol Inst 9(1):117–136
Forsey G (2010) Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography 11:558–572
Frantz K, Howitt R (2010) Geography for and with indigenous peoples: Indigenous geographies as challenge and invitation. Geo J 77:727–731
Gallopin GC, Funtowicz S, O’Connor M, Ravetz J (2001) Science for the 21st century: from social contract to the scientific core. Int J Soc Sci 168:219–229
Gibbs M (2001) Toward a strategy for undertaking cross-cultural collaborative research. Soc Nat Res 14:673–687
Ginsburg F (2008) Rethinking the Digital Age. In: Wilson P, Stewart M (eds) Global indigenous media: cultures, poetics, and politics. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 287–306
Gombay N (2012) Placing economies: lessons from the Inuit about economics, time, and existence. J Cult Geograp 29:19–38
Graham LR (2005) Image and instrumentality in a Xavante politics of existential recognition: the public outreach work of Eténhiritipa Pimentel Barbosa. Am Ethnol 32(4):622–641
Haig-Brown C (2003) Creating spaces: Testimonio, impossible knowledge, and academe. Int J Qual Stud Educ 16(3):415–433
Haig-Brown C, Archibald JA (1996) Transforming First Nations research with respect and power. Int J Qual Stud Educ 9(3):245–267
Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Stud 14(3):575–599
Harrell S, Wubumo B, Erzi M (2000) Mountain patterns: the survival of Nuosu culture in China. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Hermes M (1998) Research methods as a situated response: towards a First Nations’ methodology. Int J Qual Stud Educ 11(1):155–168
Hodge P, Lester J (2006) Indigenous research: whose priority? Journeys and possibilities of cross-cultural research in geography. Geogr Res 44(1):41–51
Howitt R et al. (2010) Nurturing new geographies of coexistence: Rethinking cultural interfaces in land and sea governance. Paper for presentation at the Institute of Australian Geographers/Geographical Society of New Zealand Conference, Christchurch, July 2010
Howitt R, Stevens S (2005) Cross-cultural research: Ethics, methods, and relationships. In: Hay I (ed) Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Howitt R, Suchet-Pearson S (2003) Ontological pluralism in contested cultural landscapes. In: Anderson K, Domosh M, Pile S, Thrift N (eds) Handbook of cultural geography. SAGE Publisher, London
Howitt R, Suchet-Pearson S (2006) Rethinking the building blocks: ontological pluralism and the idea of management. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geogr 88:323–335
Hunn ES (1999) The value of subsistence for the future of the world. In: Nazarea V (ed) Ethnoecology: situated knowledge/located lives. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 26–30
Johnson JT, Larson S (2013) Introduction: A deeper sense of place. In: Johnson JT, Larson S (eds) Deeper sense Of place: stories and journeys Of Indigenous-academic collaboration. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 7–18
Jolles C (2006) Listening to elders, working with youth. In: Stern P, Stevenson L (eds) Critical Inuit studies: an anthropology of contemporary arctic ethnography. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 35–53
Jones A, Jenkins K (2008) Rethinking collaboration: Working in the Indigene-colonizer hyphen. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, Smith LT (eds) Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies, N. Sage, Los Angeles
Kaomea J (2001) Dilemmas of an Indigenous academic: a Native Hawaiian story. Contemp Issues Early Child 2(1):61–82
Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–16
Kovach ME (2000) Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversation, and contexts. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Larkin PJ et al (2007) Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: reflections on a metaphorical process. Qual Health Res 17(4):468–476
Larsen SC, Johnson JT (2012) In between worlds: place, experience, and research in Indigenous geography. J Cult Geogr 29(1):1–13
Lassiter LE (2005) The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lather P (1986) Research as Praxis. Harvard Educ Rev 56(3):257–277
Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Laurie N, Andolina R, Radcliffe S (2005) Ethnodevelopment: social movements, creating experts and professionalising indigenous knowledge in Ecuador. Antipode 37:470–495
Louise Pratt M (1991) Arts of the contact zone. Profession 33-40
Low SM, Merry SE (2010) Engaged anthropology: diversity and dilemmas. Curr Anthropol 51(S2):S203–S226
Manathunga C (2009) Research as an intercultural ‘contact zone’. Discourse Stud Cult Politi Educ 30(2):165–177
Manzo LC, Brightbill N (2007) Toward a participatory ethics. In: Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M (eds) Participatory action research approaches and methods. Connecting people, participation and place, Routledge, London, New York, pp 33–40
Mauro F, Hardison P (2000) Traditional knowledge of Indigenous and local communities: international debate and policy initiatives. Ecol Appl 10(5):1263–1269
McGregor D (2004) Coming full circle: indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. Am Indian Quart 28(3/4):385–410
Nadasdy P (1999) The politics of TEK: power and the “integration” of knowledge. Arctic Anthropol 36(1–2):1–18
Nicholls R (2008) Research and Indigenous participation: critical reflexive methods. Int J Soc Res Methodol 12(2):117–126
Niezen R (2003) The origins of Indigenism: Human rights and the politics of identity. University of California Press, Berkeley
Nixon, R (2011) Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Overing J, Passes A (2000) The anthropology of love and anger: The aesthetics of conviviality in Native Amazonia. Routledge, London
Pain R (2004) Social geography: participatory research. Prog Hum Geogr 28(5):652–663
Pain R et al. (2007) Conclusion: the space(s) and scale(s) of Participatory Action Research: constructing empowering geographies? In: Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M (eds) Participatory action research approaches and methods. Connecting people, participation and place, Routledge, London, New York, pp 225–230
Rayner S (2012) Uncomfortable knowledge: the social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses. Econ Soc 41(1):107–125
Robbins P (2012) Political ecology a critical introduction. 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Rouch J (1991) Speaking for, speaking about, speaking with, or speaking alongside—an anthropological and documentary dilemma. Visual Anthropol Rev 7(2):50–67
Smith LT (1999) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books, London
Spagenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287
Swadener BB, Mutua K (2008) Decolonizing performances: Deconstructing the global postcolonial. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, Smith LT (eds) Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 31–43
van der Leeuw S, Wike A, Harlow J, Buizer J (2012) How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science. Sustain Sci (Supplement 1):115–120
Wright S et al (2014) Working with and learning from Country: decentring human author-ity. Cult Geogr 29(1):39–60
Zanotti L, Chernela J (2008) Conflicting cultures of nature: ecotourism, education and the Kayapó of the Brazilian Amazon. J Tourism Geogr 10(4):495–521
Zapata C (2006) Identidad, nación y territorio en la escritura de los intelectuales mapuches. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 68(3):467–509
Zimmerman B, Peres CA, Malcolm JR, Turner T (2001) Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of South-eastern Amazonia, a tropical forest indigenous people. Environ Conserv 28(1):10–22
Acknowledgments
To Jay Johnson, Renee Pualani Louis, and Andrew Kliskey for inviting us to Wis2dom Workshop and later to write in this special edition. We also would like to extend thanks to the other workshop participants. Thanks to the communities that have invited us into their homes and to whom we are forever indebted to this work. A final thanks to Patrick Freeland, who emphasised the importance of honour and respect in research praxis, and was very much an inspiration for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Andrew Kliskey, University of Idaho, USA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zanotti, L., Palomino-Schalscha, M. Taking different ways of knowing seriously: cross-cultural work as translations and multiplicity. Sustain Sci 11, 139–152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0312-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0312-x