Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 163–176

Traditional knowledge in a time of crisis: climate change, culture and communication

Special Feature: Original Article Weaving Indigenous and Sustainability Sciences to Diversify Our Methods (WIS2DOM)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Weaving Indigenous and Sustainability Sciences to Diversify Our Methods (WIS2DOM)

Abstract

Science as it has come to be defined in Western thought is at the root of our current environmental problems. This article reviews the historical trajectory of specific facets in Western thought, including the disenchantment of nature, the apotheosis of reason, the technological domination of nature, and the Puritan temper. Illuminating this history points out that what is called “rational” and what popularly acceptable as “science” is in fact a by-product of specific historical, cultural, and political circumstances, and has produced a culture of “scientism” that is ideological, not value-free, and is in fact contrary to the open inquiry of science. These ideas are linked to economic rationality, colonialism, and human rights, severing modern humans from our Indigenous roots and fostering an ideology of rapacious environmental exploitation. The author proposes “indigeneity” as embracing the holistic knowledge and wisdom found in traditional cultures while also utilizing the advances in science and other areas of human endeavor. Specifically, the paper argues for bringing about a new cultural discourse that helps reshape human behavior into a more sustainable direction. The role of communication and storytelling is emphasized, with an example given in the story of Polynesian voyaging and the five values of the voyaging canoe.

Keywords

Sustainability Values Scientism Indigenous Wisdom 

References

  1. Amundson R (1982) Science, ethnoscience, and ethnocentrism. Philos Sci 49(2):236–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argonne National Laboratory (2015) Complex adaptive systems. http://www.dis.anl.gov/exp/cas/index.html. Accessed 9 Jan 2015
  3. Baker J, Allyson R, Jennifer W (2011) Native science: a primer for science teachers.” Retrieved from: http://ctabobandung.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ns-primer.pdf
  4. Barnard A (2006) Kalahari revisionism, Vienna and the ‘indigenous peoples’ debate. Soc Anthropol 14(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell D (1972) The cultural contradictions of capitalism. In: Proceedings of Journal of Aesthetic Education, 6- 1/2, Special Double Issue: Capitalism, Culture, and Education, pp 11–38Google Scholar
  6. Besecke K (2001) Speaking of meaning in modernity: reflexive spirituality as a cultural resource. Soc Relig 62(3):365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostrom N (2011) A history of transhumanist thought. In: Michael R, Lisa C (eds) Academic Writing Across the Disciplines, New York: Pearson Longman, Section available online at http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf
  8. Burlingame B (2008) The fifth wonder: Iolani palace. Honolulu Star Bulletin 13(94). http://archives.starbulletin.com/2008/04/03/features/story02.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2015
  9. Cajete G (2000) Native science: natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publishers, Santa FeGoogle Scholar
  10. Callicott JB (2013) A neo presocratic manifesto. Environ Humanit 2:169–186Google Scholar
  11. Castree N, Nash C (2006) Posthuman geographies. Soc Cult Geogr 7(4):501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman CL, Herman D (2010) Ways of knowing: ‘naked science’ or native wisdom. In: Proceedings of National Museum of the American Indian Magazine, Winter 2010, pp 28–33Google Scholar
  13. de Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life Berkeley et al. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Deloria PJ (1998) Playing Indian. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Deloria V Jr. (2006) The world we used to live. In: Remembering the powers of the medicine men. Fulcrum PublishingGoogle Scholar
  16. Dupre L (2004) The enlightenment and the intellectual foundations of modern culture. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  17. Fowler J (2011) The concept of indigeneity: can the declaration of the rights of indigenous people be understood within western liberal philosophy? Queensland Law Student Rev 4(1):36–46Google Scholar
  18. Franklin A (2007) Posthumanism. In: George R (ed) Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_chunk_g978140512433122_ss1-71. Accessed 10 Jan 2015
  19. Ginn F (2014) Post-humanism. In: The International Encyclopedia of Geography, Wiley- Blackwell. https://franklinginn.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/post-humanism.pdf
  20. Golay C, Ioana C (2010) Legal opinion: the right to property from a human rights perspective. ICHRDD and ADH GenèveGoogle Scholar
  21. Grampp William D (1948) Adam smith and the economic man. J Polit Econ 56(4):315–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greisman HC (1976) ‘Disenchantment of the world’: romanticism, aesthetics and sociological theory. Br J Sociol 27(4):495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardin Garrett (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, New Series 162(3859):1243–1248Google Scholar
  24. Hauser-Schäublin B (ed) (2013) Adat and indigeneity in Indonesia: culture and entitlements between heteronomy and self-ascription. Göttingen Studies in Cultural Property, vol 7Google Scholar
  25. Hayek FA (1955) The counter-revolution of science: studies on the abuse of reason. Collier-Macmillan Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Herman RDK (2008) Reflections on the Importance of indigenous Geography. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 32(3):73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herman RDK (2013) In the canoe: intersections in space, time, and becoming. In: Larsen Soren, Johnson Jay T (eds) A deeper sense of place: stories and journeys of collaboration in indigenous research. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 55–72Google Scholar
  28. Hutchinson I (2011) Monopolizing knowledge. Fias PublishingGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacobs HM (2013) Private property and human rights: a mismatch in the 21st century? Int J Soc Welfare 22(Issue Supplement S1):S85–S101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson Jay T, Murton Brian (2007) Re/placing native science: indigenous voices in contemporary constructions of nature. Geograph Res 45(2):121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kekes J (1983) Wisdom. Am Philosop Quart 20(3):277–286Google Scholar
  32. Leach WR (1994) Land of desire: merchants, power, and the rise of a new American culture. Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewallen Ann-Elise (2003) Strategic “Indigeneity” and the possibility of a global indigenous women’s movement. Michigan Feminist Studies 17:105–130Google Scholar
  34. Long MF (1948) The Secret Science Behind Miracles. DeVorss & CompanyGoogle Scholar
  35. Loury E (2012) Q&A: what can indigenous people tell us about climate change? Science Magazine. http://news.sciencemag.org/2012/02/qa-what-can-indigenous-people-tell-us-about-climate-change. Accessed 19 Feb 2012
  36. Maxwell N (1984) From knowledge to wisdom: a revolution in the aims and methods of science. Basil Blackwell Inc, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehta N (2011) Mind-body dualism: a critique from a health perspective. Mens Sana Monographs 9(1):202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nisbet M (1999) The phantom menace of superstition in film and television. Skeptical Inquirer, http://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/phantom_menace_of_superstition_in_film_and_television/
  39. O’Sullivan D (2006) Needs, rights, nationhood, and the politics of indigeneity. MAI Rev 1:1–12Google Scholar
  40. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Panelli R (2010) More-than-human social geographies: posthuman and other possibilities. Prog Hum Geogr 34(1):79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peperzak A (1995) Life, science, and wisdom according to descartes. Hist Philos Q 12(2):133–153Google Scholar
  43. Plumwood V (1991) Nature, self, and gender: feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism. Hypatia 6(1):3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Plumwood V (2009) Nature in the active voice. Aust Humanit Rev 46. http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-May-2009/plumwood.html
  45. Pratt ML (1992) Imperial eyes: travel writing and transculturation. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Reydon TAC (2012) Philosophy of technology. Int Encycl Philos. http://www.iep.utm.edu/technolo/. Accessed 8 Jan 2015
  47. Robbins RH (1999) Global problems and the culture of capitalism, 1st edn. Pearson Publishers. http://faculty.plattsburgh.edu/richard.robbins/legacy/chap_1_intro.html
  48. Scribner RW (1993) The reformation, popular magic, and the ‘Disenchantment of the World’. J Interdiscip History 23:475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaw WS, Herman RDK, Rebecca Dobbs G (2006) Encountering indigeneity: re-imagining and decolonizing geography. Geogr Ann 88B(3):267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skirry J (2006) René Descartes: the mind-body distinction, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/descmind/. Accessed 7 Jan 2015
  51. Sundberg J (2014) Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cult Geogr 21(1):33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swing D (1889) Will reason exterminate christianity? North Am Rev 393(149):196–204Google Scholar
  53. Turnbull D (2007) Maps narratives and trails: performativity, hodology and distributed knowledges in complex adaptive systems—an approach to emergent mapping. Geogr Res 45(2):140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weber M (1930) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. White L (1967) The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155(3767):1203–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wildcat DR (2009) Red alert! saving the planet with indigenous knowledge. Fulcrum, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilkes C (1845) Narrative of the United States Exploring Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, vol I & IV. Philadelphia: Lea & Blanchard, The Gregg Press reprint: RidgewoodGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams RN (2015) Introduction. In: Robinson DN, Williams RN (eds) Scientism: the new orthodoxy. pp 1–22Google Scholar
  59. Zimmer C (2013) Genes are us. And them. Natl Geogr. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/07/125-explore/shared-genes

Copyright information

© Springer Japan (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian National Museum of the American IndianWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations