Collective ownership in renewable energy and opportunities for sustainable degrowth

Abstract

Following the renaissance of energy generation from renewable sources around the globe, it was suggested that the shift from fossil to renewable energy could potentially counter the growth orientation of economic activity. In this line of argument, small-scale technology and decentralised ownership, in the field of energy and beyond, are commonly regarded as potential precursors of a sustainable degrowth society. However, these systemic and conceptual considerations have been rarely assessed empirically. This paper wishes to address this research gap. It presents the exploratory findings of an EU-wide survey conducted in 2013 and further discusses the conceptualisation of small-scale ownership structures in renewable energy as an alternative to the community energy concept. Secondly, the paper relates the debates on degrowth to small-scale renewable energy schemes and illustrates its argument with four case studies from Wales, Italy, Spain, and Germany. These cases represent different organisational forms, diverse spatial settings, and varying national policy contexts. In its observations, this paper draws on the concept of collective and politically motivated renewable energy projects (CPE). While still mainly found in niches across Europe and essentially linked to environmental and social movements, we argue that CPE can potentially become blueprints for a turn towards a degrowth practice that will foster the democratisation of renewable energy production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Those were: Gerry Billing for Scandinavia, Dr. Carla Detona for Italy, Dr. Mihaela Vancea for Spain and Irune Penegaricaño for France.

References

  1. Altvater E (2011) Das Ende des Kapitalismus, wie wir ihn kennen. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvord SH, Brown LD, Letts CW (2004) Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. J Appl Behav Sci 40:260–282. doi:10.1177/0021886304266847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35:216–224. doi:10.1080/0194436690897722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asara V, Profumi E, Kallis G (2013) Degrowth, democracy and autonomy. Environ Values 22:217–239. doi:10.2307/23460979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker S, Kunze C (2014) Transcending community energy: collective and politically motivated projects in renewable energy (CPE) across Europe. People Place Policy 8:180–191. doi:10.3351/ppp.0008.0003.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker S, Beveridge R, Naumann M (2015) Remunicipalisation in German cities: reversing neo-liberalism and re-imagining urban governance? Space Polity 19:76–90. doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.991119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berkhout F, Marcotullio P, Hanaoka T (2012) Understanding energy transitions. Sustain Sci 7:109–111. doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0173-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berlin Election Officer (2013) Volksentscheid „Neue Energie” am 3. November 2013: Ergebnis des Volksentscheids. https://www.wahlen-berlin.de/Abstimmungen/VE2013_NEnergie/Ergebnisprozent.asp?sel1=6052&sel2=0798

  9. Berliner Energietisch (2012) Entwurf eines Gesetzes für die demokratische, ökologische und soziale Energieversorgung in Berlin. http://berliner-energietisch.net/images/gesetzentwurf%20und%20begrndung.pdf

  10. Beveridge R, Hüesker F, Naumann M (2014) From post-politics to a politics of possibility? Unravelling the privatization of the Berlin Water Company. Geoforum 51:66–74. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bloch E (1964) Möglichkeiten der Utopie heute. SWF, Stuttgart

  12. Braudel F (1992) Civilization and capitalism. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bristow G, Cowell R, Munday M (2012) Windfalls for whom?: the evolving notion of ‘community’ in community benefit provisions from wind farms. Geoforum 43:1108–1120. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burchardt HJ, Dietz K (2014) (Neo-) extractivism: a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Q 39:468–486. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.893488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christman J (1994) The myth of property. Oxford Univ. Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Couture T, Gagnon Y (2010) An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy 38:955–965. doi:10.1016/j.enpoI.2009.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cumbers A (2012) Reclaiming public ownership. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. D’Alessandro S, Luzzati T, Morroni M (2010) Energy transition towards economic and environmental sustainability: feasible paths and policy implications. J Clean Prod 18:291–298. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Alisa G, Cattaneo C (2013) Household work and energy consumption: a degrowth perspective. J Clean Prod 38:71–79. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Demaria F, Schneider F, Sekulova F, Martinez-Alier J (2013) What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement. Environ Values 22:191–215. doi:10.3197/096327113X13581561725194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Devine-Wright P (2011) Renewable energy and the public. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eurostat (2013) Share of renewable energy up to 13% of energy consumption in the EU 27 in 2011. Eurostat Press Release, Brussels. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/8-26042013-AP/EN/8-26042013-AP-EN.PDF

  23. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H (eds) (2007) Socioecological transitions and global change. E. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  24. Francis B (2013) Kriterien für die Planung neuer Energielandschaften: eine englische Untersuchung für die Empfindlichkeit von Landschaften gegenüber Windkraft- und Photovoltaikanlagen. In: Gailing L, Leibenath M (eds) Neue Energielandschaften. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  25. Franco J, Levidow L, Fig D, Goldfarb L, Hönicke M, Mendonça ML (2010) Assumptions in the European Union biofuels policy: frictions with experiences in Germany, Brazil and Mozambique. Journal of Peasant Studies 37:661–698. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gawel E, Strunz S, Lehmann L (2013) Germany's Energy Transition Under Attack: Is There an Inscrutable German Sonderweg. Nat Cult 8:121–133. doi:10.3167/nc.2013.080201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gibson-Graham J (1996) The end of capitalism (as we knew it): a feminist critique of the political economy. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haas T, Sanders H (2013) Grüne Basis – grüne Kapitalfraktionen in Europa. Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, Berlin. http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/Studien/IH_Studien_Gruene_Basis.pdf

  29. Hall D, Lobina E, Terhorst P (2013) Re-municipalisation in the early twenty-first century: water in France and energy in Germany. Int Rev Appl Econ 27:193–214. doi:10.1080/02692171.2012.754844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Harvey D (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hisschemöller M, Sioziou I (2013) Boundary organisations for resource mobilisation: enhancing citizens’ involvement in the Dutch energy transition. Environ Politics 22:792–810. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.775724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Illich I (1973) Tools for Conviviality. Calder and Boyars, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jegen M, Audet G (2011) Advocacy coalitions and wind power development: insights from Quebec. Energy Policy 39:7439–7447. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jenssen T, König A, Eltrop L (2014) Bioenergy villages in Germany: bringing a low carbon energy supply for rural areas into practice. Renewable Energy 61:74–80. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jeong Y, Simcock N, Walker G (2012) Making power differently: exploring in motives and meanings of community renewable energy developments in cases from the UK and South Korea. In: Davies A (ed) Enterprising Communities. Emerald Group, Bingley, pp 105–121

    Google Scholar 

  36. Johanisova N, Wolf S (2012) Economic democracy: a path for the future? Futures 44:562–570. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johanisova N, Crabtree T, Frankova E (2013) Social enterprises and non-market capitals: a path to degrowth? J Clean Prod 38:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kallis G (2011) In defence of degrowth. Ecol Econ 70:873–880. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kallis G, Kerschner C, Martinez-Alier J (2012) The economics of degrowth. Ecol Econ 84:172–180. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kelly G (2007) Renewable energy strategies in England, Australia and New Zealand. Geoforum 38:326–338. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Klitgaard KA, Krall L (2012) Ecological economics, degrowth and institutional change. Ecol Econ 84:247–253. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kunze C (2012) Soziologie der Energiewende. Ibidem, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kunze C, Becker S (2014) Energy democracy in Europe. Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, Brussels. http://rosalux-europa.info/userfiles/file/Energy-democracy-in-Europe.pdf

  44. Kunze C, Busch H (2011) The social complexity of renewable energy production in the countryside. Electronic Green Journal 1:1–18. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/18p5h0fh

  45. Latouche S (2009) Farewell to growth. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lautermann C (2013) The ambiguities of (social) value creation: towards an extended understanding of entrepreneurial value creation for society. Soc Enterp J 9:184–202. doi:10.1108/SEJ-01-2013-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lorek S, Fuchs D (2013) Strong sustainable consumption governance: precondition for a degrowth path? J Clean Prod 38:36–43. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mabee WE, Mannion J, Carpenter T (2012) Comparing the feed-in tariff incentives for renewable electricity in Ontario and Germany. Energy Policy 40:480–489. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mair J, Marti I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J World Bus 41:36–44. doi:10.2139/ssrn.673446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Martinez-Alier J (2009) Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and languages of valuation. Capital Nat Soc 20:58–87. doi:10.1080/10455750902727378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Martinez-Alier J (2012) Environmental justice and economic degrowth: an alliance between two movements. Capital Nat Soc 23:51–73. doi:10.1080/10455752.2011.648839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Moss T, Becker S, Naumann M (2014) Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organization and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environ. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.915799

    Google Scholar 

  53. Müller T (2006) Other worlds, other values. University of Sussex, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nolden C (2013) Governing community energy: feed-in tariffs and the development of community wind energy schemes in the United Kingdom and Germany. Energy Policy 63:543–552. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. North P (2005) Scaling alternative economic practices? Some lessons from alternative currencies. Trans Inst Br Geogr 30:221–233. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00162.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. North P (2010) Eco-localisation as a progressive response to peak oil and climate change: a sympathetic critique. Geoforum 41:585–594. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Olesen GB, Maegaard P, Kruse J (2004) Danish Experience in Wind Energy. WELFI, CLER, Hurup-Thy, Hjortshoj. http://base.socioeco.org/docs/danish_experience_local_financing_wind.pdf

  58. O’Neill DW (2012) Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady-state economy. Ecol Econ 84:221–231. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Poize N, Rüdinger A (2014) Projets citoyens pour la production d’énergie renouvelable. IDDRI, Paris. http://www.iddri.org/Publications/Collections/Idees-pour-le-debat/WP0114_NP%20AR_projets%20citoyens.pdf

  60. Prasad A, Holzinger I (2013) Seeing through smoke and mirrors: a critical analysis of marketing CSR. J Bus Res 66:1915–1921. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Radtke J (2013) Bürgerenergie in Deutschland—ein Modell für Partizipation? In: Radtke J, Hennig B (eds) Die deutsche Energiewende nach Fukushima. Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, pp 139–182

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rao H, Morrill C, Zald MN (2000) Power plays: how social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res Organ Behav 22:239–282. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22007-8

    Google Scholar 

  63. Retenergie (2009) La Nostra Carta Dei Principi Etici: approvata da Assemblea dei Soci, Racconigi. http://www.retenergie.it/index.php?

  64. Scheer H (2012) The energy imperative. Earthscan, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schneider F, Kallis G, Martinez-Alier J (2010) Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. J Clean Prod 18:511–518. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Schreuer A, Weismeier-Sammer D (2010) Energy cooperatives and local ownership in the field of renewable energy technologies. RICC, Vienna. http://epub.wu.ac.at/2897/1/Literature_Overview_energy_cooperatives_final_%282%29.pdf

  67. Schwartzman D (2012) A critique of degrowth and its politics. Capital Nat Soc 23:119–125. doi:10.1080/10455752.2011.648848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sekulova F, Kallis G, Rodríguez-Labajos B, Schneider F (2013) Degrowth: from theory to practice. J Clean Prod 38:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Seyfang G, Haxeltine A (2012) Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environ Plan C 30:381–400. doi:10.1068/c10222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Seyfang G, Smith A (2007) Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Politics 16:584–603. doi:10.1080/09644010701419121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Seyfang G, Smith A (2013) UK Community Energy Survey: energy and climate change. Houses of Parliament, London. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmenergy/180/180vw02.htm

  72. Seyfang G, Park JJ, Smith A (2013) A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy 61:977–989. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Seyfang G, Hielscher S, Hargreaves T, Martiskainen M, Smith A (2014) A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environ Innov Soc Transit 13:21–44. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Shove E, Walker G (2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environ Plan A 39:763–770. doi:10.1068/a39310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Somenergia (2013) Los valores de som energia, Girona. http://www.somenergia.coop/es/los-valores-de-som-energia

  76. Späth P, Rohracher H (2014) Beyond localism: the spatial scale and scaling in energy transitions. In: Padt F, Opdam P, Polman N, Termeer C (eds) Scale-sensitive governance of the environment. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 106–119

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  77. Victor PA (2012) Growth, degrowth and climate change: a scenario analysis. Ecological Economics 84:206–212. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Walker G, Devine-Wright P (2008) Community renewable energy: what should it mean? Energy Policy 36:497–500. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Walker G, Hunter S, Devine-Wright P, Evans B, Fay H (2007) Harnessing community energies: explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK. Glob Environ Politics 7:64–82. doi:10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Walker G, Devine-Wright P, Hunter S, High H, Evans B (2010) Trust and community: exploring the meaning, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy 38:2655–2663. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. White RJ, Williams CC (2012) The pervasive nature of heterodox economic spaces at a time of neoliberal crisis: towards a “postneoliberal” anarchist future. Antipode 44:1625–1644. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01033.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Wiedenhofer D, Lenzen M, Steinberger JK (2013) Energy requirements of consumption: urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications. Energy Policy 63:696–707. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wissen M, Naumann M (2006) A new logic of infrastructure supply: the commercialisation of water and the transformation of urban governance in Germany. Social Justice 33: 20–37. http://www.socialjusticejournal.org/?product=matthias-naumann-and-markus-wissen-2

  84. Yildiz Ö, Rommel J, Debor S, Holstenkamp L, Mey F, Müller JR, Radtke J, Rognli J (2015) Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci 6:59–73. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conrad Kunze.

Additional information

Handled by Viviana Asara, Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain and Research & Degrowth, Spain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunze, C., Becker, S. Collective ownership in renewable energy and opportunities for sustainable degrowth. Sustain Sci 10, 425–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0301-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Community energy
  • Remunicipalisation
  • Energy cooperatives
  • Energy geography
  • Degrowth
  • Renewable energy
  • Energy transition