Skip to main content

Why biodiversity declines as protected areas increase: the effect of the power of governance regimes on sustainable landscapes

Abstract

Achieving sustainable landscapes that integrate food production with biodiversity conservation remains challenging, particularly in the tropics where most forest clearance results from conversion to industrial agriculture. Land-sparing (delineating protected areas and intensifying agricultural production from developed land) has often been identified as more effective than land-sharing (mixing protection and production in an agro-ecological matrix) for biodiversity in the tropics. Nevertheless, biodiversity decline continues despite protected area expansion meeting global targets under international conventions. We developed a low-order stock-and-flow model to consider this apparent paradox, and used it to structure deliberations on the impacts of the power of governance regimes. The model articulates our shared hypothesis about the basic dynamics of the social–ecological system. We present scenarios that depict plausible biodiversity change over time under three different governance regimes and land-use trajectories. The scenarios raise the possibility that, while land-sparing gives better short-term results for biodiversity, land-sharing may outperform it over time. Two key insights derive from our deliberations. First, the forces that drive forest clearance for development do not necessarily oppose those that drive forest protection; this decoupling helps explain why biodiversity loss continues as protected areas increase. Second, the power of the governance regimes that protect existing forest can be weakened by protected area expansion, through lowering public discourse about risks from biodiversity loss, while the power of governance regimes for development concurrently remain strong; this helps explains why some REDD+ schemes are associated with increasing deforestation. These insights suggest novel leverage points for sustainable tropical landscapes, such as prioritising protected area placement by proximity to active agricultural frontiers, rather than by representative biodiversity or cost-effectiveness; or using area-based conservation targets that include both the extent of protected areas and of other remaining forest habitat. We recommend further investigation of these ideas, and of collaborative conceptual modelling approaches, to explore solutions for sustainable tropical landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Adger WN, Benjaminsen TA, Brown K, Svarstad H (2001) Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses. Dev Change 32:681–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkemade R, Burkhard B, Crossman ND, Nedkov S, Petz K (2014) Quantifying ecosystem services and indicators for science, policy and practice. Ecol Indic 37:161–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr LM, Pressey RL, Fuller RA, Segan DB, McDonald-Madden E, Possingham HP (2011) A new way to measure the world’s protected area coverage. PLoS One 6:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne EM, Campbell J, Hache S (2012) Is a picture worth a thousand species? Evaluating human perception of biodiversity intactness using images of cumulative effects. Ecol Indic 20:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe R, Costanza R, Farley J, Garza E, Kent J, Kubiszewski I, Martinez L, McCowen T, Murphy K, Myers N, Ogden Z, Stapleton K, Woodward J (2009) Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. PNAS 106:2483–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S, Cashore B (2012) Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. Int Aff 88:585–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Hill R (2015) Governance of the conservation of nature. In: Worboys GL, Lockwood M, Kothari A (eds) Protected area governance and management. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 170–205 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee D, Stevenson J, Villoria N (2014) Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation? Glob Food Secur 3:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco LR, Larrosa C, Milner-Gulland EJ, Edwards DP (2014) A double-edged sword for tropical forests. Science 346:38–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceddia MG, Sedlacek S, Bardsley NO, Gomez-y-Paloma S (2013) Sustainable agricultural intensification or Jevons paradox? The role of public governance in tropical South America. Glob Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 23:1052–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceddia MG, Bardsley NO, Gomez-y-Paloma S, Sedlacek S (2014) Governance, agricultural intensification, and land sparing in tropical South America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7242–7247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle S (2013) REDD+ in Madagascar: you can’t see the wood for the carbon. Paris, France: Basta! Les Amis de la Terre

  • Chhatre A, Agrawal A (2009) Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17667–17670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clement F (2010) Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sci 43:129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosquer A, Raymond R, Prevot-Julliard AC (2012) Observations of everyday biodiversity: a new perspective for conservation? Ecol Soc 17

  • Crotty M (1998) The foundations of social research. Allen & Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten JW, Arts B, Verkooijen P (2014) The evolution of REDD+: an analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics. Environ Sci Policy 35:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias PE (2013) How can we incentivize tropical forest restoration? J Sustain For 32:694–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6:380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Abson DJ, Butsic V, Chappell MJ, Ekroos J, Hanspach J, Kuemmerle T, Smith HG, von Wehrden H (2014) Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward. Conserv Lett 7:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford A (2010) Modelling for the environment, 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. Tavistock translated by Sheridan Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, McDonald-Madden E, Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Grantham HS, Watson JEM, Klein CJ, Green DC, Possingham HP (2010) Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature 466:365–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith K (1983) The anatomy of power. Hamish Hamilton, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Galudra G, van Noordwijk M, Agung P, Suyanto S, Pradhan U (2014) Migrants, land markets and carbon emissions in Jambi, Indonesia: land tenure change and the prospect of emission reduction. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 19:715–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:16732–16737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grau R, Kuemmerle T, Macchi L (2013) Beyond ‘land sparing versus land sharing’: environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agricultural production and nature conservation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Stylinski C, Nisbet MC, Duarte CM, Jordan R, Burgin A, Previtali MA, Coloso J (2010) Restarting the conversation: challenges at the interface between ecology and society. Front Ecol Environ 8:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall R, editor. (2013) REDD+ and the underlying causes of deforestation and forest degradation. Asunción, Paraguay. Online http://globalforestcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/REDD-and-UC-report-final.pdf, Global forest coalition

  • Haslett J, Berry P, Bela G, Jongman RG, Pataki G, Samways M, Zobel M (2010) Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodivers Conserv 19:2963–2977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. In: Rehg W (ed). MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Headland TN, Bailey RC (1991) Introduction: have hunter-gatherers ever lived in tropical rain forest independently of agriculture? Hum Ecol 19:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R (2011) Towards equity in Indigenous co-management of protected areas: cultural planning by Miriuwung-Gajerrong people in the Kimberley, Western Australia. Geogr Res 49:72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R, Baird A (2003) Kuku-Yalanji Rainforest Aboriginal people and carbohydrate resource management in the Wet Tropics of Queensland, Australia. Hum Ecol 30:27–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R, Halamish E, Gordon IJ, Clark M (2013) The maturation of biodiversity as a global social–ecological issue and implications for future biodiversity science and policy. Futures 46:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme MF, Vickery JA, Green RE, Phalan B, Chamberlain DE, Pomeroy DE, Nalwanga D, Mushabe D, Katebaka R, Bolwig S, Atkinson PW (2013) Conserving the birds of Uganda’s banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared. PLoS One 8:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ST, Sax DF (2010) Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. Trends Ecol Evol 25:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons WS (1865) The question of coal. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppa LN, Pfaff A (2009) High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS One 4:e8273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juntti M, Russel D, Turnpenny J (2009) Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environ Sci Policy 12:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson AM, Brockhaus M, Sunderlin WD, Duchelle A, Babon A, Dokken T, Thu Thuy P, Resosudarmo IAP, Selaya G, Awono A, Thu-Ba H (2013) Land tenure and REDD plus : the good, the bad and the ugly. Glob Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 23:678–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Useche DC, Rendeiro J, Kalka M, Bradshaw CJA, Sloan SP, Laurance SG, Campbell M, Abernethy K, Alvarez P, Arroyo-Rodriguez V, Ashton P, Benitez-Malvido J, Blom A, Bobo KS, Cannon CH, Cao M, Carroll R, Chapman C, Coates R, Cords M, Danielsen F, De Dijn B, Dinerstein E, Donnelly MA, Edwards D, Edwards F, Farwig N, Fashing P, Forget PM, Foster M, Gale G, Harris D, Harrison R, Hart J, Karpanty S, Kress WJ, Krishnaswamy J, Logsdon W, Lovett J, Magnusson W, Maisels F, Marshall AR, McClearn D, Mudappa D, Nielsen MR, Pearson R, Pitman N, van der Ploeg J, Plumptre A, Poulsen J, Quesada M, Rainey H, Robinson D, Roetgers C, Rovero F, Scatena F, Schulze C, Sheil D, Struhsaker T, Terborgh J, Thomas D, Timm R, Urbina-Cardona JN, Vasudevan K, Wright SJ, Arias-G JC, Arroyo L, Ashton M, Auzel P, Babaasa D, Babweteera F, Baker P, Banki O, Bass M, Bila-Isia I, Blake S, Brockelman W, Brokaw N, Bruhl CA, Bunyavejchewin S, Chao JT, Chave J, Chellam R, Clark CJ, Clavijo J, Congdon R, Corlett R, Dattaraja HS, Dave C, Davies G, Beisiegel BD, da Silva RD, Di Fiore A, Diesmos A, Dirzo R, Doran-Sheehy D, Eaton M, Emmons L, Estrada A, Ewango C, Fedigan L, Feer F, Fruth B, Willis JG, Goodale U, Goodman S, Guix JC, Guthiga P, Haber W, Hamer K, Herbinger I, Hill J, Huang ZL, Sun IF, Ickes K, Itoh A, Ivanauskas N, Jackes B, Janovec J, Janzen D, Jiangming M, Jin C, Jones T, Justiniano H, Kalko E, Kasangaki A, Killeen T, King HB, Klop E, Knott C, Kone I, Kudavidanage E, Ribeiro JLD, Lattke J, Laval R, Lawton R, Leal M, Leighton M, Lentino M, Leonel C, Lindsell J, Ling-Ling L, Linsenmair KE, Losos E, Lugo A, Lwanga J, Mack AL, Martins M, McGraw WS, McNab R, Montag L, Thompson JM, Nabe-Nielsen J, Nakagawa M, Nepal S, Norconk M, Novotny V, O’Donnell S, Opiang M, Ouboter P, Parker K, Parthasarathy N, Pisciotta K, Prawiradilaga D, Pringle C, Rajathurai S, Reichard U, Reinartz G, Renton K, Reynolds G, Reynolds V, Riley E, Rodel MO, Rothman J, Round P, Sakai S, Sanaiotti T, Savini T, Schaab G, Seidensticker J, Siaka A, Silman MR, Smith TB, de Almeida SS, Sodhi N, Stanford C, Stewart K, Stokes E, Stoner KE, Sukumar R, Surbeck M, Tobler M, Tscharntke T, Turkalo A, Umapathy G, van Weerd M, Rivera JV, Venkataraman M, Venn L, Verea C, de Castilho CV, Waltert M, Wang B, Watts D, Weber W, West P, Whitacre D, Whitney K, Wilkie D, Williams S, Wright DD, Wright P, Xiankai L, Yonzon P, Zamzani F (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489:290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG (2014) Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends Ecol Evol 29:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach M, Raworth K, Rockström J (2013) Between social and planetary boundaries: navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity. In: ISSC and UNESCO (eds). World Social Science Report. Changing global environments, OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing, Paris, France

  • Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R, van Noordwijk M (2014) From euphoria to reality on efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 19:615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora C, Sale PF (2011) Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 434:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad D, McGrath D, Stickler C, Alencar A, Azevedo A, Swette B, Bezerra T, DiGiano M, Shimada J, da Motta RS, Armijo E, Castello L, Brando P, Hansen MC, McGrath-Horn M, Carvalho O, Hess L (2014) Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344:1118–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell B (2012) Simple models, powerful ideas: towards effective integrative practice. Glob Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 22:776–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novacek MJ (2008) Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:11571–11578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke D (2014) The science of sustainable supply chains. Science 344:1124–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2008) The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment 50:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola J, Gouldson A, Kluvankova-Oravska T (2009) Interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity. Environ Policy Gov 19:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papworth SK, Rist J, Coad L, Milner-Gulland EJ (2009) Evidence for shifting baseline syndrome in conservation. Conserv Lett 2:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) (1992) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Bertzky M, Butchart SHM, Donald PF, Scharlemann JPW, Stattersfield AJ, Balmford A (2013) Crop expansion and conservation priorities in tropical countries. PLoS One 8:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Green R, Balmford A (2014) Closing yield gaps: perils and possibilities for biodiversity conservation. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol, Sci 369

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny B, Scholz I, de Jong W (2013) REDD+ for the poor or the poor for REDD+? About the limitations of environmental policies in the Amazon and the potential of achieving environmental goals through pro-poor policies. Ecol Soc 18:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Akcakaya HR, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Chanson JS, Fishpool LDC, Da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. Bioscience 54:1092–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder H, McDermott C (2014) Beyond carbon: enabling justice and equity in REDD plus across levels of governance. Ecol Soc 19:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford N, Hobbs RJ, Burgar JM, Erickson TE, Fontaine JB, Laliberte E, Ramalho CE, Perring MP, Standish RJ (2013) Primed for change: developing ecological restoration for the 21st century. Restor Ecol 21:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandra JM, McKinney LA, Leckband C, London B (2010) Debt, structural adjustment, and biodiversity loss: a cross-national analysis of threatened mammals and birds. Hum Ecol Rev 17:18–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan S, Pelletier J (2012) How accurately may we project tropical forest-cover change? A validation of a forward-looking baseline for REDD. Glob Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 22:440–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 18:501–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Václavík T, Lautenbach S, Kuemmerle T, Seppelt R (2013) Mapping global land system archetypes. Glob Environ Change 23:1637–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiverronen E, Hellsten I (2002) From “burning library” to “green medicine”—the role of metaphors in communicating biodiversity. Sci Commun 24:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villoria NB, Golub A, Byerlee D, Stevenson J (2013) Will yield improvements on the forest frontier reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A global analysis of oil palm. Am J Agric Econ 95:1301–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villoria NB, Byerlee D, Stevenson J (2014) The effects of agricultural technological progress on deforestation: what do we really know? Appl Econ Perspect Policy 36:211–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White D (2014) A perfect storm? Indigenous rights within a national REDD+ readiness process in Peru. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 19:657–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary Hill.

Additional information

Handled by Iris C. Bohnet, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 74 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, R., Miller, C., Newell, B. et al. Why biodiversity declines as protected areas increase: the effect of the power of governance regimes on sustainable landscapes. Sustain Sci 10, 357–369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0288-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0288-6

Keywords

  • Protected areas
  • Biodiversity
  • Aichi Targets
  • Social–ecological systems
  • System dynamics