Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 193–204 | Cite as

Shedding light on a neglected area: a new approach to knowledge creation

  • Hiroko NakamuraEmail author
  • Shingo Ii
  • Hidenori Chida
  • Ken Friedl
  • Shinji Suzuki
  • Junichiro Mori
  • Yuya Kajikawa
Original Article

Abstract

Awareness is needed of sustainability issues that are currently neglected but potentially important. A computer-based approach can highlight unconscious and neglected areas because it can structure vast amounts of knowledge. In this article, we propose a methodology to perceive unconscious areas of sustainability with the support of a computer-based approach, which creates a matrix, named the recognized-unrecognized matrix, which highlights both local and globally neglected problems. A case study is conducted to consider the potential contribution of the aviation industry to sustainability issues. We demonstrate that a citation network analysis is an effective methodology to chart the recognized-unrecognized matrix. We highlight issues of water use in the aviation industry by designing an innovative water and air circulation system, which significantly reduces water and fuel consumption on board airplane flights. We also suggest a new approach to integrating both explicit and tacit knowledge to enable knowledge creation.

Keywords

Citation network analysis Exploration Innovation Sustainability Aviation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the FY2012 “Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Aviation Program Group Research Announcement.” We would also like to thank those who kindly participated in the interviews.

Supplementary material

11625_2013_226_MOESM1_ESM.docx (95 kb)
Supplementary material (DOCX 95 kb)
11625_2013_226_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Acha V, Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2007) Exploring the miracle: strategy and management of the knowledge base in the aeronautics industry. Int J Innov Technol Manage 4(1):15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. All Nippon Airways (ANA) (2011) Opportunities for progress. Annual Report 2010, Web Edition. http://www.ana.co.jp/eng/aboutana/corporate/ir/pdf/annual/10/10_00.pdf
  3. BAA (2008) Corporate Responsibility Report 2007. http://www.baa.com/corporateresponsibility
  4. Boeing (2010) Current Market Outlook 2010–2019, Retrieved August 28, 2010. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cmo/
  5. Börner K, Chen C, Boyak KW (2003) Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu Rev Inf Sci 37:179–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyack KW, Klavans R, Börner K (2005) Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64(3):351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun T, Schubert A, Zsindely S (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38(2):315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruza P, Weeber M (2008) Literature-based discovery. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 15. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro S, Davis LC, Erickson LE (2005) Natural, cost-effective, and sustainable alternatives for treatment of aircraft deicing fluid waste. Environ Prog 24(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronin B (2001) Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. J Inf Sci 27(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drucker P (1998) The future that has already happened. Futurist 32(8):16–18Google Scholar
  12. Everett JE, Pecotich A (1993) Citation analysis mapping of journals in applied and clinical-psychology. J Appl Soc Psychol 23(9):750–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garfield L (1979) Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics 1(4):359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geels FW (2006) The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): the dynamics of regime transformation. Res Policy 35:1069–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon MD, Lindsay RK (1996) Toward discovery support system: a replication, re-examination, and extraction of Swanson’s work on literature-based discovery of a connection between Raynaud’s and fish oil. J Am Soc Inf Sci 47(2):116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoogma R, Kemp R, Schot J, Truffer B (2002) Experimenting for sustainable transport: the approach of strategic niche management. Spon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. IATA (2009) The IATA Technology Roadmap Report, 3rd edn. SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Japan Airlines (JAL) (2010). CSR report 2009. http://www.jal.com/en/corporate/csr2009/
  19. Kajikawa Y, Abe K, Noda S (2006) Filling the gap between researchers studying different materials and different methods: a proposal for structured keywords. J Inf Sci 32:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kajikawa Y, Ohono J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H (2007) Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2(2):221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kajikawa Y, Yoshikawa J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K (2008) Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(6):771–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introductions. Acad Manage J 45(6):1183–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 10:175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinoshita Y (2009) The gaspath cleaning procedure of aircraft engines. J Gas Turb Soc Japan 37(4):3–6Google Scholar
  25. Kivits R, Charles MB, Ryanb N (2010) A post-carbon aviation future: airports and the transition to a cleaner aviation sector. Future 42:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kostoff RN (2008) Literature-related discovery (LRD): introduction and background. Technol Forecast Soc 75(2):165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leydesdorff L (1995). The challenge of scientometrics: the development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden DSWO Press, Leiden UniversityGoogle Scholar
  28. Leydesdorff L (2008) Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59(10):1582–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marin J, Kennedy K, Eskicioglu C (2009) Characterization of an anaerobic baffled reactor treating dilute aircraft de-icing fluid and long term effects of operation on granular biomass. Bioresour Technol 101(7):2217–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin BR (2012) The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Res Policy 41(1):1219–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Michel J, Bettels B (2001) Patent citation analysis. A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics 51(1):185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakamura, H, Kajikawa, Y, Suzuki, S (2011). Innovation for sustainability in aviation: world challenges and visions. In: Nobre FS, Walker DS, Harris RJ (eds) Technological, managerial and organizational core competencies: dynamic innovation and sustainable advantage. IGI Global, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakamura H, Suzuki S, Tomobe H, Kajikawa Y, Sakata I (2011b) Citation lag analysis in supply chain research. Scientometrics 87(2):221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson R (1982) National innovation system. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Nerur SP, Rasheed AA, Natarajan V (2008) The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strateg Manage J 29:319–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman MEJ (2004) Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev 69:066133Google Scholar
  37. Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev 69:026133Google Scholar
  38. Nicolaisen J (2007) Citation analysis. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 14(3):609–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus. Rev., pp 96–104Google Scholar
  40. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Org Sci 5(1):14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porter AL, Cohen AS, Roessner JD et al (2007) Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics 72(1):117–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raven RPJM (2006) Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime. Res Policy 35:581–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rinia EJ, Van Leeuwen TN, Bruins EEW et al (2002) Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 54(3):347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Matsushima K (2007) Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. J Am Soc Inf Sci 60(3):571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Sakata I (2010) Extracting the commercialization gap between science and technology—case study of a solar cell. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(2):274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smalheiser, NR, Torvik VI (2008) The place of literature-based discovery in contemporary scientific practice. In: Bruza P, Weeber M (eds) Literature-based discovery. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–22Google Scholar
  47. Smalheiser NR (2012) Literature-based discovery: beyond the ABCs. J Am Soc Inf Sci 63(2):218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smalheiser NR, Swanson DR (1998) Using ARROWSMITH: a computer-assisted approach to formulating and assessing scientific hypotheses. Comput Meth Prog Biol 57(3):149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith A (2006) Niche-based approaches to sustainable development: radical activists versus strategic managers. In: Bauknecht D, Kemp R, Voss J (eds) Sustainability and reflexive governance. Edward Elgar, CamberleyGoogle Scholar
  50. Swanson DR (1986) Fish oil, Raynaud’s syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspect Biol Med 30(1):7–18Google Scholar
  51. Swanson DR (1987) Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected. J Am Soc Inf Sci 38(4):228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swanson DR (2011) Literature-based resurrection of neglected medical discoveries. J Biol Discov Collab 6:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Telwall M, Vann K, Fairclough R (2006) Web issue analysis: an integrated water resource management case study. J Am Soc Inf Sci 57(10):1303–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tijssen RJW (1992) A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: co-classification analysis of energy research. Res Policy 21(1):27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verbong G, Geels F (2007) The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35:1025–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weber M, Hoogma R, Lane B, Schot J (1999) Experimenting with sustainable transport innovations. Workbook for Strategic Niche Management. CEC Joint Research Centre, SevilleGoogle Scholar
  57. Yin RK (1984) Case study research: design and method. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu S, Kato S, Ooka R, Sakoi T (2007) Development of a computational thermal manikin applicable in a nonuniform thermal environment Part 1. HVAC R Res 13(4):661–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroko Nakamura
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shingo Ii
    • 2
  • Hidenori Chida
    • 2
  • Ken Friedl
    • 2
  • Shinji Suzuki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Junichiro Mori
    • 3
  • Yuya Kajikawa
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Aviation Innovation Research (CAIR)The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, School of EngineeringThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Innovation Policy Research CenterInstitute of Engineering Innovation at the University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Innovation ManagementTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations