Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda

Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Over the last decade, sustainability science has been at the leading edge of widespread efforts from the social and natural sciences to produce use-inspired research. Yet, how knowledge generated by sustainability science and allied fields will contribute to transitions toward sustainability remains a critical theoretical and empirical question for basic and applied research. This article explores the limitations of sustainability science research to move the field beyond the analysis of problems in coupled systems to interrogate the social, political and technological dimensions of linking knowledge and action. Over the next decade, sustainability science can strengthen its empirical, theoretical and practical contributions by developing along four research pathways focused on the role of values in science and decision-making for sustainability: how communities at various scales envision and pursue sustainable futures; how socio-technical change can be fostered at multiple scales; the promotion of social and institutional learning for sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe R, Costanza R, Farley J, Garza E, Kent J, Kubiszewski I, Martinex L, McCowen T, Murphy K, Myers N, Ogden Z, Stapleton K, Woodward J (2009) Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(8):2483–2489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19540–19545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer GD (2007) Inventing the future: scenarios, imagination, mastery and control. Sustain Sci 2:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A (2011) Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov High Educ 36:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA, Crossman ND, King D, Meyer WS (2011) Landscape futures analysis: assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environ Model Softw 26(1):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Pingali PL, Bennet EM, Zurek MB (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios, vol 2. The millennium ecosystem assessment series. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpiano RM (2009) Come take a walk with me: the ‘‘go-along’’ interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health Place 15:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casillas CE, Kammen DM (2010) The energy-poverty-climate nexus. Science 330(6008):1181–1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caswill C, Shove E (2000) Introducing interactive social science. Sci Public Policy 27(3):154–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(6):1737–1738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC (2010) Sustainable development and sustainability science. In report from Toward a Science of Sustainability conference, Airlie Center, Washington, DC

  • Clark WC, Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Guston D, Catacutan D, Dickson NM, McNie E (2011) Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow MM (2010) Organizing teaching and research to address the grand challenges of sustainable development. Bioscience 60(7):488–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrahi Y (1990) The decent of Icarus: science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Dyball R, Fazey I, Gross C, Dovers S, Ehrlich PR, Brulle RJ, Christensen C, Borden RJ (2012) Human behavior and sustainability. Front Ecol Evolut. doi:10.1890/110079

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser MW, Richman JM, Galinsky MJ, Day SH (2009) Intervention research: developing social programs. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RB (2006) Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 24(3):170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (2009) Framing of environmental disputes. In: Lewicki RJ, Gray B, Elliot M (eds) Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: frames and cases. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healy P (2007) Urban complexity and spatial strategies: towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegger DLT, Van Zeijl-Rozema A, Dieperink C (2013) Toward design principles for joint knowledge production: lessons from the deepest polder of The Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, December 2012

  • [ICSU] International Council for Science (2002) ICSU Series on science for sustainable development: report of the scientific and technological community to the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) 1

  • Jasanoff S (2007) Technologies of humility. Nature 450:33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jerneck A, Olsson L (2011) Breaking out of sustainability impasses: how to apply frame analysis, reframing and transition theory to global health challenges. Environ Innov Soc Transit 1:255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R (2011) Innovation for sustainable development as a topic for environmental assessment. J Ind Ecol 15(5):673–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP, Ehrlich PR, Alston LJ, Arrow K, Barrett S, Buchman TG, Daily GC, Levin B, Levin S, Oppenheimer M, Ostrom E, Saari D (2013) Social norms and global environmental challenges: the complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy. Bioscience 63(3):164–175. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.3.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2010) The practice of transitions management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42(3):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279(5350):491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matson P (2009) The sustainability transition. Issues Sci Technol Summer 2009:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane T, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Thang HV, Dammert JL, Pulgar-Vidal M, Welch-Devine M, Brosius JP, Coppolillo P, O’Connor S (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv 144(3):966–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8(2):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Neff MA (2013) De-facto science policy in the making: how scientists shape science policy and why it matters (or, why STS and STP scholars should socialize). Minerva. doi:10.1007/s11024-013-9234-x

  • Miller TR, Muñoz-Erickson TA, Redman CL (2011a) Transforming knowledge for sustainability: fostering adaptability in academic institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(2):177–192. doi:10.1108/14676371111118228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Minteer BA, Malan LC (2011b) The new conservation debate: a descriptive and normative analysis of international conservation. Biol Conserv 144:948–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Erickson TA (2012) How cities think: knowledge-action systems for urban sustainability. Dissertation, Arizona State University. Tempe, Arizona, USA

  • [NRC] National Research Council (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

  • Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008) The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol Soc 13(1):24

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M (2012) Socioenvironmental sustainability and actionable science. Bioscience 62(1):5–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick M (2010) An anticipatory governance approach to carbon nanotubes. Risk Anal 30(11):1708–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke Jr R, Wigley T, Green C (2008) Dangerous assumptions. Nature 452:531–532

  • Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopín G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R (2002) The great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner S, Milone E (1998) Human choice and climate change, vol 4. Battelle Press, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid RS, Nkedianye D, Said MY, Kaelo D, Neselle M, Makui O, Onetu L, Kiruswa S, Kamuaro NO, Kristjanson P, Ogutu J, BurnSilver SB, Goldman MJ, Boone RB, Galvin KA, Dickson NM, Clark WC (2009) Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900313106

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid WV, Chen D, Goldfarb L, Hackmann H, Lee YT, Mokhele K, Ostrom E, Raivio K, Rockstrom J, Schellnhuber HJ, Whyte A (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330:916–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (2008) Being undisciplined: some transgressions and intersection in academia and beyond. Futures 40(1):70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J, Carmichael J, VanWynsberghe R, Tansey J, Journeay M, Rogers L (2006) Sustainability as a problem of design: interactive science in the Georgia Basin. Integr Assess J 6(4):165–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J, Burch S, Talwar S, O’Shea M, Walsh M (2011) Envisioning sustainability: recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:756–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe D (2007) Education for a sustainable future. Science 317:323–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salter JD, Robinson J, Wiek A (2010) Participatory methods of integrated assessment: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1(5):697–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D, Kriebel D, Clapp R, Crumbley C, Hoppin P, Jacobs M, Tickner J (2012) The sustainability solutions agenda. New Solut 22(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schensul JJ (2009) Community, culture and sustainability in multilevel dynamic systems intervention science. Am J Community Psychol 43:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Stirling A (2007) Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. J Environ Plan Policy Manage 8(3–4):1–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy 34:1491–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Verissimo D, Leader-Williams N, Cowling RM, Knight AT (2009) Let the locals lead. Nature 462:280–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swart R, Raskin P, Robinson J (2002) Critical challenges for sustainability science. Science 297(5589):1994–1995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar S, Wiek A, Robinson J (2011) User engagement in sustainability research. Sci Public Policy 38:379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Wiek A, Swanson FJ, Carpenter SR, Fresco N, Hollingsworth T, Spies T, Foster DR (2012) Scenario studies as a synthetic and integrative research activity for long term ecological research. Bioscience 62:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson P, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Chistensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8074–8079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hove S (2006) Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy 23:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Ann Rev Environ Resour 31:445–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voß JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (2005) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Barrett S, Polasky S, Galaz V, Folke C, Engström G, Ackerman F, Arrow K, Carpenter S, Chopra K, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Hughes T, Kautsky N, Levin S, Mäler KG, Shogren J, Vincent J, Xepapadeas T, de Zeeuw A (2009) Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science 325(5946):1345–1346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A (2007) Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation: experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 16:52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Binder C (2005) Solution spaces for decision-making: a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:589–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based, in part, upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 0504248, IGERT in Urban Ecology at Arizona State University. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendation expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, Portland, OR, 97207, USA

    Thaddeus R. Miller

  2. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5502, USA

    Arnim Wiek & Daniel Sarewitz

  3. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Daniel Sarewitz

  4. UBC Sustainability Initiative, and Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, 2260 WestMall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    John Robinson

  5. Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS), Lund University, Box 170 S-22100, Lund, Sweden

    Lennart Olsson

  6. Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA

    David Kriebel

  7. Dutch Research Institute For Transitions (DRIFT), Faculty of Social Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Derk Loorbach

Authors
  1. Thaddeus R. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arnim Wiek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Sarewitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lennart Olsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David Kriebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Derk Loorbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thaddeus R. Miller.

Additional information

Handled by Rene Kemp, UNU-MERIT and ICIS, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, T.R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D. et al. The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9, 239–246 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6

Keywords

search

Navigation