Abstract
The importance of taking an integrative approach to research has long been integral to sustainability science, and has recently been highlighted as fundamental to the co-design of research and co-production of knowledge. Just what this means, however, and how to implement such a broad notion has escaped effective methodological development. In order to become more than a generic descriptor, integrative research needs to be conceptualized and presented in ways that offer guidance to researchers designing and conducting integrative research projects, whilst remaining broad enough to be relevant to the breadth and depth of sustainability-related problems. Drawing on complexity theory and fundamental aspects of integrative research, I present a methodological framing that seeks to achieve this balance. Using a definition of integrative research as “research in the context of complexity, with an action imperative”, I draw from complexity theory that proposes minimal specifications, generative relationships, focusing on enablers and seeking diversity as core features of a complexity-based approach. On that basis I propose four principles that can be used by researchers to guide the design and implementation of their projects: embrace uncertainty; engage stakeholders; be transdisciplinary; and have a learning orientation. Each of these principles is explained, and their relationships to research design, methodological framing, choice of methods and project development are presented. Two integrative research project frameworks are presented as examples of how this principles-based approach can be implemented in research design. Using this approach offers a simple but powerful structure to guide integrative research for sustainability science at the project scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agyeman J, Evans B (2004) ‘Just sustainability’: the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? Geogr J 170:155–164
Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B (eds) (2011) The SAGE handbook of complexity and management. Sage, London
Allenby BR, Sarewitz DR (2011) The techno-human condition. MIT Press, Cambridge
Anon (2012) Co-designing knowledge: a common understanding of integrated global change research. Online report http://www.nkgcf.org/files/pdf/4%20pages%20Integration%20WS%20%20%28web%29.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012
Bammer G (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecol Soc 20:6
Bardwell LV (1991) Problem-framing: a perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environ Manage 15:603–612
Blackstock KL, Carter CE (2007) Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects. Geogr J 173(4):343–357
Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ et al (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol Econ 60(4):726–742
Brundiers K, Wiek A (2011) Educating students in real-world sustainability research—vision and implementation. Innov Higher Educ 36(2):107–124
Cartledge K, Dürrwächter C, Jimenez VH, Winder NP (2009) Making sure you solve the right problem. Ecol Soc 14:r3
Cleland D, Dray A, Perez P, Cruz-Trinidad A, Geronimo R (2012) Simulating the dynamics of subsistence fishing communities: REEFGAME as a learning and data-gathering computer-assisted role-play game. Simul Gaming 43:102–117
Cooperrider DL, Whitney DK (2005) Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco
Evely AC, Fazey I, Lambin X, Lambert E, Allen S, Pinard M (2010) Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environ Conserv 37:442–450
Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, London
Ison RL (2010) Systems practice: how to act in a climate change world. Springer/Open University, London
Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10
Jerneck A, Olsson L et al (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(1):69–82
Jones NA, Perez P, Measham TG, Kelly GJ, D’Aquino P, Daniell KA, Dray A, Ferrand N (2009) Evaluating participatory modeling: developing a framework for cross-case analysis. Environ Manage 44:1180–1195
Kasperson RE (2008) Coping with deep uncertainty: challenges for environmental assessment and decision-making uncertainty and risk. In: Bammer G, Smithson M (eds) Multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan, London, pp 356–367
Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2005) The social contours of risk. Earthscan, London
Keen M, Brown VA et al (2005) Social learning in environmental management : towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London
Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Kueffer C (2006) Integrative ecological research: case-specific validation of ecological knowledge for environmental problem solving. GAIA 15:115–120
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):25–43
Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Earthscan, London
Liu Y, Gupta H, Springer E, Wagener T (2008) Linking science with environmental decision making: experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environ Model Softw 23:846–858
Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183
Mathews LG, Jones A (2008) Using systems thinking to improve interdisciplinary learning outcomes: reflections on a pilot study in land economics. Issues Integr Stud 26:73–104
McDonald D, Bammer G, Deane P (2009) Research integration using dialogue methods. ANU E-press, Canberra
Merali Y, Allen P (2011) Complexity and systems thinking. In: Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B (eds) The SAGE handbook of complexity and management. SAGE, London, pp 31–52
National Office of Atmospheric Administration (2004) ICM basics: what does ‘integrated’ mean? Online source: http://icm.noaa.gov/story/icm_inte.html [Accessed 12 June 2012]
National Research Council (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Plsek PE, Wilson T (2001) Complexity science: complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. Br Med J 323:746–749
Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The SAGE handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. SAGE, London
Reed J (2007) Appreciative inquiry: research for change. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
Robinson J (2008) Being undisciplined: transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures 40:70–86
Roux DJ, Stirzaker RJ, Breen CM, Lefroy EC, Cresswell HP (2010) Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environ Sci Policy 13:733–741
Rowe D (2007) Education for a sustainable future. Science 317:323–324
Russell AW, Wickson F, Carew AL (2008) Transdisciplinarity: context, contradictions and capacity. Futures 40:460–472
Schoolman ED, Guest JS, Bush KF, Bell AR (2012) How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7:67–80
Shackley S, Wynne B, Waterton C (1996) Imagine complexity: the past, present and future potential of complex thinking. Futures 28:201–225
Sherren K, Fischer J, Clayton H, Schirmer J, Dovers S (2010) Integration by case, place and process: transdisciplinary research for sustainable grazing in the Lachlan River catchment, Australia. Landsc Ecol 25:1219–1230
Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287
Stark R, Mandl H (2007) Bridging the gap between basic and applied research by an integrative research approach. Educ Res Eval 13:249–261
Stauffacher M, Walter A, Lang D, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2006) Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case study approach. Int J Sustain Higher Education 7:252–275
Stock P, Burton RJF (2011) Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability 3:1090–1113
Talwar S, Wiek A et al (2011) User engagement in sustainability research. Sci Public Policy 38(5):379–390
Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2005) Researchers’ experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environ Manage 36:792–807
Ulrich W, Reynolds M (2010) Critical systems heuristics. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. Springer, London, pp 243–292
van de Fliert E, Braun AR (2002) Conceptualizing integrative, farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture: from opportunities to impact. Agric Hum Values 19:25–38
van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:452–463
van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:445–477
Watkins JM, Mohr BJ (2001) Appreciative inquiry: change at the speed of imagination. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco
Wickson F, Carew AL, Russell AW (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38:1046–1059
Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability—a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218
Wiek A, Farioli F, Fukushi K, Yarime M (2012a) Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society. Sustain Sci 7:1–4
Wiek A, Ness B et al (2012b) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl. 1):5–24
Wuelser G, Pohl C, Hadorn GH (2011) Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: a framework. Sustain Sci 7:81–93
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Nobuo Mimura, Ibaraki University, Japan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Kerkhoff, L. Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach. Sustain Sci 9, 143–155 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0203-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0203-y