Sustainability research is expected to incorporate concepts, methods, and data from a diverse array of academic disciplines. We investigate the extent to which sustainability research lives up to this ideal of an interdisciplinary field. Using bibliometric data, we orient our study around the “tripartite model” of sustainability, which suggests that sustainability research should draw from the three “pillars” of the environmental, economic, and social sciences. We ask three questions: (i) is sustainability research truly more interdisciplinary than research generally, (ii) to what extent does research grounded in one pillar draw on research from the other two, and (iii) if certain disciplines or pillars are more interdisciplinary than others, then what explains this variation? Our results indicate that sustainability science, while more interdisciplinary than other scientific fields, falls short of the expectations inherent in the tripartite model. The pillar with the fewest articles published on sustainability—economics—is also the most integrative, while the pillar with the most articles—environmental sciences—draws the least from outside disciplines. But interdisciplinarity comes at a cost: sustainability research in economics and the social sciences is centered around a relatively small number of interdisciplinary journals, which may be becoming less valued over time. These findings suggest that, if sustainability research is to live up to its interdisciplinary ideals, researchers must be provided with greater incentives to draw from fields other than their own.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams WM (2006) The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006, IUCN
Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 3:24–41
Bailey KD (1983) Sociological entropy theory: toward a statistical and verbal congruence. Qual Quant 18:113–133
Becher T, Trowler PR (2001) Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA
Bruhn JG (1995) Beyond discipline: creating a culture for interdisciplinary research. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 30:331–341
Butler D (1998) Interdisciplinary research ‘being stifled’. Nature 396:202
Characklis GW, Adriaens P, Braden JB, Davis J, Hamilton B, Hughes JB, Small MJ, Wolfe J (2011) Increasing the role of economics in environmental research (or moving beyond the mindset that economics = accounting). Environ Sci Technol 45:6235–6236
Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(6):1737–1738
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059–8061
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (2005) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine, Washington
Costanza R, Stern D, Fisher B, He L, Ma C (2004) Influential publications in ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 50:261–292
Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of the 21st century. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
Elsevier (2010) Bibliometrics. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/editors.editors/biblio
Fujigaki Y, Leydesdorff L (2000) Quality control and validation boundaries in a triple helix of university-industry-government: “Mode 2” and the future of university research. Soc Sci Inform 39:635–655
Gill J (2005) An entropy measure of uncertainty in vote choice. Elect Stud 24:371–392
Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405
Janssen MA (2007) An update on the scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Ecol Soc 12:9
Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke W, Börner K (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 16(3):240–252
Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:69–82
Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239
Kajikawa Y, Ohno J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H (2007) Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2(2):221–231
Kastenhofer K, Rammel C (2005) Obstacles to and potentials of the societal implementation of sustainable development: a comparative analysis of two case studies. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 1(2):5–13
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642
Kaufman S, Kwon E, Krishnan N, Castaldi M, Themelis N (2008) Use of statistical entropy and life cycle analysis to evaluate global warming potential of waste management systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference (NAWTEC 16), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 2008, pp 107–112
Kim KH, Jeon BJ, Jung HS, Lu W, Jones J (2011) Effective employment brand equity through sustainable competitive advantage, marketing strategy, and corporate image. J Bus Res (in press)
Koehler DA, Hecht AD (2006) Sustainability, well being, and environmental protection: perspectives and recommendations from an Environmental Protection Agency forum. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2(2):22–28
Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6
Kostoff RN (2002) Overcoming specialization. BioScience 52:937–941
Leydesdorff L, Schank T (2008) Dynamic animations of journal maps: indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59:1810–1818
Leydesdorff L, Moya-Anegón FD, Guerrero-Bote VP (2010) Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61:352–369
Ma C, Stern DI (2006) Environmental and ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 58:491–506
Metzger N, Zare RN (1999) Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science 283(5402):642–643
Nakamura H, Suzuki S, Hironori T, Kajikawa Y, Sakata I (2011) Citation lag analysis in supply chain research. Scientometrics 87:221–232
Nelson B (2011) Interdisciplinary studies: seeking the right toolkit. Nature 476:115–117
Nyhus PJ, Westley FR, Lacy RC, Miller PS (2002) A role for natural resource social science in biodiversity risk assessment. Soc Nat Resour 15(10):923–932
Office of Government Commerce (OGC) (2007) Achieving excellence in construction procurement guide: sustainability. HM Treasury, London
Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422
Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36:859–866
Porter AL, Chubin DE (1985) An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics 8(3–4):161–176
Porter AL, Rafols I (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81:719–745
Porter AL, Roessner JD, Cohen AS, Perreault M (2006) Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture. Res Eval 15:187–195
Porter AL, Cohen AS, Roessner JD, Perreault M (2007) Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics 72:117–147
Porter AL, Roessner JD, Heberger AE (2008) How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Res Eval 17:273–282
Qian C, Chan C-Y, Yung K-L (2011) Reaching a destination earlier by starting later: revisited. Transport Res E Log Trans Rev 47:641–647
Rafols I, Meyer M (2010) Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 82:263–287
Sá CM (2008) ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities. High Educ 55(5):537–552
Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Chang 14:137–146
Tomov DT, Mutafov HG (1996) Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics 37:267–278
United Nations General Assembly (2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome. Resolution A/60/1:38
van Leeuwen T, Tijssen R (2000) Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Res Eval 9:183–187
Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman C, Mills SB (2011) Moving forward on competence in sustainability research and problem solving. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 53:3–13
Willard B (2002) The sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line. New Society Publishers, New York
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. United Nations
Yarime M, Takeda Y, Kajikawa Y (2010) Towards institutional analysis of sustainability science: a quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration. Sustain Sci 5(1):115–125
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Graham Environmental Sustainability Institute at the University of Michigan, which provided facilities for group meetings and partial funding for each author. We would also like to thank our colleagues, Graham Fellows, Graham Institute External Advisory Board Members, and the anonymous reviewers that offered input on the development of this work.
Handled by Arnim Wiek, Arizona State University, USA.
E. D. Schoolman, J. S. Guest, K. F. Bush, and A. R. Bell contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Schoolman, E.D., Guest, J.S., Bush, K.F. et al. How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7, 67–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z
- Sustainability science
- Citation analysis