Zusammenfassung
Die Verbreitung von Darstellungen von Kindesmissbrauch hat Diskussionen über den Umgang mit Inhalten im Internet und die Frage ausgelöst, ob solche Inhalte gelöscht werden können. Sie ist einer der Gründe für die Bestrebungen der EU, eine Chatkontrolle mit Client-Side-Scanning einzuführen. In jüngerer Vergangenheit ist zu beobachten, dass die Darstellungen nicht mehr unbedingt von existierenden Opfern stammen, sondern mittels KI-basierter generativer Systeme (GenAI) erstellt oder modifiziert worden sind. Der Beitrag führt auf, mit welchen Methoden entsprechende Inhalte erzeugt werden können und diskutiert die Konsequenzen der Verfügbarkeit der Methoden für potenzielle Opfer, ihr Umfeld und die Ermittler.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) § 184b: Verbreitung, Erwerb und Besitz kinderpornographischer Inhalte. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__184b.html. Accessed: 06.02.2024.
Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) § 184c: Verbreitung, Erwerb und Besitz jugendpornographischer Inhalte. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__184c.html. Accessed: 06.02.2024.
Stephanie Blümer, Martin Steinebach, Raphael Antonius Frick, and Niklas Bunzel. Detection of deepfakes using background-matching. Electronic Imaging, 35:381–1, 2023.
Stephanie Blümer, Martin Steinebach, Raphael Frick, and Niklas Bunzel. Detection of deepfakes using background-matching. Electronic Imaging, 35:381–, 01 2023.
Carlianna Dengel and Ellie Sanders. Deepfakes and intellectual property: What you should know. https://www.romanolaw.com/deepfakes-and-intellectual-property/, Oct 2022.
Asher Flynn, Anastasia Powell, Adrian J Scott, and Elena Cama. Deepfakes and digitally altered imagery abuse: A cross-country exploration of an emerging form of image-based sexual abuse. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(6):1341–1358, 2022.
Anne Pechenik Gieseke. The new weapon of choice: Law’s current inability to properly address deepfake pornography. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2020.
Sven Gowal and Pushmeet Kohli. Identifying ai-generated images with synthid. Aug 2023.
JW Graaf. Augmented reality: too good to be true? 2021.
Karen Hao. Deepfake porn is ruining women’s lives. now the law may finally ban it. MIT Technology Review, 2021.
Guy Hedgecoe. Ai-generated naked child images shock spanish town of almendralejo. BBC News, 2023.
IWF. How ai is being abused to create child sexual abuse imagery. 2023.
Zhengyuan Jiang, Jinghuai Zhang, and Neil Zhenqiang Gong. Evading watermark based detection of ai-generated content. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03807, 2023.
Annalise Kempen. The ugly side of creating life-like child abuse images. Servamus Community-based Safety and Security Magazine, 116(10):24–25, 2023.
Catherine Kerner and Mathias Risse. Beyond porn and discreditation: Epistemic promises and perils of deepfake technology in digital lifeworlds. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 8(1):81–108, 2021.
David Lester, Stephanie McSwain, and John F Gunn 3rd. Suicide and the internet: the case of amanda todd. International journal of emergency mental health, 15(3):179–180, 2013.
Claudia Ratner. When “sweetie” is not so sweet: artificial intelligence and its implications for child pornography. Family Court Review, 59(2):386–401, 2021.
Hadi Salman, Alaa Khaddaj, Guillaume Leclerc, Andrew Ilyas, and Aleksander Madry. Raising the cost of malicious ai-powered image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06588, 2023.
Pedro Sandoval-Segura, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein. Jpeg compressed images can bypass protections against ai editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02234, 2023.
Neeraja Seshadri and Sindhu A. Deepfakes and the copyright connection: Analysing the adequacy of the present machinery. https://jolt.richmond.edu, Mar 2022.
Laura Stănilă. Memories of the future-sweetie and the impact of the new technologies on the criminal justice system. EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 4:557–575, 2020.
Martin Steinebach, Tiberius Berwanger, and Huajian Liu. Towards image hashing robust against cropping and rotation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pages 1–7, 2022.
Martin Steinebach, Karol Gotkowski, and Hujian Liu. Fake news detection by image montage recognition. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pages 1–9, 2019.
David Thiel, Melissa Stroebel, and Rebecca Portnoff. Generative ml and csam: Implications and mitigations. 2023.
James Tutten. Florida students accused of creating nude photos of classmates using ai. Yahoo News, Dec 2023.
Brandon Vigliarolo. Csam found in large ai image generator-training dataset. The Register, Dec 2023.
Mika Westerlund. The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology innovation management review, 9(11), 2019.
Sandra Wittmer and Martin Steinebach. Computergenerierte Kinderpornografie zu Ermittlungszwecken im Darknet. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und technische Umsetzbarkeit. MMR, pages 650–653, 2019.
Sandra Wittmer and Martin Steinebach. Einsatz von computergenerierten Missbrauchsabbildungen zur Strafverfolgung im Darknet. In: Sexueller Kindesmissbrauch und Missbrauchsabbildungen in digitalen Medien. MVV, 2023.
Chin-Yuan Yeh, Hsi-Wen Chen, Shang-Lun Tsai, and Sheng-De Wang. Disrupting image-translation-based deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) Workshops, March 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinebach, M. KI-generierte Abbildungen von Kindesmissbrauch. Datenschutz Datensich 48, 304–309 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-024-1934-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-024-1934-x