Abstract
In the present article of the Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie, the expectations (self-assessed at the beginning of the treatment) and perception (self-assessed upon the conclusion of the treatment) of the psychotherapy process and outcome, psychotherapeutic factors and psychodrama specificities are presented and analysed in a psychodrama group for adult participants held in an outpatient psychiatric clinic. There were 12 male and 31 female participants, aged from 19 to 63 years, diagnosed with anxiety, depression, and borderline personality disorder or committed into the hospital after their first psychotic episode. Questionnaires were applied at the beginning of the treatment and at the end. Results showed that the participants’ expectations regarding the psychotherapy process and outcomes were quite high at the beginning of the treatment and rose significantly at the end. The same was true of the participants’ expectations and perception of the specificities of psychodrama—demonstrating the participants’ positive inclination towards this specific psychotherapeutic way of conducting psychodrama. Even though there were no age or gender differences, there were, differences between participants’ different diagnoses; there were significant differences in the expectations of both psychotherapy outcome and factors before treatment and perceptions of them after treatment.
Zusammenfassung
In dem vorliegenden Artikel der Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie werden Erwartungen und Wahrnehmungen des Psychotherapieprozesses und der Effekte sowie psychotherapeutische Faktoren und Psychodramaspezifitäten in der Psychodramagruppe für erwachsene Teilnehmer einer ambulanten psychiatrischen Klinik vorgestellt und analysiert. Es gab 12 männliche und 31 weibliche TeilnehmerInnen im Alter von 19 bis 63 Jahren, bei denen Angstzustände, Depressionen, Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörungen diagnostiziert wurden oder die nach ihrer ersten psychotischen Episode ins Krankenhaus eingeliefert wurden. Die Fragebögen wurden zu Beginn und am Ende der Behandlung angewendet. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Erwartungen der TeilnehmerInnen an dem Psychotherapieprozess und den Effekten zu Beginn der Behandlung recht hoch sind und am Ende sogar deutlich steigen. Gleiches gilt für die Erwartungen und Wahrnehmungen von Psychodramaspezifitäten durch die TeilnehmerInnen – möglicherweise zeigt dies die positive Neigung der TeilnehmerInnen zur spezifischen Art und Weise, einen psychotherapeutischen Prozess im Psychodrama durchzuführen. Obwohl es keine Alters- oder Geschlechtsunterschiede gibt, gab es zwischen TeilnehmerInnen mit unterschiedlichen Diagnosen signifikante Unterschiede in den Erwartungen an das Psychotherapieergebnis vor und nach der Behandlung sowie in der Erwartung hinsichtlich psychotherapeutischer Faktoren vor der Behandlung.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardito, R. B., & Rabellino, D. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270.
Benjamin, L. S., & Karpiak, C. P. (2001). Personality disorders. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, & Practice, 38, 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.487.
Blatner, A. (2000). Foundations of psychodrama. New York: Springer.
Blatner, A. (2007). Morenian approaches: recognising psychodrama’s many facets. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 59(4), 159–170.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885.
Clark, A. J. (1993). Interpretation in group counselling: theoretical and operational issues. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 18, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933929308413752.
Crouch, E. C., Bloch, S., & Wanlass, J. (1994). Therapeutic factors: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms. In A. Fuhriman & G. Burlingame (Eds.), Handbook of group psychotherapy (pp. 269–315). New York: Wiley.
D’Aniello, C., & Tambling, R. B. (2017). The Effect of Expectations on Intention to Persist in Therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 45(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1223568.
Dayton, T. (1994). The drama within: psychodrama and experiential therapy. Florida: Health Communications.
DeLucia-Waack, J. (1996). Multiculturalism is inherent in all group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 21, 218–223.
Flowers, J. V. (1987). Client outcome as a function of agreement or disagreement with the modal group perception of curative factors in short-term, structured group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 113–117.
Freud, S. (1913). On the beginning of treatment (Further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis I). In J. Strachey (Ed.), (pp. 122–144). London: Hogarth, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of S. Freud, Volume XII (1911–1913).
Fuhriman, A., Drescher, S., Hanson, E., Henrie, R., & Rybicki, W. (1986). Refining the measurement of curativeness: an empirical approach. Small Group Behavior, 17, 186–201.
Gillaspy, J. A., Wright, A. R., Campbell, C., Stokes, S., & Adinoff, B. (2002). Group alliance and cohesion as predictors of drug and alcohol abuse treatment outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 12(2), 213–229.
Goldberg, F. S., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (1988). Therapeutic factors in two forms of inpatient group psychotherapy: music therapy and verbal therapy. Group, 12(3), 145–156.
Havsteen-Franklin, D., Haeyen, S., Grant, C., & Karkou, V. (2018). A thematic synthesis of therapeutic actions in arts therapies and their perceived effects in the treatment of people with a diagnosis of Cluster B personality disorder. The Arts in Psychotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2018.10.001.
Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233.
Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 561–573.
Johnson, I. H., Torres, J. S., Coleman, V. D., & Smith, M. C. (1995). Issues and strategies in leading culturally diverse counseling groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 20, 143–150.
Kail, R. V., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (2010). Human development—a life-span view. Wadsworth: Belmont.
Kellerman, P. F. (1987). Psychodrama participants’ perception of therapeutic factors. Small Group Behavior, 18, 408–419.
Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 357–361.
Lingiardi, V., Filippucci, L., & Baiocco, R. (2005). Therapeutic alliance evaluation in personality disorders psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 15(1–2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300512331327047.
Luborsky, L. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy: the groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In J. L. Cleghorn (Ed.), Successful psychotherapy (pp. 92–116). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Marcovitz, R. J., & Smith, J. E. (1983). Patients’ perceptions of curative factors in short-term group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 33, 21–39.
McLeod, J., & Ryan, A. (1993). Therapeutic factors experienced by members of an outpatient therapy group for older women. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 21, 64–72.
Meillo, J. (1991). Issues of milieu therapy: psychodrama as a contribution to the treatment of a case of anorexia nervosa. In P. Holmes & M. Karp (Eds.), Psychodrama: Inspiration and technique (pp. 137–153). London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Moreno, J. L. (1983). The theatre of spontaneity. Ambler: Beacon House.
Norberg, M. M., Wetterneck, C. T., Sass, D. A., & Kanter, J. W. (2011). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectations Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20781.
Pinsof, W. M., & Catherall, D. R. (1986). The integrative psychotherapy alliance: family, couple and individual therapy scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 137–151.
Porges, S. W. (2007). The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology, 74(2), 116–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009.
Prosen, S. (2016). Psychodrama in the group of patients diagnosed with eating disorders. Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie, 15(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-015-0305-x.
Prosen, S., & Jendričko, T. (2014). Psychodrama Specificities Questionnaire. unpublished material.
Safran, J. D., & McMain, S. (1990). Therapeutic alliance rupture as therapy event for empirical investigation. Psychotherapy Theory Research & Practice, 27(2), 154–165.
Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind. New York, London: Guilford.
Strupp, H. H. (2001). Implications of the empirically supported treatment movement for psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 11, 605–619.
Strupp, H. H., & Hadley, S. W. (1979). Specific versus non-specific factors in psychotherapy: a controlled study of outcome. Archives in General Psychiatry, 36, 1125–1136.
Yalom, I., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th edn.). New York: Basic Books.
Zilcha-Mano, Z., Roose, S. P., Brown, P. J., & Rutherford, B. R. (2019). Not just nonspecific factors: the roles of alliance and expectancy in treatment, and their neurobiological underpinnings. Frontiers of Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 293.
Zupančič, M., Komidar, L., & Levpušček, P. M. (2014). Individuation in Slovene emerging adults: Its associations with demographics, transitional markers, achieved criteria for adulthood, and life satisfaction. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1421–1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jendričko, T., Prosen, S. Expectations and perception of the psychotherapy process and outcome. Psychotherapeutic factors and the psychodrama specificities in psychodrama group participants at a psychiatric hospital. Z Psychodrama Soziom 19 (Suppl 1), 101–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-020-00565-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-020-00565-x