Skip to main content
Log in

Peerbeziehungen im Klassenzimmer

Peer relations in the classroom

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Peerbeziehungen im Klassenzimmer sind seit langem Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Untersuchungen. Es liegen umfangreiche Nachweise dafür vor, dass sie Lernen sowohl günstig als auch ungünstig beeinflussen können. In diesem Beitrag systematisieren wir diese Einflüsse, indem wir (1) eine Differenzierung zwischen affektiven und kognitiv-instrumentellen Peerbeziehungen vornehmen. Weiterhin stellen wir zentrale Mechanismen dar, (2) über die sich diese Einflüsse entfalten und (3) die die Selbstselektion von Schülerinnen und Schülern in (mal-)adaptive Peerbeziehungen erklären können. Schließlich arbeiten wir (4) die besondere Rolle von Lehrenden als Gestaltende von Peerbeziehungen heraus und leiten (5) Maßnahmen ab, über die affektive und kognitiv-instrumentelle Beziehungsstrukturen im Klassenzimmer positiv beeinflusst werden können. Abschließend stellen wir die Bedeutung dar, die die systematische Untersuchung von Peerbeziehungen für die Entwicklung von auf Peerinteraktionen zielende Interventionen im Kontext aktueller Herausforderungen im Bildungssystem (Schereneffekte, Inklusion, soziale Integration geflüchteter Kinder und Jugendlicher) haben kann.

Abstract

Peer relations in the classroom have long been subject to scientific investigation. Extensive evidence confirms their influences, either facilitating or impeding learning. In this contribution, we systematize these influences by (1) differentiating between affective and cognitive-instrumental peer relations. Further, we outline central mechanisms by which (2) these influences unfold and (3) students self-select into (mal-)adaptive peer-relations. Next, we (4) discern the role of teachers as managers of peer-relations and (5) determine arrangements by which affective and cognitive-instrumental relationship structures can be positively influenced. Finally, we infer the meaning of the systematic study of peer-relations for the development of interventions for handling current challenges in the educational system (fan effect, inclusion, social integration of refugee children and adolescents).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Notes

  1. In einigen Arbeiten wird zudem die Intensität von Beziehungen in einem Ratingverfahren kodiert (vgl. hierzu Cillessen 2011).

  2. Der in der nordamerikanischen Peerforschung gebräuchliche Begriff Crowd beschreibt eine größere Gruppe von Individuen, die nicht zwangsläufig miteinander interagieren, aber bezüglich ihres sozialen Status und der Reputation als ähnlich wahrgenommen werden (vgl. Brown und Klute 2003).

  3. Ebenfalls belegt ist der Zusammenhang zwischen Nähe der Schülerinnen und Schüler zur Lehrperson und deren Sympathie. Bei Lehrpersonen beliebte Kinder sitzen eher vorn im Raum, weniger beliebte Kinder an der Seite; schulisch erfolgreiche und einflussreiche Schülerinnen und Schüler sitzen wiederum eher im hinteren Teil des Raumes (Babad und Ezer 1993).

Literatur

  • Abrams, D., Palmer, S. B., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & van de Vyver, J. (2014). Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H. J., Garandeau, C. F., & Rodkin, P. C. (2010). Effects of classroom embeddedness and density on the social status of aggressive and victimized children. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 76–101.

  • Allen, V. L. (2013). Children as teachers: theory and research on tutoring. Burlington: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The implications of having high-achieving versus low-achieving friends: a longitudinal analysis. Social Development, 14(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2010). Social psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Babad, E., & Ezer, H. (1993). Seating locations of sociometrically measured student types: methodological and substantive issues. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). Becoming friends by chance. Psychological Science, 19(5), 439–440.

  • Bakadorova, O., & Raufelder, D. (2015). Perception of teachers and peers during adolescence: Does school self-concept matter? Results of a qualitative study. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 218–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2006). Leistungszuwachs in Mathematik. Evidenz für einen Schereneffekt im mehrgliedrigen Schulsystem? Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20(4), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: a social relations analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, K. L. (2011). The promise and potential of studying the „invisible hand“ of teacher influence on peer relations and student outcomes: a commentary. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R. (2012). Zukunft der Jugendforschung. In A. Ittel, H. Merkens, & L. Stecher (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Jugendforschung 2011 (S. 217–228). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman-Perrott, L., Davis, H., Vannest, K., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., & Parker, R. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: a meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Klute, C. (2003). Friends, cliques, and crowds. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Hrsg.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (S. 330–348). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F. (2011). Friendship as process, function, and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Hrsg.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (S. 217–231). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünger, S. (2011). Die deutsche Peerforschung: ein historischer und methodischer Überblick über die Peerforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum von 1950-2007. In A. Ittel, H. Merkens, & L. Stecher (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Jugendforschung 2010 (S. 267–289). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2015). The girls set the tone: gendered classroom norms and the development of aggression in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2006). An achievement goal perspective on student help seeking and teacher help giving in the classroom: theory, research, and educational implications. In S. A. Karabenick & R. S. Newman (Hrsg.), Help seeking in academic settings: goals, groups, and contexts (S. 15–44). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (Hrsg.) (2005). Model and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, C. M., Ruhl, H., & Buhrmester, D. (2016). Reciprocal associations between friendship attachment and relational experiences in adolescence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 122–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Hrsg.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (S. 82–99). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A., & Eder, D. (1990). Children’s peer cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., Murray-Close, D., Marks, P. E. L., & Mohajeri-Nelson, N. (2011). Aggression and peer relationships in school-age children. Relational and physical aggression in group and dyadic contexts. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Hrsg.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (S. 287–302). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. R., & Fletcher, K. L. (2009). The challenge of adolescent crowd research: defining the crowd. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(6), 747–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, A. G., Wiium, N., Wilhelmsen, B., & Wold, B. (2010). Perceived support provided by teachers and classmates and students’ self-reported academic initiative. Journal of School Psychology, 48(3), 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delsing, M. H., Ter Bogt, T. M., Engels, R. E., & Meeus, W. J. (2007). Adolescents’ peer crowd identification in the Netherlands: structure and associations with problem behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echols, L., & Graham, S. (2013). Birds of a different feather: How do cross-ethnic friends flock together? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(4), 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, R., Erbeldinger, P., Hilgers, J., & Wetzstein, T. (2016). Informelle Beziehungen: Cliquen. In S.-M. Köhler, H.-H. Krüger, & N. Pfaff (Hrsg.), Handbuch Peerforschung (S. 201–222). Opladen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisewicht, P., Niederbacher, A., & Hitzler, R. (2016). Laboratorium statt Moratorium. In S.-M. Köhler, H.-H. Krüger, & N. Pfaff (Hrsg.), Handbuch Peerforschung (S. 291–304). Opladen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: the social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5(2), 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: a study of human factors in housing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. A. (1998). Chapter 5: quantitative methods for studying social context in multilevels and through interpersonal relations. Review of Research in Education, 23(1), 171–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(395), 832–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, C. J., & Skinner, E. A. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 48–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussangel, K., & Gräsel, C. (2012). Lehrerkooperation aus der Sicht der Bildungsforschung. In E. Baum, T.-S. Idel, & H. Ullrich (Hrsg.), Kollegialität und Kooperation in der Schule. Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Befunde (Bd. 51, S. 29–40). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gremmen, M. C., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). First selection, then influence: Developmental differences in friendship dynamics regarding academic achievement. Developmental Psychology, 53(7), 1356–1370.

  • Gest, S. D. (2006). Teacher reports of children’s friendships and social groups: agreement with peer reports and implications for studying peer similarity. Social Development, 15, 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer experience: common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräsel, C., Fussangel, K., & Pröbstel, C. (2006). Die Anregung von Lehrkräften zur Kooperation – eine Aufgabe für Sisyphos? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, J. V., Schmid, L., Farmer, T. W., & Locke, B. (2011). Injunctive and descriptive peer group norms and the academic adjustment of rural early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 41–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, J. V., Hoffman, A., & Farmer, T. W. (2012). Peer cultures of academic effort and achievement in adolescence: why they matter, and what teachers can do about them. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Hrsg.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (S. 219–250). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannemann, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2011). Concepts and measures for basic network analysis. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (S. 340–369). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, A. C., DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Denner, J., Werner, L., Campe, S., & Ortiz, E. (2015). Dyadic instruction for middle school students: liking promotes learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaven, P. C., Ciarrochi, J., & Vialle, W. (2008). Self-nominated peer crowds, school achievement, and psychological adjustment in adolescents: longitudinal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 977–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. S., Hamm, J. V., & Farmer, T. W. (2015). Teacher attunement: supporting early elementary students’ social integration and status. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 39, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. H., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: an ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 17, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoorn, J., Crone, E. A., & Leijenhorst, L. (2017). Hanging out with the right crowd: peer influence on risk-taking behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(1), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörmann, C., & Schäfer, M. (2009). Bullying im Grundschulalter: Mitschülerrollen und ihre transkontextuelle Stabilität. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 58(2), 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkowski, S., & Hänze, M. (2015). How to increase the benefits of cooperation: effects of training in transactive communication on cooperative learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, U., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Macho-man in school: toward the role of gender role self-concepts and help seeking in school performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, T. A., & Vollet, J. W. (2014). Social networks within classroom ecologies: peer effects on students’ engagement in the context of relationships with teachers and parents. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(1), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. E. (2008). Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., & McClelland, D. C. (1992). The affiliation motive. In C. P. Smith (Hrsg.), Motivation and personality: handbook of thematic content analysis (S. 205–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krappmann, L. (2013). Bindung in Kinderbeziehungen? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 59(6), 837–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzmann, M., Zander, L., & Webster, G. D. (2017). Dancing is belonging! How social networks mediate the effect of a dance intervention on students’ sense of belonging to their classroom. European Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, H.-H. (2016). Die erziehungswissenschaftliche Perspektive: Peers, Lernen und Bildung. In S.-M. Köhler, H.-H. Krüger, & N. Pfaff (Hrsg.), Handbuch Peerforschung (S. 37–54). Opladen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, H.-H., & Grunert, C. (2010). Handbuch Kindheits- und Jugendforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, H., Köhler, S., Pfaff, N., & Zschach, M. (2007). Die Bedeutung des Übergangs von der Grundschule in die Sekundarstufe I für Freundschaftsbeziehungen von Kindern. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 53(4), 509–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Ota, C., & Berdondini, L. (2008). Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansford, J. E., Yu, T., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2014). Pathways of peer relationships from childhood to young adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laureati, M., Bergamaschi, V., & Pagliarini, E. (2014). School-based intervention with children. Peer-modeling, reward and repeated exposure reduce food neophobia and increase liking of fruits and vegetables. Appetite, 83, 2–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1999). Making sense of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszczensky, L., & Pink, S. (2015). Ethnic segregation of friendship networks in school: testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophily between classroom-and grade-level networks. Social Networks, 42, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszczensky, L., & Pink, S. (2017). Intra- and inter-group friendship choices of Christian, Muslim, and non-religious youth in Germany. European Sociological Review, 33(1), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leszczensky, L., Flache, A., Stark, T. H., & Munniksma, A. (2017). The relation between ethnic classroom composition and adolescents’ ethnic pride. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430217691363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, E. R., & La Greca, A. M. (2008). Does this make me look fat? Peer crowd and peer contributions to adolescent girls’ weight control behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1097–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (2011). Survey methods for network data. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (S. 370–388). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Köller, O. (2008). Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 510–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Seaton, M. (2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications. Learning and Instruction, 33, 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., Fabes, R., Hanish, L., Leonard, S., & Dinella, L. (2011). Experienced and expected similarity to same-gender peers: moving toward a comprehensive model of gender segregation. Sex Roles, 65(5–6), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: a Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Hrsg.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (S. 227–252). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, M. P., Cappella, E., Hughes, D. L., & Gallagher, E. K. (2015). Feasible, rigorous, and relevant: validation of a measure of friendship homophily for diverse classrooms. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5), 817–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011). Peer influences on academic motivation: exploring multiple methods of assessing youth’ most „influential“ peer relationships. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K. C., Rhew, I. C., Hawkins, J. D., & Brown, E. C. (2014). Adolescent pathways to co-occurring problem behavior: the effects of peer delinquency and peer substance use. Journal of Research of Adolescence, 24(4), 630–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A. (1987). Determinants of help seeking behaviour: the effects of helper’s similarity, task centrality and recipient’s self esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A. (2015). The other side of helping: seeking and receiving help. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (S. 307–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A., & Chernyak-Hai, L. (2014). Helping them stay where they are: status effects on dependency/autonomy-oriented helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Newmann, J. E., Mason, C. A., & Carpenter, E. M. (2003). Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32(4), 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: an understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review, 1(3), 224–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, H., & Krappmann, L. (1991). Der Beitrag der Gleichaltrigen zur sozialen Entwicklung von Kindern in der Grundschule. In R. Pekrun & H. Fend (Hrsg.), Schule und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung: ein Resümee der Längsschnittforschung (Bd. 11, S. 201–216). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, H., & Uhlendorff, H. (2008). Die Gleichaltrigen. In R. K. Silbereisen & M. Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Entwicklungspsychologie des Jugendalters (S. 189–228). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkner, A., Günther, R., & Boehnke, K. (2002). Die Angst vor sozialer Ausgrenzung als leistungshemmender Faktor. Zum Stellenwert guter mathematischer Schulleistungen unter Gleichaltrigen. In M. Prenzel & J. Döll (Hrsg.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: schulische und außerschulische Bedingungen mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und überfachlicher Kompetenzen (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik: Beiheft 45, S. 326–340). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penno, J. F., Wilkinson, I. G., & Moore, D. W. (2002). Vocabulary acquisition from teacher explanation and repeated listening to stories: Do they overcome the Matthew effect? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, M., Gölitz, D., & von Salisch, M. (2010). Welchen Beitrag leistet die Peer Group für die Lesemotivation von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Beginn der Sekundarstufe? Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 57(4), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piwowar, V., Thiel, F., & Ophardt, D. (2013). Training inservice teachers’ competencies in classroom management. A quasi-experimental study with teachers of secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, A. K., Motti-Stefanidi, F., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2016). Me, us, and them: testing sociometer theory in a socially diverse real-life context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 908–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricard, N. C., & Pelletier, L. G. (2016). Dropping out of high school: the role of parent and teacher self-determination support, reciprocal friendships and academic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44-45, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. C., Heathfield, L. T., & Jenson, W. R. (2010). A classwide peer-modeling intervention package to increase on-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. R., Schofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., Smith, R. L., Glick, G. C., & Schwartz-Mette, R. A. (2016). Girls’ and boys’ problem talk: implications for emotional closeness. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Hrsg.), The handbook of child psychology (6. Aufl., S. 571–645). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(10), 1017–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagotsky, G., & Lepper, M. R. (1982). Generalization of experimentally-induced changes in children’s preferences for easy or difficult goals. Child Development, 53, 372–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Salisch, M. (2000). Peer-Einflüsse auf die Persönlichkeitsentwicklung. In M. Amelang (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Determinanten individueller Differenzen (Bd. 4, S. 345–405). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Salisch, M., & Zeman, J. L. (2017). Pathways to reciprocated friendships: a cross-lagged panel study on young adolescents’ anger regulation towards friends. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0683-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Salisch, M., Lüpschen, N., & Kanevski, R. (2013). Wer hat Freundschaften und wer verliert sie? – Notwendige sozial-emotionale Kompetenzen im frühen Jugendalter. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 62(3), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Salisch, M., von Zeman, J., Luepschen, N., & Kanevski, R. (2014). Prospective relations between adolescents’ social-emotional competencies and their friendships. Social Development, 23(4), 684–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M. (2008). Mobbing unter Schülern. In F. Petermann & W. Schneider (Hrsg.), Angewandte Entwicklungspsychologie (S. 521–545). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (S. 13–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanke, S., & Schäfer, M. (2013). „Wer ist der Boss?“ – Zum Zusammenhang zwischen der sozialen Dynamik im Klassenzimmer und Einstellungen zum Lernen in der Adoleszenz. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 62(3), 214–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer, A., Luo, T., Ross, A. C., & Fischer, J. (2017). Affiliation with antisocial crowds and psychosocial outcomes in a gang-impacted urban middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(4), 559–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2462–2472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2017). Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: teacher emotional support matters. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, S., Carlsson, R., & Björklund, F. (2014). The role of friends in career compromise: same-gender friendship intensifies gender differences in educational choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, T., & Leszczensky, L. (2017). Freundschaft und Schulleistung unter Jugendlichen derselben ethnischen Gruppe. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. doi:10.1007/s11618-017-0766-y

  • Steglich, C., & Knecht, A. (2014). Studious by association? Effects of teacher’s attunement to students’ peer relations. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(5), 153–170.

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2010). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In T. Postmes & N. R. Branscombe (Hrsg.), Rediscovering social identity (S. 173–190). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thole, W., & Schoneville, H. (2010). Jugendliche in Peer Groups und soziale Ungleichheit. In M. Harring, O. Böhm-Kasper, C. Rohlfs & C. Palentien (Hrsg.), Freundschaften, Cliquen und Jugendkulturen: Peers als Bildungs- und Sozialisationsinstanzen (1. Aufl., S. 141–166). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S. M., Kim, H. S., & Mesquita, B. (2014). Are you feeling what I’m feeling? Emotional similarity buffers stress. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 526–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, K. (2005). The effects of friendship networks on adolescent depressive symptoms. Social Science Research, 34, 484–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A. (1992). Locus of peer influence: social crowd and best friend. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(4), 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Valle, J. F., Bravo, A., & López, M. (2010). Parents and peers as providers of support in adolescents’ social network: a developmental perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2007). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Pattison, S. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and „p“. Psychometrika, 61(3), 401–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., & Muenks, K. (2016). Peer influence on students’ motivation, academic achievement, and social behaviour. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (Hrsg.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts. Social-emotional, motivation, and cognitive outcomes (S. 13–30). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C., & Caldwell, K. (2004). Friendships in middle school: influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., Filisetti, L., & Looney, L. (2007). Adolescent prosocial behavior: the role of self-processes and contextual cues. Child Development, 78(3), 895–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wölfer, R., & Cortina, K. S. (2014). Die soziale Dimension der Lernmotivation – Netzwerkanalytische Untersuchung schulischer Zielorientierungen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(1), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wölfer, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2014). Social influence and bullying behaviour: intervention-based network dynamics of the fairplayer.manual bullying prevention program. Aggressive Behaviour, 40, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. (1999). Children’s friendships and peer culture. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkner, & K. Littleton (Hrsg.), Making sense of social development (S. 13–26). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zalk, N., van Zalk, M. W., & Kerr, M. (2011). Socialization of social anxiety in adolescent crowds. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(8), 1239–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, L., Kreutzmann, M., & Wolter, I. (2014a). Constructive handling of mistakes in the classroom: the conjoint power of collaborative networks and self-efficacy beliefs. In L. Zander, N. Kolleck, & B. Hannover (Hrsg.), Soziale Netzwerkanalyse in Bildungsforschung und Bildungspolitik (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft: Sonderheft 26, S. 205–223). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, L., Kreutzmann, M., West, S. G., Mettke, E., & Hannover, B. (2014b). How school-based dancing classes change affective and collaborative networks of adolescents. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, L., Kolleck, N., & Hannover, B. (2014c). Editorial Note. In L. Zander, N. Kolleck, & B. Hannover (Hrsg.), Soziale Netzwerkanalyse in Bildungsforschung und Bildungspolitik (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft: Sonderheft 26, S. 1–7). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, L., Hannover, B., Steglich, C., & Baumert, J. (2017). Soziale Eingebundenheit in immersiven und monolingualen Klassenzimmern. Ein Index zur Messung sprachbezogener Inklusion. In J. Möller, F. Hohenstein, J. Fleckenstein, & J. Baumert (Hrsg.), Zweisprachigkeit in einer multiethnischen Gesellschaft – Was leistet die Staatliche Europaschule Berlin? (S. 285–303). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra, B. J. H., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2006). The multilevel p2 model. Methodology, 2(1), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lysann Zander.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zander, L., Kreutzmann, M. & Hannover, B. Peerbeziehungen im Klassenzimmer. Z Erziehungswiss 20, 353–386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0768-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0768-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation