Skip to main content
Log in

Nutzenorientierte Grundlagenforschung im Bildungsbereich

Argumente einer internationalen Diskussion

  • Allgemeiner Tell
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden zentrale Themen einer internationalen Diskussion aufgegriffen, die sich in den letzten Jahren ausgehend vom Befund der mangelnden Anwendung von Forschungsergebnissen im Bildungsbereich entsponnen hat. Drei Typen von Lösungsvorschlägen für dieses Problem werden unterschieden: (1) Positionen, die vor allem methodische Strenge empfehlen, wie etwa der Bericht „Scientific Inquiry in Education“ des US-amerikanischen National Research Council, (2) Ansätze wie die Design-Forschung oder der Integrative Forschungsansatz, die praxisrelevantere Erkenntnisse durch veränderte Forschungsstrategien anstreben, und (3) ingenieurwissenschaftlich beeinflusste Vorschläge für Mechanismen, wie Forschungsergebnisse in die breite Anwendung gebracht werden können. Abschließend werden Konsequenzen und offene Diskussionspunkte für die Forschung im Bildungsbereich benannt.

Summary

Use-inspired Basic Research in Education — Arguments of an international discussion

This article takes up central issues of an international discussion that has evolved over the last couple of years departing from the diagnosis that there is a lack of application of research findings in the field of education. Three types of solutions have been suggested for this problem: (1) positions mainly recommending methodological rigor, such as, for instance, the report “Scientific Inquiry in Education” of the National Research Council in the United States, (2) approaches such as Design-Based Research or the Integrative Research Approach, which strive to achieve insights of greater practical relevance by employing adjusted research strategies and (3) engineering-inspired approaches for mechanisms by which research findings can be scaled up to broad application. In this article, we first describe these three types of approaches and then indicate consequences and unsettled issues in the discussion on research in the field of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • AERA (2003): Council Minutes: January 25–26, 2003. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 32(5), pp. 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antil u.a. 1998 = Antil, L. R./ Jenkins, J. R./ Wayne, S. K./ Vadasy, P. F. (1998): Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceputalizations, and the relation between research and practice. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 419–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992): Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, H./ Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003): Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 32(9), pp. 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb u.a. 2003 = Cobb, P./ Confrey, J./ DiSessa, A./ Lehrer, R./ Schauble, L. (2003): Design experiments in educational research. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 32(1), pp. 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1992): Toward a design science of education. In: Scanlon, E./ O’shea, T. (Eds.): New Directions in Educational Technology. — Berlin, pp. 15–22.

  • DBRC 2003 = Design-Based Research Collective (2003): Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 32(1), pp. 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, H. (2002): Evaluation und Qualitätssicherung. In: Tippelt, R. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Bildungsforschung. — Opladen, S. 775–790.

  • Edelson, D. C. (2002): Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 11, pp. 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M. J./ Towne, L./ Shavelson, R. J. (2002): Scientific culture and educational research. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 31(8), pp. 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, A. (1910): Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. — Boston. — URL: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/eLibraey/docs/flexner_report.pdf (Downlad: 16.8.2005).

  • Fischer u.a. 2003 = Fischer, F./ Bouillion, L./ Mandl, H./ Gomez, L. (2003): Bridging theory and practice in learning environment research: Scientific principles in Pasteur’s Quadrant. In: International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, & Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley, C. M. (2004): Methodological alignment in design-based research. In: Educational Psychologist, Vol. 39(4), pp. 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, H./ Stark, R. (2001): Pasteur’s quadrant in educational psychology: Use-inspired basic research to overcome the gap between theory and practice. — Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der American Educational Research Association 2001, Seattle.

  • Olson, D. R. (2004): The triumph of hope over experience in the search for „what works“: A response to Slavin. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 33(1), pp. 24–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W./ Goldman, S. R. (2002): Be careful what you wish for — You may get it: Educational research in the spotlight. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 31(8), pp. 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J./ Towne, L. (2001): Scientific Inquiry in Education. — Washington.

  • Shavelson u.a. 2003 = Shavelson, R. J./ Phillips, D. C./ Towne, L./ Feuer, M. J. (2003): On the science of education design studies. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 32(1), pp. 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002): Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 31(7), pp. 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2004): Education research can and must address „what works“ questions. In: Educational Researcher, Vol. 33(1), pp. 27–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R./ Mandl, H. (2001): Die Kluft zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis — ein unlösbares Problem für die pädagogisch-psychologische Forschung? — Forschungsbericht 118, überarbeitete Fassung. — München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. (1997): Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. — Washington.

  • U. S. Department of Education (2002): Strategic Plan 2002–2007. — URL: http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/strat/plan2002-07/index.html (Download: 14.7.2005).

  • Waibel, M. (1997): ’Knick leicht durch Holm drücken’ — Lokales Wissen in der betrieblichen Lebenswelt. — Bisher unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Bremen.

  • Wottawa, H./ Thierau, H. (1998). Lehrbuch Evaluation. — 2. Aufl. — Bern.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, F., Waibel, M. & Wecker, C. Nutzenorientierte Grundlagenforschung im Bildungsbereich. ZfE 8, 427–442 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-005-0149-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-005-0149-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation