Skip to main content
Log in

Indirekte Motivdiagnostik im Management-Coaching

Indirect measurement of motives in the context of management coaching

  • Hauptbeiträge
  • Published:
Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Per Definition sind uns unsere impliziten Motive in ihrer Funktion als basale Handlungstreiber nicht bewusst. Gleichzeitig gilt der Zusammenhang zwischen impliziten Motiven und Führungsverhalten bzw. -erfolg als gesichert. Umso wichtiger ist es, dass Führungskräfte ihre eigene Motivstruktur kennen, damit Defizite im Führungskontext bearbeitet werden können. Die indirekte Motivdiagnostik kann im Rahmen eines Führungskräfte-Coachings einen wertvollen Beitrag dazu leisten, das eigene Motivprofil zu reflektieren und darauf aufbauend gezielte Motivarbeit zu betreiben sowie motivationale Kompetenzen zu erwerben.

Abstract

By definition, people are not aware of their implicit motives in their function as basic drivers of action. At the same time the relationship between implicit motives and leadership behaviour or success is considered to be proven. It is all the more important that managers know their own motivational structure in order to address possible deficits in their management skills. The indirect measurement of motives can make a valuable contribution in the context of executive coaching to reflect on one’s own motive profile and, building on this, to carry out specific work on one’s implicit motivational pattern, thus acquiring motivational competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behaviour? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, V., Job, V., & Schulze, B. (2016). Motivational incongruence and well-being at the workplace: person-job fit, job burnout, and physical symptoms. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1153.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, O. C., & Grässmann, R. (1998). Personal goals and emotional wellbeing. The moderating role of motive disposition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 494–508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Das Flow-Erlebnis (9. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, L., Nachtwei, I., & Mechers, K. (2015). Die Kluft zwischen Wissenschaft und praxis in der Personalauswahl. PERSONAL quarterly, 3, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation. Meisenheim: Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1989). Motivation und Handeln. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1967). Personality research form manual. Goshen: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Job, V., & Brandstätter, V. (2009). Get a taste of your goals: promoting motive-goal congruence through affect-focus goal fantasy. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1527–1560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: the role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research on Personality, 44, 512–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, S., & Bannier, P. (2013). Der Thematische Apperzeptionstest (TAT). In H. Möller & S. Kotte (Hrsg.), Diagnostik im coaching (S. 115–131). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, S., & Kuhl, U. (2005). Die Entwicklung von Motivförderprogrammen. In R. Vollmeyer & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Motivationspsychologie und ihre Anwendung (S. 167–188). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., & Scheffer, D. (1999). Der Operante Multi-Motiv-Test (OMT): Manual. Osnabrück: Universität Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langens, T. A., Schmalt, H.-D., & Sokolowski, K. (2005). Motivmessung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. In R. Vollmeyer & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Motivationspsychologie und ihre Anwendung (S. 70–89). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Norstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., & Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Motivational and other sources of work accomplishments in mid-life: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 60, 679–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic apperception test. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (2002). Freude am Kompetenzerwerb, Flow-Erleben und motivpassende Ziele. In M. v. Salisch (Hrsg.), Emotionale Kompetenz entwickeln (S. 179–206). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2010). Motive training and motivational competence. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Implicit motives (S. 510–548). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, D. (2005). Implizite Motive. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, D., & Kuhl, J. (2006). Erfolgreich motivieren: Mitarbeiterpersönlichkeit und Motivationstechniken. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. D. (1999). Goal imagery: bridging the gap between implicit motives and explicit goals. Journal of Personality, 67, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (1979). Relationships among projective and direct verbal measures of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 45–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.-D., Langens, T., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once—the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, B., Dörr, S. L., Schultheiss, O. C., & Maier, G. W. (2015). Implicit motives and leadership performance revisited: what constitutes the leadership motive pattern? Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (2005). Explorations in employee envy: feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition and Emotion, 19(1), 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1991). A motivational model of leadership: predicting long-term management success from TAT measures of power motivation and responsibility. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(1), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D.G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text (4 ed.). Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Unpublished manuscript.

  • Zettler, I., Friedrich, N., & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Dissecting work comittment: the role of machiavellianism. Career Development International, 16, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Hamdi Bek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamdi Bek, N. Indirekte Motivdiagnostik im Management-Coaching. Organisationsberat Superv Coach 27, 199–208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-020-00649-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-020-00649-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation