Abstract
Total disc arthroplasty for lumbar spine is a new solution for low back pain treatment after adequate patient selection. The surgical technique starts with a morphological and anatomical analysis to eliminate surgical exposure problems. The surgical approach is retroperitoneal from the left or the right side after horizontal skin incision. Video-assistance improves vision and allows minimal invasive exposure. At level L5-S1, the exposure is performed in the vessels bifurcation (aorta and vena cava), at level L4–L5 the ligature of the lumbar ascending vein is the key point to allow appropriate retraction of the vessels. In some difficult cases the use of dedicated implants allows prosthesis insertion without extensive exposure by the use of an oblique implant. The disc preparation is crucial with a good posterior release. Insertion of the prosthesis is guided with instruments according to the type of fixation (keel or pikes). To optimise the implant positioning, navigation guidance is a useful tool as any offset of the prosthesis can induce a bad mechanical load transmission. Patient selection remains the key for good clinical outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, et al. (2005) Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 36(3): 315–322
Madi K, Aunoble S, Dehoux E, Le Huec JC (2006) Anatomic variations of the iliocaval junction encountered in disk prosthesis implantation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92(2): 112–117
Capellades J, Pellisé F, Rovira A, et al. (2000) Magnetic resonance anatomic study of iliocava junction and left iliac vein positions related to L5-S1 disc. Spine 25: 1695–1700
Tribus CB, Belanger T (2001) The vascular anatomy anterior to the L5-S1 disk space. Spine 26(11): 1205–1208
Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, Heggeness MH (1993) Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 18: 2227–2230
Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, Le Huec JC (2003) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 28(10): 1023–1026
Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, et al. (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16(3): 411–421
McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the ‘Charité’ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30(14): 1576–1583 (discussion E388-E90)
Holly LT, Foley KT (2006) Percutaneous placement of posterior cervical screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy. Spine 31(5): 536–540 (discussion 541)
Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, et al. (2005) The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14(5): 480–486
Smith HE, Vaccaro AR, Yuan PS, et al. (2006) The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 19: 22–27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le Huec, J.C., Aunoble, S. & Tournier, C. Technique of insertion of total lumbar disc prostheses: preoperative assessment, insertion technique and significance of navigation. Interact Surg 3, 214–220 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11610-007-0043-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11610-007-0043-5