Skip to main content
Log in

Césarienne et troubles génitosexuels du post-partum

Cesarean and postpartum genito-sexual disorders

  • Mise au Point / Update
  • Published:
Pelvi-périnéologie

Résumé

Objet

La prévalence et la prévention des troubles génitosexuels consécutifs à l’accouchement sont peu connues. Il serait logique de penser que la césarienne qui évite le traumatisme périnéal s’accompagne de moins de troubles de la fonction sexuelle.

Méthode

Nous avons réalisé une revue de la littérature sur le sujet.

Résultat

La prévalence de la dyspareunie en post-partum immédiat est estimée entre 20 et 50 %, la durée moyenne des symptômes est de quatre mois. La déchirure périnéale est un facteur de risque pour la dyspareunie du post-partum immédiat. Les troubles sexuels peuvent persister plus longtemps en cas de déchirure grave. À distance de l’accouchement, il n’existe pas de différence entre les femmes accouchées par césarienne et les femmes accouchées par les voies naturelles pour la prévalence de la dyspareunie dans un essai randomisé, les cohortes de femmes suivies après l’accouchement et les enquêtes transversales.

Conclusion

La césarienne ne semble pas apporter de protection contre les troubles génitosexuels.

Abstract

Subject

We had little information about prevalence and prevention of genito-sexual disorders resulting from childbirth. Cesarean delivery that avoids perineal trauma should less disturb sexual function.

Method

We conducted a literature review on the subject.

Result

The prevalence of dyspareunia in the immediate postpartum period is estimated between 20 and 50%, the average duration of symptoms is four months. Perineal tear is a risk factor for dyspareunia in the immediate postpartum period. Sexual dysfunction may persist longer in the event of serious perineal tear. At distance of delivery, there is no difference between women giving birth by caesarean section and women who give birth through the natural way for dyspareunia prevalence in a randomized trial, in cohorts of women followed after delivery and cross-sectional studies.

Conclusion

Cesarean section does not appear to provide protection against genito-sexual disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1996) Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 347:544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryding EL (1984) Sexuality during and after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gybnecol Scand 63:679–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robson KM, Brant HA, Kumar R (1981) Maternal sexuality during first pregnancy and after childbirth. BJOG 88:882–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Glazener C (1997) Sexual function after childbirth: women’s experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:330–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Serati M, Salvatore S, Khullar V, et al (2008) Prospective study to assess risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction after delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol 87:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pastore L, Owens A, Raymond C (2007) Postpartum sexuality concerns among first-time parents from one US academic hospital. J Sex Med 4:115–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly AM, Thorp J, Pahel L (2005) Effects of pregnancy and childbirth on postpartum sexual function: a longitudinal prospective study. Int Urogynecol J 16:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gungor S, Baser I, Ceyhan T, et al (2008) Mode of delivery affect sexual functioning of the man partner? J Sex Med 5:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berthet J, Pache P, Racinet C (1985) Évaluation du confort périnéal en suites de couches chez les primipares. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 14:769–773

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT (2001) Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:881–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rådestad I, Olsson A, Nissen E, Rubertsson C (2008) Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up. Birth 35:98–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers RG, Borders N, Leeman LM, Albers LL (2009) Does spontaneous genital tract trauma impact postpartum sexual function? J Midwifery Womens Health 54:98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brubaker L, Handa VL, Bradley CS, et al (2008) Sexual function 6 months after first delivery. Obstet Gynecol 111:1040–1044

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G (1988) Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery, a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 27:27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW (2008) Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG 115:234–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, et al (1984) West Berkshire perineal management trial. BMJ 289:587–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sleep J, Grant A (1987) West Berkshire perineal management trial: three-year follow-up. BMJ 295:749–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, et al (1994) Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:591–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown S, Lumley J (1998) Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population-based survey. BJOG 105:156–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goetsch MF (1999) Postpartum dyspareunia, an unexplored problem. J Reprod Med 44:963–968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA (2002) Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth 29:83–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, et al (2002) Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA 287:1822–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, et al (2004) Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:917–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liebling RE, Swingler R, Patel RR, et al (2004)Pelvic floormorbidity after difficult instrumental delivery and cesarean section in the second stage of labor: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:4–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ (2005) Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:789–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Firoz T, et al (2005) A comparison of urinary and sexual outcomes in women experiencing vaginal and caesarean births. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:332–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buhling KJ, Schmidt S, Robinson JN, et al (2006) Rate of dyspareunia after delivery in primiparae according to mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 124:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barrett G, Peacock J, Victor CR, Manyonda I (2005) Cesarean section and postnatal sexual health. Birth 32:306–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Molkenboer JFM, Debie S, Roumien FJME, et al (2007) Maternal health outcomes two years after term breech delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 20:319–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lal M, Pattison HM, Allan TF, Callender R (2009) Post-cesarean pelvic floor dysfunction contributes to undisclosed psychosocial morbidity. J Reprod Med 54:53–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fritel X, Schaal JP, Fauconnier A, et al (2008) Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy. BJOG 115:247–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dean N, Wilson D, Herbison P, et al (2008) Sexual function, delivery mode, pelvic floor exercises and incontinence: a cross-sectional study six-year postpartum. Aust N Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol 48:302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Addis IB, van den Eeden SK, Wassel-Fyr CL, et al (2006) Sexual activity and function in middle-aged and older women. Obstet Gynecol 107:755–764

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fritel X, Ringa V. Enquête sur les troubles périnéaux chez 2 640 femmes agées de 50 à 61 ans. Données non publiées issues de la cohorte GAZEL

  35. McLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D (2000) The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 107:1460–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Witting K, Santtila P, Alanko K, et al (2008) Female sexual function and its associations with number of children, pregnancy, and relationship satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther 34:89–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Botros SM, Abramov Y, Millar JJR, et al (2006) Effect of parity on sexual function, an identical twin study. Obstet Gynecol 107:765–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Fritel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritel, X. Césarienne et troubles génitosexuels du post-partum. Pelv Perineol 4, 207–212 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-009-0248-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-009-0248-7

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation