Skip to main content
Log in

Électrostimulation du nerf tibial postérieur : nouvelle approche thérapeutique de l’incontinence anale ?

Electrostimulation of the posterior tibial nerve: is it a new therapeutic approach to anal incontinence?

  • Pratique Médicale / Medical Practice
  • Published:
Pelvi-périnéologie

Résumé

L’incontinence anale est un problème de santé publique du fait de sa fréquence, de son coût et de son retentissement sur la qualité de vie. Les thérapeutiques actuelles comportent trois grands volets : médical, chirurgical et de la rééducation. Le TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), utilisé depuis plusieurs années dans le cadre des douleurs périnéales et de l’incontinence urinaire pourrait être une nouvelle voie thérapeutique. Néanmoins, sa place exacte reste a` déterminer par des études validées.

Abstract

Anal incontinence has become a significant public health concern in light of its prevalence, costs and impact on quality of life. Current therapeutic strategies consist of three main modalities: medical, surgical and rehabilitative. The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) has been in use for several years in the treatment of perineal pain and urinary incontinence and might offer a new therapeutic avenue. Its precise role, nonetheless, remains to be determined by further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Damon H, Guye O, Seigneurin A, et al. (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-oflife. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30: 37–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne CM, Pager CK, Rex J, et al. (2002) Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of patients with neuropathic faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1431–1436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Damon H, Dumas P, Mion F (2004) Impact of anal incontinence and chronic constipation on quality of life. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28: 16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beddy P, Neary P, Eguare EI, et al. (2004) Electromyographic biofeedback can improve subjective and objective measures of faecal incontinence in the shortterm. J Gastrointest Surg 8: 64–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiarioni G, Bassotti G, Stanganini S, et al. (2002) Sensory retraining is key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool faecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 109–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinez-PuenteMdel C, Pascual-Montero JA, Garcia-Olmo D (2004) Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 19: 210–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, et al. (2003) Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for faecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 125: 1320–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pager CK, Solomon MJ, Rex J, et al. (2002) Long-term outcomes of pelvic floor exercise and biofeedback treatment for patients with faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 997–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solomon MJ, Pager CK, Rex J, et al. (2003) Randomized, controlled trial of biofeedback with anal manometry, transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor retraining with digital guidance alone in the treatment of mild to moderate faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 703–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schott AM, Damon H, Mion F, et al. (2004) A randomized controlled trial of biofeedback that does not have the power to conclude. Gastroenterology 126(5): 1496–1497; author reply 1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, et al. (2004) Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 91: 1559–1569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Melzack R, Wall P (1965) Pain mechanism: a new theory. Science 150: 971–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McGuire E, Shi-Chun Z, Horwinski E, et al. (1983) Treatment of motor and sensory detrusor instability by electrical stimulation. J Urol 129: 1983

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Even-Schneider A, et al. (2003) Urodynamic effect of acute transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in overactive bladder. J Urol 169: 2210–2215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vandoninck V, Van Balken MR, Finazzi Agro E, et al. (2003) Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of urge incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 22: 17–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Queralto M, Portier G, Cabarrot PH, et al. (2005) Preliminary results of peripheral transcutaneous neuromodulation in the treatment of idiopathic faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 1–3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Damon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damon, H., Mion, F. Électrostimulation du nerf tibial postérieur : nouvelle approche thérapeutique de l’incontinence anale ?. Pelv Perineol 2, 286–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-007-0141-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-007-0141-1

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation