Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lessons Learned: Evaluation of Fracture Liaison Service Quality Improvement Efforts in a Large Academic Healthcare System

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) care model, a care coordination program for patients experiencing a fragility fracture, is proven to improve management of patients with an osteoporotic fracture, but treatment initiation gaps persist.

Objective

We describe the evolution of a centralized FLS within a university-based healthcare system, including impact of adding clinical pharmacist consultation, and describe circumstances surrounding continued care gaps.

Design

Cohort analysis of osteoporosis medication initiation before FLS, after initial implementation, and after addition of pharmacist consultation.

Patients

Individuals aged 65 and older experiencing any fragility fracture between 7/1/16 and 3/31/22.

Intervention

A centralized team outreached eligible patients, ordered dual x-ray absorptiometry and laboratory tests as needed, and scheduled an osteoporosis-focused primary care appointment. Three years after FLS implementation, clinical pharmacist consultative review was added prior to the primary care visit.

Main Measures

Initiation of osteoporosis pharmacologic therapy, completion of DXA, primary care follow-up rate, and description of circumstances where therapy was not initiated.

Key Results

Of 1204 new fractures between 7/1/16 and 3/31/22, 315 patients were enrolled in one of two FLS phases, and 89 eligible historical controls were identified. Medication initiation rates went from 22/89 (25%) pre-FLS to 201/428 (47%) after-FLS phase 1 [POST1] (p<0.001) and to 106/187 (57%) after FLS phase 2 (POST2), when clinical pharmacist consultation was added (p=0.03 versus POST1). DXA was completed in 56/89 (67%) of pre-FLS patients, 364/428 (85%) POST1 patients (p<0.001 versus pre), and 163/187 (87%) POST2 (p< 0.001 versus PRE, p=0.59 versus POST1). Of 375 patients who did not initiate osteoporosis medication, more in the combined post-FLS cohorts attended a follow-up primary care appointment (233/308, 76% attended, versus pre-FLS 41/67, 61%, p=0.016).

Conclusion

An FLS including centralized outreach and care coordination significantly improved patient follow-up, DXA, and medication initiation. Addition of de-centralized pharmacist consultation further improved medication initiation rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2049-102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Shoback D. Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1595-622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Desai RJ, Mahesri M, Abdia Y, et al. Association of Osteoporosis Medication Use After Hip Fracture With Prevention of Subsequent Nonvertebral Fractures: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey NC, McCloskey EV, Mitchell PJ, et al. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1507-29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawley S, Javaid MK, Prieto-Alhambra D, et al. Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: population-based longitudinal study. Age Ageing. 2016 Mar;45(2):236-42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, et al. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Bone. 2018 Jun;111:92-100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Osteoporosis Management in Women Who Had a Fracture (OMW). National Center for Quality Assessment (NCQA); 2022 [updated 2022; cited 2023 9/29/23]; Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/osteoporosis-management-in-women-who-had-a-fracture/. Accessed December 1, 2023.

  9. Barton DW, Piple AS, Smith CT, Moskal SA, Carmouche JJ. The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021;12:2151459320979978.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Walters S, Khan T, Ong T, Sahota O. Fracture liaison services: improving outcomes for patients with osteoporosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:117-27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim M, Brunetti V, Cosman F, Curtis JR, Lewiecki EM, Phelan M, Samai P, McDermott M, Lin TC, Brookhart MA, Hurwitz K. Current trends in the risk of subsequent fracture after initial fracture, and post-fracture treatment among commercially insured postmenopausal women in the United States ASBMR 2023 Annual Meeting; October 13-16, 2023; Vancouver, BC, Canada2023.

  12. Wallace MA, Hammes A, Rothman MS, et al. Fixing a Fragmented System: Impact of a Comprehensive Geriatric Hip Fracture Program on Long-Term Mortality. Perm J. 2019;23.

  13. Wu CH, Chen CH, Chen PH, et al. Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2018 May;29(5):1023-47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Summers KM, Brock TP. Impact of pharmacist-led community bone mineral density screenings. Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Feb;39(2):243-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wopat M, Breslow R, Chesney K, et al. Implementation of a pharmacist and student pharmacist-led primary care service to identify and treat rural veterans at risk for osteoporotic fracture. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Nov-Dec;61(6):e105-e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B B. FRI0528 Successful implementation of a pharmacist-led fracture liaison service at a us veteran affairs (VA) hospital. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2017;76:691.

  17. Heilmann RM, Friesleben CR, Billups SJ. Impact of a pharmacist-directed intervention in postmenopausal women after fracture. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Mar 15;69(6):504-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakayama A, Major G, Holliday E, Attia J, Bogduk N. Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate. Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):873-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Javaid MK. Efficacy and efficiency of fracture liaison services to reduce the risk of recurrent osteoporotic fractures. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Aug;33(8):2061-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Scholten DJ, 2nd, Bray JK, Wang KY, Lake AF, Emory CL. Implementation of a fracture liaison service and its effects on osteoporosis treatment adherence and secondary fracture at a tertiary care academic health system. Arch Osteoporos. 2020 May 28;15(1):80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu CH, Kao IJ, Hung WC, et al. Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jun;29(6):1227-42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA

    Sarah J. Billups PharmD & Danielle R. Fixen PharmD

  2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA

    Lisa M. Schilling MD, MSPH, Arwa El-Sheikh MD, Alexandra M. Marcus LSW & Micol S. Rothman MD

Authors
  1. Sarah J. Billups PharmD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle R. Fixen PharmD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisa M. Schilling MD, MSPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arwa El-Sheikh MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexandra M. Marcus LSW
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Micol S. Rothman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. Billups PharmD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Billups, S.J., Fixen, D.R., Schilling, L.M. et al. Lessons Learned: Evaluation of Fracture Liaison Service Quality Improvement Efforts in a Large Academic Healthcare System. J GEN INTERN MED (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08568-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08568-8

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation