Skip to main content

In Reply Letter to Editor

We appreciate the thoughtful comments made by Dr. Schattner with regard to our article, Impact of Pre-visit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Physician Communication and Patient Activation: A Randomized Trial.

While electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to improve patient-centered care, they have not been designed to capture patient contextual data (PCD) in a structured way and make them available for pre-rounding and point-of-care use. The PCD Tool we evaluated was designed to overcome barriers within the current EHRs by directly inviting patients to share their agenda, priorities, and goals with care team members — ahead of the visit. Effectively, this tool helped humanize the EHR and provided a basis for effective health communication and empowering patient users to engage in their health and health care.1,2,3

Analogous to clinicians’ pre-charting/pre-rounding, the PCD Tool allows patients to share essential elements of their life ahead of the visit. The structured collection and storage in their EHR can facilitate using these patient-centered data points across care teams and lead health care decisions.4,5,6,7,8 Indeed, the results of our clinical trial support the comments by Dr. Schattner, who expressed the need for physicians to review patient data ahead of visits. We extend Dr. Schattner’s recommended review of critical patient data ahead of visits to patients’ health values, goals, challenges, and personal and social determinants of health.

The intervention tested in this trial encourages patients to reflect on and identify their priorities, which increases efficiency during the visit.2,3 Building on this, our trial showed that sharing these priorities enhanced aspects of patient-doctor communication during the visit. Providers often cite the burden of the EHR documentation system as impeding patient-provider communication.9 Now, we are embarking on a time when innovators must design technology that assists rather than inhibits care. Consumer informatics tools that prioritize patients’ perspectives on health/illness and management are one such innovation.


Jeana M. Holt, Ph.D., DNP, MSN, RN, FNP-BC

Bradley H. Crotty, MD, MPH, FACP


  1. Holt JM, Cusatis R, Winn A, et al. Impact of pre-visit contextual data collection on patient-physician communication and patient activation: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. Published online February 9, 2021.

  2. Holt JM, Cusatis R, Asan O, et al. Incorporating patient-generated contextual data into care: clinician perspectives using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science. Healthc (Amst). 2020;8(1):100369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cusatis R, Holt JM, Williams J, et al. The impact of patient-generated contextual data on communication in clinical practice: a qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(4):734-740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dzau VJ, Balatbat CA. Health and societal implications of medical and technological advances. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(463).

  5. Dzau VJ, McClellan MB, McGinnis JM, et al. Vital directions for health and health care: priorities From a National Academy of Medicine initiative. JAMA. 2017;317(14):1461-1470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Estiri H, Patel CJ, Murphy SN. Informatics can help providers incorporate context into care. Jamia Open. 2018;1(1):3-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Furukawa MF, King J, Patel V, Hsiao CJ, Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. Health Aff. 2014;33(9):1672-1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gold R, Cottrell E, Bunce A, et al. Developing electronic health record (EHR) strategies related to health center patients’ social determinants of health. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(4):428-447.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal SD, Pabo E, Rozenblum R, Sherritt KM. Professional dissonance and burnout in primary care: a qualitative study. JAMA Intern Med. Published online January 6, 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeana M. Holt Ph.D., DNP, MSN, RN, FNP-BC.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holt, J.M., Crotty, B.H. In Reply Letter to Editor. J GEN INTERN MED 37, 2092 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: