Skip to main content

Post‑COVID‑19 Syndrome in Outpatients: a Cohort Study

Abstract

Background

After mild COVID-19, some outpatients experience persistent symptoms. However, data are scarce and prospective studies are urgently needed.

Objectives

To characterize the post-COVID-19 syndrome after mild COVID-19 and identify predictors.

Participants

Outpatients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 with (1) PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-positive) or (2) SARS-CoV-2 negative PCR (COVID-negative).

Design

Monocentric cohort study with prospective phone interview between more than 3 months to 10 months after initial visit to the emergency department and outpatient clinics.

Main Measures

Data of the initial visits were extracted from the electronic medical file. Predefined persistent symptoms were assessed through a structured phone interview. Associations between long-term symptoms and PCR results, as well as predictors of persistent symptoms among COVID-positive, were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, smoking, comorbidities, and timing of the survey.

Key Results

The study population consisted of 418 COVID-positive and 89 COVID-negative patients, mostly young adults (median age of 41 versus 36 years in COVID-positive and COVID-negative, respectively; p = 0.020) and healthcare workers (67% versus 82%; p = 0.006). Median time between the initial visit and the phone survey was 150 days in COVID-positive and 242 days in COVID-negative patients. Persistent symptoms were reported by 223 (53%) COVID-positive and 33 (37%) COVID-negative patients (p = 0.006) and proportions were stable among the periods of the phone interviews. Overall, 21% COVID-positive and 15% COVID-negative patients (p = 0.182) attended care for this purpose. Four surveyed symptoms were independently associated with COVID-19: fatigue (adjusted odds ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.04–4.41), smell/taste disorder (26.5, 3.46–202), dyspnea (2.81, 1.10–7.16), and memory impairment (5.71, 1.53–21.3). Among COVID-positive, female gender (1.67, 1.09–2.56) and overweight/obesity (1.67, 1.10–2.56) were predictors of persistent symptoms.

Conclusions

More than half of COVID-positive outpatients report persistent symptoms up to 10 months after a mild disease. Only 4 of 14 symptoms were associated with COVID-19 status. The symptoms and predictors of the post-COVID-19 syndrome need further characterization as this condition places a significant burden on society.

INTRODUCTION

Almost 2 years after the first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 1, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic remains a constant challenge for healthcare systems and affects the well-being of many individuals. The clinical presentation and outcomes of acute COVID-19 are well described. Most patients have mild disease and only a minority need hospital admission 2. In most cases, patients experience a complete resolution of their symptoms after 2 to 6 weeks 3, but a subgroup present long-lasting symptoms. These persistent symptoms have been described in observational studies 4,5 and cohorts with a large proportion of outpatients 6,7. Three studies reported that an important number of patients had persistent symptoms for more than 6 months after COVID-19: one study included adults discharged from hospital 8 and two studies focused on outpatients with mild-to-moderate disease 9,10. NICE guideline currently defines post-COVID-19 syndrome as the persistence of signs and symptoms for more than 3 months after infection, in the absence of an alternative diagnosis 11.

To the best of our knowledge, no study evaluated the prevalence of persistent symptoms among patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, comparing patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 to those tested negative. Furthermore, no study explored the factors associated with persistent symptoms in COVID-19 outpatients. These data may modify patient’s management and influence public health vaccination strategies by identifying additional population groups that should be prioritized.

We aimed to compare the prevalence of symptoms persistent for more than 3 months between SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed (COVID-positive) and PCR-negative (COVID-negative) patients in outpatient clinics, and to identify predictors of persistent symptoms in COVID-positive.

METHODS

Study design, setting, and participants

This cohort study recruited consecutive PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (COVID-positive) during the initial visit in the emergency department (ED), in the SARS-CoV-2 screening center and in two outpatient clinics of the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, between February 26 and April 27, 2020. During the study period, SARS-CoV-2 testing was restricted to patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 (i.e., symptoms of acute respiratory tract infection, history of fever, or sudden loss of smell or taste) (1) with at least one risk factor for severe COVID-19 (i.e., ≥ 65 years old or presence of a comorbidity such as hypertension, diabetes, cancer, chronic cardiac or respiratory disease, immunosuppression) or (2) working as healthcare workers (HCW). Validated nucleic acid amplification tests were used and a dedicated trained medical team performed nasopharyngeal swabs 12.

We included a control group of outpatients with a negative nasopharyngeal swab PCR SARS-CoV-2 result (COVID-negative). This group was recruited in the same health facilities during the same period with the same screening criteria (≥ 1 risk factor for severe COVID-19 or HCW) as COVID-positive. The only differences between the two groups were the types of symptoms at inclusion. The clinical inclusion criteria of COVID-negative were the presence of cough, dyspnea, or history of fever while criteria of COVID-positive were the presence of any symptom suggestive of COVID-19. This difference is related to the fact that we used the COVID-negative group of a previously described prospective cohort 13,14. The use of this pre-existing cohort also influenced the number of COVID-negative patients included.

We excluded patients who (1) did not have a documented health assessment at the time of the test, (2) were hospitalized for more than 24 h on the day of initial visit or within the following 30 days, (3) were unable to understand the phone survey due to a language barrier or a cognitive impairment, (4) declined to participate, (5) were not reachable for the phone interview after at least two attempts, or (6) had the phone survey less than 3 months after the initial visit by mistake. Patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test performed in another location before the initial visit in the study centers were excluded, as we also planned to evaluate the impact of the infection on the healthcare system (i.e., medical consultations for persistent symptoms). Moreover, we excluded COVID-negative patients who declared having a documented (PCR or serology) SARS-CoV-2 infection before the phone follow-up.

Procedures

We retrospectively extracted data from the patients’ electronic medical records: demographics, medical history, initial clinical presentation, and SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) cycle thresholds. We prospectively conducted a structured and standardized phone survey more than 3 months after the initial consultation. We collected information on (1) persistent symptoms at the time of the call, (2) secondary hospital admission within 30 days of the initial consultation, (3) medical consultation for persistent symptoms until the call, and (4) anthropometric data. The survey included 14 pre-defined symptoms: fatigue, muscle weakness, dyspnea, cough, thoracic pain, smell or taste disorder, blurred vision, headache, memory impairment, loss of balance, numbness, nausea, sleep disorder, and hair loss. Dyspnea was further categorized according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) grades 15.

Physicians of the infectious diseases service conducted the phone survey. As they did not have dedicated time to perform these calls, they did not survey all patients at the same time point after the initial consultation. Clinicians called COVID-positive patients randomly. They called COVID-positive patients first. Indeed, we decided to include a group of COVID-negative patients in a second phase when we realized that a large proportion of COVID-positive participants had persistent symptoms. To account for the timing of symptoms assessment, we classified COVID-positive patients in three equivalent 2-month periods according to the time between SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (initial consultation) and the phone interview: first period: > 3 to 5 months after diagnosis; second period: > 5 to 7 months after diagnosis; and third period: > 7 to 10 months after diagnosis.

All data were entered in the Lausanne University Hospital’s electronic database “regCOVID” using the REDCap® platform (Research Electronic Data Capture v8.5.24, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA) 16.

Definitions

Long-term symptoms were defined as symptoms that appeared or worsened during the acute infection phase, were still present at time of the phone call (i.e., more than 3 months after the initial consultation), and were not explained by an alternative diagnosis. Smell or taste disorder included partial or complete loss of that sense. Numbness included hypoesthesia and paresthesia.

Statistical analyses

Demographics, clinical features at the time of initial consultation, consultation for persistent symptoms, and prevalence of long-term symptoms (any symptom or individualized symptoms) were compared between COVID-positive and COVID-negative by Mann Whitney U, chi-square, or Fisher tests as appropriate, as well as between COVID-positive patients surveyed during the three different periods after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by 1-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, or chi-square as appropriate. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The association between COVID-19 and long-term symptoms was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression including potential confounders (age, gender, smoking habits, comorbidities, period of the phone survey). To account for the difference in the timing of symptoms assessment between COVID-positive and COVID-negative, we added a subgroup analysis including COVID-positive and COVID-negative patients surveyed during the same period (the third period). The independent association between the previously mentioned factors and each long-term symptom in COVID-positive was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression including the same potential confounders. To account for the large number of HCW in the study population, we added a subgroup analysis including only HCW. STATA (version 15.1, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) statistical software and GraphPad Prism 8.3 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) were used for analyses.

Ethics

The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland. All participants gave their verbal consent to participate in this study during the phone interview (project-ID CER-VD 2020–01,107 and 2019–02,283).

RESULTS

A total of 956 symptomatic patients had a RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 between February 26 and April 27, 2020, and 538 patients were excluded (Fig. 1). The remaining 418 (44%) COVID-positive patients were included in the analysis. One hundred thirty-one symptomatic COVID-negative patients with a negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR between March 31 and April 26, 2020, were included. Nineteen patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (RT-PCR or serology) between the initial visit and the phone survey, 17 who could not be reached, 3 who refused to participate, 2 who did not speak one of the investigators’ languages, and 1 who died were excluded. The remaining 89 (68%) COVID-negative patients were included in the analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow-chart

Demographics and Clinical Presentation

In both groups, there was a majority of women and HCW. Approximately a third of patients had a comorbidity, mainly obesity, arterial hypertension, and asthma (Table 1). Most patients were tested within the first week of symptom onset and most had normal vital signs at initial consultation. Compared to COVID-negative, COVID-positive were slightly older and less often HCW, active smokers, or asthmatic. COVID-positive reported less often a history of fever, dyspnea, or sore throat at the time of evaluation.

Table 1 Characteristics of Patients According to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Result (COVID-Negative and COVID-Positive)

The study team assessed long-term symptoms via the phone survey at a median of 150 days (interquartile range [IQR], 121–204 days) and 242 days (IQR 236–248 days) after the initial consultation in the COVID-positive and COVID-negative groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The study team called 190 (45%) COVID-positive during the first period (> 3 to 5 months after the initial visit), 102 (24%) during the second period (> 5 to 7 months), and 126 (30%) during the third period (> 7 to 10 months). Patients called in the first period were significantly older, less often HCW, and had more comorbidities than those surveyed during the two other periods (Appendix Table 4). The study team called all COVID-negative during the third period.

Persistent Symptoms

At the time of the phone survey, 223/418 (53%) COVID-positive and 33/89 (37%) COVID-negative patients (p = 0.006) reported the presence of any long-term symptom (Fig. 2A, Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Proportions of patients with long-term symptoms at the time of the phone survey. (A) Comparison between COVID-positive (positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) and COVID-negative (negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR); (B) comparison between COVID-positive surveyed during three different period: period 1— > 3 to 5 months after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis; period 2— > 5 to 7 months after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis; period 3— > 7 to 10 months after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Data are shown as proportions (%) with 95% confidence intervals

Table 2 Association Between Long-Term Symptoms (Any and Individualized Symptoms) Assessed at the Time of Phone Survey and COVID-Positive Status

In COVID-positive, the main reported symptoms were fatigue (n = 132, 32%), smell or taste disorder (n = 93, 22%), dyspnea (n = 66, 16%), headache (n = 50, 12%), memory impairment (n = 48, 11%), hair loss (n = 43, 10%), and sleep disorders (n = 41, 10%), irrespective of HCW status (Appendix Table 7). The prevalence of long-term symptoms was similar during the three time periods (Fig. 2B). In COVID-negative, the main reported symptoms were fatigue (n = 15, 17%), headache (n = 10, 11%), sleep disorders (n = 10, 11%), and dyspnea (n = 7, 8%).

COVID-positive reported more often smell or taste disorder (p = 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.006), and memory impairment (p = 0.003) compared to COVID-negative, irrespective of the timing of the survey (Appendix Table 5 and 6). The prevalence of other symptoms was similar between COVID-positive and COVID-negative. The proportions of patients with ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 symptoms were greater in COVID-positive than COVID-negative (38% vs 19%; p = 0.001 and 23% vs 9.0%; p = 0.002, respectively). The proportion of patients requiring a medical consultation for persistent symptoms was similar between COVID-positive and COVID-negative (21% versus 15%, p = 0.182).

Independent Association Between COVID-Positive Status and Long-Term Symptoms

After adjusting for potential confounders, COVID-positive status was a predictor for reporting any symptom (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.14–3.67; p = 0.02), fatigue (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04–4.41; p = 0.04), dyspnea (aOR 2.81, 95% CI 1.10–7.16; p = 0.03), smell or taste disorder (aOR 26.5, 95% CI 3.46–202; p < 0.01), and memory impairment (aOR 5.71, 95% CI 1.53–21.3; p = 0.01) at the time of the phone survey (Table 2). Of note, dyspnea associated with limited physical activity (NYHA ≥ 2), as well as other long-term symptoms were not associated with COVID status. The results were similar when restricting the analysis to COVID-negative and COVID-positive surveyed during third period (Appendix Table 5).

Predictors of Long-Term Symptoms in COVID-Positive

While 57% of women presented long-term symptoms, only 47% of men did (p = 0.049). While 59% of overweight/obese patients presented long-term symptoms, only 49% of patients with healthy weight did (p = 0.041). After adjusting for potential confounders, independent predictors of reporting any long-term symptoms were female gender (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.09–2.56; p = 0.019) and overweight/obesity (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.10–2.56; p = 0.017; Table 3). The same predictors were associated with persistent fatigue. Overweight/obesity was a predictor of dyspnea. Female gender was a predictor of smell or taste disorder. Active smoking was a predictor of memory impairment (Fig. 3). Predictors of other long-term symptoms that were not associated with COVID status are presented in Appendix Table 8.

Table 3 Factors Associated with the Presence of Any Long-Term Symptom During The Phone Survey in COVID-Positive Patients
Fig. 3
figure 3

Factors associated with the presence of selected long-term symptoms (fatigue, smell or taste disorder, dyspnea, and memory impairment) during the phone survey in COVID-positive patients. Selected symptoms are those associated with COVID status. Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, gender, smoking, overweight/obesity, diabetes, asthma, hypertension, cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic inflammatory disease, period of the phone survey. Adjusted odds ratio for age indicates the risk of fatigue, smell/taste disorder, dyspnea, or memory impairment per 5-year age increase. aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. *p < 0.05

DISCUSSION

In a large cohort of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 outpatients, we evaluated the prevalence of persistent symptoms 3 to 10 months after diagnosis. We compared COVID-positive to a cohort of patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR with symptoms suggestive of COVID during the same period in the same study sites. In these populations consisting mostly of young and healthy participants, most working as HCW, we showed that 53% of patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 report persistent symptoms, while 37% with negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR do. Interestingly, only 4 out of the 14 surveyed persistent symptoms were independently associated with COVID status, i.e., fatigue, smell or taste disorder, dyspnea, and memory impairment, irrespective of the timing of the survey.

The type and prevalence of long-lasting symptoms in COVID-positive are consistent with the existing literature. Two studies, evaluating more than 100 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 outpatients, reported the prevalence of symptoms lasting more than 6 months after diagnosis: 33–46% participants with at least one symptom, 14–22% with fatigue, 8% with dyspnea, and 14–15% with change in sense of smell or taste 9,10. The differences between studies may be explained by different selection criteria, data collection methods, and definitions of symptoms.

Strikingly, in our study, the proportion of COVID-positive patients with long-term symptoms was similar between the three surveyed periods. It suggests that symptoms which are present 3 months after a COVID-19 diagnosis may last for several months. Our findings are supported by a couple of longitudinal studies, which analyzed the evolution of residual symptoms and showed a stable proportion after the acute phase up to 7 months 17,18.

In our study, 23% of COVID-positive required at least one additional medical visit for COVID-19-related symptoms. These data show the burden on the ambulatory healthcare facilities that may be related to the post-COVID-19 syndrome. In contrast with previous findings 19, we did not find a statistical difference in the proportion of patients requiring an additional medical consultation between COVID-positive and COVID-negative, which may be related to the timing of the survey, COVID-negative being surveyed at a later time point.

Our results shed more light on the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and long-term symptoms. While some symptoms were more frequent in PCR-confirmed COVID-19 outpatients than in COVID-negative, the prevalence of other symptoms was not different between both groups. Specifically, the prevalence of headache and sleep disorders, two predominant persistent symptoms in COVID-negative patients, was similar between COVID-negative and COVID-positive. Both symptoms may originate from mixed etiologies including psychosocial factors and/or non-specific post-infectious consequences. The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted our psychosocial behaviors due to confinement, social distancing, masks, and changes in working conditions, especially for HCW. Some symptoms may be a consequence of these unprecedented changes 20.

One study evaluating the sequelae in outpatients 6 months after COVID-19 included a small control group of healthy volunteers and showed that 33% of COVID-positive outpatients and 5% of volunteers presented symptoms 9. However, the limited sample size (21 healthy volunteers) and normal health status prevent comparison with our results. Another report also showed that 26% of seropositive HCW present long-term symptoms 8 months after mild COVID, while only 9% of seronegative do 21. Inclusion of patients irrespective of the presence of symptoms (no or mild prior symptoms) might explain the lower prevalence compared to our results.

Overweight and obesity are increasingly associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 22,23 and we found that it was an independent predictor for the presence of any long-term symptom, fatigue, and dyspnea. One study reported an association between body mass index and persistent symptoms after more than 28 days 24. The mechanisms responsible for the post-COVID-19 syndrome are not understood yet and may be multiple 25,26. Long-term symptoms may be due to higher initial organ damages related to a higher infectious burden or a dysregulated inflammatory response. This may be true in people with overweight and obesity 27, since the adipose tissue has a high expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors and secretes pro-inflammatory cytokines.

We identified female gender as a predictor for the post-COVID-19 syndrome, in particular for persistent fatigue and smell or taste disorder. Although the results are inconsistent, some studies have described an association between female gender and long-COVID 24, persistent fatigue 7,8,28, post-exertional polypnea 28, and anxiety or depression 8. There may be a difference in the immune response according to the gender, as illustrated by the higher representation of women in autoimmune diseases 29, that may explain divergent findings with COVID-19.

Our study has some limitations. First, most symptoms are subjective and prone to observer bias. Symptoms may also come from an intercurrent condition at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and not always represent sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, inclusion of a symptomatic COVID-negative group supports the association between some persistent symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Second, inclusion criteria were slightly different between COVID-positive and COVID-negative. COVID-positive presented with any symptom suggestive of COVID-19 (cough, dyspnea, sore throat, history of fever, myalgia, or smell or taste disorders), while the inclusion criteria of COVID-negative patients were the presence of cough, dyspnea, or history of fever. However, we do not think that the symptom difference at first consultation modified our results. Indeed, among COVID-positive patients, 361/418 (86%) presented with cough, dyspnea, or history of fever, which were the inclusion criteria of the COVID-negative group. Another limitation is related to the timing of the survey, which was performed later in COVID-negative. This difference could lead to an underestimation of the prevalence of persisting symptoms in COVID-negative. However, we added a subgroup analysis restricted to COVID-positive and COVID-negative surveyed during the same period (the third one) and found the same results than in the whole cohort. We also observed a difference in the characteristics of COVID-positive surveyed during the first period compared to COVID-positive surveyed during the other two periods. This difference is the result of chance as patients as clinicians called patients randomly. However, we adjusted the multivariate analyses for these characteristics and for the timing of the survey.

Our study suffers from a selection bias due to SARS-CoV-2 test criteria (HCW or presence of a risk factor of adverse outcome) at the time of the study, which may prevent generalization of our findings to a broader population. We added a subgroup analysis restricted to HCW and found the same results than in the complete population. This information suggests that our results are generalizable to HCW. Furthermore, we cannot formally exclude that some COVID-negative had an undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection due to a false negative PCR result. However, we used a validated SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test on a nasopharyngeal swab performed by a dedicated trained medical team to minimize technical and sample collection bias 12,30.

In conclusion, our study shows that more than half of outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 report long-term symptoms 3 to 10 months after diagnosis and that 21% seek medical care for this reason. These data suggest that the post-COVID syndrome places a significant burden on society and especially healthcare systems. There is an urgent need to inform physicians and political authorities about the natural long-term course of COVID-19 in order to plan an appropriate and dedicated management of those with disabling persistent symptoms.

References

  1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727–33.

  2. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239–42.

  3. Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, Billig Rose E, Shapiro NI, Files DC, et al. Symptom Duration and Risk Factors for Delayed Return to Usual Health Among Outpatients with COVID-19 in a Multistate Health Care Systems Network — United States, March–June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jul 31;69(30):993–8.

  4. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F, Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):603–5.

  5. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. Journal of Infection. 2020 Dec;81(6):e4–6.

  6. Carvalho-Schneider C, Laurent E, Lemaignen A, Beaufils E, Bourbao-Tournois C, Laribi S, et al. Follow-up of adults with noncritical COVID-19 two months after symptom onset. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2021 Feb;27(2):258–63.

  7. Townsend L, Dyer AH, Jones K, Dunne J, Mooney A, Gaffney F, et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. Madeddu G, editor. PLoS ONE. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0240784.

  8. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):220–32.

  9. Logue JK, Franko NM, McCulloch DJ, McDonald D, Magedson A, Wolf CR, et al. Sequelae in Adults at 6 Months After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 19;4(2):e210830.

  10. Klein H, Asseo K, Karni N, Benjamini Y, Nir-Paz R, Muszkat M, et al. Onset, duration and unresolved symptoms, including smell and taste changes, in mild COVID-19 infection: a cohort study in Israeli patients. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2021 May 1;27(5):769–74.

  11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, (SIGN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP). COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. 2020 Dec 18;35.

  12. Opota O, Brouillet R, Greub G, Jaton K. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on a high-throughput molecular diagnostic platform and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test for the diagnostic of COVID-19 on various clinical samples. Pathog Dis. 2020 Nov 11;78(8).

  13. Brahier T, Meuwly J-Y, Pantet O, Brochu Vez M-J, Gerhard Donnet H, Hartley M-A, et al. Lung ultrasonography for risk stratification in patients with COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020 Sep 17;ciaa1408.

  14. Schaad S, Brahier T, Hartley M-A, Cordonnier J-B, Bosso L, Espejo T, et al. Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center. medRxiv. 2021 Mar 26;2021.03.23.21254150.

  15. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association . Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. In: 9th ed. Boston, Mass: ed Little, Brown & Co; 1994. p. 253–6.

  16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208.

  17. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing Long COVID in an International Cohort: 7 Months of Symptoms and Their Impact [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS); 2020 Dec [cited 2021 Jan 19]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.24.20248802

  18. Nguyen NN, Hoang VT, Lagier J-C, Raoult D, Gautret P. Long-term persistence of olfactory and gustatory disorders in COVID-19 patients. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2021 Jan;S1198743X20307813.

  19. Lund LC, Hallas J, Nielsen H, Koch A, Mogensen SH, Brun NC, et al. Post-acute effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals not requiring hospital admission: a Danish population-based cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021 Oct 1;21(10):1373–82.

  20. Alzueta E, Perrin P, Baker FC, Caffarra S, Ramos‐Usuga D, Yuksel D, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic has changed our lives: A study of psychological correlates across 59 countries. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2021;77(3):556–70.

  21. Havervall S, Rosell A, Phillipson M, Mangsbo SM, Nilsson P, Hober S, et al. Symptoms and Functional Impairment Assessed 8 Months After Mild COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers. JAMA [Internet]. 2021 Apr 7 [cited 2021 Apr 18]; Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778528

  22. Chu Y, Yang J, Shi J, Zhang P, Wang X. Obesity is associated with increased severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Medical Research. 2020 Dec 2;25(1):64.

  23. Kompaniyets L, Goodman AB, Belay B, Freedman DS, Sucosky MS, Lange SJ, et al. Body Mass Index and Risk for COVID-19–Related Hospitalization, Intensive Care Unit Admission, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, and Death — United States, March–December 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Mar 12;70(10):355–61.

  24. Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, Graham MS, Penfold RS, Bowyer RC, et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):626–31.

  25. Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, Nair N, Mahajan S, Sehrawat TS, et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020/07/12 ed. 2020 Jul;26(7):1017–32.

  26. Wang F, Kream RM, Stefano GB. Long-Term Respiratory and Neurological Sequelae of COVID-19. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 1;26:e928996–1-e928996–10.

  27. Albashir AAD. The potential impacts of obesity on COVID-19. Clin Med (Lond). 2020;20(4):e109–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiong Q, Xu M, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Xu Y, et al. Clinical sequelae of COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China: a single-centre longitudinal study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2021;27(1):89–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ngo ST, Steyn FJ, McCombe PA. Gender differences in autoimmune disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35(3):347–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mueller L, Scherz V, Greub G, Jaton K, Opota O. Computer-aided medical microbiology monitoring tool: a strategy to adapt to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and that highlights RT-PCR consistency [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS); 2020 Jul [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.27.20162123

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients who accepted to participate and make this study possible. We thank all healthcare workers of the triage center and of the emergency department of the University Hospital of Lausanne, who supported the study and managed COVID-19-suspected patients. We thank Nadia Cattaneo and Martin Delaloye who participated to patients’ follow-up. We thank Tanguy Espejo and Luca Bosso who included patients in the COVID-negative group. Members of the RegCOVID group (by alphabetical order): Pierre-Yves Bochud (Committee President), Florian Desgranges, Paraskevas Filippidis, David Haefliger, Eleftheria Evdokia Kampouri, Oriol Manuel (Committee Member), Aline Munting, Jean-Luc Pagani (Committee Member), Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris (Registry Coordinator and Committee Member), Jean Regina, Laurence Rochat Stettler, Véronique Suttels, Eliana Tadini, Jonathan Tschopp, Mathias Van Singer, Benjamin Viala, Peter Vollenweider (Committee member).

Funding

This work was supported by an academic award of the Leenaards Foundation (to NBB), the Infectious Disease Service and the emergency department of Lausanne University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

F. D., M. P. O., N. B. B.: study conception, study design, study performance, study management, patients’ follow-up, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript writing.

E. T., A. M.: patients’ follow-up, data interpretation, and manuscript writing.

J. R., P. F., B. V., N. S., D. H., E. K., M. V. S., J. T., L. R. S.: patients’ follow-up, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript.

B. G.: study design, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript.

O. H., Y. M. C., A. G., P. N. C., B. G.: data interpretation and critical review of the manuscript.

E. K.: data analysis, interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript.

T. B., S. S.: patients’ inclusion, and critical review of the manuscript.

O. O.: microbiological data interpretation and critical review of the manuscript.

M. P. O. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Desgranges MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris and Noémie Boillat-Blanco contributed equally to this work.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 782 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desgranges, F., Tadini, E., Munting, A. et al. Post‑COVID‑19 Syndrome in Outpatients: a Cohort Study. J GEN INTERN MED 37, 1943–1952 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07242-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07242-1

Keywords

  • Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome
  • Post-COVID-19 syndrome
  • obesity