Skip to main content

Implementation and Policy Recommendations from the VHA State-of-the-Art Conference on Strategies to Improve Opioid Safety

Abstract

Evidence-based treatment of opioid use disorder, the prevention of opioid overdose and other opioid-related harms, and safe and effective pain management are priorities for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The VHA Office of Health Services Research and Development hosted a State-of-the-Art Conference on “Effective Management of Pain and Addiction: Strategies to Improve Opioid Safety” on September 10–11, 2019. This conference convened a multidisciplinary group to discuss and achieve consensus on a research agenda and on implementation and policy recommendations to improve opioid safety for Veterans. Participants were organized into three workgroups: (1) managing opioid use disorder; (2) Long-term opioid therapy and opioid tapering; (3) managing co-occurring pain and substance use disorder. Here we summarize the implementation and policy recommendations of each workgroup and highlight important cross-cutting issues related to telehealth, care coordination, and stepped care model implementation.

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), the prevention of opioid overdose and other opioid-related harms, and the provision of safe and effective acute and chronic pain management are priorities for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). During a national opioid crisis, Veterans are disproportionately impacted by opioid use disorder and opioid overdose.2 Veterans are also more likely to experience chronic pain, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicide than non-Veterans.1,16 Efforts to prevent opioid-related harms must prioritize evidence-based strategies to improve opioid safety but must also ensure access to evidence-based treatments for chronic pain and mental health conditions. As the nation’s largest integrated healthcare system, the VHA is ideally suited to address these challenges through broad implementation of evidence-based care and through research to advance the state of the evidence.

METHODS

To achieve these goals, the VHA Office of Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) hosted a State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Conference on “Effective Management of Pain and Addiction: Strategies to Improve Opioid Safety” in September 2019. In preparation for this conference, co-chairs recruited 14 researchers and key clinical stakeholders, both from within and outside VHA, and this group served as the SOTA planning committee. In a planning meeting in January 2019 and a series of follow-up teleconferences, the planning committee achieved consensus on three areas of focus: (1) managing opioid use disorder (OUD); (2) long-term opioid therapy and opioid tapering; (3) managing co-occurring pain and substance use disorder. The planning committee identified subject matter experts for invitation to the SOTA. These invitees were organized into three workgroups, and each workgroup was provided with selected readings and key questions in preparation for the conference.

One of the goals of the conference was to identify areas in which evidence is sufficient for broad implementation and to develop policy recommendations. On the first day of the conference, workgroups sought to prioritize issues that would have the greatest impact for VHA and for Veterans and to achieve consensus, when possible. On the second day, workgroup recommendations were presented to all attendees for discussion and prioritization. Following the conference, recommendations were further refined and prioritized using an iterative discussion among attendees and VHA leadership. In this manuscript, we summarize key implementation and policy recommendations of each workgroup and highlight important cross-cutting themes.

WORKGROUP RECOMMENDATIONS

Managing Opioid Use Disorder

This workgroup focused on improving timely and sustained access to evidence-based medication treatment of OUD (MOUD) by addressing the barriers and facilitators to implementing MOUD. Major barriers to MOUD include: (1) stigma, (2) logistics, (3) treatment experiences and beliefs, and (4) knowledge gaps.14 The workgroup’s recommendations focused on three main areas: (1) increasing access to MOUD, (2) improving knowledge of MOUD, and (3) improving fidelity to evidence-based models for MOUD (Table 1).

Table 1 Implementation and Policy Recommendations

To improve access, the workgroup recommended that every facility be required to provide timely access to MOUD across a range of clinical settings, including Primary Care, Mental Health, and Pain Management settings. Since the conference, several logistical aspects of this recommendation were addressed through a national VHA Notice in October 2019, requiring that facilities confirm removal of barriers to MOUD in all clinical settings and encouraging incentives to facilitate access to MOUD.3 The workgroup recommended that psychosocial treatments should be readily available but not mandatory as a prerequisite to receipt of MOUD. To improve access, particularly for rural Veterans who have disproportionately poor access to MOUD, the workgroup recommended increasing support for, and clarifying regulations around, telehealth delivery of MOUD. To increase MOUD access to those at highest risk of overdose death, the workgroup recommended requiring overdose event reporting using the existing Suicide Behavior and Overdose Report electronic health record note template with timely follow-up and engagement in treatment, as is currently required in VHA following a suicide attempt.11

Lack of patient and clinician knowledge of MOUD represents another barrier to access. To improve clinician knowledge, the workgroup recommended developing a national Substance Use Disorder (SUD) consultation program based on VHA’s successful PTSD and Suicide Prevention consultation services.20 The workgroup also recommended broad dissemination of educational resources for both Veterans and VHA healthcare providers. There have been multiple VHA quality improvement initiatives whose goals include educating VHA audiences about MOUD. For example, the VHA’s Stepped Care for Opioid Use Disorder Train-the-Trainer (SCOUTT) initiative has been training interdisciplinary teams in Primary Care, Mental Health, and Pain Management to partner with Substance Use Disorder specialty care programs to provide a stepped care model of MOUD treatment.

To implement MOUD with fidelity to the evidence, the workgroup recommended that VHA leadership provide guidance for frequency of monitoring (e.g., urine drug testing) of OUD treatment. For example, for patients initiating MOUD, the group recommended follow-up and urine drug testing at least weekly until negative for 2 weeks, decreasing frequency of monitoring as the patient stabilizes. If opioid abstinence is not achieved within 4 weeks, transition to a higher level of care may be indicated. In addition, the workgroup recommended against discontinuing OUD pharmacotherapy solely for the reason of substance use and recommended increasing care in response by providing evidence-based treatments for co-occurring substance use disorders.

The workgroup’s recommendations toward the overarching goal of improving timely and sustained access to MOUD align with other national expert groups. In its 2019 report titled “Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives”, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommended that all Food and Drug Administration–approved medications be made available for all people with OUD.17 It also concluded that “a lack of availability or utilization of behavioral interventions is not a sufficient justification to withhold medications to treat opioid use disorder.” Similarly, the 2019 National Drug Control Strategy recommended that federally employed primary care providers should screen for substance use disorders and that SUD treatment should be provided within 24–48 hours.18

Long-term Opioid Therapy and Opioid Tapering

This workgroup assessed the evidence base for both long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) and for dose reduction and discontinuation of LTOT.7, 15 The group recommended three goals with specific recommendations for policy and implementation. First, the workgroup recommended that VHA policy support approaches to opioid prescribing that are both evidence-based and patient-centered. There was consensus with the VA and Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) Management of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain that (1) clinicians and patients should seek to avoid initiation of long-term, high-dose opioid therapy for patients with chronic pain, and (2) clinicians should provide individualized assessment of risk and benefits of LTOT. The workgroup specifically recommended against policies that interfere with individualized care, and some workgroup members expressed concern about unwarranted variation in opioid-tapering practices between VHA facilities and clinicians. The workgroup members specifically acknowledged potential risks of opioid tapering, in particular with rapid reduction or abrupt discontinuation in patients receiving LTOT. The workgroup recommended clear messaging to Veterans and healthcare providers around VHA policy in support of the VA/DoD CPG for Opioid Therapy regarding the importance of individualized care in LTOT.

Next, the workgroup proposed a goal of providing system-wide access to team-based support for opioid tapering, which has been shown to improve outcomes.4 They recommended that multidisciplinary care should be available systemwide, sufficiently staffed to allow timely access by Veterans, and tailored to the needs of individual patients. Thus, the workgroup expressed support for the 2017 VHA mandate of interdisciplinary pain clinics at all VHA facilities, as legislatively required by the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) of 2016. Finally, the workgroup proposed a goal of universal access to OUD assessment and treatment, if indicated, for Veterans on LTOT, recommending against discontinuation of LTOT due to concerns for OUD without facilitating transition to evidence-based OUD treatment.

This workgroup’s emphasis on individualized, team-based multidisciplinary pain care during both LTOT and opioid tapering is consistent with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.5,21 It is also consistent with recent opioid-tapering guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services.6,9 The workgroup’s recommendations sought to target areas where guideline implementation could be enhanced to reduce unwarranted variation and to better support both opioid safety and patient-centered care.

Managing Co-occurring Pain and Substance Use Disorder

This workgroup discussed challenges in chronic pain management that are unique to individuals with co-occurring SUDs, especially individuals with OUD on long-term MOUD, but also non-opioid SUDs. The workgroup felt that the broader VA initiatives to improve access to evidence-based, non-pharmacologic treatments for chronic pain were particularly important to the population with co-occurring pain and SUD.13 They specifically identified two areas in which evidence is sufficient for broad implementation. First, they recommended implementation of combined psychological interventions for co-occurring chronic pain and SUD. For example, for Veterans with pain who are engaged in substance use treatment, a group-based psychological pain management intervention has been shown to reduce pain intensity, reduce alcohol use, and improve pain-related functioning over 12 months.10 Addressing both pain and SUD in one program may improve outcomes relative to both in different settings. Although it was developed and tested in specialty addictions treatment, implementation in primary care could be considered. Second, this workgroup recommended ensuring sufficient access to evidence-based non-pharmacologic pain treatment options such as psychological/behavioral therapies (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy) and movement therapies (e.g., exercise, yoga) for all patients.8

Cross-cutting Themes

The content areas of the three workgroups were designed to be distinct yet complementary, and several cross-cutting themes emerged. First, the VHA consists of a national network of largely urban medical centers and community-based outpatient clinics, many of which provide care for Veterans in rural communities. Nationally, many rural communities lack adequate access to OUD care.19 In VHA, in-person care from multidisciplinary teams may not be feasible in some clinics in rural settings. The potential of telehealth-based care to address this important barrier was discussed in all workgroups. The rapid expansion of telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes to federal telehealth policy related to controlled substance prescribing may present new opportunities for telehealth delivery of OUD and chronic pain care, both in VHA and non-VHA healthcare systems. Second, the VHA continues to implement a national Community Care Network, in which Veterans can receive care from non-VHA healthcare systems when timeliness or travel distance is a barrier to VHA care.12 Workgroups acknowledged the challenge of implementation of evidence-based practices in the context of a rapidly changing landscape of Veterans healthcare delivery. Additional work is needed to understand the impact of this new program on access to care, coordination of care, quality, and cost, especially for vulnerable Veterans with OUD or complex chronic pain and to identify opportunities to partner with non-VHA stakeholders to ensure access to high-quality care in the Community Care Network. Finally, for Veterans receiving care in VHA settings, improved access to OUD and chronic pain care will require improved integration across multiple clinical settings such Primary Care, Mental Health, Pain Management, and other specialty providers. Since 2009, chronic pain care in VHA has been guided by a stepped care model, which calls for population-based screening, assessment, and management of chronic pain using low-intensity interventions in primary care settings with timely access to more intensive treatments for individuals with more complex chronic pain.12 Since 2018, the VHA has funded initiatives to implement and evaluate a stepped care model for OUD treatment. Results of these VHA initiatives will likely be relevant to non-VHA integrated healthcare systems seeking to address the same goal of system-wide access to evidence-based OUD and chronic pain care.

CONCLUSION

Experts participating in the VHA HSR&D State-of-the-Art Conference provided priority recommendations in three areas: (1) managing opioid use disorder; (2) long-term opioid therapy and opioid tapering; (3) managing co-occurring pain and substance use disorder. Sustained leadership support at the national, regional, and local levels will be necessary to continue progress toward workgroup goals. For many recommendations, additional resources will be required to overcome barriers. Participants recognized the importance of ongoing evaluation of efforts to implement evidence-based practices. With implementation of these recommendations, the Veterans Health Administration can continue to be a national leader in advancing opioid safety.

References

  1. 2019 National Veteran Suicide Prevention Annual Report. Washington, DC: Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; 2019. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2019/2019_National_Veteran_Suicide_Prevention_Annual_Report_508.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2020.

  2. Bohnert AS, Ilgen MA, Trafton JA, et al. Trends and regional variation in opioid overdose mortality among Veterans Health Administration patients, fiscal year 2001 to 2009. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(7):605-612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder. VHA Notice 2019-18. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2019. https://www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=8526. Accessed 3 March 2020.

  4. Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016. Public Law No. 114–198; n.d.. https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ198/PLAW-114publ198.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  5. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain--United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1624-1645.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dowell D, Haegerich T, Chou R. No shortcuts to safer opioid prescribing. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2285-2287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank JW, Lovejoy TI, Becker WC, et al. Patient outcomes in dose reduction or discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(3):181-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haffajee RL, Lin LA, Bohnert ASB, Goldstick JE. Characteristics of US counties with high opioid overdose mortality and low capacity to deliver medications for opioid use disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e196373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. HHS Guide for Clinicians on the Appropriate dosage reduction or discontinuation of long-term opioid analgesics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2019. https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/sites/default/files/2019-10/Dosage_Reduction_Discontinuation.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2020.

  10. Ilgen MA, Bohnert AS, Chermack S, et al. A randomized trial of a pain management intervention for adults receiving substance use disorder treatment. Addiction. 2016;111(8):1385-1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kemp J, Bossarte RM. Surveillance of suicide and suicide attempts among veterans: addressing a national imperative. Am J Public Health. 2012;102 Suppl 1:e4-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kerns RD, Philip EJ, Lee AW, Rosenberger PH. Implementation of the Veterans Health Administration National Pain Management Strategy. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1(4):635-643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kligler B, Bair MJ, Banerjea R, et al. Clinical policy recommendations from the VHA State-of-the-Art Conference on non-pharmacological approaches to chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(Suppl 1):16-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mackey K, Veazie S, Anderson J, Bourne D, Peterson K. Evidence brief: Barriers and facilitators to use of medications for opioid use disorder. Washington, DC: Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2019. VA ESP Project #09-009. https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/esp/reports.cfm. Accessed 3 March 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mackey K, Anderson J, Bourne D, Chen E, Peterson K. Evidence brief: Benefits and harms of long-term opioid dose reduction or discontinuation in patients with chronic pain. Washington, DC: Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2019. VA ESP Project #09-199. Available at: https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/esp/reports.cfm. Accessed 3 Mar 2020.

  16. Nahin RL. Severe Pain in Veterans: The effect of age and sex, and comparisons with the general population. J Pain. 2017;18(3):247-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2019. https://doi.org/10.17226/25310. Accessed 14 Feb 2020

  18. National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy; 2019. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NDCS-Final.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2020.

  19. Nevedal AL, Wagner TH, Ellerbe LS, Asch SM, Koenig CJ. A qualitative study of primary care providers’ experiences with the Veterans Choice Program. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(4):598-603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. PTSD and suicide: National Center for PTSD Fiscal Year 2018 Annual Report. Washington, DC: National Center for PTSD;2018. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/about/work/docs/annual_reports/2018/NCPTSD_2018_Annual_Report.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2020.

  21. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for opioid therapy for chronic pain. Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense; 2017. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Pain/cot/VADoDOTCPG022717.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The State-of-the-Art Conference was funded by the Veterans Health Administration Office of Health Services Research and Development. The authors would like to acknowledge the leadership of Dr. David Atkins, Ms. Geraldine McGlynn, Mr. Gerald O’Keefe, and Ms. Karen Bossi in supporting the work of the conference, as well as that of the conference co-chairs, Dr. William Becker and Dr. Keith Humphries, whose intellectual effort in the planning and chairing of the conference is represented in the content of this manuscript.

The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph W. Frank MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frank, J.W., Bohnert, A.S.B., Sandbrink, F. et al. Implementation and Policy Recommendations from the VHA State-of-the-Art Conference on Strategies to Improve Opioid Safety. J GEN INTERN MED 35, 983–987 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06295-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06295-y

KEY WORDS

  • opioid use disorder
  • chronic pain
  • health policy