Skip to main content

Mobility and Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 09 September 2021

INTRODUCTION

Social distancing and other behavioral interventions help limit the spread of infectious diseases.1 These measures include school closures, cancellations of large gatherings, and travel restrictions.1 We assessed the effectiveness of social distancing during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic by examining the association between reductions in driving distances and mortality rates on an international basis.

METHODS

We identified the 45 countries with the highest numbers of COVID-19 cases globally, and excluded 9 countries because driving distance data were unavailable (e.g., China). We used an index date of the 100th COVID-19 case for each country to assess reductions in driving because this benchmark has been commonly used for pandemic growth. We calculated the mean change in driving from baseline for each country in the week following the index date using Apple Mobility Trends.2 For each nation, we also obtained the COVID-19 mortality rate as of April 30, 2020, using the Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center.3 We used the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to test the association between the reduction in driving distance and the COVID-19 mortality rate in each country.

RESULTS

We observed significant variation in driving across the different countries. For example, Chile had a 64% decrease whereas Spain had a 21% increase in driving distance. We also observed substantial variation in the COVID-19 mortality rate across different countries. Belgium had the highest mortality rate (656.7 per million) and India had the lowest (0.8 per million) at the follow-up time. As predicted (Fig. 1), we observed a significant association between decreased driving and lower COVID-19 mortality (r = 0.41, p < 0.001). In an analysis restricted to countries with a population over 30 million, we observed a similar association (r = 0.42, p = 0.01). In a further sensitivity analysis restricted to 19 of the nations in our primary analysis deemed by the World Health Organization to be in the top 30 with the best public health systems, we observed consistent findings (r = 0.38, p = 0.02).4 In addition, we also observed a similar association between decreased walking and lower COVID-19 mortality (r = 0.43, p < 0.001).

Figure 1
figure1

Association between driving patterns and COVID-19 mortality in the 36 countries with the highest number of COVID-19 cases. Countries to the right of zero exhibited increased driving, and countries to the left exhibited decreased driving. Countries low on the vertical axis experienced a relatively small mortality rate, and countries high on the vertical axis experienced a relatively large mortality rate. Overall data show a significant positive association between reduced driving and decreased mortality.

DISCUSSION

We found that countries exhibiting early and substantial decreases in driving during the pandemic experienced less COVID-19 mortality. This connection between mobility and mortality is unlikely to be causal and, instead, may be a marker for greater overall public health diligence and individual conscientiousness. One limitation to our analysis is that countries may offer fallible reporting on COVID mortality rates. In addition, many unmeasured interventions can reduce mortality during the pandemic including case surveillance, contact tracing, adequate personal protective equipment, and the regularity of hand hygiene.5, 6 Regardless of mechanisms, most countries have adopted extensive social distancing procedures to quell the spread of COVID-19. Our data suggest the importance of implementing these measures early before there are thousands of observed cases.

References

  1. 1.

    Gostin LO, Wiley LF. Governmental Public Health Powers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. April 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5460

  2. 2.

    Apple Maps. Mobility Trends Reports. https://www.apple.com/covid19/mobility. Published 2020.

  3. 3.

    Coronavirus Resource Center. Johns Hopkins University. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality. Published 2020.

  4. 4.

    Tandon A, Murray CJL, Lauer JA, Evans DB. Measuring Overall Health System Performance for 191 Countries. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No. 30. EIP/GPE/EQC. World Health Organization

  5. 5.

    Perencevich EN, Diekema DJ, Edmond MB. Moving Personal Protective Equipment Into the Community. JAMA. April 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7477

  6. 6.

    Walensky RP, del Rio C. From Mitigation to Containment of the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. April 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6572

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald A. Redelmeier MD, FRCPC, MSHSR, FACP.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zipursky, J.S., Redelmeier, D.A. Mobility and Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J GEN INTERN MED 35, 3100–3101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05943-7

Download citation