Advertisement

Separate but Equal? The Sorting of USMDs and Non-USMDs in Internal Medicine Residency Programs

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Background

The US internal medicine workforce relies on international and osteopathic medical graduates to fill gaps in residency. Little is known about the distribution and impact of IMGs, DOs, and USMDs concentrating in different types of IM programs.

Objective

Determining the extent to which USMDs, DOs, and IMGs concentrate in different types of IM programs and comparing Board pass rates by program concentration.

Design, Settings, and Participants

This survey study used data from the AMA’s FREIDA database for 476 non-military IM programs in 2017–2018, and 2016–2018 ABIM exam pass rates for 388 accredited programs.

Measurements

Outcomes were (1) program concentration based on percentage of residents who were USMDs, IMGs, and DOs in 2017–2018 and (2) 2016–2018 program ABIM pass rates as proxies for program quality. Key independent variables were hospital type (community-based, community-based university-affiliated, or university-based) when program concentration was the outcome, and program concentration when Board pass rates were the outcome.

Results

Twenty-five percent of programs were “USMD-dominated,” 17% were “DO-dominated,” 42% were “IMG dominated,” and 16% were “integrated.” The chances that a university hospital was USMD-dominated were 32 percentage points higher than that for a community hospital (AME = 0.32, baseline probability = 0.11, 95% CI, 0.17–0.46, P < .001). USMD-dominated programs also had significantly higher pass rates by 4.0 percentage points (AME = 0.04, baseline proportion = 0.90, 95% CI, 0.02–0.06, P < .001) than integrated programs, while DO-dominated programs had significantly lower pass rates (AME = − 0.1, baseline proportion = 0.90, 95% CI, − 0.15 to − 0.04, P < .001).

Conclusion

USMDs and non-USMDs systematically cluster in certain types of residency programs and their training may not be equal, as measured by board pass rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: 2019 Main Residency Match®. Washington, DC. 2019.

  2. 2.

    Boulet JR, Cooper RA, Seeling SS, Norcini JJ, McKinley DW. US Citizens Who Obtain Their Medical Degrees Abroad: An Overview, 1992-2006. Health Aff 2009;28(1):226–33.

  3. 3.

    Eckhert NL. Perspective: Private Schools of the Caribbean: Outsourcing Medical Education. Acad Med 2010;85(4):622–30.

  4. 4.

    Knobel RJ. Placement of Foreign-Trained Physicians in U. S. Medical Residencies. Med Care. 1973;11(3):224–39.

  5. 5.

    Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, Detmer DE, Committee on the U.S. Physician Supply, editors. The Nation’s Physician Workforce: Options for Balancing Supply and Requirements. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996.

  6. 6.

    Dahm MR, Cartmill JA. Talking their way to success: communicative competence for international medical graduates in transition. Med Educ 2016;50(10):992–3.

  7. 7.

    Dow WH, Harris DM. Exclusion of international medical graduates from federal health-care programs. Med Care 2002;40(1):68–72.

  8. 8.

    Howard DL, Bunch CD, Mundia WO, Konrad TR, Edwards LJ, Amamoo MA, et al. Comparing United States versus international medical school graduate physicians who serve African-American and white elderly. Health Serv Res 2006;41(6):2155–81.

  9. 9.

    Reeves RR, Burke RS. Perception of Osteopathic Medicine Among Allopathic Physicians in the Deep Central Southern United States. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2009;109(6):318–23.

  10. 10.

    National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match®: U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2018. Washington, DC; 2018.

  11. 11.

    National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match®: International Medical Graduates, 2018. Washington, DC; 2018.

  12. 12.

    National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match®: Senior Students of U.S. Osteopathic Medical Schools, 2018. Washington, DC; 2018.

  13. 13.

    Gauer JL, Jackson JB. The association of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores with residency match specialty and location. Med Educ Online 2017;22(1):1358579.

  14. 14.

    Manthous CA. Confronting the Elephant in the Room: Can We Transcend Medical Graduate Stereotypes? J Grad Med Educ 2012;4(3):290–2.

  15. 15.

    Worth T. Osteopathic Med Schools Like Kansas City University Answer The Call For More Doctors 2017. Available from: https://www.kcur.org/post/osteopathic-med-schools-kansas-city-university-answer-call-more-doctors#stream/0. Accessed 2 Jan 2019.

  16. 16.

    Whitcomb M, Miller R. Comparison of IMG-dependent and non-IMG-dependent residencies in the national resident matching program. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 1996;276(9):700–3.

  17. 17.

    American Medical Association (AMA). International Medical Graduates in American Medicine: Contemporary Challenges and Opportunities 2010. Available from: http://www.slideshare.net/drimhotep/internationalmedicalgraduatesinamericanmedicinecontemporarychallengesandopportunities.

  18. 18.

    Hagopian A, Thompson M, Kaltenbach E, Hart LG. The Role of International Medical Graduates in America’s Small Rural Critical Access Hospitals. J Rural Health 2004;20(1):52–8.

  19. 19.

    Fordyce MA, Doescher MP, Chen FM, Hart LG. Osteopathic Physicians and International Medical Graduates in the Rural Primary Care Physician Workforce. Fam Med 2012;44(6):396–403.

  20. 20.

    Sciolla AF, Lu FG. Cultural Competence for International Medical Graduate Physicians: A Perspective. In: Rao NR, Roberts LW, editors. International Medical Graduate Physicians: A Guide to Training. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 283–303.

  21. 21.

    Atsawarungruangkit A. Residency program characteristics that are associated with pass rate of the American Board of Pediatrics certifying exam. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015;6:517–24.

  22. 22.

    Falcone JL, Middleton DB. Pass Rates on the American Board of Family Medicine Certification Exam by Residency Location and Size. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26(4):453–9.

  23. 23.

    Mims LD, Mainous AG, Chirina S, Carek PJ. Are Specific Residency Program Characteristics Associated With the Pass Rate of Graduates on the ABFM Certification Examination? Fam Med 2014;46(5):360–8.

  24. 24.

    Willett LL, Halvorsen AJ, Adams M, Chacko KM, Chaudhry S, McDonald FS, et al. Factors Associated with Declining Residency Program Pass Rates on the ABIM Certification Examination. Am J Med 2016;129(7):759–65.

  25. 25.

    American Board of Internal Medicine. Residency Program Pass Rates 2016-2018, 2018. Available from: https://www.abim.org/~/media/ABIM%20Public/Files/pdf/statistics-data/residency-program-pass-rates.pdf.

  26. 26.

    Norton EC, Dowd BE, Maciejewski ML. Marginal Effects—Quantifying the Effect of Changes in Risk Factors in Logistic Regression Models. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1304–5.

  27. 27.

    Reskin BF. Sex Segregation in the Workplace. Annu Rev Sociol 1993;19:241–70.

  28. 28.

    Kay C, Jackson JL, Frank M. The Relationship Between Internal Medicine Residency Graduate Performance on the ABIM Certifying Examination, Yearly In-Service Training Examinations, and the USMLE Step 1 Examination. Acad Med 2015;90(1):100–4.

  29. 29.

    Aagaard EM, Julian K, Dedier J, Soloman I, Tillisch J, Pérez-Stable EJ. Factors affecting medical students’ selection of an internal medicine residency program. J Natl Med Assoc 2005;97(9):1264–70.

  30. 30.

    Stillman MD, Miller KH, Ziegler CH, Upadhyay A, Mitchell CK. Program Characteristics Influencing Allopathic Students’ Residency Selection. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2016;116(4):214–26.

  31. 31.

    Riley JD, Hannis M, Rice KG. Are international medical graduates a factor in residency program selection? A survey of fourth-year medical students. Acad Med 1996;71(4):381–6.

  32. 32.

    Jenkins TM. Doctors’ Orders: The Making of Status Hierarchies in an Elite Profession. New York: Columbia University Press; In press.

  33. 33.

    National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match® for International Medical Graduates Characteristics of International Medical Graduates Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2016 Main Residency Match®, 2016. Washington, DC.; 2016.

  34. 34.

    Pilotto LS, Duncan GF, Anderson-Wurf J. Issues for clinicians training international medical graduates: a systematic review. Med J Aust 2007;187(4):225–8.

  35. 35.

    Desbiens NA, Vidaillet HJ. Discrimination Against International Medical Graduates in the United States Residency Program Selection Process. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:5.

  36. 36.

    Moore RA, Rhodenbaugh EJ. The Unkindest Cut of All: Are International Medical School Graduates Subjected to Discrimination by General Surgery Residency Programs? Curr Surg 2002;59(2):228–36.

  37. 37.

    Nasir LS. Evidence of Discrimination Against International Medical Graduates Applying to Family Practice Residency Programs. Fam Med 1994;26(10):625–9.

  38. 38.

    Balon R, Mufti R, Williams M, Riba M. Possible discrimination in recruitment of psychiatry residents? Am J Psychiatry 1997;154(11):1608–9.

  39. 39.

    Go PH, Klaassen Z, Chamberlain RS. An ERAS-Based Survey Evaluating Demographics, United States Medical Licensing Examination Performance, and Research Experience Between American Medical Graduates and United States Citizen International Medical Graduates: Is the Bar Higher on the Continent? J Surg Educ 2012;69(2):143–8.

  40. 40.

    Atsawarungruangkit A. Association between proportion of US medical graduates and program characteristics in gastroenterology fellowships. Med Educ Online 2017;22:5.

  41. 41.

    Kinchen KS, Cooper LA, Wang NY, Levine D, Powe NR. The impact of international medical graduate status on primary care physicians’ choice of specialist. Med Care 2004;42(8):747–55.

  42. 42.

    Cohen JJ, Gabriel BA, Terrell C. The Case For Diversity In The Health Care Workforce. Health Aff 2002;21(5):90–102.

  43. 43.

    Andriole DA, Klingensmith ME, Schechtman KB. Diversity in General Surgery: A Period of Progress. Curr Surg 2005;62(4):423–8.

  44. 44.

    Chen PG-C, Nunez-Smith M, Bernheim S, Berg D, Gozu A, Curry L. Professional Experiences of International Medical Graduates Practicing Primary Care in the United States. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(9):947–53.

  45. 45.

    Chen PG-C, Curry LA, Bernheim SM, Berg D, Gozu A, Nunez-Smith M. Professional Challenges of Non-US-Born International Medical Graduates and Recommendations for Support During Residency Training. Acad Med 2011;86(11):1383–8.

  46. 46.

    Allman R, Perelas A, Eiger G. POINT: Should the United States Provide Postgraduate Training to International Medical Graduates? Yes Chest 2016;149(4):893–5.

  47. 47.

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Single GME Accreditation System 2019. Available from: https://acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Single-GME-Accreditation-System/Benefits-of-Single-GME. Accessed 7 Sept 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge research support from the Temple University Sociology Department and the Center for the Humanities at Temple (CHAT). We also thank the NRMP for giving us permission to cite their data.

Author information

Correspondence to Tania M. Jenkins Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

The study was deemed non-human subjects research by Temple University IRB.

Conflict of Interest

All authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Previous Presentations

Eastern Sociological Society Meetings, March 15, 2019, Boston, MA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jenkins, T.M., Franklyn, G., Klugman, J. et al. Separate but Equal? The Sorting of USMDs and Non-USMDs in Internal Medicine Residency Programs. J GEN INTERN MED (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05573-8

Download citation

KEY WORDS

  • graduate medical education
  • workforce supply
  • admissions/selection