Advertisement

A Toolbox Approach to Obesity Treatment in Urban Safety-Net Primary Care Clinics: a Pragmatic Clinical Trial

  • David R. SaxonEmail author
  • Erin L. Chaussee
  • Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga
  • Adam G. Tsai
  • Sean J. Iwamoto
  • Rebecca B. Speer
  • Hilde Heyn
  • Elizabeth H. Kealey
  • Daniel H. Bessesen
Original Research

Abstract

Background

There is a need for new strategies to improve the success of obesity treatment within the primary care setting.

Objective

To determine if patients offered low out-of-pocket cost weight management tools achieved more weight loss compared to usual care.

Design

Twelve-month pragmatic clinical weight loss trial with a registry-based comparator group performed in primary care clinics of an urban safety-net hospital.

Participants

From a large clinical registry, we randomly selected 428 patients to have the opportunity to receive the intervention.

Interventions

Medical weight management tools—partial meal replacements, recreation center vouchers, pharmacotherapy, commercial weight loss program vouchers, and a group behavioral weight loss program—for $5 or $10 monthly. Patients chose their tools, could switch tools, and could add a second tool at 6 months.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was the proportion of intervention-eligible patients who achieved ≥ 5% weight loss. The main secondary outcome was the proportion of on-treatment patients who achieved ≥ 5% weight loss.

Key Results

Overall, 71.3% (305 of 428) had available weight measurement data/PCP visit data to observe the primary outcome. At 12 months, 23.3% (71 of 305) of intervention-eligible participants and 15.7% (415 of 2640) of registry-based comparators had achieved 5% weight loss (p < 0.001). Of the on-treatment participants, 34.5% (39 of 113) achieved 5% weight loss. Mean percentage weight loss was − 3.15% ± 6.41% for on-treatment participants and − 0.30% ± 6.10% for comparators (p < 0.001). The initially preferred tools were meal replacements, pharmacotherapy, and recreation center passes.

Conclusions

Access to a variety of low out-of-pocket cost weight management tools within primary care resulted in ≥ 5% body weight loss in approximately one quarter of low-income patients with obesity.

KEY WORDS

weight management obesity primary care 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Denver Health’s patients who participated in this study and the PCPs and staff at intervention clinics. Angie Tong of the Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Center assisted the design, construction, and support of the REDCap database. Kristin Breslin of Ambulatory Care Services provided support from the DH Data Warehouse.

Funders

Research reported in this work was primarily funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (IH-12-11-4571). Support also came from P30 DK048520 and T32 DK007446 (DS, SI). DS was also supported by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR001082 and the VA Advanced Fellowship Program in Health Services Research and Development. The computer program used for participant education was developed by PHCC LP, Pueblo CO. Phentermine/topiramate ER was provided by Vivus Inc. Mountain View CA.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

DH and University of Colorado institutional review boards approved the trial.

Conflict of Interest

AGT served as a MedIQ consultant. DHB serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board of Enteromedics, Inc. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.”

Supplementary material

11606_2019_5222_MOESM1_ESM.docx (320 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 320 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Bertoni AG, et al. Lifestyle change and mobility in obese adults with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1209–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Look AHEAD Research Group, Wing RR, Bolin P, et al. Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013;369:145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) Study Group. Association of Weight Loss Maintenance and Weight Regain on 4-Year Changes in CVD Risk Factors: the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1345–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Look AHEAD Research Group, Gregg E, Jakicic J, et al. Association of the magnitude of weight loss and changes in physical fitness with long-term cardiovascular disease outcomes in overweight or obese people with type 2 diabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the Look AHEAD randomised clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;4:913–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in US Youth and Adults by Sex and Age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA 2018;319:1723–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraschnewski JL, Sciamanna CN, Pollak KI, Stuckey HL, Sherwood NE. The epidemiology of weight counseling for adults in the United States: a case of positive deviance. Int J Obes 2013;37:751–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kraschnewski JL, Sciamanna CN, Stuckey HL, et al. A silent response to the obesity epidemic: decline in US physician weight counseling. Med Care 2013;51:186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Obesity Expert Panel, 2013. Expert Panel Report: Guidelines (2013) for the management of overweight and obesity in adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014;22 Suppl 2:S41–410.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: an endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for Comprehensive Medical Care of Patients with Obesity - Executive Summary. Endocr Pract 2016;22 Suppl 3:1–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ligibel JA, Alfano CM, Courneya KS, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement on obesity and cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3568–3574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh H-C, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Weight-Loss Interventions in Clinical Practice. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1959–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, et al. A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1969–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bennett GG, Warner ET, Glasgow RE, et al. Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo C A. J, van der Knaap HCM, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes 2003;27:537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryan DH, Espeland MA, Foster GD, et al. Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Control Clin Trials 2003;24:610–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wadden TA, West DS, Neiberg RH, et al. One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gadde KM, Allison DB, Ryan DH, et al. Effects of low-dose, controlled-release, phentermine plus topiramate combination on weight and associated comorbidities in overweight and obese adults (CONQUER): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;377:1341–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phelan S, Nallari M, Darroch FE, Wing RR. What do physicians recommend to their overweight and obese patients? J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewis KH, Gudzune KA, Fischer H, Yamamoto A, Young DR. Racial and ethnic minority patients report different weight-related care experiences than non-Hispanic Whites. Prev Med Rep 2016;4:296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI, Womble LG, et al. Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2111–2120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI, Sarwer DB, Prus-Wisniewski R, Steinberg C. Benefits of lifestyle modification in the pharmacologic treatment of obesity: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willett WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med 1999;341:427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Hong PS, Tsai AG. Behavioral treatment of obesity in patients encountered in primary care settings: a systematic review. JAMA 2014;312:1779–1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Saxon
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Erin L. Chaussee
    • 3
    • 4
  • Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga
    • 3
    • 4
  • Adam G. Tsai
    • 5
  • Sean J. Iwamoto
    • 1
    • 6
  • Rebecca B. Speer
    • 7
  • Hilde Heyn
    • 7
  • Elizabeth H. Kealey
    • 8
  • Daniel H. Bessesen
    • 1
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and DiabetesUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Values Driven CareVA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemDenverUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biostatistics and InformaticsUniversity of Colorado School of Public HealthAuroraUSA
  4. 4.Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS)University of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA
  5. 5.Kaiser PermanenteDenverUSA
  6. 6.Division of EndocrinologyRocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical CenterAuroraUSA
  7. 7.Denver Health Medical CenterDenverUSA
  8. 8.Anschutz Health and Wellness CenterUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations