During the ECHO Care pilot (September 2013–June 2016), six OITs served HNHC Medicaid patients across NM. Teams were located at three safety net hospital-based outpatient clinics and three federally qualified health centers in medically underserved communities, and served only ECHO Care patients. OITs typically consisted of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant (NP/PA), a registered nurse (RN), one or two community health workers (CHWs), and a licensed mental health provider (i.e., social worker or counselor)—who provided direct behavioral health (BH) care to ECHO Care patients—all of which were supported by a part-time administrative assistant (Fig. 1). A part-time primary care physician at each site supported each OIT as needed, especially when patients initiated buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder.
We used the ECHO model to support OITs to provide effective wrap-around services8,9 (e.g., patient navigation, medical training, transportation support) and manage the diverse and complex needs of the ECHO Care patients. The ECHO model connects multiple healthcare providers at different sites with a multidisciplinary specialist team in virtual “teleECHO sessions”.10 This approach empowers healthcare providers through a knowledge sharing network, in which participants learn from each other and from specialists.11 ECHO programs traditionally focus on a particular topic or disease, for example, hepatitis C infection,12 substance use disorders (SUDs),13 or chronic pain.14 In the case of ECHO Care, sixteen multidisciplinary specialists were brought together to help OITs address the wide variety of complex physical, behavioral, and social needs of ECHO Care patients. Specialists consisted of experts in addiction medicine, cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, infectious disease, nephrology, neurology, palliative care, psychiatry, pharmacy, and pulmonology, as well as a hospitalist, a nurse, an experienced CHW, a licensed social worker, and a Legal Aid representative.
Before OITs started seeing ECHO Care patients and participating in the teleECHO sessions, they participated in a 3-day in-person team training that focused on a variety of topics (Appendix Table 1), including implementing team-based care, home visits and transitions of care, and promoting health behavior change. The training included videos, lectures, and in-person activities.
After the face-to-face training, OITs participated in weekly Complex Care teleECHO sessions that consisted of OIT-led case presentations and a specialist-led lecture on a relevant topic. Presented cases were often about the most challenging-to-treat ECHO Care patients, most of whom struggled with overcoming social barriers and behavioral health conditions that made it difficult to access effective care. Presenting OITs members completed a case presentation form about their patient before the teleECHO session, which provided specialists with pertinent information and the main concerns of the OIT (Appendix Figure 2). The specialist-led lecture curriculum evolved to address the most pressing issues faced by the OITs (Appendix Table 2) and complemented the in-depth patient case discussions, which were the primary focus of the teleECHO sessions. Lecture topics included specific disease topics (e.g., SUDs, psychiatric illnesses, liver disease) and supporting team-based care (e.g., CHW-focused training, working with managed care coordinators, professional boundaries).
Case discussions led to multidirectional knowledge sharing, with the specialists and other participants weighing in on the best course of action for the patient. OITs that did not present a case during a teleECHO session also benefited from the case discussion, and could apply relevant information to their own practice. After the teleECHO sessions, relevant specialists provided written recommendations to the presenting OIT, but it was at the team’s discretion to implement them. OITs could also re-present a patient case in a later teleECHO session to receive further suggestions as the needs of their ECHO Care patients evolved.
On average, 12 specialists (range, 2–19) and 23 participants (range, 4–45) attended each of the 111 Complex Care teleECHO sessions. Over the span of 34 months, 427 cases were presented on 282 unique patients or 37% of the total ECHO Care patient cohort (n = 770 patients). During each teleECHO session, an average of four cases were discussed, often including at least one follow-up case. NPs and PAs presented most (82%) cases, while presentations by RNs, BH providers, and CHWs accounted for the remaining 18%. OITs and specialists received nearly 2500 hours of continuing education credits for participating in the teleECHO sessions.
To understand the complexities of the cases presented, we extracted all diagnoses from the written case presentation forms that OITs submitted prior to the teleECHO sessions (n = 427 cases). We excluded seven cases due to inconsistent or uninterpretable information. Patient medical diagnoses and social needs on case presentation forms were grouped into three categories: social, behavioral, or physical “diagnoses” (Appendix Table 3). Written recommendation forms were used to clarify the diagnoses addressed during the case discussions. A total of 1787 diagnoses were documented in the case presentation forms, including 307 social (17%), 581 behavioral health (33%), and 899 physical (50%) diagnoses, respectively. Eighty-one percent of the cases had diagnoses in at least two of the three categories (social, behavioral, or physical). Depression, pain, type 2 diabetes, anxiety/panic disorders, and hepatitis C were the most common diagnoses documented on the case presentation forms (Appendix Table 3). Despite the relatively small number of social diagnoses, these needs often affected the OITs’ ability to address their patients’ behavioral or physical diagnoses, and included unreliable housing, patient isolation or lack of support, and inconsistent patient engagement (Appendix Table 3).
In addition to categorizing the patient diagnoses, we surveyed the OITs using two approaches: post-teleECHO session surveys—filled out by participants seeking continuing education credits—indicated how the case discussions affected their practice; and a feedback survey administered once to understand OIT satisfaction with the teleECHO program.
Between June 2015 and June 2016, 27 OIT members seeking continuing education credits filled out 274 post-session surveys (87% of all OIT members filled out these surveys and agreed to participate in research on program impact). From the 274 surveys, 106 were from OIT members who had presented a case. Seventy percent of these responses indicated that the case discussion changed the presenter’s care plan for their patient. Participants who did not present a case also benefitted from the case discussions. Seventy-four percent of responses (201 of 271) indicated that participants learned something new from the cases presented by others, and 87% (170 of 195) of the responses indicated that the information discussed would be useful to care for their own patients. The sample sizes vary because participants were not required to answer every question.
Additionally, the feedback survey measured OIT member self-efficacy and satisfaction with the Complex Care teleECHO program. Eighty-three percent of survey participants felt that the teleECHO program helped to develop their expertise (Table 1, Question 1), and 75% of respondents felt comfortable teaching their patients what they had learned (Table 1, Question 2). Most (83%) survey respondents indicated that participating increased their professional satisfaction (Table 1, Question 3). Finally, nearly all (92%) survey respondents agreed that their participation benefited patients under their care, and that ECHO Care enhanced the quality and safety of care for their patients (Table 1, Questions 4 and 5, respectively).