Association Between Team Learning Behavior and Reduced Burnout Among Medicine Residents


Burnout is a pervasive and alarming issue for physicians-in-training (residents), as well as practicing physicians, with significant consequences for resident well-being, care quality, and patient safety.1,] 2 Efforts to address burnout have emphasized both organization-level factors that create more supportive environments and individual-level factors that enhance physician resilience in the face of challenges.2,] 3 However, residents primarily work in teams—delivering patient care with fellow trainees, faculty, and interprofessional colleagues. Team practices and behaviors have been found to impact how individuals experience their work1,] 4—yet, the relationship of these team-level factors to resident burnout is still largely unknown.

Therefore, we explore the unique contribution of team practices in understanding resident burnout, focusing in particular on team learning behavior—a concept from organizational behavior research reflecting the extent to which team members gather information, reflect on experience, and share knowledge in their team.4 Engaging in this type of learning and reflection has been noted as an underlying feature of physician resilience3 and allows individuals to more adaptively approach work challenges.5 We thus examine the association between perceptions of team learning behavior and self-reported burnout,6 after accounting for the influence of relevant organization- and individual-level factors (specifically, perceptions of organizational support4 and individual learning and performance goal orientations5; see Table 1 note for descriptions) suggested by recent reviews of the burnout literature.2

Table 1 Multivariable Regression Analysis of Burnout


Our measures of interest were collected as part of a broader survey sent to all 148 members of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Osler Medical Residency Training Program in internal medicine. This project received a quality improvement exemption from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine IRB.

Utilizing validated measures, we asked residents to assess the extent to which they perceived their assigned clinical team as engaging in learning behaviors (team learning behavior4), their perceptions of support from the residency program/department (supportive organizational context4), their level of burnout (emotional exhaustion6), and their individual goal orientations (learning, performance-prove, and performance-avoid5) (see Table 1). Ninety-nine residents provided at least partial responses (response rate = 67% [99/148]), and 79 provided complete data on our study measures. Multivariable linear regression and conditional effect estimation were conducted using SPSS 24 (IBM); the significance threshold for 2-sided P values was set at 0.05.


Residents reporting higher team learning behavior also reported significantly lower burnout (B = − 0.68, P = 0.03; Table 1, model 2), after accounting for their perceptions of organizational context and individual goal orientations (see Table 1, model 1 for results including only these specific organization- and individual-level factors). Moreover, results revealed a significant interaction between team learning behavior and individual learning goal orientation in predicting burnout (B = 0.82, P = 0.05; Table 1, model 3). Conditional effects estimates revealed that the inverse association between team learning behavior and burnout was particularly evident for individuals with lower (1 standard deviation below mean; B = − 1.26, 95%CI [− 2.09, − 0.43], P = 0.004) or average (B = − 0.77, 95%CI [− 1.37, − 0.16], P = 0.01) learning goal orientation. This association was not statistically significant for those with higher (1 standard deviation above mean; B = − 0.27, 95%CI [− 1.00, 0.46], P = 0.46) learning goal orientation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Conditional effect estimates of team learning behavior on burnout at low (1 standard deviation below mean), average (mean), and high (1 standard deviation above mean) levels of individual learning goal orientation. Estimates of Burnout are based on setting all other model variables to their sample means, and correspond to a 7-point frequency scale where 3 = “Once a month or less”, 4 = “A few times a month”, 5 = “Once a week”, and 6 = “A few times a week”.6


Results of this cross-sectional, exploratory survey of a single residency program revealed that residents’ perceptions of greater learning behavior in their team were associated with significantly lower self-reported burnout. Indeed, the addition of team learning behavior (and its interaction with learning goal orientation) accounted for an additional 9% of the variance in burnout among this sample (Table 1), above-and-beyond the variance explained by the types of organization-and individual-level factors emphasized in prior research on burnout. This association is of particular importance for residency and medical education, as recent evidence indicates that younger physicians are at greater risk for burnout and that interventions for reducing burnout focusing on teamwork are rare.2 The significant interaction observed in the data further indicates that team learning behavior may be particularly beneficial for individuals with low to average levels of learning goal orientation, suggesting that team learning may be able to compensate for an individual’s (lack of) learning orientation in reducing burnout.

Taken together, these findings suggest interventions to increase team learning behavior—for example implementing team-level mechanisms, habits, or practices for seeking feedback, sharing information, or openly discussing errors4—should be explored more rigorously as a path forward in understanding the drivers of physician burnout.


  1. 1.

    Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ. 2016;50(1):132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zwack J, Schweitzer J. If every fifth physician is affected by burnout, what about the other four? Resilience strategies of experienced physicians. Acad Med. 2013;88(3):382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Edmondson AC. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin Sci Quart. 1999;44(2):350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    VandeWalle DM. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educ Psychol Meas. 1997;57:995–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    West CP, Dyrbye LN, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD. Single item measures of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization are useful for assessing burnout in medical professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(12):1318–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher G. Myers PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Sateia serves as a Welch Allyn Primary Care Advisory Board member. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Myers, C.G., Sateia, H.F. & Desai, S.V. Association Between Team Learning Behavior and Reduced Burnout Among Medicine Residents. J GEN INTERN MED 33, 2037–2039 (2018).

Download citation


  • burnout
  • medical education
  • organizational behavior